Um yes they do. Most orgs dont use their 26th man that much unless injuries occur and dont bring up rookies to be 26th man rittung on bench
The Curious Case of Garrett Hampson
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: The Curious Case of Garrett Hampson
Do you want church to be brought up and not get at bats? Did you want to take away scotts at bats.Cranny wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 10:35 amWere Church and Antico at Memphis when they signed Hampson?ecleme22 wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 09:13 amExactly.Melville wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 09:11 amFacts matter.
Church was blocked by Scott - both being LH hitting CF's with an organization overloaded from that side.
Hampson took zero PA's from Church.
When Scott was hurt, Church was promoted and played.
Is Hampson worthy of an MLB job?
Not really.
Did he block Church?
Not for one second.
So.e of you dont understand how 13th position player works.
You only get to start 9 guys. Not 13
Re: The Curious Case of Garrett Hampson
YepWattage wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 11:10 amDo you want church to be brought up and not get at bats? Did you want to take away scotts at bats.Cranny wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 10:35 amWere Church and Antico at Memphis when they signed Hampson?ecleme22 wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 09:13 amExactly.Melville wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 09:11 amFacts matter.
Church was blocked by Scott - both being LH hitting CF's with an organization overloaded from that side.
Hampson took zero PA's from Church.
When Scott was hurt, Church was promoted and played.
Is Hampson worthy of an MLB job?
Not really.
Did he block Church?
Not for one second.
So.e of you dont understand how 13th position player works.
You only get to start 9 guys. Not 13
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 6190
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: The Curious Case of Garrett Hampson
Exactly. Why did they need a transition year? Bloom has done this job and doesn't need training. Especially training from that putz. This was nothing more than propping up Mo's ego. The whole thing is weird and confusing. Mo was going to hand things before the deadline, then it was after the deadline, now it's after the season. What a mess.Rojo Johnson wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 10:51 amMoe has never had a plan since he became GM/POBO. Why would he establish one for his last year in the organization? This is why he should have been relegated to answering his phone, assuming it would ever ring, to answer questions such as which drawer did you put the yellow hi-liters in? It is a half-[ashed] mess because that what he does. His incompetence as a leader/manager is inexplicable.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 00:47 amUsing a reset season or runway season or whatever the heck they're calling it, should be used to play the guys who are in future plans. But that would mean there is a plan. This whole season has been a typical half-[ashed] Mozeliak mess. He did nothing to initiate a reset. He sat around all winter with his thumb up his (donkey). Couldn't trade the NTCs. He simply let old free agents walk. No effort Johnny jackass.
Re: The Curious Case of Garrett Hampson
Do you understand the difference between the conditions in AAA ball vs. the major leagues? It's not just about
ABs. It's about the aura of being a major leaguer and being honored for doing a good job at AAA.
Re: The Curious Case of Garrett Hampson
I’m sure every player in AAA understands how major-league rosters are built. And they understand Garrett Hampson is mostly just a safety net for the other starters that the organization wants to start 100% of the time.Cranny wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 12:08 pmDo you understand the difference between the conditions in AAA ball vs. the major leagues? It's not just about
ABs. It's about the aura of being a major leaguer and being honored for doing a good job at AAA.
Re: The Curious Case of Garrett Hampson
Terribly poor safety net.ecleme22 wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 12:19 pmI’m sure every player in AAA understands how major-league rosters are built. And they understand Garrett Hampson is mostly just a safety net for the other starters that the organization wants to start 100% of the time.Cranny wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 12:08 pmDo you understand the difference between the conditions in AAA ball vs. the major leagues? It's not just about
ABs. It's about the aura of being a major leaguer and being honored for doing a good job at AAA.
Re: The Curious Case of Garrett Hampson
Hampson is not an MLB player. Period. And MLB roster spots should not be handed out to anyone who is not an MLB quality player. Not on teams that actually care about winning.
But under Mozeliak, it's just fine to have players who don't belong on an MLB roster. I don't give a s*** whether he's the 26th man or whatever. He has to be able to perform when called upon, and he cannot do it.
But under Mozeliak, it's just fine to have players who don't belong on an MLB roster. I don't give a s*** whether he's the 26th man or whatever. He has to be able to perform when called upon, and he cannot do it.
Re: The Curious Case of Garrett Hampson
Not relevant.Cranny wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 10:35 amWere Church and Antico at Memphis when they signed Hampson?ecleme22 wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 09:13 amExactly.Melville wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 09:11 amFacts matter.
Church was blocked by Scott - both being LH hitting CF's with an organization overloaded from that side.
Hampson took zero PA's from Church.
When Scott was hurt, Church was promoted and played.
Is Hampson worthy of an MLB job?
Not really.
Did he block Church?
Not for one second.
Church and Antico could have been anywhere on earth when Hampson was signed - and they still would not have been able to play 7 defensive positions.
As bad as he is, Hampson can.
Re: The Curious Case of Garrett Hampson
Whom would you rather have pinch hit in a late inning with the tying or winning run in scoring position?icon wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 13:13 pm Hampson is not an MLB player. Period. And MLB roster spots should not be handed out to anyone who is not an MLB quality player. Not on teams that actually care about winning.
But under Mozeliak, it's just fine to have players who don't belong on an MLB roster. I don't give a s*** whether he's the 26th man or whatever. He has to be able to perform when called upon, and he cannot do it.
Re: The Curious Case of Garrett Hampson
Mo-ran mailed this season in...took the money ...icon wrote: ↑06 Sep 2025 13:13 pm Hampson is not an MLB player. Period. And MLB roster spots should not be handed out to anyone who is not an MLB quality player. Not on teams that actually care about winning.
But under Mozeliak, it's just fine to have players who don't belong on an MLB roster. I don't give a s*** whether he's the 26th man or whatever. He has to be able to perform when called upon, and he cannot do it.
Made no effort to make this team competitive and just watched the fans stop caring..
And his smug, arrogant attitude is a [fork] you to fans.
Re: The Curious Case of Garrett Hampson
Hampson should never have been brought in over our own prospects.
Re: The Curious Case of Garrett Hampson
Does anyone know who scored the game winning run last night?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 13516
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm