Army's PLAN FOR WINNING THE CUP?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
a smell of green grass
- Forum User
- Posts: 2639
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Army's PLAN FOR WINNING THE CUP?
Army was quite vocal about building a "team" to win the Olympics. Why is he not as laser-committed to building a "Blues Team" to win the Cup? Why is the mission for the Blues to only be "5% better"?!!
Did anyone notice that Army's roster to win the Olympics had almost zero overlap with Army's roster to win the Stanley Cup, Parayko and Binnington. And both players will be gone in 2 years. Broberg counts as 1 longer term overlap.
Fast forward 4 years to the next Olympics. Does anyone see a single Blues player other than Broberg invited to the 2030 Olympics. I don't. We have a few maybes, at best.
This is a major problem, Sports Fans! Olympics and Stanley Cups are won with elite players that perform specific roles, and we have ZERO ELITE PLAYERS.
Blues Fans should demand these answers from Army before he exits because we are in a big hole, and he owes us an answer on how he is going to dig us out of it.
Did anyone notice that Army's roster to win the Olympics had almost zero overlap with Army's roster to win the Stanley Cup, Parayko and Binnington. And both players will be gone in 2 years. Broberg counts as 1 longer term overlap.
Fast forward 4 years to the next Olympics. Does anyone see a single Blues player other than Broberg invited to the 2030 Olympics. I don't. We have a few maybes, at best.
This is a major problem, Sports Fans! Olympics and Stanley Cups are won with elite players that perform specific roles, and we have ZERO ELITE PLAYERS.
Blues Fans should demand these answers from Army before he exits because we are in a big hole, and he owes us an answer on how he is going to dig us out of it.
-
Jeff Goldblum
- Forum User
- Posts: 770
- Joined: 05 Dec 2025 15:43 pm
Re: Army's PLAN FOR WINNING THE CUP?
Do you have a problem with Doug Armstrong??
-
a smell of green grass
- Forum User
- Posts: 2639
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: Army's PLAN FOR WINNING THE CUP?
It would be more accurate to say that I have problem with how the Blues are connecting the dots to win the next Cup.
Why does assembling Team Canada look SO DIFFERENT than assembling a team to win the Stanley Cup?
-
Jeff Goldblum
- Forum User
- Posts: 770
- Joined: 05 Dec 2025 15:43 pm
Re: Army's PLAN FOR WINNING THE CUP?
Is that a serious question?
-
a smell of green grass
- Forum User
- Posts: 2639
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: Army's PLAN FOR WINNING THE CUP?
My shots go 5-hole, but yet they still go over Goldblum's crossbar. How is that possible, I ask.
-
Younghopp1991
- Forum User
- Posts: 726
- Joined: 10 Apr 2022 22:23 pm
Re: Army's PLAN FOR WINNING THE CUP?
You are doing a bit too much ASOGG. Your point landed a LONG while ago. You are sounding like a broken record at this point drilling home a point that we have no control over. At some point you should stop gracing us with your presence on this topic or take it up the chain of command. Not the board.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 15:59 pmMy shots go 5-hole, but yet they still go over Goldblum's crossbar. How is that possible, I ask.
-
a smell of green grass
- Forum User
- Posts: 2639
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: Army's PLAN FOR WINNING THE CUP?
Unfortunately, I can't get a meeting with Armstrong.Younghopp1991 wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 16:07 pmYou are doing a bit too much ASOGG. Your point landed a LONG while ago. You are sounding like a broken record at this point drilling home a point that we have no control over. At some point you should stop gracing us with your presence on this topic or take it up the chain of command. Not the board.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 15:59 pmMy shots go 5-hole, but yet they still go over Goldblum's crossbar. How is that possible, I ask.
My only hope is to keep at least 1 topic on Page 1 of BluesTalk so that anyone (NHL journalists) reading can see that there are at least some fans in St Louis that are not happy with the Doug Armstrong approach to roster building.
I'll try to keep my griping constrained to my own thread and limit my posts overall.
-
Younghopp1991
- Forum User
- Posts: 726
- Joined: 10 Apr 2022 22:23 pm
Re: Army's PLAN FOR WINNING THE CUP?
Thank you sir.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 16:17 pmUnfortunately, I can't get a meeting with Armstrong.Younghopp1991 wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 16:07 pmYou are doing a bit too much ASOGG. Your point landed a LONG while ago. You are sounding like a broken record at this point drilling home a point that we have no control over. At some point you should stop gracing us with your presence on this topic or take it up the chain of command. Not the board.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 15:59 pmMy shots go 5-hole, but yet they still go over Goldblum's crossbar. How is that possible, I ask.
My only hope is to keep at least 1 topic on Page 1 of BluesTalk so that anyone (NHL journalists) reading can see that there are at least some fans in St Louis that are not happy with the Doug Armstrong approach to roster building.
I'll try to keep my griping constrained to my own thread and limit my posts overall.
Re: Army's PLAN FOR WINNING THE CUP?
Well:
1, an NHL team has budget constraints
2, trades are limited to willing partners
3, free agency decisions start with player availability
An Olympic roster is built without any of the above restrictions.
1, an NHL team has budget constraints
2, trades are limited to willing partners
3, free agency decisions start with player availability
An Olympic roster is built without any of the above restrictions.
Re: Army's PLAN FOR WINNING THE CUP?
I took a second to re-review the Canadian roster. That team is so stacked! Even the depth players are superstars.
It's really a "cost is no object" endeavor.
It's really a "cost is no object" endeavor.
Re: Army's PLAN FOR WINNING THE CUP?
OMG
This gets more hilarious the further I look.
"Team Canada's cap hit varies depending on the specific tournament or roster, but for the recent Four Nations Face-Off (Feb 2025), Canada's roster had a combined cap hit of over $174 million, second only to Team USA, highlighting the high-caliber,"
This gets more hilarious the further I look.
"Team Canada's cap hit varies depending on the specific tournament or roster, but for the recent Four Nations Face-Off (Feb 2025), Canada's roster had a combined cap hit of over $174 million, second only to Team USA, highlighting the high-caliber,"
Re: Army's PLAN FOR WINNING THE CUP?
Lol he said he'd cut back like two days ago. Add this to the growing list of lies from this poster.Younghopp1991 wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 16:24 pmThank you sir.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 16:17 pmUnfortunately, I can't get a meeting with Armstrong.Younghopp1991 wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 16:07 pmYou are doing a bit too much ASOGG. Your point landed a LONG while ago. You are sounding like a broken record at this point drilling home a point that we have no control over. At some point you should stop gracing us with your presence on this topic or take it up the chain of command. Not the board.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 15:59 pmMy shots go 5-hole, but yet they still go over Goldblum's crossbar. How is that possible, I ask.
My only hope is to keep at least 1 topic on Page 1 of BluesTalk so that anyone (NHL journalists) reading can see that there are at least some fans in St Louis that are not happy with the Doug Armstrong approach to roster building.
I'll try to keep my griping constrained to my own thread and limit my posts overall.
Re: Army's PLAN FOR WINNING THE CUP?
100%! He is only reliable in one area, another I hate Army post tomorrow!sdaltons wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 21:43 pmLol he said he'd cut back like two days ago. Add this to the growing list of lies from this poster.Younghopp1991 wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 16:24 pmThank you sir.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 16:17 pmUnfortunately, I can't get a meeting with Armstrong.Younghopp1991 wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 16:07 pmYou are doing a bit too much ASOGG. Your point landed a LONG while ago. You are sounding like a broken record at this point drilling home a point that we have no control over. At some point you should stop gracing us with your presence on this topic or take it up the chain of command. Not the board.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 15:59 pmMy shots go 5-hole, but yet they still go over Goldblum's crossbar. How is that possible, I ask.
My only hope is to keep at least 1 topic on Page 1 of BluesTalk so that anyone (NHL journalists) reading can see that there are at least some fans in St Louis that are not happy with the Doug Armstrong approach to roster building.
I'll try to keep my griping constrained to my own thread and limit my posts overall.
Re: Army's PLAN FOR WINNING THE CUP?
I doubt that Sweden, Slovakia and Czechia agree with your outlook in 4 years.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 15:34 pm Army was quite vocal about building a "team" to win the Olympics. Why is he not as laser-committed to building a "Blues Team" to win the Cup? Why is the mission for the Blues to only be "5% better"?!!
Did anyone notice that Army's roster to win the Olympics had almost zero overlap with Army's roster to win the Stanley Cup, Parayko and Binnington. And both players will be gone in 2 years. Broberg counts as 1 longer term overlap.
Fast forward 4 years to the next Olympics. Does anyone see a single Blues player other than Broberg invited to the 2030 Olympics. I don't. We have a few maybes, at best.
This is a major problem, Sports Fans! Olympics and Stanley Cups are won with elite players that perform specific roles, and we have ZERO ELITE PLAYERS.
Blues Fans should demand these answers from Army before he exits because we are in a big hole, and he owes us an answer on how he is going to dig us out of it.
-
Harry S Deals
- Forum User
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Army's PLAN FOR WINNING THE CUP?
Lol, man this person posts some dumb [shirt]...Old_Goat wrote: ↑06 Jan 2026 09:13 amI doubt that Sweden, Slovakia and Czechia agree with your outlook in 4 years.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑05 Jan 2026 15:34 pm Army was quite vocal about building a "team" to win the Olympics. Why is he not as laser-committed to building a "Blues Team" to win the Cup? Why is the mission for the Blues to only be "5% better"?!!
Did anyone notice that Army's roster to win the Olympics had almost zero overlap with Army's roster to win the Stanley Cup, Parayko and Binnington. And both players will be gone in 2 years. Broberg counts as 1 longer term overlap.
Fast forward 4 years to the next Olympics. Does anyone see a single Blues player other than Broberg invited to the 2030 Olympics. I don't. We have a few maybes, at best.
This is a major problem, Sports Fans! Olympics and Stanley Cups are won with elite players that perform specific roles, and we have ZERO ELITE PLAYERS.
Blues Fans should demand these answers from Army before he exits because we are in a big hole, and he owes us an answer on how he is going to dig us out of it.
In 4 years???
Dvorsky, Stenberg, Lindstein, Jiricek for starters
Jecho, Stancl, Kaskimaki
Harenstam
These are all former WJC-U20 players