Gray's option for 2027
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 937
- Joined: 23 May 2024 23:25 pm
Re: Gray's option for 2027
BDW won’t spend any part of what he saves. If you think he will, you are a cotton-headed ninny muggin.
Re: Gray's option for 2027
The Cards could use '24 Lynn and Gibson next year...Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 13:13 pmI don't trust BDW to reinvenst anything. Unless its a 1 yr deal for lance lynn and kyle gibson types. Gray excites me more than that.ecleme22 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:38 pmGray has been solid.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:17 pm14 wins. 15 last night if we had any defense at all.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:02 pmHe does nothing for this team.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:55 amYeah, not at $35 million...he's not bringing anythingalw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:41 amThat's why he should be traded this offseason.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:36 amIf they play more than one month of the season in 2027 you lose that bet. I think they will not play all season, but I wouldn't bet that kind of money on it.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:22 amThat should be another teams problem.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 10:47 am If we don't pickup his option or renegotiate, he gets $5M at the end fo 2026 to walk away. But if we take the option, and IF the entire 2027 season gets locked out, he gets a pro-rated amount of $30M which would in that case be zero.
There's a pessimistic case for saving money by taking the option.
Gray also wants to be traded.
Trade Gray, then pick up two pitchers with that money saved.
Re: Gray's option for 2027
They will need 2-3 SPs to get them through the season. I'm all for it, they shouldn't be expensive.ecleme22 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 14:08 pmThe Cards could use '24 Lynn and Gibson next year...Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 13:13 pmI don't trust BDW to reinvenst anything. Unless its a 1 yr deal for lance lynn and kyle gibson types. Gray excites me more than that.ecleme22 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:38 pmGray has been solid.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:17 pm14 wins. 15 last night if we had any defense at all.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:02 pmHe does nothing for this team.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:55 amYeah, not at $35 million...he's not bringing anythingalw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:41 amThat's why he should be traded this offseason.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:36 amIf they play more than one month of the season in 2027 you lose that bet. I think they will not play all season, but I wouldn't bet that kind of money on it.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:22 amThat should be another teams problem.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 10:47 am If we don't pickup his option or renegotiate, he gets $5M at the end fo 2026 to walk away. But if we take the option, and IF the entire 2027 season gets locked out, he gets a pro-rated amount of $30M which would in that case be zero.
There's a pessimistic case for saving money by taking the option.
Gray also wants to be traded.
Trade Gray, then pick up two pitchers with that money saved.
Re: Gray's option for 2027
Right. And, IMO, these are the kind of modest deals Bloom should be making in 2026, given the state of the team.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 14:12 pmThey will need 2-3 SPs to get them through the season. I'm all for it, they shouldn't be expensive.ecleme22 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 14:08 pmThe Cards could use '24 Lynn and Gibson next year...Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 13:13 pmI don't trust BDW to reinvenst anything. Unless its a 1 yr deal for lance lynn and kyle gibson types. Gray excites me more than that.ecleme22 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:38 pmGray has been solid.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:17 pm14 wins. 15 last night if we had any defense at all.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:02 pmHe does nothing for this team.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:55 amYeah, not at $35 million...he's not bringing anythingalw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:41 amThat's why he should be traded this offseason.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:36 amIf they play more than one month of the season in 2027 you lose that bet. I think they will not play all season, but I wouldn't bet that kind of money on it.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:22 amThat should be another teams problem.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 10:47 am If we don't pickup his option or renegotiate, he gets $5M at the end fo 2026 to walk away. But if we take the option, and IF the entire 2027 season gets locked out, he gets a pro-rated amount of $30M which would in that case be zero.
There's a pessimistic case for saving money by taking the option.
Gray also wants to be traded.
Trade Gray, then pick up two pitchers with that money saved.
Re: Gray's option for 2027
Yea, seems clear to me they aren't going to spend much money til after they know what the new cap system is going to look like.ecleme22 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 14:36 pmRight. And, IMO, these are the kind of modest deals Bloom should be making in 2026, given the state of the team.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 14:12 pmThey will need 2-3 SPs to get them through the season. I'm all for it, they shouldn't be expensive.ecleme22 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 14:08 pmThe Cards could use '24 Lynn and Gibson next year...Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 13:13 pmI don't trust BDW to reinvenst anything. Unless its a 1 yr deal for lance lynn and kyle gibson types. Gray excites me more than that.ecleme22 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:38 pmGray has been solid.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:17 pm14 wins. 15 last night if we had any defense at all.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:02 pmHe does nothing for this team.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:55 amYeah, not at $35 million...he's not bringing anythingalw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:41 amThat's why he should be traded this offseason.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:36 amIf they play more than one month of the season in 2027 you lose that bet. I think they will not play all season, but I wouldn't bet that kind of money on it.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:22 amThat should be another teams problem.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 10:47 am If we don't pickup his option or renegotiate, he gets $5M at the end fo 2026 to walk away. But if we take the option, and IF the entire 2027 season gets locked out, he gets a pro-rated amount of $30M which would in that case be zero.
There's a pessimistic case for saving money by taking the option.
Gray also wants to be traded.
Trade Gray, then pick up two pitchers with that money saved.
Re: Gray's option for 2027
You really think the owners as a group will eat the entire season. I don’t.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 10:47 am If we don't pickup his option or renegotiate, he gets $5M at the end fo 2026 to walk away. But if we take the option, and IF the entire 2027 season gets locked out, he gets a pro-rated amount of $30M which would in that case be zero.
There's a pessimistic case for saving money by taking the option.
We have been thru this before. Tough talk but cooler heads prevail. Too much $$$$ for owners to lose to scrap all 162.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 267
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:50 pm
Re: Gray's option for 2027
Since when? He declined to waive his NTC last offseason AND at the trade deadline this year when asked.ecleme22 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:38 pmGray has been solid.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:17 pm14 wins. 15 last night if we had any defense at all.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:02 pmHe does nothing for this team.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:55 amYeah, not at $35 million...he's not bringing anythingalw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:41 amThat's why he should be traded this offseason.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:36 amIf they play more than one month of the season in 2027 you lose that bet. I think they will not play all season, but I wouldn't bet that kind of money on it.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:22 amThat should be another teams problem.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 10:47 am If we don't pickup his option or renegotiate, he gets $5M at the end fo 2026 to walk away. But if we take the option, and IF the entire 2027 season gets locked out, he gets a pro-rated amount of $30M which would in that case be zero.
There's a pessimistic case for saving money by taking the option.
Gray also wants to be traded.
Trade Gray, then pick up two pitchers with that money saved.
Re: Gray's option for 2027
Talk on the radio is that hes willing to do it now.WaltsSuccessor wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 16:05 pmSince when? He declined to waive his NTC last offseason AND at the trade deadline this year when asked.ecleme22 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:38 pmGray has been solid.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:17 pm14 wins. 15 last night if we had any defense at all.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:02 pmHe does nothing for this team.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:55 amYeah, not at $35 million...he's not bringing anythingalw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:41 amThat's why he should be traded this offseason.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:36 amIf they play more than one month of the season in 2027 you lose that bet. I think they will not play all season, but I wouldn't bet that kind of money on it.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:22 amThat should be another teams problem.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 10:47 am If we don't pickup his option or renegotiate, he gets $5M at the end fo 2026 to walk away. But if we take the option, and IF the entire 2027 season gets locked out, he gets a pro-rated amount of $30M which would in that case be zero.
There's a pessimistic case for saving money by taking the option.
Gray also wants to be traded.
Trade Gray, then pick up two pitchers with that money saved.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 267
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:50 pm
Re: Gray's option for 2027
Gotcha. Makes sense. The reluctance before didn't. But good to know, thanks.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 16:12 pmTalk on the radio is that hes willing to do it now.WaltsSuccessor wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 16:05 pmSince when? He declined to waive his NTC last offseason AND at the trade deadline this year when asked.ecleme22 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:38 pmGray has been solid.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:17 pm14 wins. 15 last night if we had any defense at all.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:02 pmHe does nothing for this team.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:55 amYeah, not at $35 million...he's not bringing anythingalw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:41 amThat's why he should be traded this offseason.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:36 amIf they play more than one month of the season in 2027 you lose that bet. I think they will not play all season, but I wouldn't bet that kind of money on it.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:22 amThat should be another teams problem.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 10:47 am If we don't pickup his option or renegotiate, he gets $5M at the end fo 2026 to walk away. But if we take the option, and IF the entire 2027 season gets locked out, he gets a pro-rated amount of $30M which would in that case be zero.
There's a pessimistic case for saving money by taking the option.
Gray also wants to be traded.
Trade Gray, then pick up two pitchers with that money saved.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 238
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:47 pm
Re: Gray's option for 2027
With that money saved, I'd like to see them go after high risk/high reward guys that if one of the two pan out, you flip at the deadline for young talent.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 14:12 pmThey will need 2-3 SPs to get them through the season. I'm all for it, they shouldn't be expensive.ecleme22 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 14:08 pmThe Cards could use '24 Lynn and Gibson next year...Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 13:13 pmI don't trust BDW to reinvenst anything. Unless its a 1 yr deal for lance lynn and kyle gibson types. Gray excites me more than that.ecleme22 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:38 pmGray has been solid.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:17 pm14 wins. 15 last night if we had any defense at all.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 12:02 pmHe does nothing for this team.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:55 amYeah, not at $35 million...he's not bringing anythingalw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:41 amThat's why he should be traded this offseason.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:36 amIf they play more than one month of the season in 2027 you lose that bet. I think they will not play all season, but I wouldn't bet that kind of money on it.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:22 amThat should be another teams problem.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 10:47 am If we don't pickup his option or renegotiate, he gets $5M at the end fo 2026 to walk away. But if we take the option, and IF the entire 2027 season gets locked out, he gets a pro-rated amount of $30M which would in that case be zero.
There's a pessimistic case for saving money by taking the option.
Gray also wants to be traded.
Trade Gray, then pick up two pitchers with that money saved.
Something a little less than what the Cubs did with Matthew Boyd? Zac Gallen will be a FA and had a down year - enough to bring his value down to where he goes for a pillow deal? Tyler Mahle? Dustin May?
I don't know. The standings won't matter, so try and extract value out of guys like that knowing you intend to pay them for just 60% of the season.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 356
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm
Re: Gray's option for 2027
If Dewitt ponies up a sizeable chunk of Arenado's remaining salary ($37MM after CO's payment) to move him, will he really want to do some version of that for Sonny Gray as well?
SG is nowhere near a "$35 million pitcher". If they had to pay ~ half of his salary to move him, at that point the better decision might be to keep him for their own rotation's needs.
SG is nowhere near a "$35 million pitcher". If they had to pay ~ half of his salary to move him, at that point the better decision might be to keep him for their own rotation's needs.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: 13 May 2018 08:13 am
Re: Gray's option for 2027
this, we need players who want to win, not cash pay checks, he had a chance to go to any tem in title race and wanted to cash checks, and he's never won a thing.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:22 amThat should be another teams problem.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 10:47 am If we don't pickup his option or renegotiate, he gets $5M at the end fo 2026 to walk away. But if we take the option, and IF the entire 2027 season gets locked out, he gets a pro-rated amount of $30M which would in that case be zero.
There's a pessimistic case for saving money by taking the option.
Re: Gray's option for 2027
Yea and there is just no reason to pay a guy $30M for a team that is probably going to finish in 4th place next year and is in the process of rebuilding a bit and a couple of years away from really competing again.AtillaTheBlue1 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 17:06 pmthis, we need players who want to win, not cash pay checks, he had a chance to go to any tem in title race and wanted to cash checks, and he's never won a thing.alw80 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 11:22 amThat should be another teams problem.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 10:47 am If we don't pickup his option or renegotiate, he gets $5M at the end fo 2026 to walk away. But if we take the option, and IF the entire 2027 season gets locked out, he gets a pro-rated amount of $30M which would in that case be zero.
There's a pessimistic case for saving money by taking the option.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2347
- Joined: 18 Apr 2020 13:40 pm
Re: Gray's option for 2027
The only way we pick up the 2027 options is IF 1- the new CBA is done early in 2026 season 2- the Cards young guys really start coming around (Gorman, Scott, Walker, Ivan...and others) 3- Gray pitches in 2026 like he did in 2023 4- Dewitt tells Bloom, I'm getting old, I want ONE more WS, here's the checkbook, go for it
That's 4 things that have to fall in place. I wouldn't want to make a big bet on even ONE of them,
That's 4 things that have to fall in place. I wouldn't want to make a big bet on even ONE of them,
Re: Gray's option for 2027
It all depends on how close they are to fielding a contender in 2027. If they are a decent SP away and Gray is still effective, they take the option. They won't go to FA for starting pitching.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025 10:47 am If we don't pickup his option or renegotiate, he gets $5M at the end fo 2026 to walk away. But if we take the option, and IF the entire 2027 season gets locked out, he gets a pro-rated amount of $30M which would in that case be zero.
There's a pessimistic case for saving money by taking the option.