icon wrote: ↑03 Feb 2026 11:35 am
Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑02 Feb 2026 22:17 pm
Melville wrote: ↑02 Feb 2026 22:08 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑02 Feb 2026 20:33 pm
rezero wrote: ↑02 Feb 2026 20:32 pm
ugghhhh….I would rather have gotten one top 50 prospect than 5 average ones.
I was hoping for quality over quantity as well.
Agree with both of you.
lol very doubtful anyone was willing to give up a top 50 prospect for Donovan he’s not the kind of player who would get that. He’s a .650 ops hitter career against left handers with a .614 ops last season against them so he is heading toward platoon player territory doesn’t have much power or speed. He’s way overvalued by cards fans. A team would be dumb to trade a top 50 for donovan. The Cardinals have Doyle Rodriguez and JJ in the top 50 only an idiot would trade one of them for Donovan
No kidding. The overvaluation of Donovan by some is kind of funny.
These trades create very mixed and polar emotions that can be in the same fan. Myself.
Teams IMO should always play in the present without crippling the future.
Compete.
These trades as wise, logical, and as needed as they are, depart from that.
The players moved were rational moves individually and as a group. The players
each had a weakness and a strength that we can both take a position with that
might make a post sound as an overvaluation or undervaluation. They were
competent MLB players with some certainty replaced by uncertainty.
Since these trades were not the old style baseball trade where a player comes back
that will be on the OD roster it creates the empty feel that is the root
to debate here, and the fact the rebuilds fail just like reloads fail.