Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Shady
Forum User
Posts: 7149
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 15:39 pm

Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Post by Shady »

Gore is a high rotation lefty starter with two years remaining before FA. Would the Nationals even be interested?
Last edited by Shady on 04 Nov 2025 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 4356
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Post by ecleme22 »

I wouldn’t like the deal.

Bad WHIP and the exact same timeline as BD.
NYCardsFan
Forum User
Posts: 1524
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm

Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Post by NYCardsFan »

Shady wrote: 04 Nov 2025 11:37 am Gore is a high rotation lefty starter with two years remaining before FA. Would the Nationals even be interested?
Bloom has clearly told you 2026 is a transition year in a rebuild. How does acquiring a pitcher with exactly as many years of control as Donovan advance that plan?

Also, per BTV:
Gore: 39.8
Donovan: 26.1

But hey, throw in Burleson (11.1) and they'd get pretty close (37.2). Whaddya say, Shadymaple?
Shady
Forum User
Posts: 7149
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 15:39 pm

Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Post by Shady »

The Rays just cut 5 pitchers, Wonder if Bloom is familiar with any of them and might be interested in signing any of them?
Last edited by Shady on 04 Nov 2025 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Adam2
Forum User
Posts: 823
Joined: 26 Jun 2024 11:40 am

Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Post by Adam2 »

Shady wrote: 04 Nov 2025 11:37 am Gore is a high rotation lefty starter with two years remaining before FA. Would the Nationals even be interested?
washington would want more than a high end utility player for a 1,2 type starter. obviously
Shady
Forum User
Posts: 7149
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 15:39 pm

Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Post by Shady »

Adam2 wrote: 04 Nov 2025 11:58 am
Shady wrote: 04 Nov 2025 11:37 am Gore is a high rotation lefty starter with two years remaining before FA. Would the Nationals even be interested?
washington would want more than a high end utility player for a 1,2 type starter. obviously
Some executives value some players higher than their BTV. Especially, if they fill a big need that might improve the team's chances to improve. Donovan seems highly respected around the league.
Last edited by Shady on 04 Nov 2025 12:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
NYCardsFan
Forum User
Posts: 1524
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm

Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Post by NYCardsFan »

Shady wrote: 04 Nov 2025 12:02 pm
Adam2 wrote: 04 Nov 2025 11:58 am
Shady wrote: 04 Nov 2025 11:37 am Gore is a high rotation lefty starter with two years remaining before FA. Would the Nationals even be interested?
washington would want more than a high end utility player for a 1,2 type starter. obviously
Some executives value some players higher than their BTV. Especially, if they fill a big need that might improve the team's chances to improve. Donovan seems highly respected around the league.
You should stick with your original plan of trading Jordan Walker for Bubba Chandler, and Phil Maton for Trey Yesavage.
kyace
Forum User
Posts: 923
Joined: 24 May 2024 19:11 pm

Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Post by kyace »

Deal doesn’t make sense for either team’s reported timeline to compete. Though I don’t really understand what Nats are doing as they should be adding on to their current young core to compete now.
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1546
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

Once every 5 games he pitches 5 innings with an ERA around 4.

If I was running the Cardinals I would want much more than that for Donovan. Alcantara? That's more like it but I suspect Miami will want prospects.
woofy25
Forum User
Posts: 1506
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:44 pm

Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Post by woofy25 »

Adam2 wrote: 04 Nov 2025 11:58 am
Shady wrote: 04 Nov 2025 11:37 am Gore is a high rotation lefty starter with two years remaining before FA. Would the Nationals even be interested?
washington would want more than a high end utility player for a 1,2 type starter. obviously
What about Mackenzie Gore suggests he's a 1 or 2?
woofy25
Forum User
Posts: 1506
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:44 pm

Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Post by woofy25 »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 04 Nov 2025 12:36 pm Once every 5 games he pitches 5 innings with an ERA around 4.

If I was running the Cardinals I would want much more than that for Donovan. Alcantara? That's more like it but I suspect Miami will want prospects.
It seems people are highly overvaluing this guy. He seems like a 4 to me. Gives up a lot baserunners which is equating to giving up quite a few....runs. He strikes out a decent amount, but there is nothing else in his profile other than age that suggests he'd be somebody to extend. And having an extension in mind is the only reason to trade for a guy with 2 years of control. He's also lead the league in wild pitches each of the last two seasons. Unless Crash Davis is available, I'd stay away from this guy for the Cardinals biggest on the block asset.
Strummer Jones
Forum User
Posts: 1630
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:55 pm

Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Post by Strummer Jones »

NYCardsFan wrote: 04 Nov 2025 11:48 am
Shady wrote: 04 Nov 2025 11:37 am Gore is a high rotation lefty starter with two years remaining before FA. Would the Nationals even be interested?
Bloom has clearly told you 2026 is a transition year in a rebuild. How does acquiring a pitcher with exactly as many years of control as Donovan advance that plan?

Also, per BTV:
Gore: 39.8
Donovan: 26.1

But hey, throw in Burleson (11.1) and they'd get pretty close (37.2). Whaddya say, Shadymaple?
My unsolicited two cents, but I am not a fan of BTV. It's treading something that's subjective as an objective. If you take a team that's pretty well set at 2B/3B/LF...does Donovan have much value? Or what if it's a team that isn't set at those positions, but they're (like us) in a rebuild. Does two years of Donovan really move much of a needle?

It's a fun resource, I'll give it that, but I don't take it all that seriously.
JohnnyMO
Forum User
Posts: 649
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:17 pm

Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Post by JohnnyMO »

Shady wrote: 04 Nov 2025 11:37 am Gore is a high rotation lefty starter with two years remaining before FA. Would the Nationals even be interested?
Fine idea if both teams were trying to win in 2026. They aren't. To be a semi realistic idea, the trade needs needs to benefit the Cardinals beyond 2027.
Carp4Cy
Forum User
Posts: 3000
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:38 pm

Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Post by Carp4Cy »

NYCardsFan wrote: 04 Nov 2025 11:48 am
Shady wrote: 04 Nov 2025 11:37 am Gore is a high rotation lefty starter with two years remaining before FA. Would the Nationals even be interested?
Bloom has clearly told you 2026 is a transition year in a rebuild. How does acquiring a pitcher with exactly as many years of control as Donovan advance that plan?

Also, per BTV:
Gore: 39.8
Donovan: 26.1

But hey, throw in Burleson (11.1) and they'd get pretty close (37.2). Whaddya say, Shadymaple?
I’m not sure that Gore is the right target but trading Donovan for an experienced proven veteran with control years is exactly the profile we should be going for. We want someone who can be extended without having to pay nine figures on the free agent market.

And for 2026 we can absolutely afford the salary with all the dry powder off the books since 2022.
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1546
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

woofy25 wrote: 04 Nov 2025 12:45 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 04 Nov 2025 12:36 pm Once every 5 games he pitches 5 innings with an ERA around 4.

If I was running the Cardinals I would want much more than that for Donovan. Alcantara? That's more like it but I suspect Miami will want prospects.
It seems people are highly overvaluing this guy. He seems like a 4 to me. Gives up a lot baserunners which is equating to giving up quite a few....runs. He strikes out a decent amount, but there is nothing else in his profile other than age that suggests he'd be somebody to extend. And having an extension in mind is the only reason to trade for a guy with 2 years of control. He's also lead the league in wild pitches each of the last two seasons. Unless Crash Davis is available, I'd stay away from this guy for the Cardinals biggest on the block asset.
He actually sound like the kind of Guy Bloom in looking for in the draft. Good fastball. Most guys with good fastball walks are a problem. High walks = high pitch count. High pitch count = 5 inning pitcher. Unless he can figure out how to throw strikes he is a 5 inning pitcher. I'd do it if they threw in a good prospect or two but Donovan is our biggest trade chip. If Gore is the only thing we get then I'd just as soon keep Donovan.
NYCardsFan
Forum User
Posts: 1524
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm

Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?

Post by NYCardsFan »

Carp4Cy wrote: 04 Nov 2025 13:28 pm
NYCardsFan wrote: 04 Nov 2025 11:48 am
Shady wrote: 04 Nov 2025 11:37 am Gore is a high rotation lefty starter with two years remaining before FA. Would the Nationals even be interested?
Bloom has clearly told you 2026 is a transition year in a rebuild. How does acquiring a pitcher with exactly as many years of control as Donovan advance that plan?

Also, per BTV:
Gore: 39.8
Donovan: 26.1

But hey, throw in Burleson (11.1) and they'd get pretty close (37.2). Whaddya say, Shadymaple?
I’m not sure that Gore is the right target but trading Donovan for an experienced proven veteran with control years is exactly the profile we should be going for. We want someone who can be extended without having to pay nine figures on the free agent market.

And for 2026 we can absolutely afford the salary with all the dry powder off the books since 2022.
Why would you care about getting an “experienced proven veteran” in 2026-2027 when he has just two years of control left and the Cardinals are in the midst of a rebuild? And why would Gore (or anyone else) agree to sign a below-market extension when he’s just two years away from free agency? I mean, that’s precisely the reason the Cardinals would be looking to trade Donovan in the first place.
Post Reply