MiamiLaw wrote: ↑03 Feb 2026 12:39 pmOnce again you are proving that you cannot discuss in good faith. You set up straw mans because they are easier to argue. I didn't say I don't think he will be solid. I said I am not convinced of it. And I said that nothing he has shown this year has really made me think it is any more likley. Not sure why you insist on being all snarky about this. It does seem bother you that I am less bullish on him than most and believe that a lot of people are letting their Blues fandom cloud the reality that his actual numbers are still poor. If it doesn't bother you, you have a weird way of discussing it.BleedingBleu wrote: ↑02 Feb 2026 21:12 pmNeat, you think a 22 year old former First Round Pick w/less than 50 Games won’t be a “solid” contributor… that and $1.59 won’t get you a small coffee at a QuikTrip.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑02 Feb 2026 11:30 am Sorry I am not convinced that he is going to be a solid contributor and that seems to irritate you. The Blues aren't either with their one year, league minimum deal. Maybe he will end up being solid and I will be happy about that. All I have ever said is that there is very little he has shown this year that has made me think it is more likely than it was a few months ago that he will get there.
However, it is incredibly inspiring and not remotely irritating. Once your bold, likely non-goalpost shifting premonitions comes to pass, when would you like us to commission the banner raising ceremony?
I hope you will understand that why everyBlues FanHomer would be actively rooting for your faceplant.
You continue to act like I want him to fail. I haven't moved a single goal post. I have no clue what you are talking about.

What more am I supposed to say? You claim you can’t see progress, despite statistical evidence that shows improved play and increased time.
What strawman argument have I provided? The one where you can’t identify progress because being incredibly bad in October to now just “poor” (vague definition) isn’t proof of improvement? How is it you can’t define that, but can define a bad faith argument by claiming “not thinking he’ll be solid” is a dramatic leap from “not convinced he’ll be solid.”
Mailloux’s First 20 Games
1 G, 1 A, -17, 18 PIM, 13:21 ATOI, 14 BLK, 27 Hits, 2 TA, 16 GA
Mailloux’s next 10 Games TB, BUF, UTA, MTL
0 G, 0 A, -3, 14 PIM, 14:32 ATOI, 4 BLK, 6 Hits, 2 TA, 8 GA
Mailloux’s Last 11 Games VGK, CAR, TB, EDM, WPG, DAL, LA
0 G, 1 A, -3, 2 PIM, 15:10 ATOI, 8 BLK, 19 Hits, 4 TA, 15 GA
So, not only has his ATOI, Blocks, Hits, and Takeaways increased, but his PIM and +/- decreased… all while playing against arguably better opponents (7/11 playoff opponents) than the prior samples.
Yes, the Giveaways could use work. Fowler has 12 GA over that same stretch of games. To ignore tangible evidence of improvement by simply discarding it for being “poor” is actually ignoring the massive strides a 22 year old Defenseman is making. For what, exactly?
To suggest you
Yes… reminder, he is 41 Games into his First Full Season. Even Pronger was a -18 in his First Season as a Blue, and that was on a team w/Gretzky, Hull, MacInnis, Dale Hawerchuk, & Grant Fuhr