Yep, I'm usually pretty off on my outlooks. As you and others are so obsessed about pointing out. At least I made a very good call on Burleson's hitting potential as long time. How about giving me a little credit for that one? LOL I still can't quite figure out why a legendary CT poster like you is so concerned about what a peon like me posts. I think I have an idea. But I don't want to give myself too much credit. LOLcraviduce wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 14:02 pmyou didn't say that in your OP about a Bidding War...JohnnyMo is correct, you over sensationalize all the time. You made the "Sosa/Soto" comp with a Masyn Winn trade a few months ago....remember that? So your back-tracking claim now is null/pure B.S.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:55 pmObviously, Donovan won't bring the Soto haul. I was referring to a comparable bidding war scenario. I'm sorry I didn't make that more clear.craviduce wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:51 pmnot a good start....it's "A" start, but not a "good" one. Other teams have better starts.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:47 pmSo you think the “high stakes bidding” will drive the price of Donovan up 357% from the speculative offer you mentioned? Good luck with that.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:38 pmAs I posted, "a pretty good start". Let the high stakes bidding continue. By the way, I'll take Lagrange (10M) over Gore (29.6M) for the future. It would be hard to turn down if the Yankees add another high level prospect to the offer.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 12:04 pmPer BTV:Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 11:52 amThat's my point on Donovan being that current hot player. If the Yankees are, indeed, offering Dominguez and LaGrange. That's a pretty good start to what the Nationals got for Soto.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 11:40 am Obviously the Soto comp is typical Shady being way over the top, but it is true that almost every offseason teams end up in a bidding war over one player that looked like a mid-tier value target until everyone that wanted him starts overbidding. It kind of seems Donovan is that player this year. Should bode well for the Cardinals.
CJ Abrams ($47.1M)
Robert Hassell ($38.7M)
Mackenzie Gore ($29.6M)
James Wood ($25.6M)
Jarlin Susana ($2.5M)
Luke Voit (-$0.5M)
Total: $143M
Vs.
Dominguez ($21.3M)
Lagrange ($10M)
Total: $31.3M
Yep, very similar hauls . . . Only $111.7M to go!![]()
And we're not even 15% sure this is reliable info....it's 2 fans doing a podcast. They have no insight into the everyday workings of the Front Office of the Yankees. Even beat writers don't have that much sway...but you'd trust the beat writers over the PodCasters in need of Clicks and Listens.
The ball is in Bloom's court
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: The ball is in Bloom's court
Re: The ball is in Bloom's court
Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 14:57 pm"you didn't say that in your OP about a Bidding War". Man, you fall all over yourself to try to slight me. What you claim is not at all what I posted. I still can't quite figure out why a legendary CT poster like you is so concerned about what a peon like me posts. I think I have an idea. But I don't want to give myself too much credit. LOLcraviduce wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 14:02 pmyou didn't say that in your OP about a Bidding War...JohnnyMo is correct, you over sensationalize all the time. You made the "Sosa/Soto" comp with a Masyn Winn trade a few months ago....remember that? So your back-tracking claim now is null/pure B.S.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:55 pmObviously, Donovan won't bring the Soto haul. I was referring to a comparable bidding war scenario. I'm sorry I didn't make that more clear.craviduce wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:51 pmnot a good start....it's "A" start, but not a "good" one. Other teams have better starts.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:47 pmSo you think the “high stakes bidding” will drive the price of Donovan up 357% from the speculative offer you mentioned? Good luck with that.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:38 pmAs I posted, "a pretty good start". Let the high stakes bidding continue. By the way, I'll take Lagrange (10M) over Gore (29.6M) for the future. It would be hard to turn down if the Yankees add another high level prospect to the offer.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 12:04 pmPer BTV:Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 11:52 amThat's my point on Donovan being that current hot player. If the Yankees are, indeed, offering Dominguez and LaGrange. That's a pretty good start to what the Nationals got for Soto.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 11:40 am Obviously the Soto comp is typical Shady being way over the top, but it is true that almost every offseason teams end up in a bidding war over one player that looked like a mid-tier value target until everyone that wanted him starts overbidding. It kind of seems Donovan is that player this year. Should bode well for the Cardinals.
CJ Abrams ($47.1M)
Robert Hassell ($38.7M)
Mackenzie Gore ($29.6M)
James Wood ($25.6M)
Jarlin Susana ($2.5M)
Luke Voit (-$0.5M)
Total: $143M
Vs.
Dominguez ($21.3M)
Lagrange ($10M)
Total: $31.3M
Yep, very similar hauls . . . Only $111.7M to go!![]()
And we're not even 15% sure this is reliable info....it's 2 fans doing a podcast. They have no insight into the everyday workings of the Front Office of the Yankees. Even beat writers don't have that much sway...but you'd trust the beat writers over the PodCasters in need of Clicks and Listens.
-
BrockFloodMaris
- Forum User
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: 06 Aug 2019 16:06 pm
Re: The ball is in Bloom's court
I'm not one of your fans. Shady, but I agree with you on Craviduce. As a great CT poster, he lowers himself when he doesn't have to.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 14:57 pmYep, I'm usually pretty off on my outlooks. As you and others are so obsessed about pointing out. At least I made a very good call on Burleson's hitting potential as long time. How about giving me a little credit for that one? LOL I still can't quite figure out why a legendary CT poster like you is so concerned about what a peon like me posts. I think I have an idea. But I don't want to give myself too much credit. LOLcraviduce wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 14:02 pmyou didn't say that in your OP about a Bidding War...JohnnyMo is correct, you over sensationalize all the time. You made the "Sosa/Soto" comp with a Masyn Winn trade a few months ago....remember that? So your back-tracking claim now is null/pure B.S.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:55 pmObviously, Donovan won't bring the Soto haul. I was referring to a comparable bidding war scenario. I'm sorry I didn't make that more clear.craviduce wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:51 pmnot a good start....it's "A" start, but not a "good" one. Other teams have better starts.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:47 pmSo you think the “high stakes bidding” will drive the price of Donovan up 357% from the speculative offer you mentioned? Good luck with that.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:38 pmAs I posted, "a pretty good start". Let the high stakes bidding continue. By the way, I'll take Lagrange (10M) over Gore (29.6M) for the future. It would be hard to turn down if the Yankees add another high level prospect to the offer.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 12:04 pmPer BTV:Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 11:52 amThat's my point on Donovan being that current hot player. If the Yankees are, indeed, offering Dominguez and LaGrange. That's a pretty good start to what the Nationals got for Soto.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 11:40 am Obviously the Soto comp is typical Shady being way over the top, but it is true that almost every offseason teams end up in a bidding war over one player that looked like a mid-tier value target until everyone that wanted him starts overbidding. It kind of seems Donovan is that player this year. Should bode well for the Cardinals.
CJ Abrams ($47.1M)
Robert Hassell ($38.7M)
Mackenzie Gore ($29.6M)
James Wood ($25.6M)
Jarlin Susana ($2.5M)
Luke Voit (-$0.5M)
Total: $143M
Vs.
Dominguez ($21.3M)
Lagrange ($10M)
Total: $31.3M
Yep, very similar hauls . . . Only $111.7M to go!![]()
And we're not even 15% sure this is reliable info....it's 2 fans doing a podcast. They have no insight into the everyday workings of the Front Office of the Yankees. Even beat writers don't have that much sway...but you'd trust the beat writers over the PodCasters in need of Clicks and Listens.
Re: The ball is in Bloom's court
It's mind-boggling how concerned he is with what I post. He seems to scrutinize every single word I post. It may be about how he phucked up his Burleson analysis in past. Compared to my long-time positive outlook for the eventual Silver Slugger Award winner.Cranny wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 16:42 pmI'm not one of your fans. Shady, but I agree with you on Craviduce. As a great CT poster, he lowers himself when he doesn't have to.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 14:57 pmYep, I'm usually pretty off on my outlooks. As you and others are so obsessed about pointing out. At least I made a very good call on Burleson's hitting potential as long time. How about giving me a little credit for that one? LOL I still can't quite figure out why a legendary CT poster like you is so concerned about what a peon like me posts. I think I have an idea. But I don't want to give myself too much credit. LOLcraviduce wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 14:02 pmyou didn't say that in your OP about a Bidding War...JohnnyMo is correct, you over sensationalize all the time. You made the "Sosa/Soto" comp with a Masyn Winn trade a few months ago....remember that? So your back-tracking claim now is null/pure B.S.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:55 pmObviously, Donovan won't bring the Soto haul. I was referring to a comparable bidding war scenario. I'm sorry I didn't make that more clear.craviduce wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:51 pmnot a good start....it's "A" start, but not a "good" one. Other teams have better starts.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:47 pmSo you think the “high stakes bidding” will drive the price of Donovan up 357% from the speculative offer you mentioned? Good luck with that.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:38 pmAs I posted, "a pretty good start". Let the high stakes bidding continue. By the way, I'll take Lagrange (10M) over Gore (29.6M) for the future. It would be hard to turn down if the Yankees add another high level prospect to the offer.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 12:04 pmPer BTV:Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 11:52 amThat's my point on Donovan being that current hot player. If the Yankees are, indeed, offering Dominguez and LaGrange. That's a pretty good start to what the Nationals got for Soto.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 11:40 am Obviously the Soto comp is typical Shady being way over the top, but it is true that almost every offseason teams end up in a bidding war over one player that looked like a mid-tier value target until everyone that wanted him starts overbidding. It kind of seems Donovan is that player this year. Should bode well for the Cardinals.
CJ Abrams ($47.1M)
Robert Hassell ($38.7M)
Mackenzie Gore ($29.6M)
James Wood ($25.6M)
Jarlin Susana ($2.5M)
Luke Voit (-$0.5M)
Total: $143M
Vs.
Dominguez ($21.3M)
Lagrange ($10M)
Total: $31.3M
Yep, very similar hauls . . . Only $111.7M to go!![]()
And we're not even 15% sure this is reliable info....it's 2 fans doing a podcast. They have no insight into the everyday workings of the Front Office of the Yankees. Even beat writers don't have that much sway...but you'd trust the beat writers over the PodCasters in need of Clicks and Listens.
Re: The ball is in Bloom's court
Or could it be that Craviduce, like many others, get tired of seeing you post the same garbage everyday? You have been asked many times over not to do so. Don't turn this into a poor ol Shady post, acting why you don't know why you get so much flak! Poor Shady!Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 17:06 pmIt's mind-boggling how concerned he is with what I post. He seems to scrutinize every single word I post. It may be about how he phucked up his Burleson analysis in past. Compared to my long-time positive outlook for the eventual Silver Slugger Award winner.Cranny wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 16:42 pmI'm not one of your fans. Shady, but I agree with you on Craviduce. As a great CT poster, he lowers himself when he doesn't have to.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 14:57 pmYep, I'm usually pretty off on my outlooks. As you and others are so obsessed about pointing out. At least I made a very good call on Burleson's hitting potential as long time. How about giving me a little credit for that one? LOL I still can't quite figure out why a legendary CT poster like you is so concerned about what a peon like me posts. I think I have an idea. But I don't want to give myself too much credit. LOLcraviduce wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 14:02 pmyou didn't say that in your OP about a Bidding War...JohnnyMo is correct, you over sensationalize all the time. You made the "Sosa/Soto" comp with a Masyn Winn trade a few months ago....remember that? So your back-tracking claim now is null/pure B.S.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:55 pmObviously, Donovan won't bring the Soto haul. I was referring to a comparable bidding war scenario. I'm sorry I didn't make that more clear.craviduce wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:51 pmnot a good start....it's "A" start, but not a "good" one. Other teams have better starts.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:47 pmSo you think the “high stakes bidding” will drive the price of Donovan up 357% from the speculative offer you mentioned? Good luck with that.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:38 pmAs I posted, "a pretty good start". Let the high stakes bidding continue. By the way, I'll take Lagrange (10M) over Gore (29.6M) for the future. It would be hard to turn down if the Yankees add another high level prospect to the offer.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 12:04 pmPer BTV:Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 11:52 amThat's my point on Donovan being that current hot player. If the Yankees are, indeed, offering Dominguez and LaGrange. That's a pretty good start to what the Nationals got for Soto.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 11:40 am Obviously the Soto comp is typical Shady being way over the top, but it is true that almost every offseason teams end up in a bidding war over one player that looked like a mid-tier value target until everyone that wanted him starts overbidding. It kind of seems Donovan is that player this year. Should bode well for the Cardinals.
CJ Abrams ($47.1M)
Robert Hassell ($38.7M)
Mackenzie Gore ($29.6M)
James Wood ($25.6M)
Jarlin Susana ($2.5M)
Luke Voit (-$0.5M)
Total: $143M
Vs.
Dominguez ($21.3M)
Lagrange ($10M)
Total: $31.3M
Yep, very similar hauls . . . Only $111.7M to go!![]()
And we're not even 15% sure this is reliable info....it's 2 fans doing a podcast. They have no insight into the everyday workings of the Front Office of the Yankees. Even beat writers don't have that much sway...but you'd trust the beat writers over the PodCasters in need of Clicks and Listens.
Re: The ball is in Bloom's court
Seems TraveledLessRoad is using MSN as a CT resource, too, Chippy. And craviduce is a good CT contributor. He just happens to be an obsessed, paranoid jerk regarding me.zuck698 wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 19:02 pmOr could it be that Craviduce, like many others, get tired of seeing you post the same garbage everyday? You have been asked many times over not to do so. Don't turn this into a poor ol Shady post, acting why you don't know why you get so much flak! Poor Shady!Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 17:06 pmIt's mind-boggling how concerned he is with what I post. He seems to scrutinize every single word I post. It may be about how he phucked up his Burleson analysis in past. Compared to my long-time positive outlook for the eventual Silver Slugger Award winner.Cranny wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 16:42 pmI'm not one of your fans. Shady, but I agree with you on Craviduce. As a great CT poster, he lowers himself when he doesn't have to.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 14:57 pmYep, I'm usually pretty off on my outlooks. As you and others are so obsessed about pointing out. At least I made a very good call on Burleson's hitting potential as long time. How about giving me a little credit for that one? LOL I still can't quite figure out why a legendary CT poster like you is so concerned about what a peon like me posts. I think I have an idea. But I don't want to give myself too much credit. LOLcraviduce wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 14:02 pmyou didn't say that in your OP about a Bidding War...JohnnyMo is correct, you over sensationalize all the time. You made the "Sosa/Soto" comp with a Masyn Winn trade a few months ago....remember that? So your back-tracking claim now is null/pure B.S.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:55 pmObviously, Donovan won't bring the Soto haul. I was referring to a comparable bidding war scenario. I'm sorry I didn't make that more clear.craviduce wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:51 pmnot a good start....it's "A" start, but not a "good" one. Other teams have better starts.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:47 pmSo you think the “high stakes bidding” will drive the price of Donovan up 357% from the speculative offer you mentioned? Good luck with that.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:38 pmAs I posted, "a pretty good start". Let the high stakes bidding continue. By the way, I'll take Lagrange (10M) over Gore (29.6M) for the future. It would be hard to turn down if the Yankees add another high level prospect to the offer.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 12:04 pmPer BTV:Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 11:52 amThat's my point on Donovan being that current hot player. If the Yankees are, indeed, offering Dominguez and LaGrange. That's a pretty good start to what the Nationals got for Soto.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 11:40 am Obviously the Soto comp is typical Shady being way over the top, but it is true that almost every offseason teams end up in a bidding war over one player that looked like a mid-tier value target until everyone that wanted him starts overbidding. It kind of seems Donovan is that player this year. Should bode well for the Cardinals.
CJ Abrams ($47.1M)
Robert Hassell ($38.7M)
Mackenzie Gore ($29.6M)
James Wood ($25.6M)
Jarlin Susana ($2.5M)
Luke Voit (-$0.5M)
Total: $143M
Vs.
Dominguez ($21.3M)
Lagrange ($10M)
Total: $31.3M
Yep, very similar hauls . . . Only $111.7M to go!![]()
And we're not even 15% sure this is reliable info....it's 2 fans doing a podcast. They have no insight into the everyday workings of the Front Office of the Yankees. Even beat writers don't have that much sway...but you'd trust the beat writers over the PodCasters in need of Clicks and Listens.Craviduce brings more insight to this board with his knowledge of the minor leagues as well as major league discussions than any of your AI generated MSN (bleep) that you post! Attack yourself before attacking good posters on this site.
Re: The ball is in Bloom's court
You were the one who said Burleson was the next Joey Votto/Tony Gwynn, genius. You "phucked" up the analysis. I can't wait for Burleson to put up the same numbers as Votto and Gwynn did in their age 27 seasons. For reference Gwynn's bWAR was 8.6 and Votto's was 6.6. This will be awesome!Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 17:06 pmIt's mind-boggling how concerned he is with what I post. He seems to scrutinize every single word I post. It may be about how he phucked up his Burleson analysis in past. Compared to my long-time positive outlook for the eventual Silver Slugger Award winner.Cranny wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 16:42 pmI'm not one of your fans. Shady, but I agree with you on Craviduce. As a great CT poster, he lowers himself when he doesn't have to.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 14:57 pmYep, I'm usually pretty off on my outlooks. As you and others are so obsessed about pointing out. At least I made a very good call on Burleson's hitting potential as long time. How about giving me a little credit for that one? LOL I still can't quite figure out why a legendary CT poster like you is so concerned about what a peon like me posts. I think I have an idea. But I don't want to give myself too much credit. LOLcraviduce wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 14:02 pmyou didn't say that in your OP about a Bidding War...JohnnyMo is correct, you over sensationalize all the time. You made the "Sosa/Soto" comp with a Masyn Winn trade a few months ago....remember that? So your back-tracking claim now is null/pure B.S.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:55 pmObviously, Donovan won't bring the Soto haul. I was referring to a comparable bidding war scenario. I'm sorry I didn't make that more clear.craviduce wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:51 pmnot a good start....it's "A" start, but not a "good" one. Other teams have better starts.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:47 pmSo you think the “high stakes bidding” will drive the price of Donovan up 357% from the speculative offer you mentioned? Good luck with that.Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 13:38 pmAs I posted, "a pretty good start". Let the high stakes bidding continue. By the way, I'll take Lagrange (10M) over Gore (29.6M) for the future. It would be hard to turn down if the Yankees add another high level prospect to the offer.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 12:04 pmPer BTV:Shady wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 11:52 amThat's my point on Donovan being that current hot player. If the Yankees are, indeed, offering Dominguez and LaGrange. That's a pretty good start to what the Nationals got for Soto.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 11:40 am Obviously the Soto comp is typical Shady being way over the top, but it is true that almost every offseason teams end up in a bidding war over one player that looked like a mid-tier value target until everyone that wanted him starts overbidding. It kind of seems Donovan is that player this year. Should bode well for the Cardinals.
CJ Abrams ($47.1M)
Robert Hassell ($38.7M)
Mackenzie Gore ($29.6M)
James Wood ($25.6M)
Jarlin Susana ($2.5M)
Luke Voit (-$0.5M)
Total: $143M
Vs.
Dominguez ($21.3M)
Lagrange ($10M)
Total: $31.3M
Yep, very similar hauls . . . Only $111.7M to go!![]()
And we're not even 15% sure this is reliable info....it's 2 fans doing a podcast. They have no insight into the everyday workings of the Front Office of the Yankees. Even beat writers don't have that much sway...but you'd trust the beat writers over the PodCasters in need of Clicks and Listens.
Re: The ball is in Bloom's court
Don't hold your breath. Shady isn't known for his honesty. If he drudges up something it will be MSN clickbait trash linking to a Fansided entry linking to a Patrick McAvoy AI-generated SI link.
Re: The ball is in Bloom's court
Mort Gage wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 20:24 pmDon't hold your breath. Shady isn't known for his honesty. If he drudges up something it will be MSN clickbait trash linking to a Fansided entry linking to a Patrick McAvoy AI-generated SI link.
Yes, breaking news from MSM, Shady is indeed a "Utility" poster! I wonder if the guy has ever had an original thought? Seems the only thoughts he can come up is stolen from some other location.
-
Francis Park Thug
- Forum User
- Posts: 488
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:54 pm
Re: The ball is in Bloom's court
Pretty "creative" IMO.
-
BrockFloodMaris
- Forum User
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: 06 Aug 2019 16:06 pm
Re: The ball is in Bloom's court
Yeah, I figured as much. What could possibly be suspect from a credible source like that?Mort Gage wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025 20:24 pmDon't hold your breath. Shady isn't known for his honesty. If he drudges up something it will be MSN clickbait trash linking to a Fansided entry linking to a Patrick McAvoy AI-generated SI link.
Re: The ball is in Bloom's court
Though I'm anxious to learn the outcome of the Donovan saga. I like that Bloom is taking some time to let the best return come to him.