Why Army does not want draft picks in return...
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
Harry S Deals
- Forum User
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Why Army does not want draft picks in return...
If i were picking again in '08 in hindsight AP is not the 4th overall pick, he may have been the 5th or 6th best defenseman taken Karlsson, Carlson, Josi, Doughty would have to be considered ahead of AP. This is by no means a slight to AP who was a great two way defender but the point is again and again, picking in the Top5 in the NHL is a (bleep) shoot. Would you really consider Bogosian or Luke Schenn to be Top5 players? They may have been at 18 yrs old. Army needs to stick to the plan, jettison older expiring deals for picks and prospects and continue to let the good younger guys we have now percolate. There is no magic formula to winning a Cup other than really being the best checking team going in the playoffs at that moment
-
a smell of green grass
- Forum User
- Posts: 2639
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: Why Army does not want draft picks in return...
Why must I always need to trail behind and sweep up?Harry S Deals wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 09:18 am If i were picking again in '08 in hindsight AP is not the 4th overall pick, he may have been the 5th or 6th best defenseman taken Karlsson, Carlson, Josi, Doughty would have to be considered ahead of AP. This is by no means a slight to AP who was a great two way defender but the point is again and again, picking in the Top5 in the NHL is a (bleep) shoot. Would you really consider Bogosian or Luke Schenn to be Top5 players? They may have been at 18 yrs old. Army needs to stick to the plan, jettison older expiring deals for picks and prospects and continue to let the good younger guys we have now percolate. There is no magic formula to winning a Cup other than really being the best checking team going in the playoffs at that moment
1) If you think that picking in the TOP5 is no guarantee of getting a GREAT player, you are going to hate the odds of picking after TOP10 of even finding a GOOD player.
2) Army has shown ZERO ability to staff the roster via the draft. Look at our team. Do you see much elite impact from the NHL draft? Nope. You see exceptionally little evidence of it--compared to other teams. This is especially true when you compare our team to teams like Colorado, Carolina, Minnesota and Edmonton. Some GMs may be able to find exceptional talent lower in the draft -- BUT ARMY IS NOT ONE OF THEM!!! Army picking at #15 or lower is as USELESS as (buzz) on a bore hog when it comes to staffing the team with Stanley Cup level talent.
3) Anyone that says that the Blues don't need a TOP5 pick because they won in 2019 is ignoring the fact that they did have a TOP5 pick on the roster in 2019, Alex Pietrangelo.
-
Walter Sobchak00
- Forum User
- Posts: 469
- Joined: 24 Jun 2018 09:25 am
Re: Why Army does not want draft picks in return...
Using your bend the rules reasoning:
Robert Thomas averages more points per game than the top 2 picks in his draft class making him the equivalent of a top 5 pick in his draft class.. therefore the Blues have a top 5 pick
Robert Thomas averages more points per game than the top 2 picks in his draft class making him the equivalent of a top 5 pick in his draft class.. therefore the Blues have a top 5 pick
-
Harry S Deals
- Forum User
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Why Army does not want draft picks in return...
That's right as well as Schenn, Kyrou and Neighbours also both producing right there with the top of their draft classWalter Sobchak00 wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 10:23 am Using your bend the rules reasoning:
Robert Thomas averages more points per game than the top 2 picks in his draft class making him the equivalent of a top 5 pick in his draft class.. therefore the Blues have a top 5 pick
-
2forDiving
- Forum User
- Posts: 907
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm
Re: Why Army does not want draft picks in return...
Outside of the Avs what have the other 3 done with their great draft positions? That’s the point you always seem to miss. You need to understand 99% of fans want to win a championship. You are that 1% that prefers to cheer for the name on the back of the jersey. More power to you. You would have loved the 90s teams, but they don’t throw parades for the 1%. You would have been at the curb waving your pennant every June buddying up to the homeless guy collecting beer cans at your feet.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 10:17 amWhy must I always need to trail behind and sweep up?Harry S Deals wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 09:18 am If i were picking again in '08 in hindsight AP is not the 4th overall pick, he may have been the 5th or 6th best defenseman taken Karlsson, Carlson, Josi, Doughty would have to be considered ahead of AP. This is by no means a slight to AP who was a great two way defender but the point is again and again, picking in the Top5 in the NHL is a (bleep) shoot. Would you really consider Bogosian or Luke Schenn to be Top5 players? They may have been at 18 yrs old. Army needs to stick to the plan, jettison older expiring deals for picks and prospects and continue to let the good younger guys we have now percolate. There is no magic formula to winning a Cup other than really being the best checking team going in the playoffs at that moment
1) If you think that picking in the TOP5 is no guarantee of getting a GREAT player, you are going to hate the odds of picking after TOP10 of even finding a GOOD player.
2) Army has shown ZERO ability to staff the roster via the draft. Look at our team. Do you see much elite impact from the NHL draft? Nope. You see exceptionally little evidence of it--compared to other teams. This is especially true when you compare our team to teams like Colorado, Carolina, Minnesota and Edmonton. Some GMs may be able to find exceptional talent lower in the draft -- BUT ARMY IS NOT ONE OF THEM!!! Army picking at #15 or lower is as USELESS as (buzz) on a bore hog when it comes to staffing the team with Stanley Cup level talent.
3) Anyone that says that the Blues don't need a TOP5 pick because they won in 2019 is ignoring the fact that they did have a TOP5 pick on the roster in 2019, Alex Pietrangelo.
-
seattleblue
- Forum User
- Posts: 2329
- Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm
Re: Why Army does not want draft picks in return...
If we taught "necessary but not sufficient" better as a concept then we wouldn't be plagued by this whole character. "I never said necessary was sufficient!!" lol
anyway, that aside, I personally do not want Doug Armstrong choosing the players to replace the players he signed that aren't getting it done. I want draft picks, not the players he evaluates.
anyway, that aside, I personally do not want Doug Armstrong choosing the players to replace the players he signed that aren't getting it done. I want draft picks, not the players he evaluates.
-
Harry S Deals
- Forum User
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Why Army does not want draft picks in return...
Doug Armstrong doesn't personally evaluate guys who are acquired there are pro and amateur staffs employed who do the scouting then the group makes the decisionsseattleblue wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 11:39 am If we taught "necessary but not sufficient" better as a concept then we wouldn't be plagued by this whole character. "I never said necessary was sufficient!!" lol
anyway, that aside, I personally do not want Doug Armstrong choosing the players to replace the players he signed that aren't getting it done. I want draft picks, not the players he evaluates.
-
seattleblue
- Forum User
- Posts: 2329
- Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm
Re: Why Army does not want draft picks in return...
are you explaining to me how the boss isn't the boss? and the trades Armstrong might make this season in getting players back for Schenn, et al ... if they are for players, he is merely executing the desires of his underling Teams of Responsibles?Harry S Deals wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 12:04 pmDoug Armstrong doesn't personally evaluate guys who are acquired there are pro and amateur staffs employed who do the scouting then the group makes the decisionsseattleblue wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 11:39 am If we taught "necessary but not sufficient" better as a concept then we wouldn't be plagued by this whole character. "I never said necessary was sufficient!!" lol
anyway, that aside, I personally do not want Doug Armstrong choosing the players to replace the players he signed that aren't getting it done. I want draft picks, not the players he evaluates.
-
a smell of green grass
- Forum User
- Posts: 2639
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: Why Army does not want draft picks in return...
In last year's playoffs, every team had at least one TOP5 pick on their roster (that they selected and held as a core player). Florida and Edmonton each have 2 TOP5 picks on their roster.2forDiving wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 11:34 amOutside of the Avs what have the other 3 done with their great draft positions? That’s the point you always seem to miss. You need to understand 99% of fans want to win a championship. You are that 1% that prefers to cheer for the name on the back of the jersey. More power to you. You would have loved the 90s teams, but they don’t throw parades for the 1%. You would have been at the curb waving your pennant every June buddying up to the homeless guy collecting beer cans at your feet.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 10:17 amWhy must I always need to trail behind and sweep up?Harry S Deals wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 09:18 am If i were picking again in '08 in hindsight AP is not the 4th overall pick, he may have been the 5th or 6th best defenseman taken Karlsson, Carlson, Josi, Doughty would have to be considered ahead of AP. This is by no means a slight to AP who was a great two way defender but the point is again and again, picking in the Top5 in the NHL is a (bleep) shoot. Would you really consider Bogosian or Luke Schenn to be Top5 players? They may have been at 18 yrs old. Army needs to stick to the plan, jettison older expiring deals for picks and prospects and continue to let the good younger guys we have now percolate. There is no magic formula to winning a Cup other than really being the best checking team going in the playoffs at that moment
1) If you think that picking in the TOP5 is no guarantee of getting a GREAT player, you are going to hate the odds of picking after TOP10 of even finding a GOOD player.
2) Army has shown ZERO ability to staff the roster via the draft. Look at our team. Do you see much elite impact from the NHL draft? Nope. You see exceptionally little evidence of it--compared to other teams. This is especially true when you compare our team to teams like Colorado, Carolina, Minnesota and Edmonton. Some GMs may be able to find exceptional talent lower in the draft -- BUT ARMY IS NOT ONE OF THEM!!! Army picking at #15 or lower is as USELESS as (buzz) on a bore hog when it comes to staffing the team with Stanley Cup level talent.
3) Anyone that says that the Blues don't need a TOP5 pick because they won in 2019 is ignoring the fact that they did have a TOP5 pick on the roster in 2019, Alex Pietrangelo.
Every NHL city understands the importance of TOP5 picks. It's only St Louis that is clueless about this--BECAUSE THEY HAVEN"T HAD ONE IN 20 YEARS.
-
Jeff Goldblum
- Forum User
- Posts: 769
- Joined: 05 Dec 2025 15:43 pm
Re: Why Army does not want draft picks in return...
Go root for a different team. This place would be much better without you
-
BleedingBleu
- Forum User
- Posts: 548
- Joined: 30 Nov 2025 07:19 am
Re: Why Army does not want draft picks in return...
Florida has 5a smell of green grass wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 13:39 pmIn last year's playoffs, every team had at least one TOP5 pick on their roster (that they selected and held as a core player). Florida and Edmonton each have 2 TOP5 picks on their roster.2forDiving wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 11:34 amOutside of the Avs what have the other 3 done with their great draft positions? That’s the point you always seem to miss. You need to understand 99% of fans want to win a championship. You are that 1% that prefers to cheer for the name on the back of the jersey. More power to you. You would have loved the 90s teams, but they don’t throw parades for the 1%. You would have been at the curb waving your pennant every June buddying up to the homeless guy collecting beer cans at your feet.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 10:17 amWhy must I always need to trail behind and sweep up?Harry S Deals wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 09:18 am If i were picking again in '08 in hindsight AP is not the 4th overall pick, he may have been the 5th or 6th best defenseman taken Karlsson, Carlson, Josi, Doughty would have to be considered ahead of AP. This is by no means a slight to AP who was a great two way defender but the point is again and again, picking in the Top5 in the NHL is a (bleep) shoot. Would you really consider Bogosian or Luke Schenn to be Top5 players? They may have been at 18 yrs old. Army needs to stick to the plan, jettison older expiring deals for picks and prospects and continue to let the good younger guys we have now percolate. There is no magic formula to winning a Cup other than really being the best checking team going in the playoffs at that moment
1) If you think that picking in the TOP5 is no guarantee of getting a GREAT player, you are going to hate the odds of picking after TOP10 of even finding a GOOD player.
2) Army has shown ZERO ability to staff the roster via the draft. Look at our team. Do you see much elite impact from the NHL draft? Nope. You see exceptionally little evidence of it--compared to other teams. This is especially true when you compare our team to teams like Colorado, Carolina, Minnesota and Edmonton. Some GMs may be able to find exceptional talent lower in the draft -- BUT ARMY IS NOT ONE OF THEM!!! Army picking at #15 or lower is as USELESS as (buzz) on a bore hog when it comes to staffing the team with Stanley Cup level talent.
3) Anyone that says that the Blues don't need a TOP5 pick because they won in 2019 is ignoring the fact that they did have a TOP5 pick on the roster in 2019, Alex Pietrangelo.
Every NHL city understands the importance of TOP5 picks. It's only St Louis that is clueless about this--BECAUSE THEY HAVEN"T HAD ONE IN 20 YEARS.
Barkov - #2 (2013) Fla
Jones - #4 (2013) Nsh
Ekblad - #1 (2014) Fla
Reinhart - #2 (2014) Buf
Bennett - #4 (2014) Cgy
Tkachuk - #6 (2016) Cgy
That strategy of two Top 5’s didn’t seem to work out too well for Buffalo, Calgary, nor Nashville, did it?
-
Jeff Goldblum
- Forum User
- Posts: 769
- Joined: 05 Dec 2025 15:43 pm
Re: Why Army does not want draft picks in return...
How many [fork]ing times does this need to be discussed?
-
Sunny's Teeth
- Forum User
- Posts: 807
- Joined: 30 May 2019 18:45 pm
Re: Why Army does not want draft picks in return...
It’s a subtle dance, if you have top 6 picks you stink. If you have top 7 you’re straight garbage. But top 5? It’s on like a prawn that yawns at dawn.
-
juan good eye
- Forum User
- Posts: 385
- Joined: 08 Oct 2025 23:31 pm
Re: Why Army does not want draft picks in return...
+1seattleblue wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 12:41 pmare you explaining to me how the boss isn't the boss? and the trades Armstrong might make this season in getting players back for Schenn, et al ... if they are for players, he is merely executing the desires of his underling Teams of Responsibles?Harry S Deals wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 12:04 pmDoug Armstrong doesn't personally evaluate guys who are acquired there are pro and amateur staffs employed who do the scouting then the group makes the decisionsseattleblue wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 11:39 am If we taught "necessary but not sufficient" better as a concept then we wouldn't be plagued by this whole character. "I never said necessary was sufficient!!" lol
anyway, that aside, I personally do not want Doug Armstrong choosing the players to replace the players he signed that aren't getting it done. I want draft picks, not the players he evaluates.
-
Harry S Deals
- Forum User
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Why Army does not want draft picks in return...
Verhaegee is perhaps the most important 23 pts 3 GWGs he was taken in the 3rd rndBleedingBleu wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 17:21 pmFlorida has 5a smell of green grass wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 13:39 pmIn last year's playoffs, every team had at least one TOP5 pick on their roster (that they selected and held as a core player). Florida and Edmonton each have 2 TOP5 picks on their roster.2forDiving wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 11:34 amOutside of the Avs what have the other 3 done with their great draft positions? That’s the point you always seem to miss. You need to understand 99% of fans want to win a championship. You are that 1% that prefers to cheer for the name on the back of the jersey. More power to you. You would have loved the 90s teams, but they don’t throw parades for the 1%. You would have been at the curb waving your pennant every June buddying up to the homeless guy collecting beer cans at your feet.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 10:17 amWhy must I always need to trail behind and sweep up?Harry S Deals wrote: ↑26 Dec 2025 09:18 am If i were picking again in '08 in hindsight AP is not the 4th overall pick, he may have been the 5th or 6th best defenseman taken Karlsson, Carlson, Josi, Doughty would have to be considered ahead of AP. This is by no means a slight to AP who was a great two way defender but the point is again and again, picking in the Top5 in the NHL is a (bleep) shoot. Would you really consider Bogosian or Luke Schenn to be Top5 players? They may have been at 18 yrs old. Army needs to stick to the plan, jettison older expiring deals for picks and prospects and continue to let the good younger guys we have now percolate. There is no magic formula to winning a Cup other than really being the best checking team going in the playoffs at that moment
1) If you think that picking in the TOP5 is no guarantee of getting a GREAT player, you are going to hate the odds of picking after TOP10 of even finding a GOOD player.
2) Army has shown ZERO ability to staff the roster via the draft. Look at our team. Do you see much elite impact from the NHL draft? Nope. You see exceptionally little evidence of it--compared to other teams. This is especially true when you compare our team to teams like Colorado, Carolina, Minnesota and Edmonton. Some GMs may be able to find exceptional talent lower in the draft -- BUT ARMY IS NOT ONE OF THEM!!! Army picking at #15 or lower is as USELESS as (buzz) on a bore hog when it comes to staffing the team with Stanley Cup level talent.
3) Anyone that says that the Blues don't need a TOP5 pick because they won in 2019 is ignoring the fact that they did have a TOP5 pick on the roster in 2019, Alex Pietrangelo.
Every NHL city understands the importance of TOP5 picks. It's only St Louis that is clueless about this--BECAUSE THEY HAVEN"T HAD ONE IN 20 YEARS.
Barkov - #2 (2013) Fla
Jones - #4 (2013) Nsh
Ekblad - #1 (2014) Fla
Reinhart - #2 (2014) Buf
Bennett - #4 (2014) Cgy
Tkachuk - #6 (2016) Cgy
That strategy of two Top 5’s didn’t seem to work out too well for Buffalo, Calgary, nor Nashville, did it?