Burleson is a star

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

AnExParrot
Forum User
Posts: 1137
Joined: 02 Jan 2020 19:58 pm

Re: Burleson is a star

Post by AnExParrot »

rockondlouie wrote: 26 Aug 2025 11:00 am
Rocket Scientist wrote: 26 Aug 2025 09:50 am Chip said last night mid game the Burleson was one of five MLB players that have hit 270+ against both left handed pitching and right handed pitching. That makes him elite in 2025 season. The guy can hit.

Then of course all the folks that said he couldn't hit lefthanders raise your hands. :lol:
Nice to see him overcome his difficulties vs LHP.

My hands up but, well............maybe we should look at a larger sample size.......say his career vs LHP:

6 HR
.235 .266 .338 .605
And just last season in 142 PAs vs LHP: .195 .229 .286 .514

He was the definition of suck vs LHP, in a larger sample just last season.
Talkin' Baseball
Forum User
Posts: 1442
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm

Re: Burleson is a star

Post by Talkin' Baseball »

A star draws fans. You probably see people wearing his jersey. He is among the league leaders in something. A star is under consideration for the various awards given. A star receives All-Star consideration. Star=WAR. On a team lacking stars, Burleson isn't even the best player on his team.
hugeCardfan
Forum User
Posts: 1740
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:42 pm

Re: Burleson is a star

Post by hugeCardfan »

Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:31 pm A star draws fans. You probably see people wearing his jersey. He is among the league leaders in something. A star is under consideration for the various awards given. A star receives All-Star consideration. Star=WAR. On a team lacking stars, Burleson isn't even the best player on his team.
Pffft. He’s the best hitter on the team.
Talkin' Baseball
Forum User
Posts: 1442
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm

Re: Burleson is a star

Post by Talkin' Baseball »

hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:41 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:31 pm A star draws fans. You probably see people wearing his jersey. He is among the league leaders in something. A star is under consideration for the various awards given. A star receives All-Star consideration. Star=WAR. On a team lacking stars, Burleson isn't even the best player on his team.
Pffft. He’s the best hitter on the team.
He is, undeniably, a major league hitter. He is neither a star, nor the best player on the team.
hugeCardfan
Forum User
Posts: 1740
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:42 pm

Re: Burleson is a star

Post by hugeCardfan »

Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:45 pm
hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:41 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:31 pm A star draws fans. You probably see people wearing his jersey. He is among the league leaders in something. A star is under consideration for the various awards given. A star receives All-Star consideration. Star=WAR. On a team lacking stars, Burleson isn't even the best player on his team.
Pffft. He’s the best hitter on the team.
He is, undeniably, a major league hitter. He is neither a star, nor the best player on the team.
Who said he was the best player on the team? Nobody. He is the best hitter on the 26 man roster.
ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 3679
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Burleson is a star

Post by ecleme22 »

hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:14 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:45 pm
hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:41 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:31 pm A star draws fans. You probably see people wearing his jersey. He is among the league leaders in something. A star is under consideration for the various awards given. A star receives All-Star consideration. Star=WAR. On a team lacking stars, Burleson isn't even the best player on his team.
Pffft. He’s the best hitter on the team.
He is, undeniably, a major league hitter. He is neither a star, nor the best player on the team.
Who said he was the best player on the team? Nobody. He is the best hitter on the 26 man roster.
WC is better
hugeCardfan
Forum User
Posts: 1740
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:42 pm

Re: Burleson is a star

Post by hugeCardfan »

ecleme22 wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:18 pm
hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:14 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:45 pm
hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:41 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:31 pm A star draws fans. You probably see people wearing his jersey. He is among the league leaders in something. A star is under consideration for the various awards given. A star receives All-Star consideration. Star=WAR. On a team lacking stars, Burleson isn't even the best player on his team.
Pffft. He’s the best hitter on the team.
He is, undeniably, a major league hitter. He is neither a star, nor the best player on the team.
Who said he was the best player on the team? Nobody. He is the best hitter on the 26 man roster.
WC is better
Bull chit. By what metric is .259 .343 .455 .798 with 129 K's better than .291 .341 .459 .799 with 62 K's?
Shady
Forum User
Posts: 6363
Joined: 26 Nov 2022 15:39 pm

Re: Burleson is a star

Post by Shady »

hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:28 pm
ecleme22 wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:18 pm
hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:14 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:45 pm
hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:41 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:31 pm A star draws fans. You probably see people wearing his jersey. He is among the league leaders in something. A star is under consideration for the various awards given. A star receives All-Star consideration. Star=WAR. On a team lacking stars, Burleson isn't even the best player on his team.
Pffft. He’s the best hitter on the team.
He is, undeniably, a major league hitter. He is neither a star, nor the best player on the team.
Who said he was the best player on the team? Nobody. He is the best hitter on the 26 man roster.
WC is better
Bull chit. By what metric is .259 .343 .455 .798 with 129 K's better than .291 .341 .459 .799 with 62 K's?
Somebody gets it.
greyhawk
Forum User
Posts: 684
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:34 pm

Re: Burleson is a star

Post by greyhawk »

Shady wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:30 pm
hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:28 pm
ecleme22 wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:18 pm
hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:14 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:45 pm
hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:41 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:31 pm A star draws fans. You probably see people wearing his jersey. He is among the league leaders in something. A star is under consideration for the various awards given. A star receives All-Star consideration. Star=WAR. On a team lacking stars, Burleson isn't even the best player on his team.
Pffft. He’s the best hitter on the team.
He is, undeniably, a major league hitter. He is neither a star, nor the best player on the team.
Who said he was the best player on the team? Nobody. He is the best hitter on the 26 man roster.
WC is better
Bull chit. By what metric is .259 .343 .455 .798 with 129 K's better than .291 .341 .459 .799 with 62 K's?
Somebody gets it.
if either one of them is your best player --- you have a bigger problem than trying to figure out which is better.
MIDMOBIRDTWO
Forum User
Posts: 4165
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:24 pm

Re: Burleson is a star

Post by MIDMOBIRDTWO »

Shady loves him some Big Ole Biscuit!
hugeCardfan
Forum User
Posts: 1740
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:42 pm

Re: Burleson is a star

Post by hugeCardfan »

greyhawk wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:32 pm
Shady wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:30 pm
hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:28 pm
ecleme22 wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:18 pm
hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:14 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:45 pm
hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:41 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:31 pm A star draws fans. You probably see people wearing his jersey. He is among the league leaders in something. A star is under consideration for the various awards given. A star receives All-Star consideration. Star=WAR. On a team lacking stars, Burleson isn't even the best player on his team.
Pffft. He’s the best hitter on the team.
He is, undeniably, a major league hitter. He is neither a star, nor the best player on the team.
Who said he was the best player on the team? Nobody. He is the best hitter on the 26 man roster.
WC is better
Bull chit. By what metric is .259 .343 .455 .798 with 129 K's better than .291 .341 .459 .799 with 62 K's?
Somebody gets it.
if either one of them is your best player --- you have a bigger problem than trying to figure out which is better.
Why is reading comprehension such a problem on CT?
ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 3679
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Burleson is a star

Post by ecleme22 »

hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:28 pm
ecleme22 wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:18 pm
hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 18:14 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:45 pm
hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:41 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:31 pm A star draws fans. You probably see people wearing his jersey. He is among the league leaders in something. A star is under consideration for the various awards given. A star receives All-Star consideration. Star=WAR. On a team lacking stars, Burleson isn't even the best player on his team.
Pffft. He’s the best hitter on the team.
He is, undeniably, a major league hitter. He is neither a star, nor the best player on the team.
Who said he was the best player on the team? Nobody. He is the best hitter on the 26 man roster.
WC is better
Bull chit. By what metric is .259 .343 .455 .798 with 129 K's better than .291 .341 .459 .799 with 62 K's?
By season and career stats.

Also, who cares about K total…
MIDMOBIRDTWO
Forum User
Posts: 4165
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:24 pm

Re: Burleson is a star

Post by MIDMOBIRDTWO »

Not tonight Burly.
ClassicO
Forum User
Posts: 1313
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:37 pm

Re: Burleson is a star

Post by ClassicO »

hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:41 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:31 pm A star draws fans. You probably see people wearing his jersey. He is among the league leaders in something. A star is under consideration for the various awards given. A star receives All-Star consideration. Star=WAR. On a team lacking stars, Burleson isn't even the best player on his team.
Pffft. He’s the best hitter on the team.
Ha. That’s like being a cyclops in the land of the blind.
Context please.
And he’s the 5th best player because he can’t defend or run.
Contreras, Herrera, Wynn and Donny are better all-around players.
The post is that he is a “star.” He’s not. And the others aren’t either
Talkin' Baseball
Forum User
Posts: 1442
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm

Re: Burleson is a star

Post by Talkin' Baseball »

ClassicO wrote: 27 Aug 2025 19:35 pm
hugeCardfan wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:41 pm
Talkin' Baseball wrote: 27 Aug 2025 13:31 pm A star draws fans. You probably see people wearing his jersey. He is among the league leaders in something. A star is under consideration for the various awards given. A star receives All-Star consideration. Star=WAR. On a team lacking stars, Burleson isn't even the best player on his team.
Pffft. He’s the best hitter on the team.
Ha. That’s like being a cyclops in the land of the blind.
Context please.
And he’s the 5th best player because he can’t defend or run.
Contreras, Herrera, Wynn and Donny are better all-around players.
The post is that he is a “star.” He’s not. And the others aren’t either
Winn is the closest of the group. He has one tool that is major league elite right now- not maybe in the future.
Carp4Cy
Forum User
Posts: 2402
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:38 pm

Re: Burleson is a star

Post by Carp4Cy »

Burly not getting it done tonight.

Pujols woulda hit a HR by now. 57 Career HRs vs the Pirates. 1.112 OPS
Post Reply