Fowler 3 year extension

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

bluetunehead
Forum User
Posts: 1186
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm

Re: Fowler 3 year extension

Post by bluetunehead »

Mr.Snuggleupagus wrote: 27 Sep 2025 20:54 pm Hope he don't transform back to the Anaheim Fowler.
The problem in Anaheim was Anaheim, not Fowler.
Lets_Clinch
Forum User
Posts: 572
Joined: 28 Jun 2024 16:29 pm

Re: Fowler 3 year extension

Post by Lets_Clinch »

Big fan of this extension.
STL fan in MN
Forum User
Posts: 2620
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm

Re: Fowler 3 year extension

Post by STL fan in MN »

A bit more than I was thinking it was going to take but maybe not with where the cap is now and where it’s going.

A little risky given the small sample size but he’s a talented player and the Blues system fits him to a T. As long as he can stave off Father Time a bit longer, this should work out well for the Blues.

Glad to have Cam here for 4 more years!
BobbyOrr
Forum User
Posts: 169
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:55 pm

Re: Fowler 3 year extension

Post by BobbyOrr »

Great Sign,
He is a stud and a class act.
AtillaTheBlue1
Forum User
Posts: 1108
Joined: 13 May 2018 08:13 am

Re: Fowler 3 year extension

Post by AtillaTheBlue1 »

2 long of a deal
AtillaTheBlue1
Forum User
Posts: 1108
Joined: 13 May 2018 08:13 am

Re: Fowler 3 year extension

Post by AtillaTheBlue1 »

BobbyOrr wrote: 28 Sep 2025 06:52 am
He is a stud
wait, what?
TAFKAP
Forum User
Posts: 2221
Joined: 10 May 2018 17:44 pm

Re: Fowler 3 year extension

Post by TAFKAP »

AtillaTheBlue1 wrote: 28 Sep 2025 08:02 am 2 long of a deal
You’re probably not wrong, but, you aren’t signing him for 2 years. Any signing is a gamble. Anybody you sign can fall off quickly, 3 years is usually a good balance of risk/reward for someone his age. You have to admit he looked good in that sweater last year. I’m here for it.
b-a-a-a-rclay
Forum User
Posts: 768
Joined: 30 Jun 2024 08:51 am

Re: Fowler 3 year extension

Post by b-a-a-a-rclay »

A Blues reporter told me that the Blues offered 2 years and that offer sat on the table for months (since early summer). At least that was the rumor that he shared. Obviously, CF wanted 3 years.
Frank Barone
Forum User
Posts: 279
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:55 pm

Re: Fowler 3 year extension

Post by Frank Barone »

kimzey59 wrote: 27 Sep 2025 19:54 pm 6.1 mil AAV

Slightly uncomfortable(maybe a year too long) but I see him aging well so I can live with it. Good to have the top pairing secured past this year. Hopefully Broberg/Mailloux are ready to take the reigns when it ends.
Yeah now they need to sign Broberg long term. Cam can can move to 2LD toward the back end of this deal with Broberg taking over 1LD. Really looking forward to seeing how Mailloux develops this year and how he fits long term.
SameOldBlues
Forum User
Posts: 391
Joined: 24 May 2024 11:36 am

Re: Fowler 3 year extension

Post by SameOldBlues »

Not a fan of the term or av. I wouldn’t of went longer than 2 years and 5 million per, especially since one or more of the LHD’s should be ready before then, but like always, time will tell. Hope he wasnt his old self for half the year last year cause of pending free agency and now Father Time kicks in soon.
b-a-a-a-rclay
Forum User
Posts: 768
Joined: 30 Jun 2024 08:51 am

Re: Fowler 3 year extension

Post by b-a-a-a-rclay »

I don't think the Blues feel confident that they have a LHD in the pipeline who will be ready for top 4 in 2 - 3 years. You hope LIndstein gets there but he has hasn't had a season in north america yet. I thought he looked really confident against prospects, but not confident in this Blues camp.
dhsux
Forum User
Posts: 3307
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm

Re: Fowler 3 year extension

Post by dhsux »

bluetunehead wrote: 27 Sep 2025 20:41 pm Glad he’s staying. Probably a year longer than I’d like but that’s alright. He has been terrific for us. Best LHD in that spot since Bouw.
Likely a year less than he would like!

Good signing!
Harry S Deals
Forum User
Posts: 1838
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm

Re: Fowler 3 year extension

Post by Harry S Deals »

b-a-a-a-rclay wrote: 28 Sep 2025 09:06 am I don't think the Blues feel confident that they have a LHD in the pipeline who will be ready for top 4 in 2 - 3 years. You hope LIndstein gets there but he has hasn't had a season in north america yet. I thought he looked really confident against prospects, but not confident in this Blues camp.
I agree with Fowler/Broberg Blues are set at LD for awhile. Lindstein can take on Tucker in a year or so when hes ready
SameOldBlues
Forum User
Posts: 391
Joined: 24 May 2024 11:36 am

Re: Fowler 3 year extension

Post by SameOldBlues »

Harry S Deals wrote: 28 Sep 2025 09:20 am
b-a-a-a-rclay wrote: 28 Sep 2025 09:06 am I don't think the Blues feel confident that they have a LHD in the pipeline who will be ready for top 4 in 2 - 3 years. You hope LIndstein gets there but he has hasn't had a season in north america yet. I thought he looked really confident against prospects, but not confident in this Blues camp.
I agree with Fowler/Jo Broberg Blues are set at LD for awhile. Lindstein can take on Tucker in a year or so when hes ready
Im not even a huge Lindstein fan, I was thinkin more of Fischer, but their both possible Top 4’s without a spot for awhile with Fowler being here 4 more years. It’s ok not to love every single thing the Blues do, I can still be a fan.
billybaseball
Forum User
Posts: 339
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:22 pm

Re: Fowler 3 year extension

Post by billybaseball »

If he's the 2nd or 3rd pair D by the end of this contract it still wont be bad. In 4 years 6m for a bottom pairing defenseman will only be a slight overpay. But if he's still a top pair then we have a top pair only making 12m combined. And think of how much room for development this gives our young d core.
zamadoo
Forum User
Posts: 1630
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:11 pm

Re: Fowler 3 year extension

Post by zamadoo »

SameOldBlues wrote: 28 Sep 2025 09:26 am
Harry S Deals wrote: 28 Sep 2025 09:20 am
b-a-a-a-rclay wrote: 28 Sep 2025 09:06 am I don't think the Blues feel confident that they have a LHD in the pipeline who will be ready for top 4 in 2 - 3 years. You hope LIndstein gets there but he has hasn't had a season in north america yet. I thought he looked really confident against prospects, but not confident in this Blues camp.
I agree with Fowler/Jo Broberg Blues are set at LD for awhile. Lindstein can take on Tucker in a year or so when hes ready
Im not even a huge Lindstein fan, I was thinkin more of Fischer, but their both possible Top 4’s without a spot for awhile with Fowler being here 4 more years. It’s ok not to love every single thing the Blues do, I can still be a fan.
According to the report above, a 2 year deal sat for months, so we can assume that's what the Blues really wanted. It's possible they wanted a 1 year deal but knew that wasn't on the table at all. The last year comes down to a 15-team NTC.

There's the risk that Broberg doesn't sign here long-term, though I do see a deal getting done. Seems more like going with proven veterans into a push to win rather than saving spots for unproven prospects still at least a year away. The way it works out is you have a young player who could play top-4 on your bottom pairing on a smaller contract, like Vince Dunn before he left for Seattle. I agree though, the timeline seems about a year or two off for a couple LHD prospects.
Post Reply