WeeVikes wrote: ↑01 Nov 2025 10:00 am
Ought they not go to a Canadian equivalent instead?
Yes, that would make more sense. But some bozos on here cant pass up the opportunity to throw politics into the forum. And notice the moderators haven't been quick to lock the thread.
The thread has a lot of anti incumbent comments….
If it was predominantly pro incumbent…it would have been history long ago…
This is correct.
Mods showing their true colors
Stop with the political ramifications. The thread was only about the realistic premise of whether or not they would accept an invitation if they win, or in fact even get an invitation. You all are trying to warp the thread into some political statement. Stop it.
You can’t be this naive. If your answer is “I’m not and I’m sticking to my guns” there’s simply no point in debating this
I'm not debating this with you or anyone else. I simply asked ....considering the animosity between our two countries....would Toronto be invited and/or would they go. Try to make it political if you want but it's not. If two countries were at war, would they still recognize and/or invite the champion to visit their leader? Admittedly we are not... at war with Canada. But they have been insulted and bullied... and have taken great offense to it. Now, answer the frigging question or step off.
Ask yourself why they are mad at the US. And when you realize that it’s not because we have better maple syrup you will realize it’s everything political.
So you’re either stupid or you’re playing stupid in an attempt to not be banned as you’ve been called out for it. But it’s already been established the mods pick and choose what kind of “p word” talk is acceptable so don’t worry so much
I didn't go into the reason for the animosity for a reason. That it exists is enough for the purpose of the question. Either way, I'm done with this whining by you people. Find something else or continue with your whining.
You knew what you were doing. Don’t be a narcissist.
WeeVikes wrote: ↑01 Nov 2025 10:00 am
Ought they not go to a Canadian equivalent instead?
Yes, that would make more sense. But some bozos on here cant pass up the opportunity to throw politics into the forum. And notice the moderators haven't been quick to lock the thread.
The thread has a lot of anti incumbent comments….
If it was predominantly pro incumbent…it would have been history long ago…
This is correct.
Mods showing their true colors
Stop with the political ramifications. The thread was only about the realistic premise of whether or not they would accept an invitation if they win, or in fact even get an invitation. You all are trying to warp the thread into some political statement. Stop it.
You can’t be this naive. If your answer is “I’m not and I’m sticking to my guns” there’s simply no point in debating this
I'm not debating this with you or anyone else. I simply asked ....considering the animosity between our two countries....would Toronto be invited and/or would they go. Try to make it political if you want but it's not. If two countries were at war, would they still recognize and/or invite the champion to visit their leader? Admittedly we are not... at war with Canada. But they have been insulted and bullied... and have taken great offense to it. Now, answer the frigging question or step off.
Ask yourself why they are mad at the US. And when you realize that it’s not because we have better maple syrup you will realize it’s everything political.
So you’re either stupid or you’re playing stupid in an attempt to not be banned as you’ve been called out for it. But it’s already been established the mods pick and choose what kind of “p word” talk is acceptable so don’t worry so much
I didn't go into the reason for the animosity for a reason. That it exists is enough for the purpose of the question. Either way, I'm done with this whining by you people. Find something else or continue with your whining.
You knew exactly what you were doing by starting the thread. You were baiting for a political argument. You were called out for it.
WeeVikes wrote: ↑01 Nov 2025 10:00 am
Ought they not go to a Canadian equivalent instead?
Yes, that would make more sense. But some bozos on here cant pass up the opportunity to throw politics into the forum. And notice the moderators haven't been quick to lock the thread.
The thread has a lot of anti incumbent comments….
If it was predominantly pro incumbent…it would have been history long ago…
This is correct.
Mods showing their true colors
Stop with the political ramifications. The thread was only about the realistic premise of whether or not they would accept an invitation if they win, or in fact even get an invitation. You all are trying to warp the thread into some political statement. Stop it.
You can’t be this naive. If your answer is “I’m not and I’m sticking to my guns” there’s simply no point in debating this
I'm not debating this with you or anyone else. I simply asked ....considering the animosity between our two countries....would Toronto be invited and/or would they go. Try to make it political if you want but it's not. If two countries were at war, would they still recognize and/or invite the champion to visit their leader? Admittedly we are not... at war with Canada. But they have been insulted and bullied... and have taken great offense to it. Now, answer the frigging question or step off.
Ask yourself why they are mad at the US. And when you realize that it’s not because we have better maple syrup you will realize it’s everything political.
So you’re either stupid or you’re playing stupid in an attempt to not be banned as you’ve been called out for it. But it’s already been established the mods pick and choose what kind of “p word” talk is acceptable so don’t worry so much
I didn't go into the reason for the animosity for a reason. That it exists is enough for the purpose of the question. Either way, I'm done with this whining by you people. Find something else or continue with your whining.
You knew what you were doing. Don’t be a narcissist.
I won't be drawn into you and the other guy's whining. Consider this the end.
WeeVikes wrote: ↑01 Nov 2025 10:00 am
Ought they not go to a Canadian equivalent instead?
Yes, that would make more sense. But some bozos on here cant pass up the opportunity to throw politics into the forum. And notice the moderators haven't been quick to lock the thread.
The thread has a lot of anti incumbent comments….
If it was predominantly pro incumbent…it would have been history long ago…
This is correct.
Mods showing their true colors
Stop with the political ramifications. The thread was only about the realistic premise of whether or not they would accept an invitation if they win, or in fact even get an invitation. You all are trying to warp the thread into some political statement. Stop it.
You can’t be this naive. If your answer is “I’m not and I’m sticking to my guns” there’s simply no point in debating this
I'm not debating this with you or anyone else. I simply asked ....considering the animosity between our two countries....would Toronto be invited and/or would they go. Try to make it political if you want but it's not. If two countries were at war, would they still recognize and/or invite the champion to visit their leader? Admittedly we are not... at war with Canada. But they have been insulted and bullied... and have taken great offense to it. Now, answer the frigging question or step off.
Ask yourself why they are mad at the US. And when you realize that it’s not because we have better maple syrup you will realize it’s everything political.
So you’re either stupid or you’re playing stupid in an attempt to not be banned as you’ve been called out for it. But it’s already been established the mods pick and choose what kind of “p word” talk is acceptable so don’t worry so much
I didn't go into the reason for the animosity for a reason. That it exists is enough for the purpose of the question. Either way, I'm done with this whining by you people. Find something else or continue with your whining.
You knew what you were doing. Don’t be a narcissist.
I won't be drawn into you and the other guy's whining. Consider this the end.
You’ve said that 3 times now. Yet you keep responding