With Shattenkirk it was less that he blocked deals and more that he was intent on hitting free agency (with his heart in NY). He didn’t have a NTC to use like Schenn could. But his eventual destination depended on whether a team wanted him longterm or as a rental. It’s pretty well reported that the Blues could have had either Drouin or Hall if Shattenkirk had been willing to sign extensions with Tampa or Edmonton. But he didn’t block deals with a NTC.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:10 pmI go back and forth on this, but ultimately my dream would have been to keep as much of the gang together as possible. Would've rather just kept Ed for half the price and give Petro 9mil. No Krug, keep Dunn. Make them choose between Tarasenko, UFA Schwartz (who we should've re-signed), Ed, Sunny, and Blais. No Saad. No Buch.theograce wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:14 pmFaulk for me. It was the beginning of the end. Horrible and emotional move with zero insight into the pulse of the clubMiamiLaw wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:12 pmKrug for mejuan good eye wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:08 pmThis would make me kinda hate Schenn if true and he vetoed.LuvthaBlues wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 12:33 pm According to Ek...
Last season at the deadline, Treleving offered:
Easton Cowan - Age 20 -RW 5'11" 185lb. drafted #28 in 2023, former OHL MVP
Ben Danford - Age 19 - RD 6'1" 188lb. drafted #31 in 2024
for
Schenner
But Army said no. Would you have done it?
Shattenkirk nightmares
But alas, we have a decent prospect pool and some good young NHL players, looking to move forward.
Oh and as far as the Shatty trade... This is interesting... Yes, he nixed a deal for Drouin, but the 1st we got for him was used in the deal for Schenn!![]()
Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
bluetunehead
- Forum User
- Posts: 1400
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm
Re: Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
Re: Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
Thanks for that reminder! I'm fine with the results. Hall might've been nice though...bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:37 pmWith Shattenkirk it was less that he blocked deals and more that he was intent on hitting free agency (with his heart in NY). He didn’t have a NTC to use like Schenn could. But his eventual destination depended on whether a team wanted him longterm or as a rental. It’s pretty well reported that the Blues could have had either Drouin or Hall if Shattenkirk had been willing to sign extensions with Tampa or Edmonton. But he didn’t block deals with a NTC.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:10 pmI go back and forth on this, but ultimately my dream would have been to keep as much of the gang together as possible. Would've rather just kept Ed for half the price and give Petro 9mil. No Krug, keep Dunn. Make them choose between Tarasenko, UFA Schwartz (who we should've re-signed), Ed, Sunny, and Blais. No Saad. No Buch.theograce wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:14 pmFaulk for me. It was the beginning of the end. Horrible and emotional move with zero insight into the pulse of the clubMiamiLaw wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:12 pmKrug for mejuan good eye wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:08 pmThis would make me kinda hate Schenn if true and he vetoed.LuvthaBlues wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 12:33 pm According to Ek...
Last season at the deadline, Treleving offered:
Easton Cowan - Age 20 -RW 5'11" 185lb. drafted #28 in 2023, former OHL MVP
Ben Danford - Age 19 - RD 6'1" 188lb. drafted #31 in 2024
for
Schenner
But Army said no. Would you have done it?
Shattenkirk nightmares
But alas, we have a decent prospect pool and some good young NHL players, looking to move forward.
Oh and as far as the Shatty trade... This is interesting... Yes, he nixed a deal for Drouin, but the 1st we got for him was used in the deal for Schenn!![]()
-
bluetunehead
- Forum User
- Posts: 1400
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm
Re: Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
Yeah Drouin has been serviceable but never great. Hall would have been nice but no telling if we win the Cup that way.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 17:59 pmThanks for that reminder! I'm fine with the results. Hall might've been nice though...bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:37 pmWith Shattenkirk it was less that he blocked deals and more that he was intent on hitting free agency (with his heart in NY). He didn’t have a NTC to use like Schenn could. But his eventual destination depended on whether a team wanted him longterm or as a rental. It’s pretty well reported that the Blues could have had either Drouin or Hall if Shattenkirk had been willing to sign extensions with Tampa or Edmonton. But he didn’t block deals with a NTC.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:10 pmI go back and forth on this, but ultimately my dream would have been to keep as much of the gang together as possible. Would've rather just kept Ed for half the price and give Petro 9mil. No Krug, keep Dunn. Make them choose between Tarasenko, UFA Schwartz (who we should've re-signed), Ed, Sunny, and Blais. No Saad. No Buch.theograce wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:14 pmFaulk for me. It was the beginning of the end. Horrible and emotional move with zero insight into the pulse of the clubMiamiLaw wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:12 pmKrug for mejuan good eye wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:08 pmThis would make me kinda hate Schenn if true and he vetoed.LuvthaBlues wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 12:33 pm According to Ek...
Last season at the deadline, Treleving offered:
Easton Cowan - Age 20 -RW 5'11" 185lb. drafted #28 in 2023, former OHL MVP
Ben Danford - Age 19 - RD 6'1" 188lb. drafted #31 in 2024
for
Schenner
But Army said no. Would you have done it?
Shattenkirk nightmares
But alas, we have a decent prospect pool and some good young NHL players, looking to move forward.
Oh and as far as the Shatty trade... This is interesting... Yes, he nixed a deal for Drouin, but the 1st we got for him was used in the deal for Schenn!![]()
In retrospect Shattenkirk’s best bet was agreeing to an extend with Tampa. His time in NY was a bust and he ended up there eventually anyway.
-
juan good eye
- Forum User
- Posts: 386
- Joined: 08 Oct 2025 23:31 pm
Re: Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
Drouin didn’t live up to his hype. That was back in the zero offense days for the Blues and Hitch. IIRC Hall had a pretty good season with NJD not too long after. Honestly not a big fan of him or Drouin but Shatty never showed up in the playoffs and the Blues needed a finisher like Hall. Do the Blues win a Cup sooner? I don’t think so. We see what a difference an elite shut down ROR and resilient Binnie made and the Blues still almost lost to the Stars in 7.bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 18:33 pmYeah Drouin has been serviceable but never great. Hall would have been nice but no telling if we win the Cup that way.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 17:59 pmThanks for that reminder! I'm fine with the results. Hall might've been nice though...bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:37 pmWith Shattenkirk it was less that he blocked deals and more that he was intent on hitting free agency (with his heart in NY). He didn’t have a NTC to use like Schenn could. But his eventual destination depended on whether a team wanted him longterm or as a rental. It’s pretty well reported that the Blues could have had either Drouin or Hall if Shattenkirk had been willing to sign extensions with Tampa or Edmonton. But he didn’t block deals with a NTC.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:10 pmI go back and forth on this, but ultimately my dream would have been to keep as much of the gang together as possible. Would've rather just kept Ed for half the price and give Petro 9mil. No Krug, keep Dunn. Make them choose between Tarasenko, UFA Schwartz (who we should've re-signed), Ed, Sunny, and Blais. No Saad. No Buch.theograce wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:14 pmFaulk for me. It was the beginning of the end. Horrible and emotional move with zero insight into the pulse of the clubMiamiLaw wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:12 pmKrug for mejuan good eye wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:08 pmThis would make me kinda hate Schenn if true and he vetoed.LuvthaBlues wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 12:33 pm According to Ek...
Last season at the deadline, Treleving offered:
Easton Cowan - Age 20 -RW 5'11" 185lb. drafted #28 in 2023, former OHL MVP
Ben Danford - Age 19 - RD 6'1" 188lb. drafted #31 in 2024
for
Schenner
But Army said no. Would you have done it?
Shattenkirk nightmares
But alas, we have a decent prospect pool and some good young NHL players, looking to move forward.
Oh and as far as the Shatty trade... This is interesting... Yes, he nixed a deal for Drouin, but the 1st we got for him was used in the deal for Schenn!![]()
In retrospect Shattenkirk’s best bet was agreeing to an extend with Tampa. His time in NY was a bust and he ended up there eventually anyway.
-
Hazelwood72
- Forum User
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: 02 Feb 2021 23:05 pm
Re: Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
Good points, Juan, and I’ll add that two other keys were Schwartz playing on fire plus the incredible performance of the 4th line of Sunny, Steen, and Barbashev.juan good eye wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 20:17 pmDrouin didn’t live up to his hype. That was back in the zero offense days for the Blues and Hitch. IIRC Hall had a pretty good season with NJD not too long after. Honestly not a big fan of him or Drouin but Shatty never showed up in the playoffs and the Blues needed a finisher like Hall. Do the Blues win a Cup sooner? I don’t think so. We see what a difference an elite shut down ROR and resilient Binnie made and the Blues still almost lost to the Stars in 7.bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 18:33 pmYeah Drouin has been serviceable but never great. Hall would have been nice but no telling if we win the Cup that way.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 17:59 pmThanks for that reminder! I'm fine with the results. Hall might've been nice though...bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:37 pmWith Shattenkirk it was less that he blocked deals and more that he was intent on hitting free agency (with his heart in NY). He didn’t have a NTC to use like Schenn could. But his eventual destination depended on whether a team wanted him longterm or as a rental. It’s pretty well reported that the Blues could have had either Drouin or Hall if Shattenkirk had been willing to sign extensions with Tampa or Edmonton. But he didn’t block deals with a NTC.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:10 pmI go back and forth on this, but ultimately my dream would have been to keep as much of the gang together as possible. Would've rather just kept Ed for half the price and give Petro 9mil. No Krug, keep Dunn. Make them choose between Tarasenko, UFA Schwartz (who we should've re-signed), Ed, Sunny, and Blais. No Saad. No Buch.theograce wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:14 pmFaulk for me. It was the beginning of the end. Horrible and emotional move with zero insight into the pulse of the clubMiamiLaw wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:12 pmKrug for mejuan good eye wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:08 pmThis would make me kinda hate Schenn if true and he vetoed.LuvthaBlues wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 12:33 pm According to Ek...
Last season at the deadline, Treleving offered:
Easton Cowan - Age 20 -RW 5'11" 185lb. drafted #28 in 2023, former OHL MVP
Ben Danford - Age 19 - RD 6'1" 188lb. drafted #31 in 2024
for
Schenner
But Army said no. Would you have done it?
Shattenkirk nightmares
But alas, we have a decent prospect pool and some good young NHL players, looking to move forward.
Oh and as far as the Shatty trade... This is interesting... Yes, he nixed a deal for Drouin, but the 1st we got for him was used in the deal for Schenn!![]()
In retrospect Shattenkirk’s best bet was agreeing to an extend with Tampa. His time in NY was a bust and he ended up there eventually anyway.
-
juan good eye
- Forum User
- Posts: 386
- Joined: 08 Oct 2025 23:31 pm
Re: Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
For the attempts Schwartz couldn’t get it past Quick he made up for it in 2019. Regarding shots JS is a good example of quantity over quality and why a longer Cup window allows for the breaks to even out.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑09 Jan 2026 09:48 amGood points, Juan, and I’ll add that two other keys were Schwartz playing on fire plus the incredible performance of the 4th line of Sunny, Steen, and Barbashev.juan good eye wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 20:17 pmDrouin didn’t live up to his hype. That was back in the zero offense days for the Blues and Hitch. IIRC Hall had a pretty good season with NJD not too long after. Honestly not a big fan of him or Drouin but Shatty never showed up in the playoffs and the Blues needed a finisher like Hall. Do the Blues win a Cup sooner? I don’t think so. We see what a difference an elite shut down ROR and resilient Binnie made and the Blues still almost lost to the Stars in 7.bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 18:33 pmYeah Drouin has been serviceable but never great. Hall would have been nice but no telling if we win the Cup that way.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 17:59 pmThanks for that reminder! I'm fine with the results. Hall might've been nice though...bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:37 pmWith Shattenkirk it was less that he blocked deals and more that he was intent on hitting free agency (with his heart in NY). He didn’t have a NTC to use like Schenn could. But his eventual destination depended on whether a team wanted him longterm or as a rental. It’s pretty well reported that the Blues could have had either Drouin or Hall if Shattenkirk had been willing to sign extensions with Tampa or Edmonton. But he didn’t block deals with a NTC.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:10 pmI go back and forth on this, but ultimately my dream would have been to keep as much of the gang together as possible. Would've rather just kept Ed for half the price and give Petro 9mil. No Krug, keep Dunn. Make them choose between Tarasenko, UFA Schwartz (who we should've re-signed), Ed, Sunny, and Blais. No Saad. No Buch.theograce wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:14 pmFaulk for me. It was the beginning of the end. Horrible and emotional move with zero insight into the pulse of the clubMiamiLaw wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:12 pmKrug for mejuan good eye wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:08 pmThis would make me kinda hate Schenn if true and he vetoed.LuvthaBlues wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 12:33 pm According to Ek...
Last season at the deadline, Treleving offered:
Easton Cowan - Age 20 -RW 5'11" 185lb. drafted #28 in 2023, former OHL MVP
Ben Danford - Age 19 - RD 6'1" 188lb. drafted #31 in 2024
for
Schenner
But Army said no. Would you have done it?
Shattenkirk nightmares
But alas, we have a decent prospect pool and some good young NHL players, looking to move forward.
Oh and as far as the Shatty trade... This is interesting... Yes, he nixed a deal for Drouin, but the 1st we got for him was used in the deal for Schenn!![]()
In retrospect Shattenkirk’s best bet was agreeing to an extend with Tampa. His time in NY was a bust and he ended up there eventually anyway.
Re: Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
Crazy because Schwartz was absolutley snake bitten all year. Easily his worst season as a Blue. Then come the playoffs and Schwartz scores more goals than he did the entire regular season. It all came together at the right time for the Blues to finally win the Cupjuan good eye wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 16:04 pmFor the attempts Schwartz couldn’t get it past Quick he made up for it in 2019. Regarding shots JS is a good example of quantity over quality and why a longer Cup window allows for the breaks to even out.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑09 Jan 2026 09:48 amGood points, Juan, and I’ll add that two other keys were Schwartz playing on fire plus the incredible performance of the 4th line of Sunny, Steen, and Barbashev.juan good eye wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 20:17 pmDrouin didn’t live up to his hype. That was back in the zero offense days for the Blues and Hitch. IIRC Hall had a pretty good season with NJD not too long after. Honestly not a big fan of him or Drouin but Shatty never showed up in the playoffs and the Blues needed a finisher like Hall. Do the Blues win a Cup sooner? I don’t think so. We see what a difference an elite shut down ROR and resilient Binnie made and the Blues still almost lost to the Stars in 7.bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 18:33 pmYeah Drouin has been serviceable but never great. Hall would have been nice but no telling if we win the Cup that way.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 17:59 pmThanks for that reminder! I'm fine with the results. Hall might've been nice though...bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:37 pmWith Shattenkirk it was less that he blocked deals and more that he was intent on hitting free agency (with his heart in NY). He didn’t have a NTC to use like Schenn could. But his eventual destination depended on whether a team wanted him longterm or as a rental. It’s pretty well reported that the Blues could have had either Drouin or Hall if Shattenkirk had been willing to sign extensions with Tampa or Edmonton. But he didn’t block deals with a NTC.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:10 pmI go back and forth on this, but ultimately my dream would have been to keep as much of the gang together as possible. Would've rather just kept Ed for half the price and give Petro 9mil. No Krug, keep Dunn. Make them choose between Tarasenko, UFA Schwartz (who we should've re-signed), Ed, Sunny, and Blais. No Saad. No Buch.theograce wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:14 pmFaulk for me. It was the beginning of the end. Horrible and emotional move with zero insight into the pulse of the clubMiamiLaw wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:12 pmKrug for mejuan good eye wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:08 pmThis would make me kinda hate Schenn if true and he vetoed.LuvthaBlues wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 12:33 pm According to Ek...
Last season at the deadline, Treleving offered:
Easton Cowan - Age 20 -RW 5'11" 185lb. drafted #28 in 2023, former OHL MVP
Ben Danford - Age 19 - RD 6'1" 188lb. drafted #31 in 2024
for
Schenner
But Army said no. Would you have done it?
Shattenkirk nightmares
But alas, we have a decent prospect pool and some good young NHL players, looking to move forward.
Oh and as far as the Shatty trade... This is interesting... Yes, he nixed a deal for Drouin, but the 1st we got for him was used in the deal for Schenn!![]()
In retrospect Shattenkirk’s best bet was agreeing to an extend with Tampa. His time in NY was a bust and he ended up there eventually anyway.
-
Galatians221jb1
- Forum User
- Posts: 2079
- Joined: 30 Mar 2023 15:23 pm
Re: Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
I posted separately that Schenn demanded that they also trade for his brother Luke. They said no so he said no.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 13:13 pm I would have been happy if that was just for Danford. As others have said though, rumors were that Schenn nixed a trade. Those are just rumors though and he/Army will always be tight-lipped about what really went down.
Re: Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
Elite post.
Still stuns me the vitriol folks foment over "facts" they don't have (and can never verify) and failed dreams that were never theirs.
Rage — and ignorant — world, I guess.
Re: Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
We should be trading for his brother Luke.Galatians221jb1 wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 17:20 pmI posted separately that Schenn demanded that they also trade for his brother Luke. They said no so he said no.TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 13:13 pm I would have been happy if that was just for Danford. As others have said though, rumors were that Schenn nixed a trade. Those are just rumors though and he/Army will always be tight-lipped about what really went down.
-
juan good eye
- Forum User
- Posts: 386
- Joined: 08 Oct 2025 23:31 pm
Re: Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
So many things had to come together here’s a few off the top:Sudsy 11 wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 16:21 pmCrazy because Schwartz was absolutley snake bitten all year. Easily his worst season as a Blue. Then come the playoffs and Schwartz scores more goals than he did the entire regular season. It all came together at the right time for the Blues to finally win the Cupjuan good eye wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 16:04 pmFor the attempts Schwartz couldn’t get it past Quick he made up for it in 2019. Regarding shots JS is a good example of quantity over quality and why a longer Cup window allows for the breaks to even out.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑09 Jan 2026 09:48 amGood points, Juan, and I’ll add that two other keys were Schwartz playing on fire plus the incredible performance of the 4th line of Sunny, Steen, and Barbashev.juan good eye wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 20:17 pmDrouin didn’t live up to his hype. That was back in the zero offense days for the Blues and Hitch. IIRC Hall had a pretty good season with NJD not too long after. Honestly not a big fan of him or Drouin but Shatty never showed up in the playoffs and the Blues needed a finisher like Hall. Do the Blues win a Cup sooner? I don’t think so. We see what a difference an elite shut down ROR and resilient Binnie made and the Blues still almost lost to the Stars in 7.bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 18:33 pmYeah Drouin has been serviceable but never great. Hall would have been nice but no telling if we win the Cup that way.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 17:59 pmThanks for that reminder! I'm fine with the results. Hall might've been nice though...bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:37 pmWith Shattenkirk it was less that he blocked deals and more that he was intent on hitting free agency (with his heart in NY). He didn’t have a NTC to use like Schenn could. But his eventual destination depended on whether a team wanted him longterm or as a rental. It’s pretty well reported that the Blues could have had either Drouin or Hall if Shattenkirk had been willing to sign extensions with Tampa or Edmonton. But he didn’t block deals with a NTC.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:10 pmI go back and forth on this, but ultimately my dream would have been to keep as much of the gang together as possible. Would've rather just kept Ed for half the price and give Petro 9mil. No Krug, keep Dunn. Make them choose between Tarasenko, UFA Schwartz (who we should've re-signed), Ed, Sunny, and Blais. No Saad. No Buch.theograce wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:14 pmFaulk for me. It was the beginning of the end. Horrible and emotional move with zero insight into the pulse of the clubMiamiLaw wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:12 pmKrug for mejuan good eye wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:08 pmThis would make me kinda hate Schenn if true and he vetoed.LuvthaBlues wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 12:33 pm According to Ek...
Last season at the deadline, Treleving offered:
Easton Cowan - Age 20 -RW 5'11" 185lb. drafted #28 in 2023, former OHL MVP
Ben Danford - Age 19 - RD 6'1" 188lb. drafted #31 in 2024
for
Schenner
But Army said no. Would you have done it?
Shattenkirk nightmares
But alas, we have a decent prospect pool and some good young NHL players, looking to move forward.
Oh and as far as the Shatty trade... This is interesting... Yes, he nixed a deal for Drouin, but the 1st we got for him was used in the deal for Schenn!![]()
In retrospect Shattenkirk’s best bet was agreeing to an extend with Tampa. His time in NY was a bust and he ended up there eventually anyway.![]()
- Schwartz getting hot as mentioned
- Binnie famously coming out of nowhere
- ROR reaching his ceiling
- Vladdie’s shoulder hanging on for SCF G7
- Jaybo finally getting healthy
- Blais and Barby running into everything
- Benn missing the G7 wrap around
- Sharks banged up (probably best team if healthy goalie was sus)
The Jets scared me the most. After the Blues beat them I thought anything was possible…and I never really had that quiet confidence before in the team.
-
Hazelwood72
- Forum User
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: 02 Feb 2021 23:05 pm
Re: Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
Great post, Juan. But I must admit I never had that quiet confidence you had, even after beating the Jets in the first round. Being a Blues fan since 1968, I had been disappointed so many times that I figured we would come up short somehow, some way. Once the Blues beat SJ for their 12th win, each game seemed to finally reach new territory. 12 wins, then 1st ever win in the finals, then first game ever played in June, etc.juan good eye wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 19:31 pmSo many things had to come together here’s a few off the top:Sudsy 11 wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 16:21 pmCrazy because Schwartz was absolutley snake bitten all year. Easily his worst season as a Blue. Then come the playoffs and Schwartz scores more goals than he did the entire regular season. It all came together at the right time for the Blues to finally win the Cupjuan good eye wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 16:04 pmFor the attempts Schwartz couldn’t get it past Quick he made up for it in 2019. Regarding shots JS is a good example of quantity over quality and why a longer Cup window allows for the breaks to even out.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑09 Jan 2026 09:48 amGood points, Juan, and I’ll add that two other keys were Schwartz playing on fire plus the incredible performance of the 4th line of Sunny, Steen, and Barbashev.juan good eye wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 20:17 pmDrouin didn’t live up to his hype. That was back in the zero offense days for the Blues and Hitch. IIRC Hall had a pretty good season with NJD not too long after. Honestly not a big fan of him or Drouin but Shatty never showed up in the playoffs and the Blues needed a finisher like Hall. Do the Blues win a Cup sooner? I don’t think so. We see what a difference an elite shut down ROR and resilient Binnie made and the Blues still almost lost to the Stars in 7.bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 18:33 pmYeah Drouin has been serviceable but never great. Hall would have been nice but no telling if we win the Cup that way.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 17:59 pmThanks for that reminder! I'm fine with the results. Hall might've been nice though...bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:37 pmWith Shattenkirk it was less that he blocked deals and more that he was intent on hitting free agency (with his heart in NY). He didn’t have a NTC to use like Schenn could. But his eventual destination depended on whether a team wanted him longterm or as a rental. It’s pretty well reported that the Blues could have had either Drouin or Hall if Shattenkirk had been willing to sign extensions with Tampa or Edmonton. But he didn’t block deals with a NTC.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:10 pmI go back and forth on this, but ultimately my dream would have been to keep as much of the gang together as possible. Would've rather just kept Ed for half the price and give Petro 9mil. No Krug, keep Dunn. Make them choose between Tarasenko, UFA Schwartz (who we should've re-signed), Ed, Sunny, and Blais. No Saad. No Buch.theograce wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:14 pmFaulk for me. It was the beginning of the end. Horrible and emotional move with zero insight into the pulse of the clubMiamiLaw wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:12 pmKrug for mejuan good eye wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 14:08 pm
This would make me kinda hate Schenn if true and he vetoed.
Shattenkirk nightmares
But alas, we have a decent prospect pool and some good young NHL players, looking to move forward.
Oh and as far as the Shatty trade... This is interesting... Yes, he nixed a deal for Drouin, but the 1st we got for him was used in the deal for Schenn!![]()
In retrospect Shattenkirk’s best bet was agreeing to an extend with Tampa. His time in NY was a bust and he ended up there eventually anyway.![]()
- Schwartz getting hot as mentioned
- Binnie famously coming out of nowhere
- ROR reaching his ceiling
- Vladdie’s shoulder hanging on for SCF G7
- Jaybo finally getting healthy
- Blais and Barby running into everything
- Benn missing the G7 wrap around
- Sharks banged up (probably best team if healthy goalie was sus)
The Jets scared me the most. After the Blues beat them I thought anything was possible…and I never really had that quiet confidence before in the team.
Then when we lost Game 6 at home, I just KNEW we would not only lose, but lose badly in Boston.
When Zach Sanford scored the 4th goal in Boston, I was finally confident. But it sure as hell wasn’t quiet confidence! My neighbors probably thought the screaming was domestic violence. (I live in San Antonio, so not many hockey fans here).
-
juan good eye
- Forum User
- Posts: 386
- Joined: 08 Oct 2025 23:31 pm
Re: Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
Thank you. Been to SA once during August. Melted on the river walk.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 21:18 pmGreat post, Juan. But I must admit I never had that quiet confidence you had, even after beating the Jets in the first round. Being a Blues fan since 1968, I had been disappointed so many times that I figured we would come up short somehow, some way. Once the Blues beat SJ for their 12th win, each game seemed to finally reach new territory. 12 wins, then 1st ever win in the finals, then first game ever played in June, etc.juan good eye wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 19:31 pmSo many things had to come together here’s a few off the top:Sudsy 11 wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 16:21 pmCrazy because Schwartz was absolutley snake bitten all year. Easily his worst season as a Blue. Then come the playoffs and Schwartz scores more goals than he did the entire regular season. It all came together at the right time for the Blues to finally win the Cupjuan good eye wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 16:04 pmFor the attempts Schwartz couldn’t get it past Quick he made up for it in 2019. Regarding shots JS is a good example of quantity over quality and why a longer Cup window allows for the breaks to even out.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑09 Jan 2026 09:48 amGood points, Juan, and I’ll add that two other keys were Schwartz playing on fire plus the incredible performance of the 4th line of Sunny, Steen, and Barbashev.juan good eye wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 20:17 pmDrouin didn’t live up to his hype. That was back in the zero offense days for the Blues and Hitch. IIRC Hall had a pretty good season with NJD not too long after. Honestly not a big fan of him or Drouin but Shatty never showed up in the playoffs and the Blues needed a finisher like Hall. Do the Blues win a Cup sooner? I don’t think so. We see what a difference an elite shut down ROR and resilient Binnie made and the Blues still almost lost to the Stars in 7.bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 18:33 pmYeah Drouin has been serviceable but never great. Hall would have been nice but no telling if we win the Cup that way.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 17:59 pmThanks for that reminder! I'm fine with the results. Hall might've been nice though...bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:37 pmWith Shattenkirk it was less that he blocked deals and more that he was intent on hitting free agency (with his heart in NY). He didn’t have a NTC to use like Schenn could. But his eventual destination depended on whether a team wanted him longterm or as a rental. It’s pretty well reported that the Blues could have had either Drouin or Hall if Shattenkirk had been willing to sign extensions with Tampa or Edmonton. But he didn’t block deals with a NTC.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:10 pmI go back and forth on this, but ultimately my dream would have been to keep as much of the gang together as possible. Would've rather just kept Ed for half the price and give Petro 9mil. No Krug, keep Dunn. Make them choose between Tarasenko, UFA Schwartz (who we should've re-signed), Ed, Sunny, and Blais. No Saad. No Buch.
But alas, we have a decent prospect pool and some good young NHL players, looking to move forward.
Oh and as far as the Shatty trade... This is interesting... Yes, he nixed a deal for Drouin, but the 1st we got for him was used in the deal for Schenn!![]()
In retrospect Shattenkirk’s best bet was agreeing to an extend with Tampa. His time in NY was a bust and he ended up there eventually anyway.![]()
- Schwartz getting hot as mentioned
- Binnie famously coming out of nowhere
- ROR reaching his ceiling
- Vladdie’s shoulder hanging on for SCF G7
- Jaybo finally getting healthy
- Blais and Barby running into everything
- Benn missing the G7 wrap around
- Sharks banged up (probably best team if healthy goalie was sus)
The Jets scared me the most. After the Blues beat them I thought anything was possible…and I never really had that quiet confidence before in the team.
Then when we lost Game 6 at home, I just KNEW we would not only lose, but lose badly in Boston.
When Zach Sanford scored the 4th goal in Boston, I was finally confident. But it sure as hell wasn’t quiet confidence! My neighbors probably thought the screaming was domestic violence. (I live in San Antonio, so not many hockey fans here).
I celebrated the Cup win in Nashville of all places. Screw the Preds. A stranger bought me a glass of champagne as the game ended, nice memory.
Btw that was the only time I recall feeling that way regarding a Blues Cup run. 90s kid. Sounds kooky but they just had that team of destiny feel. 2011 Cards had it too. They had the talent; not all of it but a good mix. They had the experience. They had been counted out yet remained resilient. Stressful to watch as a fan but fun to relive!
Key thing for me even when I feel confident like that I don’t utter a word about it to a person. “Don’t count your chickens…” It’s not like the Blues were this years Avs or the 2001 Rams…oops. Every victory was hard earned and came with a price. Total team effort.
Regarding G6 against Boston I didn’t feel good about that one going in. The Blues played better as underdogs and winning on home ice seemed too good to be true…and it was! Idr how I felt about Game 7 other than Boston was scary. However I knew the Blues (road team) could lean on “anything can happen”. And Boston probably should’ve won that game but oh well not our problem
On the other end the G7 last second goal last season by the Jets didn’t catch me by surprise. Of course the way it was given up probably didn’t surprise anyone who watched the team all season
-
diehardbluesfan1
- Forum User
- Posts: 195
- Joined: 18 Jul 2024 09:52 am
Re: Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
2019 was the only year I could remember in the playoffs when I wasn’t worried about the goaltending. I had zero worries. It was so odd and I can’t explain it. The fear of a weak goal breaking our backs wasn’t there anymore.
That’s when I knew that team was different and had a chance.
Does that make sense or did anyone else feel that way or was it just me?
That’s when I knew that team was different and had a chance.
Does that make sense or did anyone else feel that way or was it just me?
-
Hazelwood72
- Forum User
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: 02 Feb 2021 23:05 pm
Re: Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
Yeah, I suppose I shouldn’t have been surprised at the Game 6 outcome, since we (bleep) our pants at home in Game 3. Yeah, I was there in person. I spent $3,800 for 4 tickets, paid for my 2 adult sons flights to STL, and drove all the way from SA to STL to see Game 3 in person where we lost 7-2. Seems fitting since the last time I attended a Blues game in the Finals was Game 1 in 1970 where we lost 6-1, the same 5 goal differential against the same Boston Bruins. The afternoon that Jacques Plante took a slap shot from Fred Stanfield in the head. (Total silence in The Arena when that happened).juan good eye wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 22:06 pmThank you. Been to SA once during August. Melted on the river walk.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 21:18 pmGreat post, Juan. But I must admit I never had that quiet confidence you had, even after beating the Jets in the first round. Being a Blues fan since 1968, I had been disappointed so many times that I figured we would come up short somehow, some way. Once the Blues beat SJ for their 12th win, each game seemed to finally reach new territory. 12 wins, then 1st ever win in the finals, then first game ever played in June, etc.juan good eye wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 19:31 pmSo many things had to come together here’s a few off the top:Sudsy 11 wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 16:21 pmCrazy because Schwartz was absolutley snake bitten all year. Easily his worst season as a Blue. Then come the playoffs and Schwartz scores more goals than he did the entire regular season. It all came together at the right time for the Blues to finally win the Cupjuan good eye wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 16:04 pmFor the attempts Schwartz couldn’t get it past Quick he made up for it in 2019. Regarding shots JS is a good example of quantity over quality and why a longer Cup window allows for the breaks to even out.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑09 Jan 2026 09:48 amGood points, Juan, and I’ll add that two other keys were Schwartz playing on fire plus the incredible performance of the 4th line of Sunny, Steen, and Barbashev.juan good eye wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 20:17 pmDrouin didn’t live up to his hype. That was back in the zero offense days for the Blues and Hitch. IIRC Hall had a pretty good season with NJD not too long after. Honestly not a big fan of him or Drouin but Shatty never showed up in the playoffs and the Blues needed a finisher like Hall. Do the Blues win a Cup sooner? I don’t think so. We see what a difference an elite shut down ROR and resilient Binnie made and the Blues still almost lost to the Stars in 7.bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 18:33 pmYeah Drouin has been serviceable but never great. Hall would have been nice but no telling if we win the Cup that way.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 17:59 pmThanks for that reminder! I'm fine with the results. Hall might've been nice though...bluetunehead wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:37 pmWith Shattenkirk it was less that he blocked deals and more that he was intent on hitting free agency (with his heart in NY). He didn’t have a NTC to use like Schenn could. But his eventual destination depended on whether a team wanted him longterm or as a rental. It’s pretty well reported that the Blues could have had either Drouin or Hall if Shattenkirk had been willing to sign extensions with Tampa or Edmonton. But he didn’t block deals with a NTC.zamadoo wrote: ↑08 Jan 2026 16:10 pmI go back and forth on this, but ultimately my dream would have been to keep as much of the gang together as possible. Would've rather just kept Ed for half the price and give Petro 9mil. No Krug, keep Dunn. Make them choose between Tarasenko, UFA Schwartz (who we should've re-signed), Ed, Sunny, and Blais. No Saad. No Buch.
But alas, we have a decent prospect pool and some good young NHL players, looking to move forward.
Oh and as far as the Shatty trade... This is interesting... Yes, he nixed a deal for Drouin, but the 1st we got for him was used in the deal for Schenn!![]()
In retrospect Shattenkirk’s best bet was agreeing to an extend with Tampa. His time in NY was a bust and he ended up there eventually anyway.![]()
- Schwartz getting hot as mentioned
- Binnie famously coming out of nowhere
- ROR reaching his ceiling
- Vladdie’s shoulder hanging on for SCF G7
- Jaybo finally getting healthy
- Blais and Barby running into everything
- Benn missing the G7 wrap around
- Sharks banged up (probably best team if healthy goalie was sus)
The Jets scared me the most. After the Blues beat them I thought anything was possible…and I never really had that quiet confidence before in the team.
Then when we lost Game 6 at home, I just KNEW we would not only lose, but lose badly in Boston.
When Zach Sanford scored the 4th goal in Boston, I was finally confident. But it sure as hell wasn’t quiet confidence! My neighbors probably thought the screaming was domestic violence. (I live in San Antonio, so not many hockey fans here).
I celebrated the Cup win in Nashville of all places. Screw the Preds. A stranger bought me a glass of champagne as the game ended, nice memory.
Btw that was the only time I recall feeling that way regarding a Blues Cup run. 90s kid. Sounds kooky but they just had that team of destiny feel. 2011 Cards had it too. They had the talent; not all of it but a good mix. They had the experience. They had been counted out yet remained resilient. Stressful to watch as a fan but fun to relive!
Key thing for me even when I feel confident like that I don’t utter a word about it to a person. “Don’t count your chickens…” It’s not like the Blues were this years Avs or the 2001 Rams…oops. Every victory was hard earned and came with a price. Total team effort.
Regarding G6 against Boston I didn’t feel good about that one going in. The Blues played better as underdogs and winning on home ice seemed too good to be true…and it was! Idr how I felt about Game 7 other than Boston was scary. However I knew the Blues (road team) could lean on “anything can happen”. And Boston probably should’ve won that game but oh well not our problem![]()
On the other end the G7 last second goal last season by the Jets didn’t catch me by surprise. Of course the way it was given up probably didn’t surprise anyone who watched the team all season
Of course, me and my high school buddy only drove 10 miles from North County, and we sure as hell didn’t have to spend $3,800! Upper Circle seats for that game were probably only about $30. Of course, you had to stand in line forever at The Arena parking lot to buy those precious tix! Easy enough for two 16-year-olds! No StubHub or Ticketmaster robbery.
Ah the good ol’ days.
-
Hazelwood72
- Forum User
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: 02 Feb 2021 23:05 pm
Re: Toronto's trade proposal for Schenner
Nah, I’m a major league level worrier when it comes to the Blues. Even when Binny had his otherworldly run in 2019, I feared the worst. A soft goal, a defenseman hitting a rut, falling and allowing a breakaway, a bad bounce off the glass to right in front of our net — I had been conditioned after 52 years of fandom to expect the worst! I can empathize with Buffalo Sabres fans.diehardbluesfan1 wrote: ↑13 Jan 2026 22:15 pm 2019 was the only year I could remember in the playoffs when I wasn’t worried about the goaltending. I had zero worries. It was so odd and I can’t explain it. The fear of a weak goal breaking our backs wasn’t there anymore.
That’s when I knew that team was different and had a chance.
Does that make sense or did anyone else feel that way or was it just me?