GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

Post Reply
hotrivets
Forum User
Posts: 2018
Joined: 24 May 2024 07:38 am

Re: GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Post by hotrivets »

Rangers Projected Lineup:

Will Cuylle-Mika Zibanejad-Alexis Lafreniere
Artemi Panarin-Jusso Parssinen-Johnny Brodzinski
Connor Sheary-Noah Laba-Brett Berard
Adam Edstrom-Sam Carrick-Taylor Raddysh

Vladislav Gavrikov-Adam Fox
Carson Soucy-Braden Schneider
Urho Vaakanainen-Matthew Robertson

Igor Shesterkin will start in goal; Dylan Garand will be the backup.

The Rangers have no healthy scratches. J.T. Miller (upper body), Jonathan Quick (lower body), Will Borgen (upper body) and Matt Rempe (upper body) are out. Vincent Trocheck (undisclosed) is questionable.
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 7824
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Post by DawgDad »

Is Panarin bored yet?
Pierre McGuire
Forum User
Posts: 1868
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm

Re: GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Post by Pierre McGuire »

Based on that Rangers lineup, I’m calling a straight out win tonight. No blowing a 2 goal lead late. We win this one going away tonight.
Bacchk29
Forum User
Posts: 1219
Joined: 29 Apr 2019 07:24 am

Re: GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Post by Bacchk29 »

wiscrev wrote: 24 Nov 2025 12:48 pm
Younghopp1991 wrote: 24 Nov 2025 12:30 pm
Bacchk29 wrote: 24 Nov 2025 11:48 am Maybe our leading scorer plays more than 12 min a game. We might score more than two. Another head scratcher by Monty.
Inwonder what stat line would kyrou have if he had buch ice time
1/0/-4
Didn’t take much to draw the Kyrou hater Mafia out of hiding
MiamiLaw
Forum User
Posts: 1962
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:16 pm

Re: GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Post by MiamiLaw »

stlblue06 wrote: 24 Nov 2025 10:40 am I’m trying to figure out if the 2nd or 3rd d pair is more scary looking on paper.
Instead of having 1 [shirt]ty d pairing, now we have two!
Russdv14
Forum User
Posts: 2110
Joined: 23 May 2024 20:31 pm

Re: GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Post by Russdv14 »

It appears that this game might be on the NHL network, which I don’t have being out of town or and other issues.
I’m old,l and forgetful, so will some of you techies give me some advice pregame as to how to find this broadcast

I believe the two recommended to try are “on hockey .TV”
And maybe something called sports surge

Best recommendation for tonight is appreciated so I don’t fool around too much trying to find it and getting frustrated as I listened to the Internet radio broadcast otherwise. Thanks again. I know you guys have given the information before but maybe there’s some new people signing onto I need to know how to watch the game.
theograce
Forum User
Posts: 5642
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Post by theograce »

Pierre McGuire wrote: 24 Nov 2025 11:03 am Fowler and Mailloux is what I’ve been calling for. Now just upgrade the LD2 with Byram or Matheson and then we will be good to go
Who you trading for Byram. What’s your offer
Pierre McGuire
Forum User
Posts: 1868
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm

Re: GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Post by Pierre McGuire »

theograce wrote: 24 Nov 2025 13:40 pm
Pierre McGuire wrote: 24 Nov 2025 11:03 am Fowler and Mailloux is what I’ve been calling for. Now just upgrade the LD2 with Byram or Matheson and then we will be good to go
Who you trading for Byram. What’s your offer
They are going to lose him in two years, he would like to be out of there now. If a deal presented itself, I would be willing to give up any one player in Springfield except for Stenberg. If they wanted Lindstein…done deal. I know they want NHL help so not sure we are a match for that.
I think Matheson is more likely, he’s older but he’s decent player, very active always involved with the play when he’s on the ice and the Blues have been interested in him for awhile just like they had some interest in Byram.
theograce
Forum User
Posts: 5642
Joined: 27 Apr 2024 20:56 pm

Re: GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Post by theograce »

Pierre McGuire wrote: 24 Nov 2025 14:06 pm
theograce wrote: 24 Nov 2025 13:40 pm
Pierre McGuire wrote: 24 Nov 2025 11:03 am Fowler and Mailloux is what I’ve been calling for. Now just upgrade the LD2 with Byram or Matheson and then we will be good to go
Who you trading for Byram. What’s your offer
They are going to lose him in two years, he would like to be out of there now. If a deal presented itself, I would be willing to give up any one player in Springfield except for Stenberg. If they wanted Lindstein…done deal. I know they want NHL help so not sure we are a match for that.
I think Matheson is more likely, he’s older but he’s decent player, very active always involved with the play when he’s on the ice and the Blues have been interested in him for awhile just like they had some interest in Byram.
Yeah that ain’t getting Byram as you said. It’s like saying wants out which I’m sure he does.
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 7824
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Post by DawgDad »

theograce wrote: 24 Nov 2025 14:11 pm
Pierre McGuire wrote: 24 Nov 2025 14:06 pm
theograce wrote: 24 Nov 2025 13:40 pm
Pierre McGuire wrote: 24 Nov 2025 11:03 am Fowler and Mailloux is what I’ve been calling for. Now just upgrade the LD2 with Byram or Matheson and then we will be good to go
Who you trading for Byram. What’s your offer
They are going to lose him in two years, he would like to be out of there now. If a deal presented itself, I would be willing to give up any one player in Springfield except for Stenberg. If they wanted Lindstein…done deal. I know they want NHL help so not sure we are a match for that.
I think Matheson is more likely, he’s older but he’s decent player, very active always involved with the play when he’s on the ice and the Blues have been interested in him for awhile just like they had some interest in Byram.
Yeah that ain’t getting Byram as you said. It’s like saying wants out which I’m sure he does.
I thought we wanted bigger with longer sticks. He's a younger Faulk.
smilinjoefission
Forum User
Posts: 683
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:44 pm

Re: GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Post by smilinjoefission »

Pierre McGuire wrote: 24 Nov 2025 11:06 am
callitwhatyouwant wrote: 24 Nov 2025 11:01 am Faulk has been playing really well. The top 4 has a chance to be really good. They just let Texier walk and the contract got terminated. How is there not some sideways 1 person vet signing/trade that can be made to just throw someone who isn't terrible on the 3rd line. EVEN if LM plays well with Fowler, the Faulk pairing just got significantly worse. Faulk has been playing good offense, Tucker is a weight. It only worked last year with Tucker and Suter because Suter was so responsible defensively.

This is just a problem they keep kicking the can on.
Patience…there is definitely a move coming for a dman…
BOOK IT!
Pavel Mintyukov?
TAFKAP
Forum User
Posts: 2297
Joined: 10 May 2018 17:44 pm

Re: GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Post by TAFKAP »

DawgDad wrote: 24 Nov 2025 14:30 pm
theograce wrote: 24 Nov 2025 14:11 pm
Pierre McGuire wrote: 24 Nov 2025 14:06 pm
theograce wrote: 24 Nov 2025 13:40 pm
Pierre McGuire wrote: 24 Nov 2025 11:03 am Fowler and Mailloux is what I’ve been calling for. Now just upgrade the LD2 with Byram or Matheson and then we will be good to go
Who you trading for Byram. What’s your offer
They are going to lose him in two years, he would like to be out of there now. If a deal presented itself, I would be willing to give up any one player in Springfield except for Stenberg. If they wanted Lindstein…done deal. I know they want NHL help so not sure we are a match for that.
I think Matheson is more likely, he’s older but he’s decent player, very active always involved with the play when he’s on the ice and the Blues have been interested in him for awhile just like they had some interest in Byram.
Yeah that ain’t getting Byram as you said. It’s like saying wants out which I’m sure he does.
I thought we wanted bigger with longer sticks. He's a younger Faulk.
With concussion issues, yes?
Backesdraft
Forum User
Posts: 673
Joined: 15 Mar 2019 07:23 am

Re: GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Post by Backesdraft »

hotrivets wrote: 24 Nov 2025 12:55 pm Rangers Projected Lineup:

Will Cuylle-Mika Zibanejad-Alexis Lafreniere
Artemi Panarin-Jusso Parssinen-Johnny Brodzinski
Connor Sheary-Noah Laba-Brett Berard
Adam Edstrom-Sam Carrick-Taylor Raddysh

Vladislav Gavrikov-Adam Fox
Carson Soucy-Braden Schneider
Urho Vaakanainen-Matthew Robertson

Igor Shesterkin will start in goal; Dylan Garand will be the backup.

The Rangers have no healthy scratches. J.T. Miller (upper body), Jonathan Quick (lower body), Will Borgen (upper body) and Matt Rempe (upper body) are out. Vincent Trocheck (undisclosed) is questionable.
If the Blues can’t beat this lineup then we should just burn it all to the ground.
Pierre McGuire
Forum User
Posts: 1868
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm

Re: GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Post by Pierre McGuire »

smilinjoefission wrote: 24 Nov 2025 14:42 pm
Pierre McGuire wrote: 24 Nov 2025 11:06 am
callitwhatyouwant wrote: 24 Nov 2025 11:01 am Faulk has been playing really well. The top 4 has a chance to be really good. They just let Texier walk and the contract got terminated. How is there not some sideways 1 person vet signing/trade that can be made to just throw someone who isn't terrible on the 3rd line. EVEN if LM plays well with Fowler, the Faulk pairing just got significantly worse. Faulk has been playing good offense, Tucker is a weight. It only worked last year with Tucker and Suter because Suter was so responsible defensively.

This is just a problem they keep kicking the can on.
Patience…there is definitely a move coming for a dman…
BOOK IT!
Pavel Mintyukov?
He’s available, but man he doesn’t like to actually play D.
Last edited by Pierre McGuire on 24 Nov 2025 15:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Harry S Deals
Forum User
Posts: 2358
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm

Re: GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Post by Harry S Deals »

smilinjoefission wrote: 24 Nov 2025 14:42 pm
Pierre McGuire wrote: 24 Nov 2025 11:06 am
callitwhatyouwant wrote: 24 Nov 2025 11:01 am Faulk has been playing really well. The top 4 has a chance to be really good. They just let Texier walk and the contract got terminated. How is there not some sideways 1 person vet signing/trade that can be made to just throw someone who isn't terrible on the 3rd line. EVEN if LM plays well with Fowler, the Faulk pairing just got significantly worse. Faulk has been playing good offense, Tucker is a weight. It only worked last year with Tucker and Suter because Suter was so responsible defensively.

This is just a problem they keep kicking the can on.
Patience…there is definitely a move coming for a dman…
BOOK IT!
Pavel Mintyukov?
this is an interesting suggestion, i believe he had a knee injury maybe was not fully recovered, young guy. May be worth a look if the price is right if nothing else than for the future, 10th overall pick
Pierre McGuire
Forum User
Posts: 1868
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm

Re: GDT: Blues at Rags 6:00 FanDuel

Post by Pierre McGuire »

DawgDad wrote: 24 Nov 2025 14:30 pm
theograce wrote: 24 Nov 2025 14:11 pm
Pierre McGuire wrote: 24 Nov 2025 14:06 pm
theograce wrote: 24 Nov 2025 13:40 pm
Pierre McGuire wrote: 24 Nov 2025 11:03 am Fowler and Mailloux is what I’ve been calling for. Now just upgrade the LD2 with Byram or Matheson and then we will be good to go
Who you trading for Byram. What’s your offer
They are going to lose him in two years, he would like to be out of there now. If a deal presented itself, I would be willing to give up any one player in Springfield except for Stenberg. If they wanted Lindstein…done deal. I know they want NHL help so not sure we are a match for that.
I think Matheson is more likely, he’s older but he’s decent player, very active always involved with the play when he’s on the ice and the Blues have been interested in him for awhile just like they had some interest in Byram.
Yeah that ain’t getting Byram as you said. It’s like saying wants out which I’m sure he does.
I thought we wanted bigger with longer sticks. He's a younger Faulk.
Real good player, would improve our defense immensely.
Post Reply