Understood, you made a more coherent argument than the OP. I just don’t think they want to pay prevailing market prices for a couple of premium seasons from a current #1/#2-type in 2026-2027 when this process is likely to take more than a year or two. By the time they’re “in the window,” that current #1/#2 will likely be on the less attractive back-end of his contract (and career).TraveledLessRoad wrote: ↑28 Nov 2025 14:49 pmI understand your point. I was more thinking, it wouldn't have been that outlandish (though very improbable) to sign someone like Cease to a long-term contract even amidst the rebuild. You get a young ace to anchor the rotation, try and help keep the team at least competitive, and bring the youngen's along.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑28 Nov 2025 13:41 pmHe's not talking about a "rebuild" or "competitive windows," he's talking about 2026--he said they need to add a "#2 type FA starting pitcher" specifically for the purpose of being competitive "next season", because of "hint hint, attendance."TraveledLessRoad wrote: ↑28 Nov 2025 12:55 pmIt's actually not as crazy or contradictive as many are making it out to be. There is a world where they could sign or trade for a #1/#2 if that pitcher is under contract for 4+ years. Through the rebuild and into our competitive window. Sonny Gray was not that, as his contract was all but up after this year.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑28 Nov 2025 10:12 amSo you’re saying they’re “dumping salary” by trading away a “quality #2 type starting pitcher” (and kicking in $20mm) for prospects so that they can turn around and “spend the money” in free agency to acquire . . . a “quality #2 type starting pitcher” to compete in 2026? Brilliant.Shady wrote: ↑28 Nov 2025 09:16 amDumping salary to spend the money elsewhere. While adding some younger players.Bushiro wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025 21:44 pmNo kidding...so why will he shell out cash when he is dumping it...unbelievableShady wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025 18:05 pm"They just traded away a legit “quality #2 type starting pitcher” (plus $20mm) for prospects. What does that tell you?" That they are dumping salary, Stooge.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025 16:42 pmThey just traded away a legit “quality #2 type starting pitcher” (plus $20mm) for prospects. What does that tell you?Shady wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025 16:18 pmYou are probably right. That's why DeWitt needs to shell out some cash for a quality FA starting pitcher to help make this team more competitive next season. And get more fans back in the stadium.Adam2 wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025 16:11 pmI don't think anybody we have on the trade block can bring that returnShady wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025 14:36 pm And DeWitt really needs to OK the money to sign that pitcher. Or maybe Bloom can get one in a trade. Probably, trading Donovan is the only possibility that route. Maybe a Contreras trade could. With Liberatore, McGreevy and Fitts, the Cardinals now have three pretty good #3 type starting pitchers.But that's not going to move the needle much from last season. If this scenario plays out, the Cardinals might surprise some people next season.
For the umpteenth time: They. Aren’t. Focused. On. Being. Competitive. Next. Season.
And if you trade for a (presumably young) "#1/#2 pitcher" that is "under contract for 4+ years," you will have to raid the same farm system that you're trying to build up for the next "competitive window." Or take on the longer-term FA market contract of a 30+ year old veteran "#1/#2," which would be a terrible fit for any team in the early stages of a credible rebuild.
Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
Last edited by NYCardsFan on 28 Nov 2025 15:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
I agree. This is a timely OP topic. But the goon squad, as usual, turn the thread into a personal vendetta. Trying to nitpick every word I post. Strange behavior for such a distinguished group.hornetfb52 wrote: ↑28 Nov 2025 14:57 pm The constant b****ing back and forth between certain posters makes this f***ing website borderline unbearable. And don’t pull the “it’s a message board, people are allowed to have differing opinions”. Thats not what this is. People on here just go at each other just because. This place used to be full of good info and good sports talk, but has really gone down the crapper.
Go ahead, start b****ing at me now, flame away.
And this is not just this thread. It’s been this way for a long [ash] time.
-
RamFan08NY
- Forum User
- Posts: 973
- Joined: 24 May 2024 12:48 pm
Re: Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
You pretty much get what you pay for with pitchers. Your reference to a #2 is kind of a gray area. A #2 on the Cardinals for a "bargain price", would probably be a 4-5 on most other teams. Just by labeling a guy a 2, doesn't make him good.Shady wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025 14:36 pm And DeWitt really needs to OK the money to sign that pitcher. Or maybe Bloom can get one in a trade. Probably, trading Donovan is the only possibility that route. Maybe a Contreras trade could. With Liberatore, McGreevy and Fitts, the Cardinals now have three pretty good #3 type starting pitchers.But that's not going to move the needle much from last season. If this scenario plays out, the Cardinals might surprise some people next season.
Just look around the league at what quality pitchers are being paid and how they are coveted. Teams aren't giving them away and quality free agent pitchers aren't giving the bargain discounts, especially to a bad baseball team.
You want a pitcher at a cheap price to label #2? Meet Miles Mikolas. Thats what you get.
Re: Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
Good pointshornetfb52 wrote: ↑28 Nov 2025 14:57 pm The constant b****ing back and forth between certain posters makes this f***ing website borderline unbearable. And don’t pull the “it’s a message board, people are allowed to have differing opinions”. Thats not what this is. People on here just go at each other just because. This place used to be full of good info and good sports talk, but has really gone down the crapper.
Go ahead, start b****ing at me now, flame away.
And this is not just this thread. It’s been this way for a long [ash] time.
-
TraveledLessRoad
- Forum User
- Posts: 335
- Joined: 10 Jul 2024 14:36 pm
Re: Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
It's a fair point. Only reason to pull the trigger on doing this now as opposed to when we are actually in our window, would be an attempt to drum up some excitement with the fan base.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑28 Nov 2025 15:01 pmUnderstood, you made a more coherent argument than the OP. I just don’t think they want to pay prevailing market prices for a couple of premium seasons from a current #1/#2-type in 2026-2027 when this process is likely to take more than a year or two. By the time they’re “in the window,” that current #1/#2 will likely be on the less attractive back-end of his contract (and career).TraveledLessRoad wrote: ↑28 Nov 2025 14:49 pmI understand your point. I was more thinking, it wouldn't have been that outlandish (though very improbable) to sign someone like Cease to a long-term contract even amidst the rebuild. You get a young ace to anchor the rotation, try and help keep the team at least competitive, and bring the youngen's along.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑28 Nov 2025 13:41 pmHe's not talking about a "rebuild" or "competitive windows," he's talking about 2026--he said they need to add a "#2 type FA starting pitcher" specifically for the purpose of being competitive "next season", because of "hint hint, attendance."TraveledLessRoad wrote: ↑28 Nov 2025 12:55 pmIt's actually not as crazy or contradictive as many are making it out to be. There is a world where they could sign or trade for a #1/#2 if that pitcher is under contract for 4+ years. Through the rebuild and into our competitive window. Sonny Gray was not that, as his contract was all but up after this year.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑28 Nov 2025 10:12 amSo you’re saying they’re “dumping salary” by trading away a “quality #2 type starting pitcher” (and kicking in $20mm) for prospects so that they can turn around and “spend the money” in free agency to acquire . . . a “quality #2 type starting pitcher” to compete in 2026? Brilliant.Shady wrote: ↑28 Nov 2025 09:16 amDumping salary to spend the money elsewhere. While adding some younger players.Bushiro wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025 21:44 pmNo kidding...so why will he shell out cash when he is dumping it...unbelievableShady wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025 18:05 pm"They just traded away a legit “quality #2 type starting pitcher” (plus $20mm) for prospects. What does that tell you?" That they are dumping salary, Stooge.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025 16:42 pmThey just traded away a legit “quality #2 type starting pitcher” (plus $20mm) for prospects. What does that tell you?Shady wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025 16:18 pmYou are probably right. That's why DeWitt needs to shell out some cash for a quality FA starting pitcher to help make this team more competitive next season. And get more fans back in the stadium.Adam2 wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025 16:11 pmI don't think anybody we have on the trade block can bring that returnShady wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025 14:36 pm And DeWitt really needs to OK the money to sign that pitcher. Or maybe Bloom can get one in a trade. Probably, trading Donovan is the only possibility that route. Maybe a Contreras trade could. With Liberatore, McGreevy and Fitts, the Cardinals now have three pretty good #3 type starting pitchers.But that's not going to move the needle much from last season. If this scenario plays out, the Cardinals might surprise some people next season.
For the umpteenth time: They. Aren’t. Focused. On. Being. Competitive. Next. Season.
And if you trade for a (presumably young) "#1/#2 pitcher" that is "under contract for 4+ years," you will have to raid the same farm system that you're trying to build up for the next "competitive window." Or take on the longer-term FA market contract of a 30+ year old veteran "#1/#2," which would be a terrible fit for any team in the early stages of a credible rebuild.
-
imetsatchelpaige
- Forum User
- Posts: 1425
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm
Re: Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
From the mouth of morans....
Hysterical. When you are done patting yourself on the back, go take your meds.This is a timely OP topic. But the goon squad, as usual, turn the thread into a personal vendetta.
This should help: https://schizowarriors.com/the-best-tre ... zophrenia/
-
WaltsSuccessor
- Forum User
- Posts: 324
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:50 pm
Re: Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
The only way Cease is a questionable #2 is if you’re still stuck in 1990 only looking at ERA.
Re: Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
They are rebuilding. The players they should sign are players coming off a down year(s) with the potential to bounce back so you can trade them to desperate teams at the deadline. They'll sign a couple veteran types as well. Only expect short contracts which won't include a #2 type.Shady wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025 14:36 pm And DeWitt really needs to OK the money to sign that pitcher. Or maybe Bloom can get one in a trade. Probably, trading Donovan is the only possibility that route. Maybe a Contreras trade could. With Liberatore, McGreevy and Fitts, the Cardinals now have three pretty good #3 type starting pitchers.But that's not going to move the needle much from last season. If this scenario plays out, the Cardinals might surprise some people next season.
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1385
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
29 other teams would also like to have a bargain #2. How exactly are we going to accomplish that. We'd all love to see the plans.
Re: Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
Bargain #2 starters. And the tooth fairy.
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1385
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
The best way to accomplish that is the amateur draft and international signings. Then develop and don't trade them away like we did with Alcantara and Gallen.
I put that on DeWitt. I don't think Mozeliak did that without pressure to win now or else.
Re: Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
That last paragraph is made up bull[shirt].ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑29 Nov 2025 09:19 amThe best way to accomplish that is the amateur draft and international signings. Then develop and don't trade them away like we did with Alcantara and Gallen.
I put that on DeWitt. I don't think Mozeliak did that without pressure to win now or else.
My guess is the Ozuna trade was MO’s attempt to make up for the Grichuk and Piscotty disappointments. That’s my guess.
But let’s assume your made up narrative is correct. A POBO who knows the players in his organization would tell Dewitt Sandy and Zac are off limits.
Re: Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
No way on last seasons's Mikolas being that type #2. I'm talking something more like a healthy Buehler or a May on the comeback trail. Both should be reasonably priced.RamFan08NY wrote: ↑28 Nov 2025 16:47 pmYou pretty much get what you pay for with pitchers. Your reference to a #2 is kind of a gray area. A #2 on the Cardinals for a "bargain price", would probably be a 4-5 on most other teams. Just by labeling a guy a 2, doesn't make him good.Shady wrote: ↑27 Nov 2025 14:36 pm And DeWitt really needs to OK the money to sign that pitcher. Or maybe Bloom can get one in a trade. Probably, trading Donovan is the only possibility that route. Maybe a Contreras trade could. With Liberatore, McGreevy and Fitts, the Cardinals now have three pretty good #3 type starting pitchers.But that's not going to move the needle much from last season. If this scenario plays out, the Cardinals might surprise some people next season.
Just look around the league at what quality pitchers are being paid and how they are coveted. Teams aren't giving them away and quality free agent pitchers aren't giving the bargain discounts, especially to a bad baseball team.
You want a pitcher at a cheap price to label #2? Meet Miles Mikolas. Thats what you get.
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1385
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
DeWitt's comments about the firing of Matheny revealed the truth. Winning isn't enough. Mozeliak didn't want to suffer the same fate so he traded the future for 2 seasons of playoffs.ecleme22 wrote: ↑29 Nov 2025 09:27 amThat last paragraph is made up bull[shirt].ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑29 Nov 2025 09:19 amThe best way to accomplish that is the amateur draft and international signings. Then develop and don't trade them away like we did with Alcantara and Gallen.
I put that on DeWitt. I don't think Mozeliak did that without pressure to win now or else.
My guess is the Ozuna trade was MO’s attempt to make up for the Grichuk and Piscotty disappointments. That’s my guess.
But let’s assume your made up narrative is correct. A POBO who knows the players in his organization would tell Dewitt Sandy and Zac are off limits.
It's not made up. DeWitt said it out loud with the cameras rolling.
Re: Bloom needs to find a bargain #2 type FA starting pitcher
Ozuna was traded for like 5 months before MM’s firing.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑29 Nov 2025 09:52 amDeWitt's comments about the firing of Matheny revealed the truth. Winning isn't enough. Mozeliak didn't want to suffer the same fate so he traded the future for 2 seasons of playoffs.ecleme22 wrote: ↑29 Nov 2025 09:27 amThat last paragraph is made up bull[shirt].ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑29 Nov 2025 09:19 amThe best way to accomplish that is the amateur draft and international signings. Then develop and don't trade them away like we did with Alcantara and Gallen.
I put that on DeWitt. I don't think Mozeliak did that without pressure to win now or else.
My guess is the Ozuna trade was MO’s attempt to make up for the Grichuk and Piscotty disappointments. That’s my guess.
But let’s assume your made up narrative is correct. A POBO who knows the players in his organization would tell Dewitt Sandy and Zac are off limits.
It's not made up. DeWitt said it out loud with the cameras rolling.
Also, Dewitt said, paraphrase, “being a few games over .500 isn’t enough.”