But your “source” article doesn’t support your thread title, topic, or premise. 82birds was asking you to support your claim that “it appears that Bregman won’t be returning to the Red Sox.” It now seems clear that you had/have no basis or support for that claim.Shady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:12 pmI just accommodated a request. Cool your jets.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:10 pmThis linked MSN article refers to a reporter in The Athletic speculating that the Tigers should make a run at Bregman if they decide to keep Skubal. And that is your basis for saying “it appears Bregman won’t be returning to the Red Sox”?Shady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 17:58 pmhttps://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nhl/al ... c61e&ei=12
Please stop.
It appears Bregman won't be returning to the Red Sox
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1524
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: It appears Bregman won't be returning to the Red Sox
Last edited by NYCardsFan on 25 Nov 2025 18:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: It appears Bregman won't be returning to the Red Sox
Gotcha' Guru. You never ever are off the mark on baseball projections. Wrong.craviduce wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:11 pmit's not me being right, Marshall. It's everyone else's assessment as well.Shady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:10 pmOh really? You aren't right about everything. Ex. The Silver Slugger.craviduce wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:02 pmThat's on you...you refuse to accept reality....compare the two players. It's rather simple, even for you.Shady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:01 pmI;m not so sureabout that. It depends on how badly a team needs a fairlt dependable 3B. And how much of Arenado's salary the Cardinals would send.craviduce wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 17:48 pmyou've been told over and over again that the Cards aren't getting a Top Prospect for Arenado. CT has told you, Pundits have told you.Shady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 17:19 pmThe Cardinals might have to eat some salary in order to get Garcia. Maybe some for Arenado this upcoming season. The following season he's fairly reasonably priced.
No amount of eaten contract will pry the #85 overall prospect from the Red Sox.
Once again, they'll likely get an expiring contract so the other team can offset their cost. And maybe a DSL/FCL/Low A lottery ticket that hits .680 OPS, K's a lot, but hits HR's when he makes contact.
![]()
Re: It appears Bregman won't be returning to the Red Sox
I always have trouble determining if he's willfully obtuse or naturally obtuse? Maybe there's a mixture there?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:13 pmBut your “source” article doesn’t support your thread title or topic. That’s on you.Shady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:12 pmI just accommodated a request. Cool your jets.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:10 pmThis linked MSN article refers to a Tigers reporter in The Athletic speculating that the Tigers should make a run at Bregman if they decide to keep Skubal. And that is your basis for saying “it appears Bregman won’t be returning to the Red Sox”?Shady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 17:58 pmhttps://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nhl/al ... c61e&ei=12
Please stop.
Re: It appears Bregman won't be returning to the Red Sox
His problem is he doesn't know when he is outclassed! He calls you "Guru", but he is the one who acts like he is a "Guru" because he refuses to listen to common sense or any opinion that doesn't fit his agenda. He also must not understand the difference between a contract that is a good value, vs. one that is completely underwater. I said in another thread, we need a Shady Face Palm emoji on this site.craviduce wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:18 pmI always have trouble determining if he's willfully obtuse or naturally obtuse? Maybe there's a mixture there?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:13 pmBut your “source” article doesn’t support your thread title or topic. That’s on you.Shady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:12 pmI just accommodated a request. Cool your jets.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:10 pmThis linked MSN article refers to a Tigers reporter in The Athletic speculating that the Tigers should make a run at Bregman if they decide to keep Skubal. And that is your basis for saying “it appears Bregman won’t be returning to the Red Sox”?Shady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 17:58 pmhttps://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nhl/al ... c61e&ei=12
Please stop.
Last edited by zuck698 on 25 Nov 2025 18:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: It appears Bregman won't be returning to the Red Sox
YES, Pleasezuck698 wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:22 pmHis problem is he doesn't know when he is outclassed! He calls you "Guru", but he is the one who acts like he is a "Guru" because he refuses to listen to common sense. He also must not understand the difference between a contract that is a good value, vs. one that is completely underwater. I said in another thread, we need a Shady Face Palm emoji on this site.craviduce wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:18 pmI always have trouble determining if he's willfully obtuse or naturally obtuse? Maybe there's a mixture there?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:13 pmBut your “source” article doesn’t support your thread title or topic. That’s on you.Shady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:12 pmI just accommodated a request. Cool your jets.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:10 pmThis linked MSN article refers to a Tigers reporter in The Athletic speculating that the Tigers should make a run at Bregman if they decide to keep Skubal. And that is your basis for saying “it appears Bregman won’t be returning to the Red Sox”?Shady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 17:58 pmhttps://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nhl/al ... c61e&ei=12
Please stop.![]()
Re: It appears Bregman won't be returning to the Red Sox
But I know a future Silver Slugger when I see one. Something that escaped many hotshots on CT. Just maybe some of those hotshots were the ones outclassed.zuck698 wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:22 pmHis problem is he doesn't know when he is outclassed! He calls you "Guru", but he is the one who acts like he is a "Guru" because he refuses to listen to common sense or any opinion that doesn't fit his agenda. He also must not understand the difference between a contract that is a good value, vs. one that is completely underwater. I said in another thread, we need a Shady Face Palm emoji on this site.craviduce wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:18 pmI always have trouble determining if he's willfully obtuse or naturally obtuse? Maybe there's a mixture there?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:13 pmBut your “source” article doesn’t support your thread title or topic. That’s on you.Shady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:12 pmI just accommodated a request. Cool your jets.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:10 pmThis linked MSN article refers to a Tigers reporter in The Athletic speculating that the Tigers should make a run at Bregman if they decide to keep Skubal. And that is your basis for saying “it appears Bregman won’t be returning to the Red Sox”?Shady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 17:58 pmhttps://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nhl/al ... c61e&ei=12
Please stop.![]()
Last edited by Shady on 25 Nov 2025 18:34 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: It appears Bregman won't be returning to the Red Sox
it wouldn't at all surprise me if Bregman DOES re-sign with Boston.
who knows?
who knows?
Re: It appears Bregman won't be returning to the Red Sox
He has no idea
Re: It appears Bregman won't be returning to the Red Sox
Stop linking MSN. Do you know what their specialty is? Hint, not sportsShady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 17:58 pmhttps://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nhl/al ... c61e&ei=12
Re: It appears Bregman won't be returning to the Red Sox
Utility Silver Slugger. Fixed it for you.Shady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:26 pmBut I know a future Silver Slugger when I see one. Something that escaped many hotshots on CT. Just maybe some of those hotshots were outclassed.zuck698 wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:22 pmHis problem is he doesn't know when he is outclassed! He calls you "Guru", but he is the one who acts like he is a "Guru" because he refuses to listen to common sense or any opinion that doesn't fit his agenda. He also must not understand the difference between a contract that is a good value, vs. one that is completely underwater. I said in another thread, we need a Shady Face Palm emoji on this site.craviduce wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:18 pmI always have trouble determining if he's willfully obtuse or naturally obtuse? Maybe there's a mixture there?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:13 pmBut your “source” article doesn’t support your thread title or topic. That’s on you.Shady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:12 pmI just accommodated a request. Cool your jets.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 18:10 pmThis linked MSN article refers to a Tigers reporter in The Athletic speculating that the Tigers should make a run at Bregman if they decide to keep Skubal. And that is your basis for saying “it appears Bregman won’t be returning to the Red Sox”?Shady wrote: ↑25 Nov 2025 17:58 pmhttps://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nhl/al ... c61e&ei=12
Please stop.![]()
-
BrockFloodMaris
- Forum User
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: 06 Aug 2019 16:06 pm
Re: It appears Bregman won't be returning to the Red Sox
Yes, I agree. I don’t know how anyone could jump to the conclusion that AB is gone from the Bosox. Unless that conclusion makes another conclusion fit better. It’s kind of a house of cards.
Re: It appears Bregman won't be returning to the Red Sox
Are you suggesting we sign Bergman to replace Nado? That’s a move that could improve us.
Re: It appears Bregman won't be returning to the Red Sox
My money says he will be a Red Sox. But if not Arenado is a possibility. But don’t expect a big return unless he is a part of a package deal.
Re: It appears Bregman won't be returning to the Red Sox
I would say there is at least a chance that Bregman goes back to the Red Sox. But if the Red Sox would sign say Pete Alonso instead then I can see the possibility of them being interested in the cheaper Arenado for 3B. I don’t see much of a return for Arenado unless we eat some salary like the Gray deal. I don’t know much about prospects, if the Red Sox signed Alonso and traded for Arenado would anyone be interested in Casas or Mayer as the return?