He wa a 7 year veteran last year.Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 15:07 pmHe’s had a variety of secondary pitches throughout his career. The Cardinals mostly limited him to fastball/slider when he worked out of the pen. That doesn’t mean he had refined secondary pitches… it typically takes time to have command over them - time that he did not have, when the Cardinals chose to interrupt his development and rush him to the majors as a reliever.ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:49 pmSo...did he have a second pitch or not?Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:37 pmThen what happened?ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:20 pmHis first 12 starts of 2024 he was 4-2 with a 2.70 ERAQuincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:13 pmHe wasn’t that good. Started off terribly this year, and the Giants had better options.
Pretty much what you’d expect from a guy adapting to starting in the major leagues, right?
jordan hicks
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: jordan hicks
Re: jordan hicks
JMO but -Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 15:07 pmHe’s had a variety of secondary pitches throughout his career. The Cardinals mostly limited him to fastball/slider when he worked out of the pen. That doesn’t mean he had refined secondary pitches… it typically takes time to have command over them - time that he did not have, when the Cardinals chose to interrupt his development and rush him to the majors as a reliever.ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:49 pmSo...did he have a second pitch or not?Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:37 pmThen what happened?ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:20 pmHis first 12 starts of 2024 he was 4-2 with a 2.70 ERAQuincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:13 pmHe wasn’t that good. Started off terribly this year, and the Giants had better options.
Pretty much what you’d expect from a guy adapting to starting in the major leagues, right?
Hicks has had plenty of time to develop and/or refine secondary pitches.
He’s just not that good.
-
An Old Friend
- Forum User
- Posts: 13232
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
Re: jordan hicks
The time to develop those is the time that they skipped. Trying to develop secondaries in the majors is extremely difficult as the margin for error is so slim.Bomber1 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 16:01 pmJMO but -Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 15:07 pmHe’s had a variety of secondary pitches throughout his career. The Cardinals mostly limited him to fastball/slider when he worked out of the pen. That doesn’t mean he had refined secondary pitches… it typically takes time to have command over them - time that he did not have, when the Cardinals chose to interrupt his development and rush him to the majors as a reliever.ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:49 pmSo...did he have a second pitch or not?Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:37 pmThen what happened?ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:20 pmHis first 12 starts of 2024 he was 4-2 with a 2.70 ERAQuincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:13 pmHe wasn’t that good. Started off terribly this year, and the Giants had better options.
Pretty much what you’d expect from a guy adapting to starting in the major leagues, right?
Hicks has had plenty of time to develop and/or refine secondary pitches.
He’s just not that good.
His outcome as a starter would have had a greater likelihood of success had they let him build and develop at AA and AAA as a starter.
Re: jordan hicks
Thanks for clearing that up. I remember him as a future starter in the minors but he struggled with control the whole time.rockondlouie wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 12:11 pmOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 11:54 amYou don’t develop secondary pitches in the bullpen you rely on your best pitches. You develop your secondary pitches by starting in the minors and working on them he was rushed to the majors and thrown in the bullpen for four years so he was never able to develop those pitchesrockondlouie wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 11:09 am Didn't give him time to develop.![]()
![]()
He's a one trick pony, never had the secondary pitches needed to be a starter.![]()
You do realize he wasn't drafted as a reliever and that he was a starter who made 31 minor league starts over two minor league seasons (not rushed), right?
He didn't have the necessary secondary pitches to be successful in MLB and thus was converted (like many) into a RP.
He never had the secondary pitch quality to become a good major league starter, proven out by his terrible career 4.91 ERA when starting.
One trick pony, not a major league caliber starter.
Re: jordan hicks
Ok I’ll grant that the likelihood of starter success would have been greater had they left him to develop.An Old Friend wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 16:10 pmThe time to develop those is the time that they skipped. Trying to develop secondaries in the majors is extremely difficult as the margin for error is so slim.Bomber1 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 16:01 pmJMO but -Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 15:07 pmHe’s had a variety of secondary pitches throughout his career. The Cardinals mostly limited him to fastball/slider when he worked out of the pen. That doesn’t mean he had refined secondary pitches… it typically takes time to have command over them - time that he did not have, when the Cardinals chose to interrupt his development and rush him to the majors as a reliever.ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:49 pmSo...did he have a second pitch or not?Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:37 pmThen what happened?ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:20 pmHis first 12 starts of 2024 he was 4-2 with a 2.70 ERAQuincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:13 pmHe wasn’t that good. Started off terribly this year, and the Giants had better options.
Pretty much what you’d expect from a guy adapting to starting in the major leagues, right?
Hicks has had plenty of time to develop and/or refine secondary pitches.
He’s just not that good.
His outcome as a starter would have had a greater likelihood of success had they let him build and develop at AA and AAA as a starter.
But likelihood doesn’t mean certainty. It’s possible he may never have made it to the bigs had he remained a starter.
He also didn’t help his development by choosing to sit out 2020.
-
An Old Friend
- Forum User
- Posts: 13232
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
Re: jordan hicks
Ok two things:Bomber1 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 16:28 pmOk I’ll grant that the likelihood of starter success would have been greater had they left him to develop.An Old Friend wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 16:10 pmThe time to develop those is the time that they skipped. Trying to develop secondaries in the majors is extremely difficult as the margin for error is so slim.Bomber1 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 16:01 pmJMO but -Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 15:07 pmHe’s had a variety of secondary pitches throughout his career. The Cardinals mostly limited him to fastball/slider when he worked out of the pen. That doesn’t mean he had refined secondary pitches… it typically takes time to have command over them - time that he did not have, when the Cardinals chose to interrupt his development and rush him to the majors as a reliever.ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:49 pmSo...did he have a second pitch or not?Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:37 pmThen what happened?ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:20 pmHis first 12 starts of 2024 he was 4-2 with a 2.70 ERAQuincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:13 pmHe wasn’t that good. Started off terribly this year, and the Giants had better options.
Pretty much what you’d expect from a guy adapting to starting in the major leagues, right?
Hicks has had plenty of time to develop and/or refine secondary pitches.
He’s just not that good.
His outcome as a starter would have had a greater likelihood of success had they let him build and develop at AA and AAA as a starter.
But likelihood doesn’t mean certainty. It’s possible he may never have made it to the bigs had he remained a starter.
He also didn’t help his development by choosing to sit out 2020.
1. Hicks wasn’t an isolated case. Rosenthal should’ve been kept in a starter role, same as Helsley. They kept repeating the same mistakes.
2. He was hurt in 2020. He wasn’t going to be able to pitch and COVID gave him and the team an out.
Re: jordan hicks
I really hope Liberatore is outstanding the rest of his career.
But we all know if he has a bad 2026, OldFriend will blame it on how Oli mismanaged him for one week in 2023…
But we all know if he has a bad 2026, OldFriend will blame it on how Oli mismanaged him for one week in 2023…
-
Quincy Varnish
- Forum User
- Posts: 17491
- Joined: 10 Nov 2019 04:55 am
Re: jordan hicks
And?ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 15:51 pmHe wa a 7 year veteran last year.Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 15:07 pmHe’s had a variety of secondary pitches throughout his career. The Cardinals mostly limited him to fastball/slider when he worked out of the pen. That doesn’t mean he had refined secondary pitches… it typically takes time to have command over them - time that he did not have, when the Cardinals chose to interrupt his development and rush him to the majors as a reliever.ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:49 pmSo...did he have a second pitch or not?Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:37 pmThen what happened?ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:20 pmHis first 12 starts of 2024 he was 4-2 with a 2.70 ERAQuincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:13 pmHe wasn’t that good. Started off terribly this year, and the Giants had better options.
Pretty much what you’d expect from a guy adapting to starting in the major leagues, right?
I imagine you realize that starting pitchers require a wider arsenal of pitches than relief pitchers. Being a “7 year veteran” means [shirt] when all you do is throw 12-20 pitches for one inning every third day, and they are almost exclusively fastball/slider.
If you actually have a point, please try to articulate it.
-
Quincy Varnish
- Forum User
- Posts: 17491
- Joined: 10 Nov 2019 04:55 am
Re: jordan hicks
He may not be, but that isn’t the issue.Bomber1 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 16:01 pmJMO but -Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 15:07 pmHe’s had a variety of secondary pitches throughout his career. The Cardinals mostly limited him to fastball/slider when he worked out of the pen. That doesn’t mean he had refined secondary pitches… it typically takes time to have command over them - time that he did not have, when the Cardinals chose to interrupt his development and rush him to the majors as a reliever.ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:49 pmSo...did he have a second pitch or not?Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:37 pmThen what happened?ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:20 pmHis first 12 starts of 2024 he was 4-2 with a 2.70 ERAQuincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:13 pmHe wasn’t that good. Started off terribly this year, and the Giants had better options.
Pretty much what you’d expect from a guy adapting to starting in the major leagues, right?
Hicks has had plenty of time to develop and/or refine secondary pitches.
He’s just not that good.
Why the [fork] would he develop secondary pitches when he wouldn’t be asked to throw them? A hobby?
Re: jordan hicks
What exactly is the issue?Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 18:30 pmHe may not be, but that isn’t the issue.Bomber1 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 16:01 pmJMO but -Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 15:07 pmHe’s had a variety of secondary pitches throughout his career. The Cardinals mostly limited him to fastball/slider when he worked out of the pen. That doesn’t mean he had refined secondary pitches… it typically takes time to have command over them - time that he did not have, when the Cardinals chose to interrupt his development and rush him to the majors as a reliever.ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:49 pmSo...did he have a second pitch or not?Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:37 pmThen what happened?ecleme22 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:20 pmHis first 12 starts of 2024 he was 4-2 with a 2.70 ERAQuincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 14:13 pmHe wasn’t that good. Started off terribly this year, and the Giants had better options.
Pretty much what you’d expect from a guy adapting to starting in the major leagues, right?
Hicks has had plenty of time to develop and/or refine secondary pitches.
He’s just not that good.
Why the [fork] would he develop secondary pitches when he wouldn’t be asked to throw them? A hobby?
Hicks has said he wants to start. Hicks knows or should know that starting requires more than 2 pitches.
Hicks has had opportunities to start and signed a nice FA contract to be a starter.
Hicks is in his 7th year.
At what point is it up to Hicks to learn/develop new pitches?
I say he’s just not that good.
But I don’t feel too sorry for him, by end of this season he will have pocketed $ 22 million for his career. Also
I’m glad we’re not on the hook for the next 2 years of his deal.
-
Quincy Varnish
- Forum User
- Posts: 17491
- Joined: 10 Nov 2019 04:55 am
Re: jordan hicks
My point is that Hicks development was interrupted by the Cardinals immediate needs. Could he have been a good starter? Maybe, maybe not… shoveling him straight from A ball to the majors disrupted the process. Unless your name is Paul Skenes, pitchers need years to refine their offspeed pitches in the minors to become effective starters - especially when drafted out of HS like Hicks. The notion that he should have spent his free time developing secondary pitches, that he would not need as a reliever, or “experiment” with them in major league action is basically nonsense. He was a casualty of the Cardinals wreckage of a minor league system.Bomber1 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 19:12 pmWhat exactly is the issue?Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 18:30 pmHe may not be, but that isn’t the issue.Bomber1 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 16:01 pmJMO but -Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 15:07 pm He’s had a variety of secondary pitches throughout his career. The Cardinals mostly limited him to fastball/slider when he worked out of the pen. That doesn’t mean he had refined secondary pitches… it typically takes time to have command over them - time that he did not have, when the Cardinals chose to interrupt his development and rush him to the majors as a reliever.
Hicks has had plenty of time to develop and/or refine secondary pitches.
He’s just not that good.
Why the [fork] would he develop secondary pitches when he wouldn’t be asked to throw them? A hobby?
Hicks has said he wants to start. Hicks knows or should know that starting requires more than 2 pitches.
Hicks has had opportunities to start and signed a nice FA contract to be a starter.
Hicks is in his 7th year.
At what point is it up to Hicks to learn/develop new pitches?
I say he’s just not that good.
But I don’t feel too sorry for him, by end of this season he will have pocketed $ 22 million for his career. Also
I’m glad we’re not on the hook for the next 2 years of his deal.
If Rock wants to pat himself on the back with an “I told you so”, that’s great… he needs that, particularly after spending years stomping his feet demanding that Liberatore could never be anything but a reliever.
Re: jordan hicks
I think you make some good points. The farm was declining and Mozeliak made a bad decision. Nothing new there.Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 19:32 pmMy point is that Hicks development was interrupted by the Cardinals immediate needs. Could he have been a good starter? Maybe, maybe not… shoveling him straight from A ball to the majors disrupted the process. Unless your name is Paul Skenes, pitchers need years to refine their offspeed pitches in the minors to become effective starters - especially when drafted out of HS like Hicks. The notion that he should have spent his free time developing secondary pitches, that he would not need as a reliever, or “experiment” with them in major league action is basically nonsense. He was a casualty of the Cardinals wreckage of a minor league system.Bomber1 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 19:12 pmWhat exactly is the issue?Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 18:30 pmHe may not be, but that isn’t the issue.Bomber1 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 16:01 pmJMO but -Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 15:07 pm He’s had a variety of secondary pitches throughout his career. The Cardinals mostly limited him to fastball/slider when he worked out of the pen. That doesn’t mean he had refined secondary pitches… it typically takes time to have command over them - time that he did not have, when the Cardinals chose to interrupt his development and rush him to the majors as a reliever.
Hicks has had plenty of time to develop and/or refine secondary pitches.
He’s just not that good.
Why the [fork] would he develop secondary pitches when he wouldn’t be asked to throw them? A hobby?
Hicks has said he wants to start. Hicks knows or should know that starting requires more than 2 pitches.
Hicks has had opportunities to start and signed a nice FA contract to be a starter.
Hicks is in his 7th year.
At what point is it up to Hicks to learn/develop new pitches?
I say he’s just not that good.
But I don’t feel too sorry for him, by end of this season he will have pocketed $ 22 million for his career. Also
I’m glad we’re not on the hook for the next 2 years of his deal.
If Rock wants to pat himself on the back with an “I told you so”, that’s great… he needs that, particularly after spending years stomping his feet demanding that Liberatore could never be anything but a reliever.
I just think in this case the team wouldn’t be any better off today had Jordan Hicks had been sent to AA to start.
Not sure where the Rock comment came from.
-
Ozziesfan41
- Forum User
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: jordan hicks
lol no kidding. And also can’t trade helsley the team will blow too many saves. But his logic is well he started at A ball so no difference between that and starting in the major leagues four years laterQuincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 19:32 pmMy point is that Hicks development was interrupted by the Cardinals immediate needs. Could he have been a good starter? Maybe, maybe not… shoveling him straight from A ball to the majors disrupted the process. Unless your name is Paul Skenes, pitchers need years to refine their offspeed pitches in the minors to become effective starters - especially when drafted out of HS like Hicks. The notion that he should have spent his free time developing secondary pitches, that he would not need as a reliever, or “experiment” with them in major league action is basically nonsense. He was a casualty of the Cardinals wreckage of a minor league system.Bomber1 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 19:12 pmWhat exactly is the issue?Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 18:30 pmHe may not be, but that isn’t the issue.Bomber1 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 16:01 pmJMO but -Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 15:07 pm He’s had a variety of secondary pitches throughout his career. The Cardinals mostly limited him to fastball/slider when he worked out of the pen. That doesn’t mean he had refined secondary pitches… it typically takes time to have command over them - time that he did not have, when the Cardinals chose to interrupt his development and rush him to the majors as a reliever.
Hicks has had plenty of time to develop and/or refine secondary pitches.
He’s just not that good.
Why the [fork] would he develop secondary pitches when he wouldn’t be asked to throw them? A hobby?
Hicks has said he wants to start. Hicks knows or should know that starting requires more than 2 pitches.
Hicks has had opportunities to start and signed a nice FA contract to be a starter.
Hicks is in his 7th year.
At what point is it up to Hicks to learn/develop new pitches?
I say he’s just not that good.
But I don’t feel too sorry for him, by end of this season he will have pocketed $ 22 million for his career. Also
I’m glad we’re not on the hook for the next 2 years of his deal.
If Rock wants to pat himself on the back with an “I told you so”, that’s great… he needs that, particularly after spending years stomping his feet demanding that Liberatore could never be anything but a reliever.
-
Quincy Varnish
- Forum User
- Posts: 17491
- Joined: 10 Nov 2019 04:55 am
Re: jordan hicks
Funny you mention Helsley… remember the insistence he should start ‘22 in the minors because he was trying to throw the ball too hard? That was another good one.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 20:29 pmlol no kidding. And also can’t trade helsley the team will blow too many saves. But his logic is well he started at A ball so no difference between that and starting in the major leagues four years laterQuincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 19:32 pmMy point is that Hicks development was interrupted by the Cardinals immediate needs. Could he have been a good starter? Maybe, maybe not… shoveling him straight from A ball to the majors disrupted the process. Unless your name is Paul Skenes, pitchers need years to refine their offspeed pitches in the minors to become effective starters - especially when drafted out of HS like Hicks. The notion that he should have spent his free time developing secondary pitches, that he would not need as a reliever, or “experiment” with them in major league action is basically nonsense. He was a casualty of the Cardinals wreckage of a minor league system.Bomber1 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 19:12 pmWhat exactly is the issue?Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 18:30 pmHe may not be, but that isn’t the issue.Bomber1 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 16:01 pmJMO but -Quincy Varnish wrote: ↑05 Sep 2025 15:07 pm He’s had a variety of secondary pitches throughout his career. The Cardinals mostly limited him to fastball/slider when he worked out of the pen. That doesn’t mean he had refined secondary pitches… it typically takes time to have command over them - time that he did not have, when the Cardinals chose to interrupt his development and rush him to the majors as a reliever.
Hicks has had plenty of time to develop and/or refine secondary pitches.
He’s just not that good.
Why the [fork] would he develop secondary pitches when he wouldn’t be asked to throw them? A hobby?
Hicks has said he wants to start. Hicks knows or should know that starting requires more than 2 pitches.
Hicks has had opportunities to start and signed a nice FA contract to be a starter.
Hicks is in his 7th year.
At what point is it up to Hicks to learn/develop new pitches?
I say he’s just not that good.
But I don’t feel too sorry for him, by end of this season he will have pocketed $ 22 million for his career. Also
I’m glad we’re not on the hook for the next 2 years of his deal.
If Rock wants to pat himself on the back with an “I told you so”, that’s great… he needs that, particularly after spending years stomping his feet demanding that Liberatore could never be anything but a reliever.