How many losses are too much for Bloom?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
Ronnie Dobbs
- Forum User
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:17 pm
Re: How many losses are too much for Bloom?
There is no magic number of losses. It's not about wins or losses this season. Unless the team just rebels against him, but that's a different reason. This season is about how Bloom and Oli work together and if Bloom thinks it will work moving forward.
-
Cardinals4Life
- Forum User
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: 05 Nov 2022 18:19 pm
Re: How many losses are too much for Bloom?
Some posters on here are rubes45s wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 11:30 amNot my experience..CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 11:22 amJust the ones that believe in tanking.45s wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:51 amCards fans are “rubes” now…?CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:48 amBloom was brought here to do a job. He was tasked with tanking the team and he has a long rope. His job is to fool the rubes into thinking that he's building a mythical beast to be unleashed after a few years of tanking. It's going according to the billionaires schedule. The fans be damned.RichieRichSTL wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:45 am To stick with Oli?
No one expects them to contend this year. They will be closer to 70 wins than 90. But, there does come a point at which even Bloom can't ignore a level of 'failure'.
I think triple digit losses could be too much, even on a rebuilding team.
Ok
Some have questionable priorities……at least by my values…
But none are rubes…
-
CCard
- Forum User
- Posts: 2217
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am
Re: How many losses are too much for Bloom?
Are they not deliberately gutting the team? Is that not going to cause the team to lose? You can deny it but it is tanking. Did Chicago tank before they won their World Series? Did Houston? Yes, it is tanking.Jeff Goldblum wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 12:17 pmIt's not tanking. They aren't losing on purpose to get a high draft pick. They are forced to tear down the smoldering remains left over from Mo to create a new foundation.CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 11:22 amJust the ones that believe in tanking.45s wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:51 amCards fans are “rubes” now…?CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:48 amBloom was brought here to do a job. He was tasked with tanking the team and he has a long rope. His job is to fool the rubes into thinking that he's building a mythical beast to be unleashed after a few years of tanking. It's going according to the billionaires schedule. The fans be damned.RichieRichSTL wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:45 am To stick with Oli?
No one expects them to contend this year. They will be closer to 70 wins than 90. But, there does come a point at which even Bloom can't ignore a level of 'failure'.
I think triple digit losses could be too much, even on a rebuilding team.
Ok
-
CCard
- Forum User
- Posts: 2217
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am
Re: How many losses are too much for Bloom?
My understanding is that the more you lose the higher your odds of getting a higher pick. Is that not right? I thought the Cards got very lucky in being able to draft JJ? Wasn't that the case? Getting rid of Gray and Contreras didn't make us better. Maybe Arenado, that remains to be seen. But getting rid of your best pitcher and your best offensive player is not a breath of fresh air, it's a recipe to lose more. Instead of filling the gaps with the team, ownership has decided to gut the team which will in all probability lead to a last place finish. When you're trying to improve a team, you don't get rid of your top talent for question marks. That's my opinion anyway.rage-STL wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 11:51 amI feel like the term "tanking" is dated now that the draft lottery is in place. Losing the most games doesn't guarantee you the top pick or even a top 5 pick. I'm also not overly concerned with the long range models people throw out and discuss on here regarding prospect accumulation, data points needing to be met in order to "compete" for a WS title. I don't necessarily think Bloom is looking to go the extremes a lot of posters fret about. I look at things through more of a right here, right now lens.CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 11:33 amYou are if you believe tanking will bring you a World Series title. It's only worked a couple of times and one of those was Houston's cheating scandal. The other was a thin skinned late inning victory that could have just as easily went the other way. Tanking only guarantee's losing.45s wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 11:30 amNot my experience..CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 11:22 amJust the ones that believe in tanking.45s wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:51 amCards fans are “rubes” now…?CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:48 amBloom was brought here to do a job. He was tasked with tanking the team and he has a long rope. His job is to fool the rubes into thinking that he's building a mythical beast to be unleashed after a few years of tanking. It's going according to the billionaires schedule. The fans be damned.RichieRichSTL wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:45 am To stick with Oli?
No one expects them to contend this year. They will be closer to 70 wins than 90. But, there does come a point at which even Bloom can't ignore a level of 'failure'.
I think triple digit losses could be too much, even on a rebuilding team.
Ok
Some have questionable priorities……at least by my values…
But none are rubes…
This team has been DOA the last 3 seasons with our last playoff appearance coming in 2022. We finished 4th in the NL Central last year, a division that sent 3 teams to the playoffs. We were 19 games behind the Brewers. I find getting rid of Gray, Arenado and Contreras refreshing. Those 3 made up the core of what we've been watching as fans the last 3 seasons. The roster shake up was sorely needed, now we all get to move forward.
-
Jatalk
- Forum User
- Posts: 2373
- Joined: 05 Apr 2024 08:33 am
Re: How many losses are too much for Bloom?
Haven’t you read the other threads? Oli is on double secret probation. Yadi is the real manager. Albert hitting coach and Waino will coach pitching and guitar playing.
-
Jeff Goldblum
- Banned User
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: 05 Dec 2025 15:43 pm
Re: How many losses are too much for Bloom?
They are gutting the team because Mo screwed up the organization so badly. Have to start from scratch.CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 20:33 pmAre they not deliberately gutting the team? Is that not going to cause the team to lose? You can deny it but it is tanking. Did Chicago tank before they won their World Series? Did Houston? Yes, it is tanking.Jeff Goldblum wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 12:17 pmIt's not tanking. They aren't losing on purpose to get a high draft pick. They are forced to tear down the smoldering remains left over from Mo to create a new foundation.CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 11:22 amJust the ones that believe in tanking.45s wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:51 amCards fans are “rubes” now…?CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:48 amBloom was brought here to do a job. He was tasked with tanking the team and he has a long rope. His job is to fool the rubes into thinking that he's building a mythical beast to be unleashed after a few years of tanking. It's going according to the billionaires schedule. The fans be damned.RichieRichSTL wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:45 am To stick with Oli?
No one expects them to contend this year. They will be closer to 70 wins than 90. But, there does come a point at which even Bloom can't ignore a level of 'failure'.
I think triple digit losses could be too much, even on a rebuilding team.
Ok
-
Dazepster
- Forum User
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm
Re: How many losses are too much for Bloom?
Don't know there is a big priority on W/L record. Certainly still in high end talent acquisition phase. A higher draft slot is more valuable than a poser run.
-
Clubmaker2
- Forum User
- Posts: 2101
- Joined: 16 Apr 2021 16:53 pm
Re: How many losses are too much for Bloom?
Will the number of bodies in seats be a bigger factor?
-
Cardinals1964
- Forum User
- Posts: 1706
- Joined: 12 May 2024 02:13 am
- Location: St. Louis
Re: How many losses are too much for Bloom?
3 losses.RichieRichSTL wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:45 am To stick with Oli?
No one expects them to contend this year. They will be closer to 70 wins than 90. But, there does come a point at which even Bloom can't ignore a level of 'failure'.
I think triple digit losses could be too much, even on a rebuilding team.
-
Cardinals1964
- Forum User
- Posts: 1706
- Joined: 12 May 2024 02:13 am
- Location: St. Louis
Re: How many losses are too much for Bloom?
I like that view point.
-
Cardinals1964
- Forum User
- Posts: 1706
- Joined: 12 May 2024 02:13 am
- Location: St. Louis
Re: How many losses are too much for Bloom?
Great answer.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 14:07 pm There is no magic number of losses. It's not about wins or losses this season. Unless the team just rebels against him, but that's a different reason. This season is about how Bloom and Oli work together and if Bloom thinks it will work moving forward.
-
Cardinals1964
- Forum User
- Posts: 1706
- Joined: 12 May 2024 02:13 am
- Location: St. Louis
Re: How many losses are too much for Bloom?
You should write fiction for a living. You’d be a $millionaire. Your creativity is extraordinary. The editor would have you cut out tanking, but I truly admire your creativity.CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:48 amBloom was brought here to do a job. He was tasked with tanking the team and he has a long rope. His job is to fool the rubes into thinking that he's building a mythical beast to be unleashed after a few years of tanking. It's going according to the billionaires schedule. The fans be damned.RichieRichSTL wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:45 am To stick with Oli?
No one expects them to contend this year. They will be closer to 70 wins than 90. But, there does come a point at which even Bloom can't ignore a level of 'failure'.
I think triple digit losses could be too much, even on a rebuilding team.
-
Cardinals1964
- Forum User
- Posts: 1706
- Joined: 12 May 2024 02:13 am
- Location: St. Louis
Re: How many losses are too much for Bloom?
Didn’t the Cardinals move down in the draft after tanking in 2025? Not a great strategy.CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 20:33 pmAre they not deliberately gutting the team? Is that not going to cause the team to lose? You can deny it but it is tanking. Did Chicago tank before they won their World Series? Did Houston? Yes, it is tanking.Jeff Goldblum wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 12:17 pmIt's not tanking. They aren't losing on purpose to get a high draft pick. They are forced to tear down the smoldering remains left over from Mo to create a new foundation.CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 11:22 amJust the ones that believe in tanking.45s wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:51 amCards fans are “rubes” now…?CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:48 amBloom was brought here to do a job. He was tasked with tanking the team and he has a long rope. His job is to fool the rubes into thinking that he's building a mythical beast to be unleashed after a few years of tanking. It's going according to the billionaires schedule. The fans be damned.RichieRichSTL wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:45 am To stick with Oli?
No one expects them to contend this year. They will be closer to 70 wins than 90. But, there does come a point at which even Bloom can't ignore a level of 'failure'.
I think triple digit losses could be too much, even on a rebuilding team.
Ok
-
CCard
- Forum User
- Posts: 2217
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am
Re: How many losses are too much for Bloom?
Did they? I don't remember that. Maybe they could move down a few spots and still get a player they could comfortably sign. They signed Liam didn't they?Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 22:10 pmDidn’t the Cardinals move down in the draft after tanking in 2025? Not a great strategy.CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 20:33 pmAre they not deliberately gutting the team? Is that not going to cause the team to lose? You can deny it but it is tanking. Did Chicago tank before they won their World Series? Did Houston? Yes, it is tanking.Jeff Goldblum wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 12:17 pmIt's not tanking. They aren't losing on purpose to get a high draft pick. They are forced to tear down the smoldering remains left over from Mo to create a new foundation.CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 11:22 amJust the ones that believe in tanking.45s wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:51 amCards fans are “rubes” now…?CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:48 amBloom was brought here to do a job. He was tasked with tanking the team and he has a long rope. His job is to fool the rubes into thinking that he's building a mythical beast to be unleashed after a few years of tanking. It's going according to the billionaires schedule. The fans be damned.RichieRichSTL wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:45 am To stick with Oli?
No one expects them to contend this year. They will be closer to 70 wins than 90. But, there does come a point at which even Bloom can't ignore a level of 'failure'.
I think triple digit losses could be too much, even on a rebuilding team.
Ok
-
CCard
- Forum User
- Posts: 2217
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am
Re: How many losses are too much for Bloom?
My scenario fits the facts. You can't prove anything different, you just have your "feelings".Cardinals1964 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 22:07 pmYou should write fiction for a living. You’d be a $millionaire. Your creativity is extraordinary. The editor would have you cut out tanking, but I truly admire your creativity.CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:48 amBloom was brought here to do a job. He was tasked with tanking the team and he has a long rope. His job is to fool the rubes into thinking that he's building a mythical beast to be unleashed after a few years of tanking. It's going according to the billionaires schedule. The fans be damned.RichieRichSTL wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:45 am To stick with Oli?
No one expects them to contend this year. They will be closer to 70 wins than 90. But, there does come a point at which even Bloom can't ignore a level of 'failure'.
I think triple digit losses could be too much, even on a rebuilding team.
-
CCard
- Forum User
- Posts: 2217
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am
Re: How many losses are too much for Bloom?
There we are, the old blame Mo trope. I'm sure trading for some no name pitching and trading away your best players will set everything right. All hail Bloom, the savior in Tampa and Boston. Just stop, you're embarrassing yourself.Jeff Goldblum wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 21:25 pmThey are gutting the team because Mo screwed up the organization so badly. Have to start from scratch.CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 20:33 pmAre they not deliberately gutting the team? Is that not going to cause the team to lose? You can deny it but it is tanking. Did Chicago tank before they won their World Series? Did Houston? Yes, it is tanking.Jeff Goldblum wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 12:17 pmIt's not tanking. They aren't losing on purpose to get a high draft pick. They are forced to tear down the smoldering remains left over from Mo to create a new foundation.CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 11:22 amJust the ones that believe in tanking.45s wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:51 amCards fans are “rubes” now…?CCard wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:48 amBloom was brought here to do a job. He was tasked with tanking the team and he has a long rope. His job is to fool the rubes into thinking that he's building a mythical beast to be unleashed after a few years of tanking. It's going according to the billionaires schedule. The fans be damned.RichieRichSTL wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026 10:45 am To stick with Oli?
No one expects them to contend this year. They will be closer to 70 wins than 90. But, there does come a point at which even Bloom can't ignore a level of 'failure'.
I think triple digit losses could be too much, even on a rebuilding team.
Ok