Baseball America has him ranked 9th. Seems to be a guy with a lot of potential.craviduce wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:55 pmYep.... Fajardo is the GEM of this trade.
We did GREAT there. Sequera, AD4, Fajardo.... very young RHP ....we need the depth. Palm Beach for all 3, with immediate promotions to Peoria...imo.
He might be 23rd in the Red Sox pipeline...but by mid summer, he'll be that or higher with the Cards. Our system is currently a bit deeper than the Sox, so I'm not sure if he lines up in our Top 30....I would be put him Top 20, imo....his K rate and control are stupendous for an 18yo
Contreras to Red Sox
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
Ronnie Dobbs
- Forum User
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:17 pm
Re: Contreras to Red Sox
-
scoutyjones2
- Forum User
- Posts: 8803
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: Contreras to Red Sox
So Bloom gets what? A (C) for this trade?
This is a nothing move
This is a nothing move
Re: Contreras to Red Sox
BA has him that high? Good stuff....I'll read up on him later, I guess.Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:59 pmBaseball America has him ranked 9th. Seems to be a guy with a lot of potential.craviduce wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:55 pmYep.... Fajardo is the GEM of this trade.
We did GREAT there. Sequera, AD4, Fajardo.... very young RHP ....we need the depth. Palm Beach for all 3, with immediate promotions to Peoria...imo.
He might be 23rd in the Red Sox pipeline...but by mid summer, he'll be that or higher with the Cards. Our system is currently a bit deeper than the Sox, so I'm not sure if he lines up in our Top 30....I would be put him Top 20, imo....his K rate and control are stupendous for an 18yo
I'm really stoked about Fajardo. It's becoming a rare thing to find Control from a young Latin pitchers now a days. The focus is more on the Athletic Bats...just seems that way.
Sequera and Fajardo in our system, there's some hope there.
Re: Contreras to Red Sox
I didn't see him listed on Boston's prospects. When were these rankings?Absolut wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:57 pmHe’s not the centerpiece of the returnFrancis Park Thug wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:46 pm MLB Pipeline has Dobbins rated #14 in the Boston prospect rankings.
-
cardinalsfever44
- Forum User
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:03 pm
Re: Contreras to Red Sox
He's not a prospect, he's an MLB pitcher. Made the Red Sox rotation last season before his injury.brock118 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 20:03 pmI didn't see him listed on Boston's prospects. When were these rankings?Absolut wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:57 pmHe’s not the centerpiece of the returnFrancis Park Thug wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:46 pm MLB Pipeline has Dobbins rated #14 in the Boston prospect rankings.
Re: Contreras to Red Sox
This had fajardo at 10brock118 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 20:03 pmI didn't see him listed on Boston's prospects. When were these rankings?Absolut wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:57 pmHe’s not the centerpiece of the returnFrancis Park Thug wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:46 pm MLB Pipeline has Dobbins rated #14 in the Boston prospect rankings.
https://www.soxprospects.com/players/fa ... hoiker.htm
Re: Contreras to Red Sox
I understand. I really do. People want to win. But this roster that was put together is incapable of it with the amount of money they would need to spend to make it competitive vs the amount of money they actually have to spend plus the big contracts they already had. They are rebuilding. Hopefully it is a short one.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:58 pmThat’s always the excuse for salary dumps. We could have competed in 2027 if Bill was willing to try.2ninr wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:49 pm^^^^^^^.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:30 pmMo would have kept him got nothing for him and the cardinals would have still missed the playoffs the next two years with him then he would have left with nothing to show in return
Thanks Oz. This really is the truth.
As it is we are getting back long shots and non needle moving role players. Filler and the dreaded innings eaters.
Re: Contreras to Red Sox
He's only given up 2 long balls in 120 total innings pitched?...did I read that right?Absolut wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 20:08 pmThis had fajardo at 10brock118 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 20:03 pmI didn't see him listed on Boston's prospects. When were these rankings?Absolut wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:57 pmHe’s not the centerpiece of the returnFrancis Park Thug wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:46 pm MLB Pipeline has Dobbins rated #14 in the Boston prospect rankings.
https://www.soxprospects.com/players/fa ... hoiker.htm
Re: Contreras to Red Sox
thanks for the link rage daverage dave wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:40 pm Found this on one of the prospects: https://talksox.com/news-rumors/red-sox ... lab-r2681/
-
Whatashame
- Forum User
- Posts: 3762
- Joined: 24 May 2018 20:27 pm
Re: Contreras to Red Sox
scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:59 pmHe's not a 1b option. Keep Ivan in the OF. The less touches the betterWhatashame wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:46 pm
Maybe not. I think Herrera is going to be given every opportunity to show his work over the winter to improve his catching defense has legs. If it doesn’t work out, then Herrera to 1B makes a lot of sense. I have never seen Herrera as an outfield option and many don’t believe that he’s a catching option. He needs a place to play. 1B is a definite option.
I don’t think he’s an outfield option either but he needs a position to play. It sounds like they are going to give him another opportunity to catch. Many don’t think he can do that either but he needs a place to play. Maybe it’s 1B, maybe he fixes his defense at catcher over the winter. Maybe he catches
40ish games and DHs the rest. I happen to see 1B as an option.
Re: Contreras to Red Sox
Insane!Bushiro wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 20:14 pmHe's only given up 2 long balls in 120 total innings pitched?...did I read that right?Absolut wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 20:08 pmThis had fajardo at 10brock118 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 20:03 pmI didn't see him listed on Boston's prospects. When were these rankings?Absolut wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:57 pmHe’s not the centerpiece of the returnFrancis Park Thug wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:46 pm MLB Pipeline has Dobbins rated #14 in the Boston prospect rankings.
https://www.soxprospects.com/players/fa ... hoiker.htm
Another write up
https://fansided.com/mlb/mlb-trade-grad ... reras-deal
-
cardinalsfever44
- Forum User
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:03 pm
Re: Contreras to Red Sox
That is correct. 2 HR's in 122.2 IP. 2.93 ERA, 147 K's and 1.13 WHIP. He's also only 18.Bushiro wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 20:14 pmHe's only given up 2 long balls in 120 total innings pitched?...did I read that right?Absolut wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 20:08 pmThis had fajardo at 10brock118 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 20:03 pmI didn't see him listed on Boston's prospects. When were these rankings?Absolut wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:57 pmHe’s not the centerpiece of the returnFrancis Park Thug wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:46 pm MLB Pipeline has Dobbins rated #14 in the Boston prospect rankings.
https://www.soxprospects.com/players/fa ... hoiker.htm
Re: Contreras to Red Sox
I think the "GO Point" will be when the Rotation becomes strong. We're gathering assets by the bunches right now. And AAA is looking mighty juicy with pitching talent in 2026. Springfield, too, will have the Likes of Doyle and maybe Clarke.2ninr wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 20:10 pmI understand. I really do. People want to win. But this roster that was put together is incapable of it with the amount of money they would need to spend to make it competitive vs the amount of money they actually have to spend plus the big contracts they already had. They are rebuilding. Hopefully it is a short one.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:58 pmThat’s always the excuse for salary dumps. We could have competed in 2027 if Bill was willing to try.2ninr wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:49 pm^^^^^^^.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:30 pmMo would have kept him got nothing for him and the cardinals would have still missed the playoffs the next two years with him then he would have left with nothing to show in return
Thanks Oz. This really is the truth.
As it is we are getting back long shots and non needle moving role players. Filler and the dreaded innings eaters.
Let's assume for the sake of this exercise we're keeping Libby and McGreevy as future cogs in the rotation....we would need 3 of the following to make it to the BIGs and succeed enough to cement a place in the rotation : Henderson, Mathews, Doyle, Mautz, Clarke, Franklin....3 of the 6. And still having the "next men up" in Memphis.
From there, you can starting trading your piled up assets in Springfield/Peoria for offensive MLB gems for your lineup. I love the potential Wetherholt, but he's not going to be able to do it on his own.
All eyes are on the Pitching prospects, imo....or that's where our eyes should be.
-
Ozziesfan41
- Forum User
- Posts: 6918
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Contreras to Red Sox
+1 a lot of people can’t comprehend the strategy but the strategy is a good one.craviduce wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 20:17 pmI think the "GO Point" will be when the Rotation becomes strong. We're gathering assets by the bunches right now. And AAA is looking mighty juicy with pitching talent in 2026. Springfield, too, will have the Likes of Doyle and maybe Clarke.2ninr wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 20:10 pmI understand. I really do. People want to win. But this roster that was put together is incapable of it with the amount of money they would need to spend to make it competitive vs the amount of money they actually have to spend plus the big contracts they already had. They are rebuilding. Hopefully it is a short one.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:58 pmThat’s always the excuse for salary dumps. We could have competed in 2027 if Bill was willing to try.2ninr wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:49 pm^^^^^^^.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:30 pmMo would have kept him got nothing for him and the cardinals would have still missed the playoffs the next two years with him then he would have left with nothing to show in return
Thanks Oz. This really is the truth.
As it is we are getting back long shots and non needle moving role players. Filler and the dreaded innings eaters.
Let's assume for the sake of this exercise we're keeping Libby and McGreevy as future cogs in the rotation....we would need 3 of the following to make it to the BIGs and succeed enough to cement a place in the rotation : Henderson, Mathews, Doyle, Mautz, Clarke, Franklin....3 of the 6. And still having the "next men up" in Memphis.
From there, you can starting trading your piled up assets in Springfield/Peoria for offensive MLB gems for your lineup. I love the potential Wetherholt, but he's not going to be able to do it on his own.
All eyes are on the Pitching prospects, imo....or that's where our eyes should be.
-
scoutyjones2
- Forum User
- Posts: 8803
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: Contreras to Red Sox
DH and LF. The less he handles the ball, the better.Whatashame wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 20:14 pmscoutyjones2 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:59 pmHe's not a 1b option. Keep Ivan in the OF. The less touches the betterWhatashame wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 19:46 pm
Maybe not. I think Herrera is going to be given every opportunity to show his work over the winter to improve his catching defense has legs. If it doesn’t work out, then Herrera to 1B makes a lot of sense. I have never seen Herrera as an outfield option and many don’t believe that he’s a catching option. He needs a place to play. 1B is a definite option.
I don’t think he’s an outfield option either but he needs a position to play. It sounds like they are going to give him another opportunity to catch. Many don’t think he can do that either but he needs a place to play. Maybe it’s 1B, maybe he fixes his defense at catcher over the winter. Maybe he catches
40ish games and DHs the rest. I happen to see 1B as an option.
-
BleedingBleu
- Forum User
- Posts: 129
- Joined: 30 Nov 2025 07:19 am
Re: Contreras to Red Sox
Considering Mo failed his one goal in the 2024/5 offseason; which was to trade Arenado. This is at least a C, because no one will be contributing to the Major League club for possibly 2 yearsscoutyjones2 wrote: ↑21 Dec 2025 20:00 pm So Bloom gets what? A (C) for this trade?
This is a nothing move