Come on. The Cubs are just a better team and they were playing at home all three games.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 06:35 am Inherited great rosters both in St Louis and San Diego. 0-5 in the playoffs.
Shildt doing less with more
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: Shildt doing less with more
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: 13 May 2018 08:13 am
Re: Shildt doing less with more
lol, where did he touch you????ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 06:35 am Inherited great rosters both in St Louis and San Diego. 0-5 in the playoffs.
Re: Shildt doing less with more
poor Mikey
Re: Shildt doing less with more
It'll take Oli another 6-8 years to get 5 playoff games under his belt.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 17474
- Joined: 10 Nov 2019 04:55 am
Re: Shildt doing less with more
This may have already been pointed out, but the 2019 NLDS happened.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 09:05 am5 playoffs. 0 wins. He inherited fantastic veteran rosters twice and can't win when it counts.12xu wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 07:30 am The Padres did not lose the playoff to the cubs because of Shildt. He handled his pitching staff well, and they were superb, holding the cubs to 6 runs in 3 games. He played the best lineup he had available.
The Padres lost the series primarily due to their first 3 batters in the lineup not coming thru. Tatis was 1 for 12, Arraez 2 for 11, Machado 1 for 10. All of their hits came in game 2, which the Padres won.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1283
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:52 pm
Re: Shildt doing less with more
Randy Arozarena can confirm:Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 11:23 amThis may have already been pointed out, but the 2019 NLDS happened.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 09:05 am5 playoffs. 0 wins. He inherited fantastic veteran rosters twice and can't win when it counts.12xu wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 07:30 am The Padres did not lose the playoff to the cubs because of Shildt. He handled his pitching staff well, and they were superb, holding the cubs to 6 runs in 3 games. He played the best lineup he had available.
The Padres lost the series primarily due to their first 3 batters in the lineup not coming thru. Tatis was 1 for 12, Arraez 2 for 11, Machado 1 for 10. All of their hits came in game 2, which the Padres won.
Disclaimer: The video above is hosted on Youtube, and has not be reviewed by the staff of the Post-Dispatch.
Re: Shildt doing less with more
I find it funny Scotch understands the concept of inheriting a solid roster except when it comes to Matheny.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 06:35 am Inherited great rosters both in St Louis and San Diego. 0-5 in the playoffs.
Re: Shildt doing less with more
The Cardinals missed the playoffs in 2016, 2017, 2018.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 09:05 am5 playoffs. 0 wins. He inherited fantastic veteran rosters twice and can't win when it counts.12xu wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 07:30 am The Padres did not lose the playoff to the cubs because of Shildt. He handled his pitching staff well, and they were superb, holding the cubs to 6 runs in 3 games. He played the best lineup he had available.
The Padres lost the series primarily due to their first 3 batters in the lineup not coming thru. Tatis was 1 for 12, Arraez 2 for 11, Machado 1 for 10. All of their hits came in game 2, which the Padres won.
Shildt took over in mid-2018.
You claim “he inherited a fantastic veteran roster” in 2018?
Ok.
Re: Shildt doing less with more
Well played and true.ecleme22 wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 11:57 amI find it funny Scotch understands the concept of inheriting a solid roster except when it comes to Matheny.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 06:35 am Inherited great rosters both in St Louis and San Diego. 0-5 in the playoffs.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Shildt doing less with more
That’s a good pointBomber1 wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 12:05 pmThe Cardinals missed the playoffs in 2016, 2017, 2018.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 09:05 am5 playoffs. 0 wins. He inherited fantastic veteran rosters twice and can't win when it counts.12xu wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 07:30 am The Padres did not lose the playoff to the cubs because of Shildt. He handled his pitching staff well, and they were superb, holding the cubs to 6 runs in 3 games. He played the best lineup he had available.
The Padres lost the series primarily due to their first 3 batters in the lineup not coming thru. Tatis was 1 for 12, Arraez 2 for 11, Machado 1 for 10. All of their hits came in game 2, which the Padres won.
Shildt took over in mid-2018.
You claim “he inherited a fantastic veteran roster” in 2018?
Ok.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 303
- Joined: 15 Oct 2019 17:33 pm
Re: Shildt doing less with more
I have yet to see a manager throw a pitch or swing a bat in a game. Players play and execute. This obsession with managers and the outcome of games is wonky. When the Tigers folded against the Cardinals in 2006 the manager wasn't out there throwing the ball all over the place.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 918
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Shildt doing less with more
What got him fired in St Louis reportedly was going on a local sports talk radio show and saying he did as well as could be expected given the lack of talent on the team. That's still the excuse?icon wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 10:35 amCome on. The Cubs are just a better team and they were playing at home all three games.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 06:35 am Inherited great rosters both in St Louis and San Diego. 0-5 in the playoffs.
San Diego's payroll is higher than the Cubs.
Re: Shildt doing less with more
Blaming the manager when his team's biggest hitters flunked out is evidence of an anti-Shildt bias. The Padres won 1 of 3 on the road against a favored team. About what would be expected.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 12:45 pmWhat got him fired in St Louis reportedly was going on a local sports talk radio show and saying he did as well as could be expected given the lack of talent on the team. That's still the excuse?icon wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 10:35 amCome on. The Cubs are just a better team and they were playing at home all three games.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 06:35 am Inherited great rosters both in St Louis and San Diego. 0-5 in the playoffs.
San Diego's payroll is higher than the Cubs.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 6233
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Shildt doing less with more
Yea it’s stupid all these Teams that fire managers I guess they don’t understand managers don’t matter someone should probably tell the players managers don’t matter since they think they do alsoTopofthePerch wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 12:26 pm I have yet to see a manager throw a pitch or swing a bat in a game. Players play and execute. This obsession with managers and the outcome of games is wonky. When the Tigers folded against the Cardinals in 2006 the manager wasn't out there throwing the ball all over the place.
Re: Shildt doing less with more
It's everything. Some based on manager moves, but usually it just comes down the little things, luck, two out hitting, execution, umpire balls/strike calls which can change at bats, etc. He put the best team out there he had available.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 06:35 am Inherited great rosters both in St Louis and San Diego. 0-5 in the playoffs.
Re: Shildt doing less with more
about what I expected too - although I was hoping the Scrubs would sweep 'emicon wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 13:42 pmBlaming the manager when his team's biggest hitters flunked out is evidence of an anti-Shildt bias. The Padres won 1 of 3 on the road against a favored team. About what would be expected.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 12:45 pmWhat got him fired in St Louis reportedly was going on a local sports talk radio show and saying he did as well as could be expected given the lack of talent on the team. That's still the excuse?icon wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 10:35 amCome on. The Cubs are just a better team and they were playing at home all three games.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 06:35 am Inherited great rosters both in St Louis and San Diego. 0-5 in the playoffs.
San Diego's payroll is higher than the Cubs.