Broberg Extension

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

Post Reply
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 8304
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: Broberg Extension

Post by DawgDad »

smilinjoefission wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:06 pm
LewisL wrote: 10 Jan 2026 17:37 pm The staff over at PuckPedia revealed Broberg’s contract breakdown relatively soon after:

Year 1: $10MM salary
Year 2: $10MM salary
Year 3: $9.25MM salary, full no-trade clause
Year 4: $6.75MM salary, full no-trade clause
Year 5: $6MM salary, 20-team no-trade clause
Year 6: $6MM salary, 15-team no-trade clause
If that's the structure then this as good a deal you can get...Blues could trade him off Year 5 or 6 for an absolute mint if he becomes the player he's projected to be
He could be worth twice as much by years 5-6.
Bluesfan1978
Forum User
Posts: 984
Joined: 17 Jan 2021 16:44 pm

Re: Broberg Extension

Post by Bluesfan1978 »

I like that he only has a NTC for two years. As far as value can’t argue with that number. I would say Broberg has a high likelihood to be worth more than 8 million a year within 1-2 years.
theograce
Forum User
Posts: 6311
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: Broberg Extension

Post by theograce »

DawgDad wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:09 pm
smilinjoefission wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:06 pm
LewisL wrote: 10 Jan 2026 17:37 pm The staff over at PuckPedia revealed Broberg’s contract breakdown relatively soon after:

Year 1: $10MM salary
Year 2: $10MM salary
Year 3: $9.25MM salary, full no-trade clause
Year 4: $6.75MM salary, full no-trade clause
Year 5: $6MM salary, 20-team no-trade clause
Year 6: $6MM salary, 15-team no-trade clause
If that's the structure then this as good a deal you can get...Blues could trade him off Year 5 or 6 for an absolute mint if he becomes the player he's projected to be
He could be worth twice as much by years 5-6.
He’s pacing for 25 points and has yet to score a PP goal in his life.

He’s not looking like a number 1…let alone a really good one
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 8304
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: Broberg Extension

Post by DawgDad »

theograce wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:22 pm
DawgDad wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:09 pm
smilinjoefission wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:06 pm
LewisL wrote: 10 Jan 2026 17:37 pm The staff over at PuckPedia revealed Broberg’s contract breakdown relatively soon after:

Year 1: $10MM salary
Year 2: $10MM salary
Year 3: $9.25MM salary, full no-trade clause
Year 4: $6.75MM salary, full no-trade clause
Year 5: $6MM salary, 20-team no-trade clause
Year 6: $6MM salary, 15-team no-trade clause
If that's the structure then this as good a deal you can get...Blues could trade him off Year 5 or 6 for an absolute mint if he becomes the player he's projected to be
He could be worth twice as much by years 5-6.
He’s pacing for 25 points and has yet to score a PP goal in his life.

He’s not looking like a number 1…let alone a really good one
LOL
BudOnTap
Forum User
Posts: 554
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:46 pm

Re: Broberg Extension

Post by BudOnTap »

theograce wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:22 pm
DawgDad wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:09 pm
smilinjoefission wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:06 pm
LewisL wrote: 10 Jan 2026 17:37 pm The staff over at PuckPedia revealed Broberg’s contract breakdown relatively soon after:

Year 1: $10MM salary
Year 2: $10MM salary
Year 3: $9.25MM salary, full no-trade clause
Year 4: $6.75MM salary, full no-trade clause
Year 5: $6MM salary, 20-team no-trade clause
Year 6: $6MM salary, 15-team no-trade clause
If that's the structure then this as good a deal you can get...Blues could trade him off Year 5 or 6 for an absolute mint if he becomes the player he's projected to be
He could be worth twice as much by years 5-6.
He’s pacing for 25 points and has yet to score a PP goal in his life.

He’s not looking like a number 1…let alone a really good one
Can you stop bumping your other stupid thread to the front page every day now?
theograce
Forum User
Posts: 6311
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: Broberg Extension

Post by theograce »

DawgDad wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:26 pm
theograce wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:22 pm
DawgDad wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:09 pm
smilinjoefission wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:06 pm
LewisL wrote: 10 Jan 2026 17:37 pm The staff over at PuckPedia revealed Broberg’s contract breakdown relatively soon after:

Year 1: $10MM salary
Year 2: $10MM salary
Year 3: $9.25MM salary, full no-trade clause
Year 4: $6.75MM salary, full no-trade clause
Year 5: $6MM salary, 20-team no-trade clause
Year 6: $6MM salary, 15-team no-trade clause
If that's the structure then this as good a deal you can get...Blues could trade him off Year 5 or 6 for an absolute mint if he becomes the player he's projected to be
He could be worth twice as much by years 5-6.
He’s pacing for 25 points and has yet to score a PP goal in his life.

He’s not looking like a number 1…let alone a really good one
LOL
At what? Make a point ol’ guy. Support something if you can
TruBlueFan_1970
Forum User
Posts: 1889
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm

Re: Broberg Extension

Post by TruBlueFan_1970 »

Seems like a good deal for both sides. Glad he’ll be here for potentially the next 6 years.
Harry S Deals
Forum User
Posts: 2752
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm

Re: Broberg Extension

Post by Harry S Deals »

Great signing
Attachments
G-VfZJrXoAEALfb.jpeg
G-VfZJrXoAEALfb.jpeg (134.22 KiB) Viewed 290 times
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 8304
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: Broberg Extension

Post by DawgDad »

theograce wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:30 pm
DawgDad wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:26 pm
theograce wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:22 pm
DawgDad wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:09 pm
smilinjoefission wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:06 pm
LewisL wrote: 10 Jan 2026 17:37 pm The staff over at PuckPedia revealed Broberg’s contract breakdown relatively soon after:

Year 1: $10MM salary
Year 2: $10MM salary
Year 3: $9.25MM salary, full no-trade clause
Year 4: $6.75MM salary, full no-trade clause
Year 5: $6MM salary, 20-team no-trade clause
Year 6: $6MM salary, 15-team no-trade clause
If that's the structure then this as good a deal you can get...Blues could trade him off Year 5 or 6 for an absolute mint if he becomes the player he's projected to be
He could be worth twice as much by years 5-6.
He’s pacing for 25 points and has yet to score a PP goal in his life.

He’s not looking like a number 1…let alone a really good one
LOL
At what? Make a point ol’ guy. Support something if you can
I watch all the games. My assessment is consistent with the extension contract and the pundit assessments I've seen. He's tall/long stick, athletic, plus skating and puckhandling, plus hockey sense. He's not being asked to be a PP QB but he could be. Could have more goals and assists but the team around him can't finish and many can't skate fast enough to join the play on his rushes. He's getting nastier the more he plays. Solid top-4 or top-2, with his athleticism he should still have more upside.
theograce
Forum User
Posts: 6311
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: Broberg Extension

Post by theograce »

DawgDad wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:59 pm
theograce wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:30 pm
DawgDad wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:26 pm
theograce wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:22 pm
DawgDad wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:09 pm
smilinjoefission wrote: 10 Jan 2026 18:06 pm
LewisL wrote: 10 Jan 2026 17:37 pm The staff over at PuckPedia revealed Broberg’s contract breakdown relatively soon after:

Year 1: $10MM salary
Year 2: $10MM salary
Year 3: $9.25MM salary, full no-trade clause
Year 4: $6.75MM salary, full no-trade clause
Year 5: $6MM salary, 20-team no-trade clause
Year 6: $6MM salary, 15-team no-trade clause
If that's the structure then this as good a deal you can get...Blues could trade him off Year 5 or 6 for an absolute mint if he becomes the player he's projected to be
He could be worth twice as much by years 5-6.
He’s pacing for 25 points and has yet to score a PP goal in his life.

He’s not looking like a number 1…let alone a really good one
LOL
At what? Make a point ol’ guy. Support something if you can
I watch all the games. My assessment is consistent with the extension contract and the pundit assessments I've seen. He's tall/long stick, athletic, plus skating and puckhandling, plus hockey sense. He's not being asked to be a PP QB but he could be. Could have more goals and assists but the team around him can't finish and many can't skate fast enough to join the play on his rushes. He's getting nastier the more he plays. Solid top-4 or top-2, with his athleticism he should still have more upside.
Nastier? One example from the season please. I mean come on…it’s not who he is. Yeah of course he’s going to be top 4. He is now. He has a poor/weak shot and his execution offensively is average at best. He’s pushing 25. I don’t see real leadership in him either.
BalotelliMassive
Forum User
Posts: 1384
Joined: 24 May 2024 10:31 am

Re: Broberg Extension

Post by BalotelliMassive »

This is a Steen victory - there's no doubt his connection to Sweden put this guy on his radar.

lol @ Stan Bowman
gpe13579
Forum User
Posts: 490
Joined: 28 Jan 2022 12:06 pm

Re: Broberg Extension

Post by gpe13579 »

I'll go with I'm on "ok" with it.

Hopefully there is more there but if this is all he is it becomes underwhelming quickly.

A lot of good tools to work. We'll see how good he can use them.
bluetunehead
Forum User
Posts: 1400
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm

Re: Broberg Extension

Post by bluetunehead »

Given what guys like Makar and Hughes are looking at these days, that's a totally reasonable contract. Good move IMO. I don't know if it'll ever be some kind of steal, but at worst he's a solid all-situations Top 4.
MiamiLaw
Forum User
Posts: 2291
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:16 pm

Re: Broberg Extension

Post by MiamiLaw »

theograce wrote: 10 Jan 2026 16:52 pm
MiamiLaw wrote: 10 Jan 2026 16:51 pm That’s about as good as we could’ve hoped for. Nice work on this one
I wanted a bridge. I just can’t see him in the leadership group and I don’t think he’s earned it.
I don’t see this being a disaster. At worst, it’s a bit overpriced. He’s not a number 1 but this isn’t a no 1 contract. I think it’s a safe gamble.

He’s overrated around here but he’s solid.
theograce
Forum User
Posts: 6311
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: Broberg Extension

Post by theograce »

MiamiLaw wrote: 10 Jan 2026 20:15 pm
theograce wrote: 10 Jan 2026 16:52 pm
MiamiLaw wrote: 10 Jan 2026 16:51 pm That’s about as good as we could’ve hoped for. Nice work on this one
I wanted a bridge. I just can’t see him in the leadership group and I don’t think he’s earned it.
I don’t see this being a disaster. At worst, it’s a bit overpriced. He’s not a number 1 but this isn’t a no 1 contract. I think it’s a safe gamble.

He’s overrated around here but he’s solid.
It won’t be a disaster at all. Its principle. He hasn’t earned it for me. Plus he hasn’t looked that good to me this year…especially with the puck.
somni
Forum User
Posts: 3481
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:53 pm

Re: Broberg Extension

Post by somni »

He leads the team in TOI. Right now, he's a 1st pairing defenseman. Is he the #1? Yet to be determined.

No doubt he would've gotten $9M in the offseason. Good signing.
Post Reply