Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?
Gore is a high rotation lefty starter with two years remaining before FA. Would the Nationals even be interested?
Last edited by Shady on 04 Nov 2025 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?
I wouldn’t like the deal.
Bad WHIP and the exact same timeline as BD.
Bad WHIP and the exact same timeline as BD.
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1524
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?
Bloom has clearly told you 2026 is a transition year in a rebuild. How does acquiring a pitcher with exactly as many years of control as Donovan advance that plan?
Also, per BTV:
Gore: 39.8
Donovan: 26.1
But hey, throw in Burleson (11.1) and they'd get pretty close (37.2). Whaddya say, Shadymaple?
Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?
The Rays just cut 5 pitchers, Wonder if Bloom is familiar with any of them and might be interested in signing any of them?
Last edited by Shady on 04 Nov 2025 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?
Some executives value some players higher than their BTV. Especially, if they fill a big need that might improve the team's chances to improve. Donovan seems highly respected around the league.
Last edited by Shady on 04 Nov 2025 12:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1524
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?
You should stick with your original plan of trading Jordan Walker for Bubba Chandler, and Phil Maton for Trey Yesavage.
Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?
Deal doesn’t make sense for either team’s reported timeline to compete. Though I don’t really understand what Nats are doing as they should be adding on to their current young core to compete now.
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1540
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?
Once every 5 games he pitches 5 innings with an ERA around 4.
If I was running the Cardinals I would want much more than that for Donovan. Alcantara? That's more like it but I suspect Miami will want prospects.
If I was running the Cardinals I would want much more than that for Donovan. Alcantara? That's more like it but I suspect Miami will want prospects.
Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?
What about Mackenzie Gore suggests he's a 1 or 2?
Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?
It seems people are highly overvaluing this guy. He seems like a 4 to me. Gives up a lot baserunners which is equating to giving up quite a few....runs. He strikes out a decent amount, but there is nothing else in his profile other than age that suggests he'd be somebody to extend. And having an extension in mind is the only reason to trade for a guy with 2 years of control. He's also lead the league in wild pitches each of the last two seasons. Unless Crash Davis is available, I'd stay away from this guy for the Cardinals biggest on the block asset.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025 12:36 pm Once every 5 games he pitches 5 innings with an ERA around 4.
If I was running the Cardinals I would want much more than that for Donovan. Alcantara? That's more like it but I suspect Miami will want prospects.
-
Strummer Jones
- Forum User
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:55 pm
Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?
My unsolicited two cents, but I am not a fan of BTV. It's treading something that's subjective as an objective. If you take a team that's pretty well set at 2B/3B/LF...does Donovan have much value? Or what if it's a team that isn't set at those positions, but they're (like us) in a rebuild. Does two years of Donovan really move much of a needle?NYCardsFan wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025 11:48 amBloom has clearly told you 2026 is a transition year in a rebuild. How does acquiring a pitcher with exactly as many years of control as Donovan advance that plan?
Also, per BTV:
Gore: 39.8
Donovan: 26.1
But hey, throw in Burleson (11.1) and they'd get pretty close (37.2). Whaddya say, Shadymaple?
It's a fun resource, I'll give it that, but I don't take it all that seriously.
Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?
Fine idea if both teams were trying to win in 2026. They aren't. To be a semi realistic idea, the trade needs needs to benefit the Cardinals beyond 2027.
Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?
I’m not sure that Gore is the right target but trading Donovan for an experienced proven veteran with control years is exactly the profile we should be going for. We want someone who can be extended without having to pay nine figures on the free agent market.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025 11:48 amBloom has clearly told you 2026 is a transition year in a rebuild. How does acquiring a pitcher with exactly as many years of control as Donovan advance that plan?
Also, per BTV:
Gore: 39.8
Donovan: 26.1
But hey, throw in Burleson (11.1) and they'd get pretty close (37.2). Whaddya say, Shadymaple?
And for 2026 we can absolutely afford the salary with all the dry powder off the books since 2022.
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1540
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?
He actually sound like the kind of Guy Bloom in looking for in the draft. Good fastball. Most guys with good fastball walks are a problem. High walks = high pitch count. High pitch count = 5 inning pitcher. Unless he can figure out how to throw strikes he is a 5 inning pitcher. I'd do it if they threw in a good prospect or two but Donovan is our biggest trade chip. If Gore is the only thing we get then I'd just as soon keep Donovan.woofy25 wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025 12:45 pmIt seems people are highly overvaluing this guy. He seems like a 4 to me. Gives up a lot baserunners which is equating to giving up quite a few....runs. He strikes out a decent amount, but there is nothing else in his profile other than age that suggests he'd be somebody to extend. And having an extension in mind is the only reason to trade for a guy with 2 years of control. He's also lead the league in wild pitches each of the last two seasons. Unless Crash Davis is available, I'd stay away from this guy for the Cardinals biggest on the block asset.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025 12:36 pm Once every 5 games he pitches 5 innings with an ERA around 4.
If I was running the Cardinals I would want much more than that for Donovan. Alcantara? That's more like it but I suspect Miami will want prospects.
-
NYCardsFan
- Forum User
- Posts: 1524
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Would Donovan be too much to give up for MacKenzie Gore?
Why would you care about getting an “experienced proven veteran” in 2026-2027 when he has just two years of control left and the Cardinals are in the midst of a rebuild? And why would Gore (or anyone else) agree to sign a below-market extension when he’s just two years away from free agency? I mean, that’s precisely the reason the Cardinals would be looking to trade Donovan in the first place.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025 13:28 pmI’m not sure that Gore is the right target but trading Donovan for an experienced proven veteran with control years is exactly the profile we should be going for. We want someone who can be extended without having to pay nine figures on the free agent market.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025 11:48 amBloom has clearly told you 2026 is a transition year in a rebuild. How does acquiring a pitcher with exactly as many years of control as Donovan advance that plan?
Also, per BTV:
Gore: 39.8
Donovan: 26.1
But hey, throw in Burleson (11.1) and they'd get pretty close (37.2). Whaddya say, Shadymaple?
And for 2026 we can absolutely afford the salary with all the dry powder off the books since 2022.