Contreras to Red Sox

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Post Reply
Ronnie Dobbs
Forum User
Posts: 1476
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:17 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by Ronnie Dobbs »

craviduce wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:55 pm
craviduce wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:36 pm Fajardo looks like a pretty good get....we'll see. Not familiar with the other guys.
Yep.... Fajardo is the GEM of this trade.

We did GREAT there. Sequera, AD4, Fajardo.... very young RHP ....we need the depth. Palm Beach for all 3, with immediate promotions to Peoria...imo.

He might be 23rd in the Red Sox pipeline...but by mid summer, he'll be that or higher with the Cards. Our system is currently a bit deeper than the Sox, so I'm not sure if he lines up in our Top 30....I would be put him Top 20, imo....his K rate and control are stupendous for an 18yo
Baseball America has him ranked 9th. Seems to be a guy with a lot of potential.
scoutyjones2
Forum User
Posts: 8803
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by scoutyjones2 »

So Bloom gets what? A (C) for this trade?

This is a nothing move
craviduce
Forum User
Posts: 24366
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by craviduce »

Ronnie Dobbs wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:59 pm
craviduce wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:55 pm
craviduce wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:36 pm Fajardo looks like a pretty good get....we'll see. Not familiar with the other guys.
Yep.... Fajardo is the GEM of this trade.

We did GREAT there. Sequera, AD4, Fajardo.... very young RHP ....we need the depth. Palm Beach for all 3, with immediate promotions to Peoria...imo.

He might be 23rd in the Red Sox pipeline...but by mid summer, he'll be that or higher with the Cards. Our system is currently a bit deeper than the Sox, so I'm not sure if he lines up in our Top 30....I would be put him Top 20, imo....his K rate and control are stupendous for an 18yo
Baseball America has him ranked 9th. Seems to be a guy with a lot of potential.
BA has him that high? Good stuff....I'll read up on him later, I guess.

I'm really stoked about Fajardo. It's becoming a rare thing to find Control from a young Latin pitchers now a days. The focus is more on the Athletic Bats...just seems that way.

Sequera and Fajardo in our system, there's some hope there.
brock118
Forum User
Posts: 455
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:56 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by brock118 »

Absolut wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:57 pm
Francis Park Thug wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:46 pm MLB Pipeline has Dobbins rated #14 in the Boston prospect rankings.
He’s not the centerpiece of the return
I didn't see him listed on Boston's prospects. When were these rankings?
cardinalsfever44
Forum User
Posts: 1162
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:03 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by cardinalsfever44 »

brock118 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:03 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:57 pm
Francis Park Thug wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:46 pm MLB Pipeline has Dobbins rated #14 in the Boston prospect rankings.
He’s not the centerpiece of the return
I didn't see him listed on Boston's prospects. When were these rankings?
He's not a prospect, he's an MLB pitcher. Made the Red Sox rotation last season before his injury.
Absolut
Forum User
Posts: 12889
Joined: 12 Jan 2020 20:06 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by Absolut »

brock118 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:03 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:57 pm
Francis Park Thug wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:46 pm MLB Pipeline has Dobbins rated #14 in the Boston prospect rankings.
He’s not the centerpiece of the return
I didn't see him listed on Boston's prospects. When were these rankings?
This had fajardo at 10
https://www.soxprospects.com/players/fa ... hoiker.htm
2ninr
Forum User
Posts: 1023
Joined: 24 May 2024 15:04 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by 2ninr »

Carp4Cy wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:58 pm
2ninr wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:49 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:30 pm
Hoosier59 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:23 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:21 pm
No-Mo-Mo wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:19 pm This is all they can get for Contreras? Lolol
What did you think they were going to get for him lol
Mo could have gotten more than this!
Mo would have kept him got nothing for him and the cardinals would have still missed the playoffs the next two years with him then he would have left with nothing to show in return
^^^^^^^.
Thanks Oz. This really is the truth.
That’s always the excuse for salary dumps. We could have competed in 2027 if Bill was willing to try.
As it is we are getting back long shots and non needle moving role players. Filler and the dreaded innings eaters.
I understand. I really do. People want to win. But this roster that was put together is incapable of it with the amount of money they would need to spend to make it competitive vs the amount of money they actually have to spend plus the big contracts they already had. They are rebuilding. Hopefully it is a short one.
Bushiro
Forum User
Posts: 986
Joined: 07 Nov 2018 11:29 am

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by Bushiro »

Absolut wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:08 pm
brock118 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:03 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:57 pm
Francis Park Thug wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:46 pm MLB Pipeline has Dobbins rated #14 in the Boston prospect rankings.
He’s not the centerpiece of the return
I didn't see him listed on Boston's prospects. When were these rankings?
This had fajardo at 10
https://www.soxprospects.com/players/fa ... hoiker.htm
He's only given up 2 long balls in 120 total innings pitched?...did I read that right?
82birds
Forum User
Posts: 17023
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:17 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by 82birds »

rage dave wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:40 pm Found this on one of the prospects: https://talksox.com/news-rumors/red-sox ... lab-r2681/
thanks for the link rage dave
Whatashame
Forum User
Posts: 3762
Joined: 24 May 2018 20:27 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by Whatashame »

scoutyjones2 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:59 pm
Whatashame wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:46 pm
BleedingBleu wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:36 pm
Melville wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:08 pm
Web7 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:00 pm I mean we already didn’t have any RH bats and now we lose our best one? Lol
This is about moving Herrera to 1B.
Probably more Burleson to first

Maybe not. I think Herrera is going to be given every opportunity to show his work over the winter to improve his catching defense has legs. If it doesn’t work out, then Herrera to 1B makes a lot of sense. I have never seen Herrera as an outfield option and many don’t believe that he’s a catching option. He needs a place to play. 1B is a definite option.
He's not a 1b option. Keep Ivan in the OF. The less touches the better

I don’t think he’s an outfield option either but he needs a position to play. It sounds like they are going to give him another opportunity to catch. Many don’t think he can do that either but he needs a place to play. Maybe it’s 1B, maybe he fixes his defense at catcher over the winter. Maybe he catches
40ish games and DHs the rest. I happen to see 1B as an option.
Absolut
Forum User
Posts: 12889
Joined: 12 Jan 2020 20:06 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by Absolut »

Bushiro wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:14 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:08 pm
brock118 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:03 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:57 pm
Francis Park Thug wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:46 pm MLB Pipeline has Dobbins rated #14 in the Boston prospect rankings.
He’s not the centerpiece of the return
I didn't see him listed on Boston's prospects. When were these rankings?
This had fajardo at 10
https://www.soxprospects.com/players/fa ... hoiker.htm
He's only given up 2 long balls in 120 total innings pitched?...did I read that right?
Insane!

Another write up
https://fansided.com/mlb/mlb-trade-grad ... reras-deal
cardinalsfever44
Forum User
Posts: 1162
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:03 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by cardinalsfever44 »

Bushiro wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:14 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:08 pm
brock118 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:03 pm
Absolut wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:57 pm
Francis Park Thug wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:46 pm MLB Pipeline has Dobbins rated #14 in the Boston prospect rankings.
He’s not the centerpiece of the return
I didn't see him listed on Boston's prospects. When were these rankings?
This had fajardo at 10
https://www.soxprospects.com/players/fa ... hoiker.htm
He's only given up 2 long balls in 120 total innings pitched?...did I read that right?
That is correct. 2 HR's in 122.2 IP. 2.93 ERA, 147 K's and 1.13 WHIP. He's also only 18.
craviduce
Forum User
Posts: 24366
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by craviduce »

2ninr wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:10 pm
Carp4Cy wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:58 pm
2ninr wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:49 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:30 pm
Hoosier59 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:23 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:21 pm
No-Mo-Mo wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:19 pm This is all they can get for Contreras? Lolol
What did you think they were going to get for him lol
Mo could have gotten more than this!
Mo would have kept him got nothing for him and the cardinals would have still missed the playoffs the next two years with him then he would have left with nothing to show in return
^^^^^^^.
Thanks Oz. This really is the truth.
That’s always the excuse for salary dumps. We could have competed in 2027 if Bill was willing to try.
As it is we are getting back long shots and non needle moving role players. Filler and the dreaded innings eaters.
I understand. I really do. People want to win. But this roster that was put together is incapable of it with the amount of money they would need to spend to make it competitive vs the amount of money they actually have to spend plus the big contracts they already had. They are rebuilding. Hopefully it is a short one.
I think the "GO Point" will be when the Rotation becomes strong. We're gathering assets by the bunches right now. And AAA is looking mighty juicy with pitching talent in 2026. Springfield, too, will have the Likes of Doyle and maybe Clarke.

Let's assume for the sake of this exercise we're keeping Libby and McGreevy as future cogs in the rotation....we would need 3 of the following to make it to the BIGs and succeed enough to cement a place in the rotation : Henderson, Mathews, Doyle, Mautz, Clarke, Franklin....3 of the 6. And still having the "next men up" in Memphis.

From there, you can starting trading your piled up assets in Springfield/Peoria for offensive MLB gems for your lineup. I love the potential Wetherholt, but he's not going to be able to do it on his own.

All eyes are on the Pitching prospects, imo....or that's where our eyes should be.
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 6918
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

craviduce wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:17 pm
2ninr wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:10 pm
Carp4Cy wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:58 pm
2ninr wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:49 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:30 pm
Hoosier59 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:23 pm
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:21 pm
No-Mo-Mo wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:19 pm This is all they can get for Contreras? Lolol
What did you think they were going to get for him lol
Mo could have gotten more than this!
Mo would have kept him got nothing for him and the cardinals would have still missed the playoffs the next two years with him then he would have left with nothing to show in return
^^^^^^^.
Thanks Oz. This really is the truth.
That’s always the excuse for salary dumps. We could have competed in 2027 if Bill was willing to try.
As it is we are getting back long shots and non needle moving role players. Filler and the dreaded innings eaters.
I understand. I really do. People want to win. But this roster that was put together is incapable of it with the amount of money they would need to spend to make it competitive vs the amount of money they actually have to spend plus the big contracts they already had. They are rebuilding. Hopefully it is a short one.
I think the "GO Point" will be when the Rotation becomes strong. We're gathering assets by the bunches right now. And AAA is looking mighty juicy with pitching talent in 2026. Springfield, too, will have the Likes of Doyle and maybe Clarke.

Let's assume for the sake of this exercise we're keeping Libby and McGreevy as future cogs in the rotation....we would need 3 of the following to make it to the BIGs and succeed enough to cement a place in the rotation : Henderson, Mathews, Doyle, Mautz, Clarke, Franklin....3 of the 6. And still having the "next men up" in Memphis.

From there, you can starting trading your piled up assets in Springfield/Peoria for offensive MLB gems for your lineup. I love the potential Wetherholt, but he's not going to be able to do it on his own.

All eyes are on the Pitching prospects, imo....or that's where our eyes should be.
+1 a lot of people can’t comprehend the strategy but the strategy is a good one.
scoutyjones2
Forum User
Posts: 8803
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by scoutyjones2 »

Whatashame wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:14 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:59 pm
Whatashame wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:46 pm
BleedingBleu wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:36 pm
Melville wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:08 pm
Web7 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 19:00 pm I mean we already didn’t have any RH bats and now we lose our best one? Lol
This is about moving Herrera to 1B.
Probably more Burleson to first

Maybe not. I think Herrera is going to be given every opportunity to show his work over the winter to improve his catching defense has legs. If it doesn’t work out, then Herrera to 1B makes a lot of sense. I have never seen Herrera as an outfield option and many don’t believe that he’s a catching option. He needs a place to play. 1B is a definite option.
He's not a 1b option. Keep Ivan in the OF. The less touches the better

I don’t think he’s an outfield option either but he needs a position to play. It sounds like they are going to give him another opportunity to catch. Many don’t think he can do that either but he needs a place to play. Maybe it’s 1B, maybe he fixes his defense at catcher over the winter. Maybe he catches
40ish games and DHs the rest. I happen to see 1B as an option.
DH and LF. The less he handles the ball, the better.
BleedingBleu
Forum User
Posts: 129
Joined: 30 Nov 2025 07:19 am

Re: Contreras to Red Sox

Post by BleedingBleu »

scoutyjones2 wrote: 21 Dec 2025 20:00 pm So Bloom gets what? A (C) for this trade?

This is a nothing move
Considering Mo failed his one goal in the 2024/5 offseason; which was to trade Arenado. This is at least a C, because no one will be contributing to the Major League club for possibly 2 years
Post Reply