For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

desertrat23
Forum User
Posts: 1541
Joined: 28 May 2024 18:12 pm

Re: For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Post by desertrat23 »

Cranny wrote: 05 Sep 2025 07:48 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 05 Sep 2025 07:32 am
Bomber1 wrote: 04 Sep 2025 14:37 pm
ForumPolice wrote: 04 Sep 2025 14:17 pm I personally don't care. I want Bloom to install who he likes best. There just needs to be a flushing of this system and you can't do it keeping Oli at the helm.

Canning him is the easiest way to signal to fans that you know that there's a major issue, you hear them and are trying a different path. Just the idea of bringing him back optically looks like, as a team, you like where we're going. If you want any fans in the stadium next year that cannot be the message
The only thing that would be worse than keeping him would be a repeat of Mozeliak’s moronic statement after extending Marmol in early ‘24 - “we don’t want pressure on him to win”.
Same owner and front office who fired Matheny who never had a losing season.
Matheny was under appreciated.
Opponents appreciated him. Heck, he gave the 2013 Red Sox a world championship and the 2014 Giants the National League pennant. What’s not to like?
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 836
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Post by ScotchMIrish »

desertrat23 wrote: 05 Sep 2025 08:50 am
Cranny wrote: 05 Sep 2025 07:48 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 05 Sep 2025 07:32 am
Bomber1 wrote: 04 Sep 2025 14:37 pm
ForumPolice wrote: 04 Sep 2025 14:17 pm I personally don't care. I want Bloom to install who he likes best. There just needs to be a flushing of this system and you can't do it keeping Oli at the helm.

Canning him is the easiest way to signal to fans that you know that there's a major issue, you hear them and are trying a different path. Just the idea of bringing him back optically looks like, as a team, you like where we're going. If you want any fans in the stadium next year that cannot be the message
The only thing that would be worse than keeping him would be a repeat of Mozeliak’s moronic statement after extending Marmol in early ‘24 - “we don’t want pressure on him to win”.
Same owner and front office who fired Matheny who never had a losing season.
Matheny was under appreciated.
Opponents appreciated him. Heck, he gave the 2013 Red Sox a world championship and the 2014 Giants the National League pennant. What’s not to like?
Scoreboard.

LaRussa's final 6 seasons with Pujols
2006 - 83
2007 - 78
2008 - 86
2009 - 91
2010 - 86
2011 - 90
________
514

Matheny's 6 seasons without Pujols
2012 - 88
2013 - 97
2014 - 90
2015 - 100
2016 - 86
2017 - 83
________
544

LaRussa's first 6 seasons without Pujols
1996 - 88
1997 - 73
1998 - 83
1999 - 75
2000 - 95
2001 - 93
________
507

6 seasons after Matheny
2019 - 91
covid 30-28 extrapolate to 162 = 84
2021 - 90
2022 - 93
2023 - 71
2024 - 83
________
512
JuanAgosto
Forum User
Posts: 5991
Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm

Re: For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Post by JuanAgosto »

You should note that Tony's last 6 seasons included 2 WS titles.
Cranny
Forum User
Posts: 5278
Joined: 24 May 2024 09:26 am

Re: For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Post by Cranny »

Matheny was undermined by several players who didn’t like his constant push for 110%+ effort.
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 12131
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Post by rockondlouie »

Cranny wrote: 05 Sep 2025 12:13 pm Matheny was undermined by several players who didn’t like his constant push for 110%+ effort.
Matheny was a pitiful manager carried by the veterans from a World Series winning team he inherited.

He preceded to drive the Rolls Royce over the cliff.

Horribly Manager, right up there w/Oli.
ramfandan
Forum User
Posts: 5339
Joined: 27 May 2024 19:52 pm

Re: For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Post by ramfandan »

Cranny wrote: 05 Sep 2025 12:13 pm Matheny was undermined by several players who didn’t like his constant push for 110%+ effort.
Maybe because athletes know there is no such thing as 110% effort.
100% is max and a coach/manager stating 110% + comes across as phony to the player.
100% in anything is the ultimate.
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 6026
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

desertrat23 wrote: 05 Sep 2025 08:50 am
Cranny wrote: 05 Sep 2025 07:48 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 05 Sep 2025 07:32 am
Bomber1 wrote: 04 Sep 2025 14:37 pm
ForumPolice wrote: 04 Sep 2025 14:17 pm I personally don't care. I want Bloom to install who he likes best. There just needs to be a flushing of this system and you can't do it keeping Oli at the helm.

Canning him is the easiest way to signal to fans that you know that there's a major issue, you hear them and are trying a different path. Just the idea of bringing him back optically looks like, as a team, you like where we're going. If you want any fans in the stadium next year that cannot be the message
The only thing that would be worse than keeping him would be a repeat of Mozeliak’s moronic statement after extending Marmol in early ‘24 - “we don’t want pressure on him to win”.
Same owner and front office who fired Matheny who never had a losing season.
Matheny was under appreciated.
Opponents appreciated him. Heck, he gave the 2013 Red Sox a world championship and the 2014 Giants the National League pennant. What’s not to like?
lol
Melville
Forum User
Posts: 4158
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:16 pm

Re: For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Post by Melville »

Adam2 wrote: 04 Sep 2025 14:09 pm If you are one of what seems to be the majority of posters here who want Marmol gone, who is your wish list of candidates?
The Marmot is terrible.
Period.
Whoever replaces him must have zero previous connection to the STL organization.
The WORST thing the team could do is make a stupid legacy marketing play involving the likes of Yad-I or Pujols.
Such a move would be toxic and would further damage the franchise for many years.
It would also be a mistake to turn to familiar organization retreads - Jay, Descalso, etc.
STL needs an experienced, respected, tough leader
My preferred candidates would include Ausmus, Mattingly, Gibbons, Bochy.
Possibly Weiss.
Bomber1
Forum User
Posts: 1235
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:27 pm

Re: For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Post by Bomber1 »

Melville wrote: 05 Sep 2025 13:37 pm
Adam2 wrote: 04 Sep 2025 14:09 pm If you are one of what seems to be the majority of posters here who want Marmol gone, who is your wish list of candidates?
The Marmot is terrible.
Period.
Whoever replaces him must have zero previous connection to the STL organization.
The WORST thing the team could do is make a stupid legacy marketing play involving the likes of Yad-I or Pujols.
Such a move would be toxic and would further damage the franchise for many years.
It would also be a mistake to turn to familiar organization retreads - Jay, Descalso, etc.
STL needs an experienced, respected, tough leader
My preferred candidates would include Ausmus, Mattingly, Gibbons, Bochy.
Possibly Weiss.
I agree with your thinking that the next manager should not have ANY previous ties to the Cardinals.
The last manager they hired with zero ties to the organization won 2 World Series.

I hope Bloom agrees with us.
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 6026
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

Cranny wrote: 05 Sep 2025 12:13 pm Matheny was undermined by several players who didn’t like his constant push for 110%+ effort.
Matheny himself said he struggled with communication when he was hired by the royals and said he worked on improving before being hired. Good communication skills is one of the most important things a manager needs to be good at
Melville
Forum User
Posts: 4158
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:16 pm

Re: For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Post by Melville »

Bomber1 wrote: 05 Sep 2025 13:41 pm
Melville wrote: 05 Sep 2025 13:37 pm
Adam2 wrote: 04 Sep 2025 14:09 pm If you are one of what seems to be the majority of posters here who want Marmol gone, who is your wish list of candidates?
The Marmot is terrible.
Period.
Whoever replaces him must have zero previous connection to the STL organization.
The WORST thing the team could do is make a stupid legacy marketing play involving the likes of Yad-I or Pujols.
Such a move would be toxic and would further damage the franchise for many years.
It would also be a mistake to turn to familiar organization retreads - Jay, Descalso, etc.
STL needs an experienced, respected, tough leader
My preferred candidates would include Ausmus, Mattingly, Gibbons, Bochy.
Possibly Weiss.
I agree with your thinking that the next manager should not have ANY previous ties to the Cardinals.
The last manager they hired with zero ties to the organization won 2 World Series.

I hope Bloom agrees with us.
If he doesn't, the team will fail to content next year.
As certain as your next heartbeat.
Cranny
Forum User
Posts: 5278
Joined: 24 May 2024 09:26 am

Re: For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Post by Cranny »

rockondlouie wrote: 05 Sep 2025 12:51 pm
Cranny wrote: 05 Sep 2025 12:13 pm Matheny was undermined by several players who didn’t like his constant push for 110%+ effort.
Matheny was a pitiful manager carried by the veterans from a World Series winning team he inherited.

He preceded to drive the Rolls Royce over the cliff.

Horribly Manager, right up there w/Oli.
We can agree to disagree on our OPINIONS of what type of manager Matheny was. That's fine.
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 12131
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Post by rockondlouie »

Cranny wrote: 05 Sep 2025 14:25 pm
rockondlouie wrote: 05 Sep 2025 12:51 pm
Cranny wrote: 05 Sep 2025 12:13 pm Matheny was undermined by several players who didn’t like his constant push for 110%+ effort.
Matheny was a pitiful manager carried by the veterans from a World Series winning team he inherited.

He preceded to drive the Rolls Royce over the cliff.

Horribly Manager, right up there w/Oli.
We can agree to disagree on our OPINIONS of what type of manager Matheny was. That's fine.
Agreed
Mr.Snuggleupagus
Forum User
Posts: 200
Joined: 23 Aug 2025 17:34 pm

Re: For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Post by Mr.Snuggleupagus »

Tom Herr
Adam2
Forum User
Posts: 670
Joined: 26 Jun 2024 11:40 am

Re: For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Post by Adam2 »

Melville wrote: 05 Sep 2025 13:37 pm
Adam2 wrote: 04 Sep 2025 14:09 pm If you are one of what seems to be the majority of posters here who want Marmol gone, who is your wish list of candidates?
The Marmot is terrible.
Period.
Whoever replaces him must have zero previous connection to the STL organization.
The WORST thing the team could do is make a stupid legacy marketing play involving the likes of Yad-I or Pujols.
Such a move would be toxic and would further damage the franchise for many years.
It would also be a mistake to turn to familiar organization retreads - Jay, Descalso, etc.
STL needs an experienced, respected, tough leader
My preferred candidates would include Ausmus, Mattingly, Gibbons, Bochy.
Possibly Weiss.
I do like Mattingly, he did well in an awful situation in Miami. What are your thoughts on Varitek?
Melville
Forum User
Posts: 4158
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:16 pm

Re: For all the people wanting Marmol gone

Post by Melville »

Adam2 wrote: 06 Sep 2025 08:18 am
Melville wrote: 05 Sep 2025 13:37 pm
Adam2 wrote: 04 Sep 2025 14:09 pm If you are one of what seems to be the majority of posters here who want Marmol gone, who is your wish list of candidates?
The Marmot is terrible.
Period.
Whoever replaces him must have zero previous connection to the STL organization.
The WORST thing the team could do is make a stupid legacy marketing play involving the likes of Yad-I or Pujols.
Such a move would be toxic and would further damage the franchise for many years.
It would also be a mistake to turn to familiar organization retreads - Jay, Descalso, etc.
STL needs an experienced, respected, tough leader
My preferred candidates would include Ausmus, Mattingly, Gibbons, Bochy.
Possibly Weiss.
I do like Mattingly, he did well in an awful situation in Miami. What are your thoughts on Varitek?
Never been a manager.
Never been a bench coach.
Appears to have been primarily involved in scouting/video/data for game preparation.
Has been retired more than a decade and his coaching career has not really shown advance or progress.
He is a huge question mark who may or may not be managerial material.
That is not a risk STL can afford to take.
Post Reply