Vandy is not that good

Got an opinion about the Tigers? Let's hear it.

[Complete Mizzou coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderator: STLtoday Forum Moderators

Kelledr
Forum User
Posts: 27
Joined: 12 Jun 2023 21:35 pm

Vandy is not that good

Post by Kelledr »

Mizzou wasn’t beaten, they did everything they could to give the game away and Vandy didn’t capitalize until 2 min left in the game.
Penalties, a ruffing the passer, a tripping penalty when we were at the 1 yd line, bad play calling, a fumbled hand off, going for the TD rather than a field goal, a missed field goal. We out gained them by over 100 yds. Without the 80;yd run they had less than 200 yds total offense. I would love to see Mizzou actually get pasted one time rather than always giving the game away that they should win.
dugoutrex
Forum User
Posts: 1138
Joined: 24 Jun 2025 13:18 pm

Re: Vandy is not that good

Post by dugoutrex »

we play A&M in 2 weeks ... remember last year?
rezero
Forum User
Posts: 2624
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:24 pm

Re: Vandy is not that good

Post by rezero »

If you take away the 80yd run, the Zollers handoff issue, the missed FG, and not being able to score from 2yds away on 3 tries, then Mizzou wins easily.

The problem is those things all happened and to be a good team you can’t have those mistakes (and the 5 personal fouls - 3 on defense). While Vandy is not very good, the harsh truth is Mizzou is a notch below them when you consider all things like special teams, coaching, team discipline, etc…
JackBolly
Forum User
Posts: 620
Joined: 25 May 2024 08:01 am

Re: Vandy is not that good

Post by JackBolly »

Kelledr wrote: 25 Oct 2025 18:41 pm Mizzou wasn’t beaten, they did everything they could to give the game away and Vandy didn’t capitalize until 2 min left in the game.
Penalties, a ruffing the passer, a tripping penalty when we were at the 1 yd line, bad play calling, a fumbled hand off, going for the TD rather than a field goal, a missed field goal. We out gained them by over 100 yds. Without the 80;yd run they had less than 200 yds total offense. I would love to see Mizzou actually get pasted one time rather than always giving the game away that they should win.
Except for the toe-tip catch on a long ball, Pavia looked mediocre by Heisman standards. But he's a ESPN/ Disney media darling so anything can happen.
skeezix
Forum User
Posts: 365
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:29 pm

Re: Vandy is not that good

Post by skeezix »

He is another Johnny Manziel.
2forDiving
Forum User
Posts: 775
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm

Re: Vandy is not that good

Post by 2forDiving »

JackBolly wrote: 25 Oct 2025 18:47 pm
Kelledr wrote: 25 Oct 2025 18:41 pm Mizzou wasn’t beaten, they did everything they could to give the game away and Vandy didn’t capitalize until 2 min left in the game.
Penalties, a ruffing the passer, a tripping penalty when we were at the 1 yd line, bad play calling, a fumbled hand off, going for the TD rather than a field goal, a missed field goal. We out gained them by over 100 yds. Without the 80;yd run they had less than 200 yds total offense. I would love to see Mizzou actually get pasted one time rather than always giving the game away that they should win.
Except for the toe-tip catch on a long ball, Pavia looked mediocre by Heisman standards. But he's a ESPN/ Disney media darling so anything can happen.
He was nothing more than ordinary today. And they won because of a botched handoff by Mizzou
rezero
Forum User
Posts: 2624
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:24 pm

Re: Vandy is not that good

Post by rezero »

2forDiving wrote: 25 Oct 2025 18:49 pm
JackBolly wrote: 25 Oct 2025 18:47 pm
Kelledr wrote: 25 Oct 2025 18:41 pm Mizzou wasn’t beaten, they did everything they could to give the game away and Vandy didn’t capitalize until 2 min left in the game.
Penalties, a ruffing the passer, a tripping penalty when we were at the 1 yd line, bad play calling, a fumbled hand off, going for the TD rather than a field goal, a missed field goal. We out gained them by over 100 yds. Without the 80;yd run they had less than 200 yds total offense. I would love to see Mizzou actually get pasted one time rather than always giving the game away that they should win.
Except for the toe-tip catch on a long ball, Pavia looked mediocre by Heisman standards. But he's a ESPN/ Disney media darling so anything can happen.
He was nothing more than ordinary today. And they won because of a botched handoff by Mizzou
How was a turnover at mid field more important than not scoring on 3 tried from the 2? Of Burks taking a bad angle and giving up an 80yd TD? Or Kitchen with a dumb roughing the passer call on 3rd down that extended the drive the scored that they TD on? Etc….

The mistakes were plentiful, and all were responsible for the loss not the one handoff.
AntillesHS
Forum User
Posts: 6
Joined: 12 Jul 2025 16:00 pm

Re: Vandy is not that good

Post by AntillesHS »

Either is Mizzou if you haven't noticed.

Vandy took advantage of mistakes and Mizzou didn't.
2forDiving
Forum User
Posts: 775
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm

Re: Vandy is not that good

Post by 2forDiving »

rezero wrote: 25 Oct 2025 18:55 pm
2forDiving wrote: 25 Oct 2025 18:49 pm
JackBolly wrote: 25 Oct 2025 18:47 pm
Kelledr wrote: 25 Oct 2025 18:41 pm Mizzou wasn’t beaten, they did everything they could to give the game away and Vandy didn’t capitalize until 2 min left in the game.
Penalties, a ruffing the passer, a tripping penalty when we were at the 1 yd line, bad play calling, a fumbled hand off, going for the TD rather than a field goal, a missed field goal. We out gained them by over 100 yds. Without the 80;yd run they had less than 200 yds total offense. I would love to see Mizzou actually get pasted one time rather than always giving the game away that they should win.
Except for the toe-tip catch on a long ball, Pavia looked mediocre by Heisman standards. But he's a ESPN/ Disney media darling so anything can happen.
He was nothing more than ordinary today. And they won because of a botched handoff by Mizzou
How was a turnover at mid field more important than not scoring on 3 tried from the 2? Of Burks taking a bad angle and giving up an 80yd TD? Or Kitchen with a dumb roughing the passer call on 3rd down that extended the drive the scored that they TD on? Etc….

The mistakes were plentiful, and all were responsible for the loss not the one handoff.
I was referring to Pavia. He got a chance to win the game late because of a botched handoff. I’m not saying there weren’t other reasons they lost. He got the chance because of the hand off.
acco40
Forum User
Posts: 833
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:50 pm

Re: Vandy is not that good

Post by acco40 »

rezero wrote: 25 Oct 2025 18:45 pm If you take away the 80yd run, the Zollers handoff issue, the missed FG, and not being able to score from 2yds away on 3 tries, then Mizzou wins easily.
Seriously? If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we'd all have a merry Christmas.
Luke77
Forum User
Posts: 146
Joined: 24 May 2024 09:40 am

Re: Vandy is not that good

Post by Luke77 »

acco40 wrote: 25 Oct 2025 19:27 pm
rezero wrote: 25 Oct 2025 18:45 pm If you take away the 80yd run, the Zollers handoff issue, the missed FG, and not being able to score from 2yds away on 3 tries, then Mizzou wins easily.
Seriously? If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we'd all have a merry Christmas.
You literally cut out Rezero's 2nd paragraph :roll:
icon
Forum User
Posts: 5445
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm

Re: Vandy is not that good

Post by icon »

Kelledr wrote: 25 Oct 2025 18:41 pm Mizzou wasn’t beaten, they did everything they could to give the game away and Vandy didn’t capitalize until 2 min left in the game.
Penalties, a ruffing the passer, a tripping penalty when we were at the 1 yd line, bad play calling, a fumbled hand off, going for the TD rather than a field goal, a missed field goal. We out gained them by over 100 yds. Without the 80;yd run they had less than 200 yds total offense. I would love to see Mizzou actually get pasted one time rather than always giving the game away that they should win.
So Mizzou to score just 10 points vs. Vandy. That game should have been won.
Armchair QB
Forum User
Posts: 3256
Joined: 09 Sep 2018 14:06 pm

Re: Vandy is not that good

Post by Armchair QB »

I kind of think they’re a little over rated too. We’re better, we just played terrible. The offense with Pribula at QB was becoming ineffective. Hate that he was hurt, but it looks way better with Zollers back there. I don’t think we’ll be worse off going forward. He appears MUCH more confident in the pocket and can throw it a lot better. But he’s just a freshman so we need to wait and see.
jcgmoi
Forum User
Posts: 1165
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:17 pm

Re: Vandy is not that good

Post by jcgmoi »

Win or lose next week, I don't think anyone will be complaining that the Aggies aren't that good a team.
succinct712
Forum User
Posts: 257
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm

Re: Vandy is not that good

Post by succinct712 »

I see the same old, same old Tigers at work. They don't seem to be able to get to the next level. Two losses that were very winnable games this year if you don't make so many key mistakes(penalties/turnovers) in crucial moments in a game. I'm willing to cut Pribula some slack with this being his first season as a starter but he needs to be better when it matters most. Drinkwitz is just too conservative at times when he could put the team in a much better position to win. His clock management is also a real head scratcher. Just my opinion watching the Tigers last 30 years. 10 win seasons are nice but a national title is the goal right?
dugoutrex
Forum User
Posts: 1138
Joined: 24 Jun 2025 13:18 pm

Re: Vandy is not that good

Post by dugoutrex »

jcgmoi wrote: 26 Oct 2025 08:18 am Win or lose next week, I don't think anyone will be complaining that the Aggies aren't that good a team.
we will do neither next week ... the game is in 2 weeks :D
Post Reply