Because you pull one name out of several people mentioned in this forum. I throw a name in with a similar resume and you act like it's foolish. So here's another name. Dusty Baker. Better resume than Girardi. More recently a manager. And mentioned much more on here than Joe Girardi.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:31 pmOkay.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:06 pmIm not making an argument for Guillen to manage. I asked why not use him instead. Keep up.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 18:28 pmGirardi was the manager of the Phillies when Shildt was fired. Okay, bud?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 17:58 pmGirardi was mentioned on here as a possible replacement for Shildt 4 years ago. Nobody has been talking about him since. And I mentioned a guy with an almost identical resume, age, and availability. But you contradict your own reasoning. If 4 years is ok, why isn't 13? Especially when there is so little difference in age and resume?ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 17:09 pm3 1/2 years isn’t a while.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 16:51 pmJust a random guy to use since he's been out a while.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 16:32 pmWhy not use Girardi?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 15:59 pmNo assertion. Im asking a question that you are avoiding. Simply pointing out Guillen's time away from the game is not an answer. He and Girardi are one year apart in age. Have similar resumes. And both have been away from the game. Guillen is probably the better manager. So why not use Guillen as a comparison?ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 13:55 pmCool dude.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 13:47 pmBoth won WS. And Guillen arguably got more out of his rosters. Hes still close to the game. And relatively young.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 12:41 pm3 years and 13 years are a big difference.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 12:07 pm
Out of the game for 3 years. Why not compare him to Ozzie Guillen? Similar resume and out of the game for a while.
Try again….
How does that support your assertion?
He’s only been away from the game 3+ years, was a WS champ and team leader.
Why shouldn’t Girardi be used in this example?
Girardi has been talked about on this forum a lot in the past.
Your attempt to come up with a better option was Guillen? A guy who last managed in Obama’s first term. Lol
I recall some chatter about Girardi on CT in 2023. But of course not right after Shildt was fired. Get your facts right.
And I never said 13 years was not okay. Please, by all means write an OP about Guillen being manager in 2025 instead of Oli.
Not sure why you are even making this argument.
We both agree Girardi was talked about on CT in the last 2-3 years, right?
We can agree that JG hasn’t managed in 13 years and JoeG 3.5, right?
And we can both agree that they are neck and neck as far as being formidable managers in their tenure, right?
So why is it weird I chose Girardi?
If Girardi were the 2025 Cardinals manager
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5917
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: If Girardi were the 2025 Cardinals manager
Re: If Girardi were the 2025 Cardinals manager
The foolishness comes not from you mentioning Guillen, but from you being beside yourself on why I would use girardi in my OP and not Guillen. It’s weird.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 00:40 amBecause you pull one name out of several people mentioned in this forum. I throw a name in with a similar resume and you act like it's foolish. So here's another name. Dusty Baker. Better resume than Girardi. More recently a manager. And mentioned much more on here than Joe Girardi.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:31 pmOkay.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:06 pmIm not making an argument for Guillen to manage. I asked why not use him instead. Keep up.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 18:28 pmGirardi was the manager of the Phillies when Shildt was fired. Okay, bud?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 17:58 pmGirardi was mentioned on here as a possible replacement for Shildt 4 years ago. Nobody has been talking about him since. And I mentioned a guy with an almost identical resume, age, and availability. But you contradict your own reasoning. If 4 years is ok, why isn't 13? Especially when there is so little difference in age and resume?ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 17:09 pm3 1/2 years isn’t a while.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 16:51 pmJust a random guy to use since he's been out a while.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 16:32 pmWhy not use Girardi?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 15:59 pmNo assertion. Im asking a question that you are avoiding. Simply pointing out Guillen's time away from the game is not an answer. He and Girardi are one year apart in age. Have similar resumes. And both have been away from the game. Guillen is probably the better manager. So why not use Guillen as a comparison?ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 13:55 pmCool dude.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 13:47 pmBoth won WS. And Guillen arguably got more out of his rosters. Hes still close to the game. And relatively young.
How does that support your assertion?
He’s only been away from the game 3+ years, was a WS champ and team leader.
Why shouldn’t Girardi be used in this example?
Girardi has been talked about on this forum a lot in the past.
Your attempt to come up with a better option was Guillen? A guy who last managed in Obama’s first term. Lol
I recall some chatter about Girardi on CT in 2023. But of course not right after Shildt was fired. Get your facts right.
And I never said 13 years was not okay. Please, by all means write an OP about Guillen being manager in 2025 instead of Oli.
Not sure why you are even making this argument.
We both agree Girardi was talked about on CT in the last 2-3 years, right?
We can agree that JG hasn’t managed in 13 years and JoeG 3.5, right?
And we can both agree that they are neck and neck as far as being formidable managers in their tenure, right?
So why is it weird I chose Girardi?
And I guess I could’ve used Baker, but he’s been retired for a while. And he’s more of a players manager, unlike Girardi.
Boy, basil shabaz has sure sent you on a wild goose chase. lol
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5917
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: If Girardi were the 2025 Cardinals manager
Not beside myself at all. I just asked a question and was not getting a legitimate answer. Just thought it was weird you singled out one guy's name out of several that have been mentioned over the past couple years.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 08:41 amThe foolishness comes not from you mentioning Guillen, but from you being beside yourself on why I would use girardi in my OP and not Guillen. It’s weird.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 00:40 amBecause you pull one name out of several people mentioned in this forum. I throw a name in with a similar resume and you act like it's foolish. So here's another name. Dusty Baker. Better resume than Girardi. More recently a manager. And mentioned much more on here than Joe Girardi.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:31 pmOkay.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:06 pmIm not making an argument for Guillen to manage. I asked why not use him instead. Keep up.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 18:28 pmGirardi was the manager of the Phillies when Shildt was fired. Okay, bud?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 17:58 pmGirardi was mentioned on here as a possible replacement for Shildt 4 years ago. Nobody has been talking about him since. And I mentioned a guy with an almost identical resume, age, and availability. But you contradict your own reasoning. If 4 years is ok, why isn't 13? Especially when there is so little difference in age and resume?ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 17:09 pm3 1/2 years isn’t a while.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 16:51 pmJust a random guy to use since he's been out a while.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 16:32 pmWhy not use Girardi?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 15:59 pmNo assertion. Im asking a question that you are avoiding. Simply pointing out Guillen's time away from the game is not an answer. He and Girardi are one year apart in age. Have similar resumes. And both have been away from the game. Guillen is probably the better manager. So why not use Guillen as a comparison?ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 13:55 pmCool dude.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 13:47 pm
Both won WS. And Guillen arguably got more out of his rosters. Hes still close to the game. And relatively young.
How does that support your assertion?
He’s only been away from the game 3+ years, was a WS champ and team leader.
Why shouldn’t Girardi be used in this example?
Girardi has been talked about on this forum a lot in the past.
Your attempt to come up with a better option was Guillen? A guy who last managed in Obama’s first term. Lol
I recall some chatter about Girardi on CT in 2023. But of course not right after Shildt was fired. Get your facts right.
And I never said 13 years was not okay. Please, by all means write an OP about Guillen being manager in 2025 instead of Oli.
Not sure why you are even making this argument.
We both agree Girardi was talked about on CT in the last 2-3 years, right?
We can agree that JG hasn’t managed in 13 years and JoeG 3.5, right?
And we can both agree that they are neck and neck as far as being formidable managers in their tenure, right?
So why is it weird I chose Girardi?
And I guess I could’ve used Baker, but he’s been retired for a while. And he’s more of a players manager, unlike Girardi.
Boy, basil shabaz has sure sent you on a wild goose chase. lol
Re: If Girardi were the 2025 Cardinals manager
I don’t recall OG’s name ever being mentioned on here. At least not in the last decade.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 09:25 amNot beside myself at all. I just asked a question and was not getting a legitimate answer. Just thought it was weird you singled out one guy's name out of several that have been mentioned over the past couple years.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 08:41 amThe foolishness comes not from you mentioning Guillen, but from you being beside yourself on why I would use girardi in my OP and not Guillen. It’s weird.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 00:40 amBecause you pull one name out of several people mentioned in this forum. I throw a name in with a similar resume and you act like it's foolish. So here's another name. Dusty Baker. Better resume than Girardi. More recently a manager. And mentioned much more on here than Joe Girardi.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:31 pmOkay.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:06 pmIm not making an argument for Guillen to manage. I asked why not use him instead. Keep up.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 18:28 pmGirardi was the manager of the Phillies when Shildt was fired. Okay, bud?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 17:58 pmGirardi was mentioned on here as a possible replacement for Shildt 4 years ago. Nobody has been talking about him since. And I mentioned a guy with an almost identical resume, age, and availability. But you contradict your own reasoning. If 4 years is ok, why isn't 13? Especially when there is so little difference in age and resume?ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 17:09 pm3 1/2 years isn’t a while.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 16:51 pmJust a random guy to use since he's been out a while.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 16:32 pmWhy not use Girardi?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 15:59 pmNo assertion. Im asking a question that you are avoiding. Simply pointing out Guillen's time away from the game is not an answer. He and Girardi are one year apart in age. Have similar resumes. And both have been away from the game. Guillen is probably the better manager. So why not use Guillen as a comparison?
He’s only been away from the game 3+ years, was a WS champ and team leader.
Why shouldn’t Girardi be used in this example?
Girardi has been talked about on this forum a lot in the past.
Your attempt to come up with a better option was Guillen? A guy who last managed in Obama’s first term. Lol
I recall some chatter about Girardi on CT in 2023. But of course not right after Shildt was fired. Get your facts right.
And I never said 13 years was not okay. Please, by all means write an OP about Guillen being manager in 2025 instead of Oli.
Not sure why you are even making this argument.
We both agree Girardi was talked about on CT in the last 2-3 years, right?
We can agree that JG hasn’t managed in 13 years and JoeG 3.5, right?
And we can both agree that they are neck and neck as far as being formidable managers in their tenure, right?
So why is it weird I chose Girardi?
And I guess I could’ve used Baker, but he’s been retired for a while. And he’s more of a players manager, unlike Girardi.
Boy, basil shabaz has sure sent you on a wild goose chase. lol
This is what we call grasping at straws, bud. Look it up.
Re: If Girardi were the 2025 Cardinals manager
Of course you would, you're an idiot.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 23:46 pmI'd still take either Yorst or Girardi over Marmol. I don't know why this means so much to you.alw80 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 16:42 pmBFD, Ned Yost won a WS too and hes an awful manager as well. You dont have a [fork]ing clue as to what youre talking about.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑12 Sep 2025 20:54 pmGirardi is a former Manager of the Year and World Champion. Still a lot better than Marmol.alw80 wrote: ↑12 Sep 2025 16:11 pmReality is that Girardi isn't a good manager and there is no way in hell hed have this group of misfits over .500.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑12 Sep 2025 09:33 amI suppose I don't, because it's ecleme22's fantasy, not mine. I'm just trying to inject some reality into it.alw80 wrote: ↑12 Sep 2025 06:02 amOf course you do, you dont have a clue as to what youre talking about.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025 14:25 pmIf Girardi were manager I suspect this team would be over .500. But play your fantasy games all you want.ecleme22 wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025 09:37 am ...and had a 72-75 record compared to the Pythagoreanan 69-78, and doing it with a FO that divested in the team last offseason, Mr. Girardi would be so celebrated on Cards Talk.
"Just give'em a good roster to work with!"
I want Bloom to change managers in 2026. I think we need a fresh approach. But unlike many CTers, I don't think 99% of the issues on the 2025 team are a result of Marmol's mismanagement.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2436
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:12 pm
Re: If Girardi were the 2025 Cardinals manager
I'm glad you think so.alw80 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 09:33 amOf course you would, you're an idiot.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 23:46 pmI'd still take either Yorst or Girardi over Marmol. I don't know why this means so much to you.alw80 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 16:42 pmBFD, Ned Yost won a WS too and hes an awful manager as well. You dont have a [fork]ing clue as to what youre talking about.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑12 Sep 2025 20:54 pmGirardi is a former Manager of the Year and World Champion. Still a lot better than Marmol.alw80 wrote: ↑12 Sep 2025 16:11 pmReality is that Girardi isn't a good manager and there is no way in hell hed have this group of misfits over .500.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑12 Sep 2025 09:33 amI suppose I don't, because it's ecleme22's fantasy, not mine. I'm just trying to inject some reality into it.alw80 wrote: ↑12 Sep 2025 06:02 amOf course you do, you dont have a clue as to what youre talking about.BrummerStealsHome wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025 14:25 pmIf Girardi were manager I suspect this team would be over .500. But play your fantasy games all you want.ecleme22 wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025 09:37 am ...and had a 72-75 record compared to the Pythagoreanan 69-78, and doing it with a FO that divested in the team last offseason, Mr. Girardi would be so celebrated on Cards Talk.
"Just give'em a good roster to work with!"
I want Bloom to change managers in 2026. I think we need a fresh approach. But unlike many CTers, I don't think 99% of the issues on the 2025 team are a result of Marmol's mismanagement.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5917
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: If Girardi were the 2025 Cardinals manager
I mentioned it, dumb[ash]. As a comparison to your name drop. Good grief. You have nothing other than avoiding the original question.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 09:31 amI don’t recall OG’s name ever being mentioned on here. At least not in the last decade.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 09:25 amNot beside myself at all. I just asked a question and was not getting a legitimate answer. Just thought it was weird you singled out one guy's name out of several that have been mentioned over the past couple years.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 08:41 amThe foolishness comes not from you mentioning Guillen, but from you being beside yourself on why I would use girardi in my OP and not Guillen. It’s weird.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 00:40 amBecause you pull one name out of several people mentioned in this forum. I throw a name in with a similar resume and you act like it's foolish. So here's another name. Dusty Baker. Better resume than Girardi. More recently a manager. And mentioned much more on here than Joe Girardi.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:31 pmOkay.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:06 pmIm not making an argument for Guillen to manage. I asked why not use him instead. Keep up.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 18:28 pmGirardi was the manager of the Phillies when Shildt was fired. Okay, bud?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 17:58 pmGirardi was mentioned on here as a possible replacement for Shildt 4 years ago. Nobody has been talking about him since. And I mentioned a guy with an almost identical resume, age, and availability. But you contradict your own reasoning. If 4 years is ok, why isn't 13? Especially when there is so little difference in age and resume?ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 17:09 pm3 1/2 years isn’t a while.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 16:51 pmJust a random guy to use since he's been out a while.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 16:32 pmWhy not use Girardi?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 15:59 pm
No assertion. Im asking a question that you are avoiding. Simply pointing out Guillen's time away from the game is not an answer. He and Girardi are one year apart in age. Have similar resumes. And both have been away from the game. Guillen is probably the better manager. So why not use Guillen as a comparison?
He’s only been away from the game 3+ years, was a WS champ and team leader.
Why shouldn’t Girardi be used in this example?
Girardi has been talked about on this forum a lot in the past.
Your attempt to come up with a better option was Guillen? A guy who last managed in Obama’s first term. Lol
I recall some chatter about Girardi on CT in 2023. But of course not right after Shildt was fired. Get your facts right.
And I never said 13 years was not okay. Please, by all means write an OP about Guillen being manager in 2025 instead of Oli.
Not sure why you are even making this argument.
We both agree Girardi was talked about on CT in the last 2-3 years, right?
We can agree that JG hasn’t managed in 13 years and JoeG 3.5, right?
And we can both agree that they are neck and neck as far as being formidable managers in their tenure, right?
So why is it weird I chose Girardi?
And I guess I could’ve used Baker, but he’s been retired for a while. And he’s more of a players manager, unlike Girardi.
Boy, basil shabaz has sure sent you on a wild goose chase. lol
This is what we call grasping at straws, bud. Look it up.
Re: If Girardi were the 2025 Cardinals manager
So you’re wondering why I didn’t use Guillen in my OP because you mentioned him after I wrote the OP?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 11:48 amI mentioned it, dumb[ash]. As a comparison to your name drop. Good grief. You have nothing other than avoiding the original question.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 09:31 amI don’t recall OG’s name ever being mentioned on here. At least not in the last decade.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 09:25 amNot beside myself at all. I just asked a question and was not getting a legitimate answer. Just thought it was weird you singled out one guy's name out of several that have been mentioned over the past couple years.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 08:41 amThe foolishness comes not from you mentioning Guillen, but from you being beside yourself on why I would use girardi in my OP and not Guillen. It’s weird.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 00:40 amBecause you pull one name out of several people mentioned in this forum. I throw a name in with a similar resume and you act like it's foolish. So here's another name. Dusty Baker. Better resume than Girardi. More recently a manager. And mentioned much more on here than Joe Girardi.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:31 pmOkay.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:06 pmIm not making an argument for Guillen to manage. I asked why not use him instead. Keep up.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 18:28 pmGirardi was the manager of the Phillies when Shildt was fired. Okay, bud?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 17:58 pmGirardi was mentioned on here as a possible replacement for Shildt 4 years ago. Nobody has been talking about him since. And I mentioned a guy with an almost identical resume, age, and availability. But you contradict your own reasoning. If 4 years is ok, why isn't 13? Especially when there is so little difference in age and resume?ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 17:09 pm3 1/2 years isn’t a while.
Girardi has been talked about on this forum a lot in the past.
Your attempt to come up with a better option was Guillen? A guy who last managed in Obama’s first term. Lol
I recall some chatter about Girardi on CT in 2023. But of course not right after Shildt was fired. Get your facts right.
And I never said 13 years was not okay. Please, by all means write an OP about Guillen being manager in 2025 instead of Oli.
Not sure why you are even making this argument.
We both agree Girardi was talked about on CT in the last 2-3 years, right?
We can agree that JG hasn’t managed in 13 years and JoeG 3.5, right?
And we can both agree that they are neck and neck as far as being formidable managers in their tenure, right?
So why is it weird I chose Girardi?
And I guess I could’ve used Baker, but he’s been retired for a while. And he’s more of a players manager, unlike Girardi.
Boy, basil shabaz has sure sent you on a wild goose chase. lol
This is what we call grasping at straws, bud. Look it up.
Lol. You grasping at straws. “Why didn’t you mention Ozzie Guillen in your OP??!!” How random…
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5917
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: If Girardi were the 2025 Cardinals manager
You have real reading comprehension problems. I asked why you picked one random guy who had been discussed. Several others have been mentioned, but you singled out one. You have failed to provide an answer to that simple question.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 12:02 pmSo you’re wondering why I didn’t use Guillen in my OP because you mentioned him after I wrote the OP?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 11:48 amI mentioned it, dumb[ash]. As a comparison to your name drop. Good grief. You have nothing other than avoiding the original question.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 09:31 amI don’t recall OG’s name ever being mentioned on here. At least not in the last decade.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 09:25 amNot beside myself at all. I just asked a question and was not getting a legitimate answer. Just thought it was weird you singled out one guy's name out of several that have been mentioned over the past couple years.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 08:41 amThe foolishness comes not from you mentioning Guillen, but from you being beside yourself on why I would use girardi in my OP and not Guillen. It’s weird.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 00:40 amBecause you pull one name out of several people mentioned in this forum. I throw a name in with a similar resume and you act like it's foolish. So here's another name. Dusty Baker. Better resume than Girardi. More recently a manager. And mentioned much more on here than Joe Girardi.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:31 pmOkay.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:06 pmIm not making an argument for Guillen to manage. I asked why not use him instead. Keep up.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 18:28 pmGirardi was the manager of the Phillies when Shildt was fired. Okay, bud?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 17:58 pmGirardi was mentioned on here as a possible replacement for Shildt 4 years ago. Nobody has been talking about him since. And I mentioned a guy with an almost identical resume, age, and availability. But you contradict your own reasoning. If 4 years is ok, why isn't 13? Especially when there is so little difference in age and resume?
I recall some chatter about Girardi on CT in 2023. But of course not right after Shildt was fired. Get your facts right.
And I never said 13 years was not okay. Please, by all means write an OP about Guillen being manager in 2025 instead of Oli.
Not sure why you are even making this argument.
We both agree Girardi was talked about on CT in the last 2-3 years, right?
We can agree that JG hasn’t managed in 13 years and JoeG 3.5, right?
And we can both agree that they are neck and neck as far as being formidable managers in their tenure, right?
So why is it weird I chose Girardi?
And I guess I could’ve used Baker, but he’s been retired for a while. And he’s more of a players manager, unlike Girardi.
Boy, basil shabaz has sure sent you on a wild goose chase. lol
This is what we call grasping at straws, bud. Look it up.
Lol. You grasping at straws. “Why didn’t you mention Ozzie Guillen in your OP??!!” How random…
I mentioned Guillen because he was very similar. Nowhere did I question why you didn't use him. You took issue because he had been away from the game for a while. Yet your choice had been also.
Try reading very slowly. Maybe have someone else read it and explain so you understand.
Re: If Girardi were the 2025 Cardinals manager
You: “Why did you pick this random manager and not that random manager?”JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 13:00 pmYou have real reading comprehension problems. I asked why you picked one random guy who had been discussed. Several others have been mentioned, but you singled out one. You have failed to provide an answer to that simple question.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 12:02 pmSo you’re wondering why I didn’t use Guillen in my OP because you mentioned him after I wrote the OP?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 11:48 amI mentioned it, dumb[ash]. As a comparison to your name drop. Good grief. You have nothing other than avoiding the original question.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 09:31 amI don’t recall OG’s name ever being mentioned on here. At least not in the last decade.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 09:25 amNot beside myself at all. I just asked a question and was not getting a legitimate answer. Just thought it was weird you singled out one guy's name out of several that have been mentioned over the past couple years.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 08:41 amThe foolishness comes not from you mentioning Guillen, but from you being beside yourself on why I would use girardi in my OP and not Guillen. It’s weird.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 00:40 amBecause you pull one name out of several people mentioned in this forum. I throw a name in with a similar resume and you act like it's foolish. So here's another name. Dusty Baker. Better resume than Girardi. More recently a manager. And mentioned much more on here than Joe Girardi.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:31 pmOkay.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:06 pmIm not making an argument for Guillen to manage. I asked why not use him instead. Keep up.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 18:28 pmGirardi was the manager of the Phillies when Shildt was fired. Okay, bud?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 17:58 pmGirardi was mentioned on here as a possible replacement for Shildt 4 years ago. Nobody has been talking about him since. And I mentioned a guy with an almost identical resume, age, and availability. But you contradict your own reasoning. If 4 years is ok, why isn't 13? Especially when there is so little difference in age and resume?
I recall some chatter about Girardi on CT in 2023. But of course not right after Shildt was fired. Get your facts right.
And I never said 13 years was not okay. Please, by all means write an OP about Guillen being manager in 2025 instead of Oli.
Not sure why you are even making this argument.
We both agree Girardi was talked about on CT in the last 2-3 years, right?
We can agree that JG hasn’t managed in 13 years and JoeG 3.5, right?
And we can both agree that they are neck and neck as far as being formidable managers in their tenure, right?
So why is it weird I chose Girardi?
And I guess I could’ve used Baker, but he’s been retired for a while. And he’s more of a players manager, unlike Girardi.
Boy, basil shabaz has sure sent you on a wild goose chase. lol
This is what we call grasping at straws, bud. Look it up.
Lol. You grasping at straws. “Why didn’t you mention Ozzie Guillen in your OP??!!” How random…
I mentioned Guillen because he was very similar. Nowhere did I question why you didn't use him. You took issue because he had been away from the game for a while. Yet your choice had been also.
Try reading very slowly. Maybe have someone else read it and explain so you understand.
I think it’s great you mentioned Guillen, but he’s been away from the game 13 years. And if you know about math, 3.5 years is different than 13 years. Also, you have admitted that Girardi has been mentioned on CT.
So in my OP, I used a manager who managed as recently as 2022 and has been discussed on CT.
So…what’s your beef?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1319
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: If Girardi were the 2025 Cardinals manager
Grasping at straws still?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1319
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: If Girardi were the 2025 Cardinals manager
Not at all. It’s just common place for any thread you are involved in to turn into childish and endless back and forth drivel devoid of any meaningful content.
You are typically the common denominator when this happens.
Congratulations.
Re: If Girardi were the 2025 Cardinals manager
Let’s see. I’m currently on two threads, both of which you have gone after me unprovoked.Basil Shabazz wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 14:05 pmNot at all. It’s just common place for any thread you are involved in to turn into childish and endless back and forth drivel devoid of any meaningful content.
You are typically the common denominator when this happens.
Congratulations.
When it comes to ‘childish’ maybe look in the mirror, bud.
Also, I love living in your head…
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5917
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: If Girardi were the 2025 Cardinals manager
I dont have a beef. I asked why you chose that one guy. Got no straight answer. So I posed another name and you blew it off because he'd been out of the game too long. So I posed another name. You admitted that guy was a name that could've been considered. You were the one who got offended and claimed 'straw man' and such.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 13:11 pmYou: “Why did you pick this random manager and not that random manager?”JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 13:00 pmYou have real reading comprehension problems. I asked why you picked one random guy who had been discussed. Several others have been mentioned, but you singled out one. You have failed to provide an answer to that simple question.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 12:02 pmSo you’re wondering why I didn’t use Guillen in my OP because you mentioned him after I wrote the OP?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 11:48 amI mentioned it, dumb[ash]. As a comparison to your name drop. Good grief. You have nothing other than avoiding the original question.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 09:31 amI don’t recall OG’s name ever being mentioned on here. At least not in the last decade.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 09:25 amNot beside myself at all. I just asked a question and was not getting a legitimate answer. Just thought it was weird you singled out one guy's name out of several that have been mentioned over the past couple years.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 08:41 amThe foolishness comes not from you mentioning Guillen, but from you being beside yourself on why I would use girardi in my OP and not Guillen. It’s weird.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 00:40 amBecause you pull one name out of several people mentioned in this forum. I throw a name in with a similar resume and you act like it's foolish. So here's another name. Dusty Baker. Better resume than Girardi. More recently a manager. And mentioned much more on here than Joe Girardi.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:31 pmOkay.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:06 pmIm not making an argument for Guillen to manage. I asked why not use him instead. Keep up.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 18:28 pmGirardi was the manager of the Phillies when Shildt was fired. Okay, bud?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 17:58 pm
Girardi was mentioned on here as a possible replacement for Shildt 4 years ago. Nobody has been talking about him since. And I mentioned a guy with an almost identical resume, age, and availability. But you contradict your own reasoning. If 4 years is ok, why isn't 13? Especially when there is so little difference in age and resume?
I recall some chatter about Girardi on CT in 2023. But of course not right after Shildt was fired. Get your facts right.
And I never said 13 years was not okay. Please, by all means write an OP about Guillen being manager in 2025 instead of Oli.
Not sure why you are even making this argument.
We both agree Girardi was talked about on CT in the last 2-3 years, right?
We can agree that JG hasn’t managed in 13 years and JoeG 3.5, right?
And we can both agree that they are neck and neck as far as being formidable managers in their tenure, right?
So why is it weird I chose Girardi?
And I guess I could’ve used Baker, but he’s been retired for a while. And he’s more of a players manager, unlike Girardi.
Boy, basil shabaz has sure sent you on a wild goose chase. lol
This is what we call grasping at straws, bud. Look it up.
Lol. You grasping at straws. “Why didn’t you mention Ozzie Guillen in your OP??!!” How random…
I mentioned Guillen because he was very similar. Nowhere did I question why you didn't use him. You took issue because he had been away from the game for a while. Yet your choice had been also.
Try reading very slowly. Maybe have someone else read it and explain so you understand.
I think it’s great you mentioned Guillen, but he’s been away from the game 13 years. And if you know about math, 3.5 years is different than 13 years. Also, you have admitted that Girardi has been mentioned on CT.
So in my OP, I used a manager who managed as recently as 2022 and has been discussed on CT.
So…what’s your beef?
Re: If Girardi were the 2025 Cardinals manager
You asked me if I wrote OPs like this one when Matheny and Shildt were managers. Funny question.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 14:23 pmI dont have a beef. I asked why you chose that one guy. Got no straight answer. So I posed another name and you blew it off because he'd been out of the game too long. So I posed another name. You admitted that guy was a name that could've been considered. You were the one who got offended and claimed 'straw man' and such.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 13:11 pmYou: “Why did you pick this random manager and not that random manager?”JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 13:00 pmYou have real reading comprehension problems. I asked why you picked one random guy who had been discussed. Several others have been mentioned, but you singled out one. You have failed to provide an answer to that simple question.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 12:02 pmSo you’re wondering why I didn’t use Guillen in my OP because you mentioned him after I wrote the OP?JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 11:48 amI mentioned it, dumb[ash]. As a comparison to your name drop. Good grief. You have nothing other than avoiding the original question.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 09:31 amI don’t recall OG’s name ever being mentioned on here. At least not in the last decade.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 09:25 amNot beside myself at all. I just asked a question and was not getting a legitimate answer. Just thought it was weird you singled out one guy's name out of several that have been mentioned over the past couple years.ecleme22 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 08:41 amThe foolishness comes not from you mentioning Guillen, but from you being beside yourself on why I would use girardi in my OP and not Guillen. It’s weird.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025 00:40 amBecause you pull one name out of several people mentioned in this forum. I throw a name in with a similar resume and you act like it's foolish. So here's another name. Dusty Baker. Better resume than Girardi. More recently a manager. And mentioned much more on here than Joe Girardi.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:31 pmOkay.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 20:06 pmIm not making an argument for Guillen to manage. I asked why not use him instead. Keep up.ecleme22 wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025 18:28 pm
Girardi was the manager of the Phillies when Shildt was fired. Okay, bud?
I recall some chatter about Girardi on CT in 2023. But of course not right after Shildt was fired. Get your facts right.
And I never said 13 years was not okay. Please, by all means write an OP about Guillen being manager in 2025 instead of Oli.
Not sure why you are even making this argument.
We both agree Girardi was talked about on CT in the last 2-3 years, right?
We can agree that JG hasn’t managed in 13 years and JoeG 3.5, right?
And we can both agree that they are neck and neck as far as being formidable managers in their tenure, right?
So why is it weird I chose Girardi?
And I guess I could’ve used Baker, but he’s been retired for a while. And he’s more of a players manager, unlike Girardi.
Boy, basil shabaz has sure sent you on a wild goose chase. lol
This is what we call grasping at straws, bud. Look it up.
Lol. You grasping at straws. “Why didn’t you mention Ozzie Guillen in your OP??!!” How random…
I mentioned Guillen because he was very similar. Nowhere did I question why you didn't use him. You took issue because he had been away from the game for a while. Yet your choice had been also.
Try reading very slowly. Maybe have someone else read it and explain so you understand.
I think it’s great you mentioned Guillen, but he’s been away from the game 13 years. And if you know about math, 3.5 years is different than 13 years. Also, you have admitted that Girardi has been mentioned on CT.
So in my OP, I used a manager who managed as recently as 2022 and has been discussed on CT.
So…what’s your beef?
Later I said if you wanted to write an OP about Guillen, that would be cool.
I haven't been offended at all. I find it funny you're like 'why not Guillen?' Then you're like, 'why not Baker?'
LOL. So random.