Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

sdaltons
Forum User
Posts: 4008
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:45 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Post by sdaltons »

Panarin to LA 8O
Harry S Deals
Forum User
Posts: 2736
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Post by Harry S Deals »

sdaltons wrote: 04 Feb 2026 14:08 pm Panarin to LA 8O
The Kings have everything except scoring this will help that
aslord
Forum User
Posts: 533
Joined: 24 May 2024 11:01 am

Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Post by aslord »

Good riddance. He was a square peg
2forDiving
Forum User
Posts: 907
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Post by 2forDiving »

I don’t mind moving Bjugstad, but I sure hope the deal wasn’t made to keep open doors available for Joseph, Walker, Sunny, etc. those guys need to be finding new addresses, too, because there shouldn’t be any spots for them going forward.
MiamiLaw
Forum User
Posts: 2290
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:16 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Post by MiamiLaw »

TheJackBurton wrote: 04 Feb 2026 13:56 pm How emotional will the tribute video be when he returns?
:lol:
callitwhatyouwant
Forum User
Posts: 4146
Joined: 12 Jan 2019 20:05 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Post by callitwhatyouwant »

britishblue wrote: 04 Feb 2026 13:54 pm
ShakeyWalton wrote: 04 Feb 2026 13:51 pm
schwartzwatch wrote: 04 Feb 2026 13:48 pm Thomas Bordeleau, NJ Devils
Useless.
What were expecting for Bjugstad?!
our board apparently wants to trade our good players for peanuts and our bad players for 1st's. reactionary thought not assessing history of play with some and other teams value. just look what panarin brought back. granted their gm shouldn't have said they arent extending
zamadoo
Forum User
Posts: 2245
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:11 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Post by zamadoo »

2forDiving wrote: 04 Feb 2026 14:50 pm I don’t mind moving Bjugstad, but I sure hope the deal wasn’t made to keep open doors available for Joseph, Walker, Sunny, etc. those guys need to be finding new addresses, too, because there shouldn’t be any spots for them going forward.
I agree. Unless Bjug asked to leave, hopefully he was asked for rather than intentionally shopped first.

I didn't care for the signing, but he really grew on me.

Generally not a good look when you trade a guy you just signed, so if Suter goes that will really be something. I'd rather have kept Bjugstad for the bottom 6. Getting a 4th is nice I guess.
BluesDom
Forum User
Posts: 738
Joined: 19 Jun 2024 18:16 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Post by BluesDom »

zamadoo wrote: 04 Feb 2026 15:16 pm
2forDiving wrote: 04 Feb 2026 14:50 pm I don’t mind moving Bjugstad, but I sure hope the deal wasn’t made to keep open doors available for Joseph, Walker, Sunny, etc. those guys need to be finding new addresses, too, because there shouldn’t be any spots for them going forward.
I agree. Unless Bjug asked to leave, hopefully he was asked for rather than intentionally shopped first.

I didn't care for the signing, but he really grew on me.

Generally not a good look when you trade a guy you just signed, so if Suter goes that will really be something. I'd rather have kept Bjugstad for the bottom 6. Getting a 4th is nice I guess.
"Not a good look"==what does that actually mean. What choice do they have?
The owner will want to shed salary now.
Nothing has worked out for the Blues. Bad coaching--hes here for a really long time. Bad play by star players; Bad defense; Bad goaltending. etc etc,
The GM signed these guys hoping to be a winning team.
The Blues failed in their messaging and their play. The GM said retool over--its not over.
They planned on being a playoff team. Now that we are bottom dwellers. They will listen to all offers.

Faulk, Joseph, Suter may be moved. Maybe Binner. I dont see us doing much more due to the salaries and no trade clauses.
skilles
Forum User
Posts: 1788
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:28 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Post by skilles »

2forDiving wrote: 04 Feb 2026 14:50 pm I don’t mind moving Bjugstad, but I sure hope the deal wasn’t made to keep open doors available for Joseph, Walker, Sunny, etc. those guys need to be finding new addresses, too, because there shouldn’t be any spots for them going forward.
I would think we are trading Joseph and Sunny.

Probably want to keep berggren
ShakeyWalton
Forum User
Posts: 386
Joined: 27 May 2024 13:22 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Post by ShakeyWalton »

callitwhatyouwant wrote: 04 Feb 2026 15:02 pm
britishblue wrote: 04 Feb 2026 13:54 pm
ShakeyWalton wrote: 04 Feb 2026 13:51 pm
schwartzwatch wrote: 04 Feb 2026 13:48 pm Thomas Bordeleau, NJ Devils
Useless.
What were expecting for Bjugstad?!
our board apparently wants to trade our good players for peanuts and our bad players for 1st's. reactionary thought not assessing history of play with some and other teams value. just look what panarin brought back. granted their gm shouldn't have said they arent extending
I don’t expect much for Bjugstad, but Bordeleau is useless. Is he not?
callitwhatyouwant
Forum User
Posts: 4146
Joined: 12 Jan 2019 20:05 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Post by callitwhatyouwant »

ShakeyWalton wrote: 04 Feb 2026 15:25 pm
callitwhatyouwant wrote: 04 Feb 2026 15:02 pm
britishblue wrote: 04 Feb 2026 13:54 pm
ShakeyWalton wrote: 04 Feb 2026 13:51 pm
schwartzwatch wrote: 04 Feb 2026 13:48 pm Thomas Bordeleau, NJ Devils
Useless.
What were expecting for Bjugstad?!
our board apparently wants to trade our good players for peanuts and our bad players for 1st's. reactionary thought not assessing history of play with some and other teams value. just look what panarin brought back. granted their gm shouldn't have said they arent extending
I don’t expect much for Bjugstad, but Bordeleau is useless. Is he not?
They have to open room for Stenberg. 1 more guy needs to go. So hollywood, Thomas, Suter, Stenberg can go. Need an AHL body to replace stenberg
BluesDom
Forum User
Posts: 738
Joined: 19 Jun 2024 18:16 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Post by BluesDom »

ShakeyWalton wrote: 04 Feb 2026 15:25 pm
callitwhatyouwant wrote: 04 Feb 2026 15:02 pm
britishblue wrote: 04 Feb 2026 13:54 pm
ShakeyWalton wrote: 04 Feb 2026 13:51 pm
schwartzwatch wrote: 04 Feb 2026 13:48 pm Thomas Bordeleau, NJ Devils
Useless.
What were expecting for Bjugstad?!
our board apparently wants to trade our good players for peanuts and our bad players for 1st's. reactionary thought not assessing history of play with some and other teams value. just look what panarin brought back. granted their gm shouldn't have said they arent extending
I don’t expect much for Bjugstad, but Bordeleau is useless. Is he not?
Probably

I bet our owner has a big say.
Hes yelling dump salary!!! dont care about return on 4th or 3rd line guys.
zamadoo
Forum User
Posts: 2245
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:11 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Post by zamadoo »

BluesDom wrote: 04 Feb 2026 15:24 pm
zamadoo wrote: 04 Feb 2026 15:16 pm
2forDiving wrote: 04 Feb 2026 14:50 pm I don’t mind moving Bjugstad, but I sure hope the deal wasn’t made to keep open doors available for Joseph, Walker, Sunny, etc. those guys need to be finding new addresses, too, because there shouldn’t be any spots for them going forward.
I agree. Unless Bjug asked to leave, hopefully he was asked for rather than intentionally shopped first.

I didn't care for the signing, but he really grew on me.

Generally not a good look when you trade a guy you just signed, so if Suter goes that will really be something. I'd rather have kept Bjugstad for the bottom 6. Getting a 4th is nice I guess.
"Not a good look"==what does that actually mean. What choice do they have?
The owner will want to shed salary now.
Nothing has worked out for the Blues. Bad coaching--hes here for a really long time. Bad play by star players; Bad defense; Bad goaltending. etc etc,
The GM signed these guys hoping to be a winning team.
The Blues failed in their messaging and their play. The GM said retool over--its not over.
They planned on being a playoff team. Now that we are bottom dwellers. They will listen to all offers.

Faulk, Joseph, Suter may be moved. Maybe Binner. I dont see us doing much more due to the salaries and no trade clauses.
Well I completely agree with you on why it makes sense, even after a franchise record win streak and double OT game 7 loss (which is why we signed Suter and Bjugstad), but generally when you sign vets to multi-year contracts and then trade them at the TDL in the first year, you send the signal to other players that would potentially sign here that you might trade them, which could discourage them or force a NTC. It could also point to players wanting to leave immediately to rid themselves of the stench. But yeah, Army should be cleaning house before he turns it over to Steen.
MandatoryDenial
Forum User
Posts: 347
Joined: 24 May 2024 08:39 am

Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Post by MandatoryDenial »

I actually like this deal a lot as this really is addition by subtraction and it frees up a roster spot for a young player, lets cycle more out.
BluesDom
Forum User
Posts: 738
Joined: 19 Jun 2024 18:16 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Post by BluesDom »

zamadoo wrote: 04 Feb 2026 15:34 pm
BluesDom wrote: 04 Feb 2026 15:24 pm
zamadoo wrote: 04 Feb 2026 15:16 pm
2forDiving wrote: 04 Feb 2026 14:50 pm I don’t mind moving Bjugstad, but I sure hope the deal wasn’t made to keep open doors available for Joseph, Walker, Sunny, etc. those guys need to be finding new addresses, too, because there shouldn’t be any spots for them going forward.
I agree. Unless Bjug asked to leave, hopefully he was asked for rather than intentionally shopped first.

I didn't care for the signing, but he really grew on me.

Generally not a good look when you trade a guy you just signed, so if Suter goes that will really be something. I'd rather have kept Bjugstad for the bottom 6. Getting a 4th is nice I guess.
"Not a good look"==what does that actually mean. What choice do they have?
The owner will want to shed salary now.
Nothing has worked out for the Blues. Bad coaching--hes here for a really long time. Bad play by star players; Bad defense; Bad goaltending. etc etc,
The GM signed these guys hoping to be a winning team.
The Blues failed in their messaging and their play. The GM said retool over--its not over.
They planned on being a playoff team. Now that we are bottom dwellers. They will listen to all offers.

Faulk, Joseph, Suter may be moved. Maybe Binner. I dont see us doing much more due to the salaries and no trade clauses.
Well I completely agree with you on why it makes sense, even after a franchise record win streak and double OT game 7 loss (which is why we signed Suter and Bjugstad), but generally when you sign vets to multi-year contracts and then trade them at the TDL in the first year, you send the signal to other players that would potentially sign here that you might trade them, which could discourage them or force a NTC. It could also point to players wanting to leave immediately to rid themselves of the stench. But yeah, Army should be cleaning house before he turns it over to Steen.
Makes sense.
This may be the end of the free agent signing era in STL.(for a while)
May be a develop from within model going forward. I think it should be.
2forDiving
Forum User
Posts: 907
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad on the move???

Post by 2forDiving »

callitwhatyouwant wrote: 04 Feb 2026 15:29 pm
ShakeyWalton wrote: 04 Feb 2026 15:25 pm
callitwhatyouwant wrote: 04 Feb 2026 15:02 pm
britishblue wrote: 04 Feb 2026 13:54 pm
ShakeyWalton wrote: 04 Feb 2026 13:51 pm
schwartzwatch wrote: 04 Feb 2026 13:48 pm Thomas Bordeleau, NJ Devils
Useless.
What were expecting for Bjugstad?!
our board apparently wants to trade our good players for peanuts and our bad players for 1st's. reactionary thought not assessing history of play with some and other teams value. just look what panarin brought back. granted their gm shouldn't have said they arent extending
I don’t expect much for Bjugstad, but Bordeleau is useless. Is he not?
They have to open room for Stenberg. 1 more guy needs to go. So hollywood, Thomas, Suter, Stenberg can go. Need an AHL body to replace stenberg
It better be more than Stenberg. See what Peterson can do on the 4th line after the Olympics. I realize you don’t want to overload your roster with too many kids, but this team needs size Peterson and/or Stancl should get a look too.
Post Reply