And with his contract and option buyout he's owed 41.5mm for his age 34-35 seasons. I don't see anyone taking him on unless the Cards eat a significant portion of that.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:49 pmI’d also like to see that creative thinking put to use to suggest some possible landing spots Contreras might consider that would be looking for a veteran right hander bat for 1B/DH.Mort Gage wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:46 pmPlease explain how you would be "creative" in convincing Contreras to waive his NTC when he is happy here? We know you're dying to see him gone so your dreamboat could take over 1B, but it's not happening soon.Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:40 pmDo you feel the Cardinals are screwed in trying to make this happen, somehow, in order to enhance the reset? Be creative in your thinking occasionally.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:36 pmDo you think Contreras would waive his no trade? He has stated he will not.Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:33 pmThere's more to the advantage of trading Contreras. The money saved could be utilized for a FA starting pitcher of significance. Burleson would be fine at 1B, offensively and defensively.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:30 pmThat would be great. Get Herrera some reps there too. Not happening, though. As you’ve been told probably hundreds of times by now.Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:20 pmAnother option, trade Contreras. Move Burleson to 1B.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:17 pm Two of Burly/Noot/Gorman/Donovan need traded for sure. Noot and Donovan are the two I’d trade in a perfect scenario, but any two of those four is fine if the return is right.
I hold on to Gorman because of the needed power upside and Burly just because I think the other two will bring back more in a trade.
Do you think many teams would have interest if he did waive his no trade?
This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 8094
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
LoL. Fat fingers hit 2 vs 1...brilliant catch...TheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:24 pmHe doesn’t play 2b.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:17 pmNope. A perfectly good signing.TheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:14 pmWhich only adds to the complications and validation that it was a very dumb signing.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:25 pm(bleep), WillyCon has NTC thru 2026Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:20 pmAnother option, trade Contreras. Move Burleson to 1B.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:17 pm Two of Burly/Noot/Gorman/Donovan need traded for sure. Noot and Donovan are the two I’d trade in a perfect scenario, but any two of those four is fine if the return is right.
I hold on to Gorman because of the needed power upside and Burly just because I think the other two will bring back more in a trade.
He’s never hit 25 HR’s in his career, hits for a low average, can’t play his main position, blocks others at DH and 1B, and did I mention he’s going to be 34 and has never hit 25 HR’s in a season and he’s taking up DH and 1B.
He's blocking no one from DH or 2b. He has hit 24.
Had some injury issues during his Cards career.
Anybody on this team leading in HRs or RBI's
7 year ago, at the age of 27, he hit his max HR total in his career of a whopping 24, which is nowhere near what you’d want at DH or 1B when selecting a free agent for these spots.
He'd be tied for 5th in all of MLB as a catcher, for HRs. He's like 7 behind the over valued Realmuto on career HRs. In almost 1500 less ABs
13th for 1b in all ofLB. Nothing to complain about when it's a new position

-
- Forum User
- Posts: 69
- Joined: 27 Aug 2025 23:24 pm
Re: This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
What point are you attempting to make?AnExParrot wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:32 pmAnd when he did that he wasn't a DH or 1b, but you knew that.TheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:24 pmHe doesn’t play 2b.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:17 pmNope. A perfectly good signing.TheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:14 pmWhich only adds to the complications and validation that it was a very dumb signing.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:25 pm(bleep), WillyCon has NTC thru 2026Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:20 pmAnother option, trade Contreras. Move Burleson to 1B.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:17 pm Two of Burly/Noot/Gorman/Donovan need traded for sure. Noot and Donovan are the two I’d trade in a perfect scenario, but any two of those four is fine if the return is right.
I hold on to Gorman because of the needed power upside and Burly just because I think the other two will bring back more in a trade.
He’s never hit 25 HR’s in his career, hits for a low average, can’t play his main position, blocks others at DH and 1B, and did I mention he’s going to be 34 and has never hit 25 HR’s in a season and he’s taking up DH and 1B.
He's blocking no one from DH or 2b. He has hit 24.
Had some injury issues during his Cards career.
Anybody on this team leading in HRs or RBI's
7 year ago, at the age of 27, he hit his max HR total in his career of a whopping 24, which is nowhere near what you’d want at DH or 1B when selecting a free agent for these spots.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 69
- Joined: 27 Aug 2025 23:24 pm
Re: This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
Right, signing a free agent catcher who can’t catch who must play DH or 1B who’s never hit 25 HR’s is an excellent choice.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 18:11 pmLoL. Fat fingers hit 2 vs 1...brilliant catch...TheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:24 pmHe doesn’t play 2b.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:17 pmNope. A perfectly good signing.TheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:14 pmWhich only adds to the complications and validation that it was a very dumb signing.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:25 pm(bleep), WillyCon has NTC thru 2026Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:20 pmAnother option, trade Contreras. Move Burleson to 1B.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:17 pm Two of Burly/Noot/Gorman/Donovan need traded for sure. Noot and Donovan are the two I’d trade in a perfect scenario, but any two of those four is fine if the return is right.
I hold on to Gorman because of the needed power upside and Burly just because I think the other two will bring back more in a trade.
He’s never hit 25 HR’s in his career, hits for a low average, can’t play his main position, blocks others at DH and 1B, and did I mention he’s going to be 34 and has never hit 25 HR’s in a season and he’s taking up DH and 1B.
He's blocking no one from DH or 2b. He has hit 24.
Had some injury issues during his Cards career.
Anybody on this team leading in HRs or RBI's
7 year ago, at the age of 27, he hit his max HR total in his career of a whopping 24, which is nowhere near what you’d want at DH or 1B when selecting a free agent for these spots.
He'd be tied for 5th in all of MLB as a catcher, for HRs. He's like 7 behind the over valued Realmuto on career HRs. In almost 1500 less ABs
13th for 1b in all ofLB. Nothing to complain about when it's a new position![]()
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 8094
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
I bet you'd wet your pants for Realamuto, who he only lags behind by 8 HRsTheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 18:55 pmRight, signing a free agent catcher who can’t catch who must play DH or 1B who’s never hit 25 HR’s is an excellent choice.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 18:11 pmLoL. Fat fingers hit 2 vs 1...brilliant catch...TheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:24 pmHe doesn’t play 2b.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:17 pmNope. A perfectly good signing.TheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:14 pmWhich only adds to the complications and validation that it was a very dumb signing.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:25 pm(bleep), WillyCon has NTC thru 2026Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:20 pmAnother option, trade Contreras. Move Burleson to 1B.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:17 pm Two of Burly/Noot/Gorman/Donovan need traded for sure. Noot and Donovan are the two I’d trade in a perfect scenario, but any two of those four is fine if the return is right.
I hold on to Gorman because of the needed power upside and Burly just because I think the other two will bring back more in a trade.
He’s never hit 25 HR’s in his career, hits for a low average, can’t play his main position, blocks others at DH and 1B, and did I mention he’s going to be 34 and has never hit 25 HR’s in a season and he’s taking up DH and 1B.
He's blocking no one from DH or 2b. He has hit 24.
Had some injury issues during his Cards career.
Anybody on this team leading in HRs or RBI's
7 year ago, at the age of 27, he hit his max HR total in his career of a whopping 24, which is nowhere near what you’d want at DH or 1B when selecting a free agent for these spots.
He'd be tied for 5th in all of MLB as a catcher, for HRs. He's like 7 behind the over valued Realmuto on career HRs. In almost 1500 less ABs
13th for 1b in all ofLB. Nothing to complain about when it's a new position![]()

Cards needed a 1b once Oldys contract expired. Baker wasn't doing it so WillyCon stepped up and been pretty (bleep) good. But think what you want, no matter how misaligned your thinking is..
What other RH bat should have played 1b? JW???

-
- Forum User
- Posts: 930
- Joined: 02 May 2025 19:12 pm
Re: This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
Would the trade return not be better for the great Alec Burleson? Considering the cost, WC would be more of a salary dump, so no prospect return.Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:33 pmThere's more to the advantage of trading Contreras. The money saved could be utilized for a FA starting pitcher of significance. Burleson would be fine at 1B, offensively and defensively.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:30 pmThat would be great. Get Herrera some reps there too. Not happening, though. As you’ve been told probably hundreds of times by now.Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:20 pmAnother option, trade Contreras. Move Burleson to 1B.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:17 pm Two of Burly/Noot/Gorman/Donovan need traded for sure. Noot and Donovan are the two I’d trade in a perfect scenario, but any two of those four is fine if the return is right.
I hold on to Gorman because of the needed power upside and Burly just because I think the other two will bring back more in a trade.
As far as savings in salary, do you really think BDW will reinvest the $$ in a “FA pitcher of significance?
With their offensive numbers being similar, why not keep the better defender and RH hitter on a team starved for it? Burleson will likely never reach 25 HRs either btw.
Re: This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
Don’t go injecting logic into thingsCorneliusWolfe wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 20:15 pmWould the trade return not be better for the great Alec Burleson? Considering the cost, WC would be more of a salary dump, so no prospect return.Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:33 pmThere's more to the advantage of trading Contreras. The money saved could be utilized for a FA starting pitcher of significance. Burleson would be fine at 1B, offensively and defensively.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:30 pmThat would be great. Get Herrera some reps there too. Not happening, though. As you’ve been told probably hundreds of times by now.Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:20 pmAnother option, trade Contreras. Move Burleson to 1B.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:17 pm Two of Burly/Noot/Gorman/Donovan need traded for sure. Noot and Donovan are the two I’d trade in a perfect scenario, but any two of those four is fine if the return is right.
I hold on to Gorman because of the needed power upside and Burly just because I think the other two will bring back more in a trade.
As far as savings in salary, do you really think BDW will reinvest the $$ in a “FA pitcher of significance?
With their offensive numbers being similar, why not keep the better defender and RH hitter on a team starved for it? Burleson will likely never reach 25 HRs either btw.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 930
- Joined: 02 May 2025 19:12 pm
Re: This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
Sorry, I don’t know what came over me! I should’ve known better. Shady only engages in insult dialogue instead of the “baseball discussion” he claims to crave so much.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 20:29 pmDon’t go injecting logic into thingsCorneliusWolfe wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 20:15 pmWould the trade return not be better for the great Alec Burleson? Considering the cost, WC would be more of a salary dump, so no prospect return.Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:33 pmThere's more to the advantage of trading Contreras. The money saved could be utilized for a FA starting pitcher of significance. Burleson would be fine at 1B, offensively and defensively.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:30 pmThat would be great. Get Herrera some reps there too. Not happening, though. As you’ve been told probably hundreds of times by now.Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:20 pmAnother option, trade Contreras. Move Burleson to 1B.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:17 pm Two of Burly/Noot/Gorman/Donovan need traded for sure. Noot and Donovan are the two I’d trade in a perfect scenario, but any two of those four is fine if the return is right.
I hold on to Gorman because of the needed power upside and Burly just because I think the other two will bring back more in a trade.
As far as savings in salary, do you really think BDW will reinvest the $$ in a “FA pitcher of significance?
With their offensive numbers being similar, why not keep the better defender and RH hitter on a team starved for it? Burleson will likely never reach 25 HRs either btw.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 13170
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
Re: This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
<starts thread talking about ways to get pitching, suggesting additions>Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:11 pm https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/mlb/ca ... 291d&ei=12
Right now, the Cardinals are going to need, at least, two additions to the '26 starting rotation. This makes sense as a way to try to get them.
<links article without a single pitcher target mentioned>
Sounds about right.
Their pitching acquisition plan should start with Dylan Cease. It WON’T, but it should.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 12069
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
Only a few dozen posters here have made the same suggestion for months, this is an OLD IDEA.
Re: This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
Honest question. Doesn’t every team have a bunch of Noots?JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:17 pm Two of Burly/Noot/Gorman/Donovan need traded for sure. Noot and Donovan are the two I’d trade in a perfect scenario, but any two of those four is fine if the return is right.
I hold on to Gorman because of the needed power upside and Burly just because I think the other two will bring back more in a trade.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5980
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
Contreras has played well in moving to 1b. Having him there in 2026 isn't a bad thing.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 18:11 pmLoL. Fat fingers hit 2 vs 1...brilliant catch...TheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:24 pmHe doesn’t play 2b.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:17 pmNope. A perfectly good signing.TheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:14 pmWhich only adds to the complications and validation that it was a very dumb signing.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:25 pm(bleep), WillyCon has NTC thru 2026Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:20 pmAnother option, trade Contreras. Move Burleson to 1B.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:17 pm Two of Burly/Noot/Gorman/Donovan need traded for sure. Noot and Donovan are the two I’d trade in a perfect scenario, but any two of those four is fine if the return is right.
I hold on to Gorman because of the needed power upside and Burly just because I think the other two will bring back more in a trade.
He’s never hit 25 HR’s in his career, hits for a low average, can’t play his main position, blocks others at DH and 1B, and did I mention he’s going to be 34 and has never hit 25 HR’s in a season and he’s taking up DH and 1B.
He's blocking no one from DH or 2b. He has hit 24.
Had some injury issues during his Cards career.
Anybody on this team leading in HRs or RBI's
7 year ago, at the age of 27, he hit his max HR total in his career of a whopping 24, which is nowhere near what you’d want at DH or 1B when selecting a free agent for these spots.
He'd be tied for 5th in all of MLB as a catcher, for HRs. He's like 7 behind the over valued Realmuto on career HRs. In almost 1500 less ABs
13th for 1b in all ofLB. Nothing to complain about when it's a new position![]()
Re: This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
Contreras isn't the problem. The problem is no serious power in outfield.
Re: This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
Left hander that plays all three outfield positions and generally gives you about a .780 ops? A lot of teams have something like that, plenty don’t. And, more importantly, a lot of teams are in love with hard hit percentage and swing speed and all those underlying stats that make Noot an analytics darling.njcardfan wrote: ↑30 Aug 2025 12:48 pmHonest question. Doesn’t every team have a bunch of Noots?JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:17 pm Two of Burly/Noot/Gorman/Donovan need traded for sure. Noot and Donovan are the two I’d trade in a perfect scenario, but any two of those four is fine if the return is right.
I hold on to Gorman because of the needed power upside and Burly just because I think the other two will bring back more in a trade.
Re: This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
That’s what I was wondering.TheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 18:54 pmWhat point are you attempting to make?AnExParrot wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:32 pmAnd when he did that he wasn't a DH or 1b, but you knew that.TheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:24 pmHe doesn’t play 2b.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:17 pmNope. A perfectly good signing.TheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:14 pmWhich only adds to the complications and validation that it was a very dumb signing.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:25 pm(bleep), WillyCon has NTC thru 2026Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:20 pmAnother option, trade Contreras. Move Burleson to 1B.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:17 pm Two of Burly/Noot/Gorman/Donovan need traded for sure. Noot and Donovan are the two I’d trade in a perfect scenario, but any two of those four is fine if the return is right.
I hold on to Gorman because of the needed power upside and Burly just because I think the other two will bring back more in a trade.
He’s never hit 25 HR’s in his career, hits for a low average, can’t play his main position, blocks others at DH and 1B, and did I mention he’s going to be 34 and has never hit 25 HR’s in a season and he’s taking up DH and 1B.
He's blocking no one from DH or 2b. He has hit 24.
Had some injury issues during his Cards career.
Anybody on this team leading in HRs or RBI's
7 year ago, at the age of 27, he hit his max HR total in his career of a whopping 24, which is nowhere near what you’d want at DH or 1B when selecting a free agent for these spots.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 69
- Joined: 27 Aug 2025 23:24 pm
Re: This could be the most practical way to get some needed '26 starting pitching
Mentioning that Contreras hit his 24 HR’s (career max) while catching, not DH or 1B, as a reply to me pointing out he’s never hit 25 HR’s in his career and he hit his career max 7 years ago makes zero sense as an attempted point.Bomber1 wrote: ↑30 Aug 2025 16:25 pmThat’s what I was wondering.TheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 18:54 pmWhat point are you attempting to make?AnExParrot wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:32 pmAnd when he did that he wasn't a DH or 1b, but you knew that.TheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:24 pmHe doesn’t play 2b.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:17 pmNope. A perfectly good signing.TheSolution wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 17:14 pmWhich only adds to the complications and validation that it was a very dumb signing.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:25 pm(bleep), WillyCon has NTC thru 2026Shady wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:20 pmAnother option, trade Contreras. Move Burleson to 1B.JohnnyMO wrote: ↑29 Aug 2025 16:17 pm Two of Burly/Noot/Gorman/Donovan need traded for sure. Noot and Donovan are the two I’d trade in a perfect scenario, but any two of those four is fine if the return is right.
I hold on to Gorman because of the needed power upside and Burly just because I think the other two will bring back more in a trade.
He’s never hit 25 HR’s in his career, hits for a low average, can’t play his main position, blocks others at DH and 1B, and did I mention he’s going to be 34 and has never hit 25 HR’s in a season and he’s taking up DH and 1B.
He's blocking no one from DH or 2b. He has hit 24.
Had some injury issues during his Cards career.
Anybody on this team leading in HRs or RBI's
7 year ago, at the age of 27, he hit his max HR total in his career of a whopping 24, which is nowhere near what you’d want at DH or 1B when selecting a free agent for these spots.