Practice Lines (10/17)

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

Frank Barone
Forum User
Posts: 284
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:55 pm

Re: Practice Lines (10/17)

Post by Frank Barone »

STL fan in MN wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:37 pm
skilles wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:32 pm Really probably need to find a way to go out and find Mailloux a solid veteran partner. Last years Suter would have been perfect.
You mean someone like Nick Leddy?
+1. I didn't understand the need to move him when they could have moved a depth forward to make the cap work.
bluetunehead
Forum User
Posts: 1207
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm

Re: Practice Lines (10/17)

Post by bluetunehead »

BalotelliMassive wrote: 17 Oct 2025 14:53 pm Montreal is going to take this news as validation of the trade.....at least the dumb ones will.
Two-thirds of this board already has
STL fan in MN
Forum User
Posts: 2670
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm

Re: Practice Lines (10/17)

Post by STL fan in MN »

Frank Barone wrote: 17 Oct 2025 18:15 pm
STL fan in MN wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:37 pm
skilles wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:32 pm Really probably need to find a way to go out and find Mailloux a solid veteran partner. Last years Suter would have been perfect.
You mean someone like Nick Leddy?
+1. I didn't understand the need to move him when they could have moved a depth forward to make the cap work.
Well, maybe we can get him back now. :lol:

With Krug on LTIR now, we’d be able to go over the cap plenty if we wanted to.
blues2112
Forum User
Posts: 3518
Joined: 27 Apr 2018 18:17 pm

Re: Practice Lines (10/17)

Post by blues2112 »

Frank Barone wrote: 17 Oct 2025 18:15 pm
STL fan in MN wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:37 pm
skilles wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:32 pm Really probably need to find a way to go out and find Mailloux a solid veteran partner. Last years Suter would have been perfect.
You mean someone like Nick Leddy?
+1. I didn't understand the need to move him when they could have moved a depth forward to make the cap work.
Respect you posters, but Leddy's cap hit is $4 million. Which depth forward is the same? Am I missing something?

https://puckpedia.com/player/nick-leddy
ChooseBlues
Forum User
Posts: 849
Joined: 06 Jan 2019 21:22 pm

Re: Practice Lines (10/17)

Post by ChooseBlues »

bluetunehead wrote: 17 Oct 2025 18:18 pm
BalotelliMassive wrote: 17 Oct 2025 14:53 pm Montreal is going to take this news as validation of the trade.....at least the dumb ones will.
Two-thirds of this board already has
Montreal does not need validation. They are doing just fine. Mailloux is already a distant memory.
Mr.Snuggleupagus
Forum User
Posts: 492
Joined: 23 Aug 2025 17:34 pm

Re: Practice Lines (10/17)

Post by Mr.Snuggleupagus »

STL fan in MN wrote: 17 Oct 2025 12:16 pm And Pronger? He now with the FanDual broadcast so wouldn’t he be busy with that? And not like he’s been around a ton over the years. That said, has he even been on a FanDual broadcast yet? I saw where he was on Hockey Night in Canada the other night so I guess the FanDual thing isn’t every game. But either way, not like he’s just in the pressbox ready to give advice to whatever d-man is scratched that night.
FanDuel (with an 'e') mijo
TheJackBurton
Forum User
Posts: 2578
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm

Re: Practice Lines (10/17)

Post by TheJackBurton »

STL fan in MN wrote: 17 Oct 2025 18:35 pm
Frank Barone wrote: 17 Oct 2025 18:15 pm
STL fan in MN wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:37 pm
skilles wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:32 pm Really probably need to find a way to go out and find Mailloux a solid veteran partner. Last years Suter would have been perfect.
You mean someone like Nick Leddy?
+1. I didn't understand the need to move him when they could have moved a depth forward to make the cap work.
Well, maybe we can get him back now. :lol:

With Krug on LTIR now, we’d be able to go over the cap plenty if we wanted to.
It's really not that far fetched. San Jose doesn't necessarily need him and didn't seem like there were any hard feelings when San Jose plucked him off waivers.

I was looking at teams and their d-corps and even this early in the season there just isn't that much out there even on the left side.
kimzey59
Forum User
Posts: 760
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: Practice Lines (10/17)

Post by kimzey59 »

blues2112 wrote: 17 Oct 2025 18:41 pm
Frank Barone wrote: 17 Oct 2025 18:15 pm
STL fan in MN wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:37 pm
skilles wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:32 pm Really probably need to find a way to go out and find Mailloux a solid veteran partner. Last years Suter would have been perfect.
You mean someone like Nick Leddy?
+1. I didn't understand the need to move him when they could have moved a depth forward to make the cap work.
Respect you posters, but Leddy's cap hit is $4 million. Which depth forward is the same? Am I missing something?

https://puckpedia.com/player/nick-leddy
We didn't need to move him, period.
We've still got 650K in cap space with neither of Krug or Dean officially on LTIR.

If we had wanted to keep Leddy, we could have. Easily. We could still bring in a vet Dman with a faiirly hefty cap hit any time we want to just by LTIR'ing Krug. We're simply chosing not to do so(there are long term Cap benefits for not putting him on).
blues2112
Forum User
Posts: 3518
Joined: 27 Apr 2018 18:17 pm

Re: Practice Lines (10/17)

Post by blues2112 »

kimzey59 wrote: 17 Oct 2025 20:00 pm
blues2112 wrote: 17 Oct 2025 18:41 pm
Frank Barone wrote: 17 Oct 2025 18:15 pm
STL fan in MN wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:37 pm
skilles wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:32 pm Really probably need to find a way to go out and find Mailloux a solid veteran partner. Last years Suter would have been perfect.
You mean someone like Nick Leddy?
+1. I didn't understand the need to move him when they could have moved a depth forward to make the cap work.
Respect you posters, but Leddy's cap hit is $4 million. Which depth forward is the same? Am I missing something?

https://puckpedia.com/player/nick-leddy
We didn't need to move him, period.
We've still got 650K in cap space with neither of Krug or Dean officially on LTIR.

If we had wanted to keep Leddy, we could have. Easily. We could still bring in a vet Dman with a faiirly hefty cap hit any time we want to just by LTIR'ing Krug. We're simply chosing not to do so(there are long term Cap benefits for not putting him on).
Truly, appreciate your insight.

Thoughts about Suter?
Mr.Snuggleupagus
Forum User
Posts: 492
Joined: 23 Aug 2025 17:34 pm

Re: Practice Lines (10/17)

Post by Mr.Snuggleupagus »

TheJackBurton wrote: 17 Oct 2025 11:35 am We are moving Kyrou to the 3rd line? Not sure how I feel about that one.
Because you lack hockey knowledge and common sense.
dtkblueshockey
Forum User
Posts: 209
Joined: 24 May 2024 17:18 pm

Re: Practice Lines (10/17)

Post by dtkblueshockey »

Good lines.

Balanced lineup.

Need to get Buch and Kyrou going on the scoresheet.
kimzey59
Forum User
Posts: 760
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: Practice Lines (10/17)

Post by kimzey59 »

blues2112 wrote: 17 Oct 2025 20:13 pm
kimzey59 wrote: 17 Oct 2025 20:00 pm
blues2112 wrote: 17 Oct 2025 18:41 pm
Frank Barone wrote: 17 Oct 2025 18:15 pm
STL fan in MN wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:37 pm
skilles wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:32 pm Really probably need to find a way to go out and find Mailloux a solid veteran partner. Last years Suter would have been perfect.
You mean someone like Nick Leddy?
+1. I didn't understand the need to move him when they could have moved a depth forward to make the cap work.
Respect you posters, but Leddy's cap hit is $4 million. Which depth forward is the same? Am I missing something?

https://puckpedia.com/player/nick-leddy
We didn't need to move him, period.
We've still got 650K in cap space with neither of Krug or Dean officially on LTIR.

If we had wanted to keep Leddy, we could have. Easily. We could still bring in a vet Dman with a faiirly hefty cap hit any time we want to just by LTIR'ing Krug. We're simply chosing not to do so(there are long term Cap benefits for not putting him on).
Truly, appreciate your insight.

Thoughts about Suter?
I'd take Suter back in a heartbeat if he wanted to keep playing. We need a stabilizing vet for the 3rd pair.
blues2112
Forum User
Posts: 3518
Joined: 27 Apr 2018 18:17 pm

Re: Practice Lines (10/17)

Post by blues2112 »

kimzey59 wrote: 17 Oct 2025 20:26 pm
blues2112 wrote: 17 Oct 2025 20:13 pm
kimzey59 wrote: 17 Oct 2025 20:00 pm
blues2112 wrote: 17 Oct 2025 18:41 pm
Frank Barone wrote: 17 Oct 2025 18:15 pm
STL fan in MN wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:37 pm
skilles wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:32 pm Really probably need to find a way to go out and find Mailloux a solid veteran partner. Last years Suter would have been perfect.
You mean someone like Nick Leddy?
+1. I didn't understand the need to move him when they could have moved a depth forward to make the cap work.
Respect you posters, but Leddy's cap hit is $4 million. Which depth forward is the same? Am I missing something?

https://puckpedia.com/player/nick-leddy
We didn't need to move him, period.
We've still got 650K in cap space with neither of Krug or Dean officially on LTIR.

If we had wanted to keep Leddy, we could have. Easily. We could still bring in a vet Dman with a faiirly hefty cap hit any time we want to just by LTIR'ing Krug. We're simply chosing not to do so(there are long term Cap benefits for not putting him on).
Truly, appreciate your insight.

Thoughts about Suter?
I'd take Suter back in a heartbeat if he wanted to keep playing. We need a stabilizing vet for the 3rd pair.
Yah, played 82 games last year. Curious if it's possible.
skilles
Forum User
Posts: 1523
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:28 pm

Re: Practice Lines (10/17)

Post by skilles »

STL fan in MN wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:37 pm
skilles wrote: 17 Oct 2025 15:32 pm Really probably need to find a way to go out and find Mailloux a solid veteran partner. Last years Suter would have been perfect.
You mean someone like Nick Leddy?
I think there must have been some disconnect with Leddy
Unfathomable
Forum User
Posts: 529
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:29 pm

Re: Practice Lines (10/17)

Post by Unfathomable »

STL fan in MN wrote: 17 Oct 2025 12:16 pm
TheJackBurton wrote: 17 Oct 2025 11:35 am
STL fan in MN wrote: 17 Oct 2025 11:16 am
Holloway-Thomas-Neighbours
Buchnevich-Suter-Snuggerud
Joseph-Schenn-Kyrou
Texier-Bjugsrad-Walker

Fowler-Parayko
Broberg-Faulk
Tucker-Kessel
Mailloux

Binnington
Hofer

* Sundqvist (LBI) and Toropchenko (LBI/UBI) not skating again.
Neighbours to the right side, Buch down to line 2, Snuggy up to line 2, Kyrou down to line 3. The lines are all jumbled.

Unsurprisingly, Kessel being given a chance. Probably likely to slot in for Mailloux for the next game.
A game or two from the high seats for Logan with Chopper and likely Prongs will do the young fella some good.

We are moving Kyrou to the 3rd line? Not sure how I feel about that one.

Kessel and Tucker will also very likely be a disaster.
I’ve seen comments like this for years and I don’t get it. In all the years MacInnis has been employed by the Blues, I’ve heard of zero times of him working with a player directly. I’m not even sure he works for the Blues fulltime. He’s an advisor to Army. Likely just someone Army gets an opinion from from time to time.

And Pronger? He now with the FanDual broadcast so wouldn’t he be busy with that? And not like he’s been around a ton over the years. That said, has he even been on a FanDual broadcast yet? I saw where he was on Hockey Night in Canada the other night so I guess the FanDual thing isn’t every game. But either way, not like he’s just in the pressbox ready to give advice to whatever d-man is scratched that night.
Fwiw I think pronger mentioned on his interview on the fast lane yesterday the Dallas game would be his first blues broadcast. So wouldn't surprise me if he is in mailloux ear tomorrow. Wish the kid ALL the best think the pr comparison to the pronger trade was dumb at best.
ScalesofJustice
Forum User
Posts: 98
Joined: 24 May 2024 21:28 pm

Re: Practice Lines (10/17)

Post by ScalesofJustice »

TheJackBurton wrote: 17 Oct 2025 11:35 am
STL fan in MN wrote: 17 Oct 2025 11:16 am
Holloway-Thomas-Neighbours
Buchnevich-Suter-Snuggerud
Joseph-Schenn-Kyrou
Texier-Bjugsrad-Walker

Fowler-Parayko
Broberg-Faulk
Tucker-Kessel
Mailloux

Binnington
Hofer

* Sundqvist (LBI) and Toropchenko (LBI/UBI) not skating again.
Neighbours to the right side, Buch down to line 2, Snuggy up to line 2, Kyrou down to line 3. The lines are all jumbled.

Unsurprisingly, Kessel being given a chance. Probably likely to slot in for Mailloux for the next game.
A game or two from the high seats for Logan with Chopper and likely Prongs will do the young fella some good.

We are moving Kyrou to the 3rd line? Not sure how I feel about that one.

Kessel and Tucker will also very likely be a disaster.
I agree...Kyrou on the 3rd line is a very questionable move but it might open up the ice some for him.
More likely this will be very temporary.
Post Reply