Dodgers' Luxury Tax
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Dodgers' Luxury Tax
$169 million.
More than the Cardinals' entire parole. $153 million.
Opti
More than the Cardinals' entire parole. $153 million.
Opti
-
Rosie's Rule
- Forum User
- Posts: 189
- Joined: 23 May 2024 22:35 pm
Re: Dodgers' Luxury Tax
How many team’s payrolls exceeded the Dodgers luxury tax?
Re: Dodgers' Luxury Tax
Well, the luxury tax exceeded the payroll of 12 teams.
Opti
Opti
Re: Dodgers' Luxury Tax
Yes, baseball is broken. The only people who refuse that fact are either fans of those few large markets or complete idiots.
-
juan good eye
- Forum User
- Posts: 222
- Joined: 08 Oct 2025 23:31 pm
Re: Dodgers' Luxury Tax
There are currently 14 teams with payrolls > $200M.
The Cards will need to be in that group once BDW starts spending again with hopes of *seriously* competing. Major changes to the next CBA notwithstanding.
https://x.com/ichiroxmariners/status/20 ... YokKMDmAvQ
The Cards will need to be in that group once BDW starts spending again with hopes of *seriously* competing. Major changes to the next CBA notwithstanding.
https://x.com/ichiroxmariners/status/20 ... YokKMDmAvQ
Re: Dodgers' Luxury Tax
They pay the tax because of all the star power on the team. The interesting question is how much revenue would they lose without the star power. Sure it’s a huge market but I think the revenue loss would be significant.
Re: Dodgers' Luxury Tax
The difference is not star power, it is population base. The Dodgers make more in local TV money than the Card's do from all sources. The team had a bad year and the "Cardinal Fans" stopped going to the games. The best fans in baseball deserted their team. At least 20 of the MLB teams can not spend like the Dodgers. What the players need to realize is that if they allow a payroll cap and floor, they will still get their money. It just won't be in NY or LA.
They may get their 25 million a year in KC or Minnesota, but they will still get it and the competition created by balanced salaries will lead to more teams competing and that means more TV money and packed stadiums which will generate even more money for salaries.
They may get their 25 million a year in KC or Minnesota, but they will still get it and the competition created by balanced salaries will lead to more teams competing and that means more TV money and packed stadiums which will generate even more money for salaries.
Re: Dodgers' Luxury Tax
You’re right about Tv. But think beyond that. What is the most popular baseball cap in Japan? Dodgers or Cardinals?bretto12 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 08:39 am The difference is not star power, it is population base. The Dodgers make more in local TV money than the Card's do from all sources. The team had a bad year and the "Cardinal Fans" stopped going to the games. The best fans in baseball deserted their team. At least 20 of the MLB teams can not spend like the Dodgers. What the players need to realize is that if they allow a payroll cap and floor, they will still get their money. It just won't be in NY or LA.
They may get their 25 million a year in KC or Minnesota, but they will still get it and the competition created by balanced salaries will lead to more teams competing and that means more TV money and packed stadiums which will generate even more money for salaries.
-
Alex Reyes Cy Young
- Forum User
- Posts: 3374
- Joined: 25 May 2024 06:20 am
Re: Dodgers' Luxury Tax
-
Ike Hammett
- Forum User
- Posts: 680
- Joined: 24 Dec 2022 11:20 am
Re: Dodgers' Luxury Tax
No, it's the opposite! Dodgers fans showed up 4 million strong, root like crazy ( in a fun and happy way) people love their players and management, love baseball and pay big bucks to see it.
The system isn't really that broken, you "best fans in baseball" are. Yeah, Cards could definitely use a TV deal like that.
-
makesnosense
- Forum User
- Posts: 267
- Joined: 25 May 2024 06:39 am
Re: Dodgers' Luxury Tax
The difference is most certainly star power. The Dodgers and other big market teams offer so much more than salary and a chance to win. I'm not trying to start an argument or defend the current salary gap. But Minnesota and KC will have to offer more salary than La or NY because of less of an opportunity for outside income.bretto12 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 08:39 am The difference is not star power, it is population base. The Dodgers make more in local TV money than the Card's do from all sources. The team had a bad year and the "Cardinal Fans" stopped going to the games. The best fans in baseball deserted their team. At least 20 of the MLB teams can not spend like the Dodgers. What the players need to realize is that if they allow a payroll cap and floor, they will still get their money. It just won't be in NY or LA.
They may get their 25 million a year in KC or Minnesota, but they will still get it and the competition created by balanced salaries will lead to more teams competing and that means more TV money and packed stadiums which will generate even more money for salaries.
Re: Dodgers' Luxury Tax
They got a smart player thinking about financial future and agreed to defer. Then they have a smart front office to structure the deal within the rules.Alex Reyes Cy Young wrote: ↑20 Dec 2025 10:12 amThey got a steal on Ohtani.
I’m not a Dodger fan and I’m 100% behind a salary cap and floor. But Dodger management has run circles around the rest of the league.
