Nick Bjugstad on the move???
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???
Panarin to LA 
-
Harry S Deals
- Forum User
- Posts: 2736
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???
Good riddance. He was a square peg
-
2forDiving
- Forum User
- Posts: 907
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm
Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???
I don’t mind moving Bjugstad, but I sure hope the deal wasn’t made to keep open doors available for Joseph, Walker, Sunny, etc. those guys need to be finding new addresses, too, because there shouldn’t be any spots for them going forward.
-
callitwhatyouwant
- Forum User
- Posts: 4146
- Joined: 12 Jan 2019 20:05 pm
Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???
our board apparently wants to trade our good players for peanuts and our bad players for 1st's. reactionary thought not assessing history of play with some and other teams value. just look what panarin brought back. granted their gm shouldn't have said they arent extendingbritishblue wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 13:54 pmWhat were expecting for Bjugstad?!
Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???
I agree. Unless Bjug asked to leave, hopefully he was asked for rather than intentionally shopped first.2forDiving wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 14:50 pm I don’t mind moving Bjugstad, but I sure hope the deal wasn’t made to keep open doors available for Joseph, Walker, Sunny, etc. those guys need to be finding new addresses, too, because there shouldn’t be any spots for them going forward.
I didn't care for the signing, but he really grew on me.
Generally not a good look when you trade a guy you just signed, so if Suter goes that will really be something. I'd rather have kept Bjugstad for the bottom 6. Getting a 4th is nice I guess.
Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???
"Not a good look"==what does that actually mean. What choice do they have?zamadoo wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 15:16 pmI agree. Unless Bjug asked to leave, hopefully he was asked for rather than intentionally shopped first.2forDiving wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 14:50 pm I don’t mind moving Bjugstad, but I sure hope the deal wasn’t made to keep open doors available for Joseph, Walker, Sunny, etc. those guys need to be finding new addresses, too, because there shouldn’t be any spots for them going forward.
I didn't care for the signing, but he really grew on me.
Generally not a good look when you trade a guy you just signed, so if Suter goes that will really be something. I'd rather have kept Bjugstad for the bottom 6. Getting a 4th is nice I guess.
The owner will want to shed salary now.
Nothing has worked out for the Blues. Bad coaching--hes here for a really long time. Bad play by star players; Bad defense; Bad goaltending. etc etc,
The GM signed these guys hoping to be a winning team.
The Blues failed in their messaging and their play. The GM said retool over--its not over.
They planned on being a playoff team. Now that we are bottom dwellers. They will listen to all offers.
Faulk, Joseph, Suter may be moved. Maybe Binner. I dont see us doing much more due to the salaries and no trade clauses.
Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???
I would think we are trading Joseph and Sunny.2forDiving wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 14:50 pm I don’t mind moving Bjugstad, but I sure hope the deal wasn’t made to keep open doors available for Joseph, Walker, Sunny, etc. those guys need to be finding new addresses, too, because there shouldn’t be any spots for them going forward.
Probably want to keep berggren
-
ShakeyWalton
- Forum User
- Posts: 386
- Joined: 27 May 2024 13:22 pm
Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???
I don’t expect much for Bjugstad, but Bordeleau is useless. Is he not?callitwhatyouwant wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 15:02 pmour board apparently wants to trade our good players for peanuts and our bad players for 1st's. reactionary thought not assessing history of play with some and other teams value. just look what panarin brought back. granted their gm shouldn't have said they arent extendingbritishblue wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 13:54 pmWhat were expecting for Bjugstad?!
-
callitwhatyouwant
- Forum User
- Posts: 4146
- Joined: 12 Jan 2019 20:05 pm
Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???
They have to open room for Stenberg. 1 more guy needs to go. So hollywood, Thomas, Suter, Stenberg can go. Need an AHL body to replace stenbergShakeyWalton wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 15:25 pmI don’t expect much for Bjugstad, but Bordeleau is useless. Is he not?callitwhatyouwant wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 15:02 pmour board apparently wants to trade our good players for peanuts and our bad players for 1st's. reactionary thought not assessing history of play with some and other teams value. just look what panarin brought back. granted their gm shouldn't have said they arent extendingbritishblue wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 13:54 pmWhat were expecting for Bjugstad?!
Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???
ProbablyShakeyWalton wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 15:25 pmI don’t expect much for Bjugstad, but Bordeleau is useless. Is he not?callitwhatyouwant wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 15:02 pmour board apparently wants to trade our good players for peanuts and our bad players for 1st's. reactionary thought not assessing history of play with some and other teams value. just look what panarin brought back. granted their gm shouldn't have said they arent extendingbritishblue wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 13:54 pmWhat were expecting for Bjugstad?!
I bet our owner has a big say.
Hes yelling dump salary!!! dont care about return on 4th or 3rd line guys.
Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???
Well I completely agree with you on why it makes sense, even after a franchise record win streak and double OT game 7 loss (which is why we signed Suter and Bjugstad), but generally when you sign vets to multi-year contracts and then trade them at the TDL in the first year, you send the signal to other players that would potentially sign here that you might trade them, which could discourage them or force a NTC. It could also point to players wanting to leave immediately to rid themselves of the stench. But yeah, Army should be cleaning house before he turns it over to Steen.BluesDom wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 15:24 pm"Not a good look"==what does that actually mean. What choice do they have?zamadoo wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 15:16 pmI agree. Unless Bjug asked to leave, hopefully he was asked for rather than intentionally shopped first.2forDiving wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 14:50 pm I don’t mind moving Bjugstad, but I sure hope the deal wasn’t made to keep open doors available for Joseph, Walker, Sunny, etc. those guys need to be finding new addresses, too, because there shouldn’t be any spots for them going forward.
I didn't care for the signing, but he really grew on me.
Generally not a good look when you trade a guy you just signed, so if Suter goes that will really be something. I'd rather have kept Bjugstad for the bottom 6. Getting a 4th is nice I guess.
The owner will want to shed salary now.
Nothing has worked out for the Blues. Bad coaching--hes here for a really long time. Bad play by star players; Bad defense; Bad goaltending. etc etc,
The GM signed these guys hoping to be a winning team.
The Blues failed in their messaging and their play. The GM said retool over--its not over.
They planned on being a playoff team. Now that we are bottom dwellers. They will listen to all offers.
Faulk, Joseph, Suter may be moved. Maybe Binner. I dont see us doing much more due to the salaries and no trade clauses.
-
MandatoryDenial
- Forum User
- Posts: 347
- Joined: 24 May 2024 08:39 am
Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???
I actually like this deal a lot as this really is addition by subtraction and it frees up a roster spot for a young player, lets cycle more out.
Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???
Makes sense.zamadoo wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 15:34 pmWell I completely agree with you on why it makes sense, even after a franchise record win streak and double OT game 7 loss (which is why we signed Suter and Bjugstad), but generally when you sign vets to multi-year contracts and then trade them at the TDL in the first year, you send the signal to other players that would potentially sign here that you might trade them, which could discourage them or force a NTC. It could also point to players wanting to leave immediately to rid themselves of the stench. But yeah, Army should be cleaning house before he turns it over to Steen.BluesDom wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 15:24 pm"Not a good look"==what does that actually mean. What choice do they have?zamadoo wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 15:16 pmI agree. Unless Bjug asked to leave, hopefully he was asked for rather than intentionally shopped first.2forDiving wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 14:50 pm I don’t mind moving Bjugstad, but I sure hope the deal wasn’t made to keep open doors available for Joseph, Walker, Sunny, etc. those guys need to be finding new addresses, too, because there shouldn’t be any spots for them going forward.
I didn't care for the signing, but he really grew on me.
Generally not a good look when you trade a guy you just signed, so if Suter goes that will really be something. I'd rather have kept Bjugstad for the bottom 6. Getting a 4th is nice I guess.
The owner will want to shed salary now.
Nothing has worked out for the Blues. Bad coaching--hes here for a really long time. Bad play by star players; Bad defense; Bad goaltending. etc etc,
The GM signed these guys hoping to be a winning team.
The Blues failed in their messaging and their play. The GM said retool over--its not over.
They planned on being a playoff team. Now that we are bottom dwellers. They will listen to all offers.
Faulk, Joseph, Suter may be moved. Maybe Binner. I dont see us doing much more due to the salaries and no trade clauses.
This may be the end of the free agent signing era in STL.(for a while)
May be a develop from within model going forward. I think it should be.
-
2forDiving
- Forum User
- Posts: 907
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm
Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???
It better be more than Stenberg. See what Peterson can do on the 4th line after the Olympics. I realize you don’t want to overload your roster with too many kids, but this team needs size Peterson and/or Stancl should get a look too.callitwhatyouwant wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 15:29 pmThey have to open room for Stenberg. 1 more guy needs to go. So hollywood, Thomas, Suter, Stenberg can go. Need an AHL body to replace stenbergShakeyWalton wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 15:25 pmI don’t expect much for Bjugstad, but Bordeleau is useless. Is he not?callitwhatyouwant wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 15:02 pmour board apparently wants to trade our good players for peanuts and our bad players for 1st's. reactionary thought not assessing history of play with some and other teams value. just look what panarin brought back. granted their gm shouldn't have said they arent extendingbritishblue wrote: ↑04 Feb 2026 13:54 pmWhat were expecting for Bjugstad?!