Do you think his cognitive powers were diluted by a number of concussions from home plate collisions, icon?
For the Matheny haters
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: For the Matheny haters
Re: For the Matheny haters
You "I respected his toughness as a player."Cranny wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 21:09 pmI respected his toughness as a player. I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him. And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in. And then was made a scapegoat. That’s all.ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 20:49 pmCranny isn't some insider. Maybe he knows one or two joe blows from his church.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:59 pmOl’ Friend, I believe you. And I’ve posted several times that to be so vehement in his defense of Mozo, Cranny must be connected with the FO, or be related to someone in the FO, or be friends with someone in the FO. I’ve derisively called him Mrs. Mozeliak in a couple of posts.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:44 pmIt’s not an off chance. Seriously.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:37 pmSuuuuure he does.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:05 pmFWIW, Cranny likely does have acquaintances in or adjacent to the front office / ownership.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 18:48 pmFeel free to prove me wrong.Cranny wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 18:38 pmWhatever you say, Rat.
He’s not gonna “prove” it in any way that satiates your demand, but I’m familiar enough with Cranny to know he’s closer to that room than probably any other regular on the forum.
And, on the off chance he does, I guess it would explain the sycophancy.
You don’t have to believe me, but I also have no reason to make it up.
No normal Cardinal “just a fan” would be on here as much, blindly defending this incompetent organization.
Cranny doesn't defend Oli. He even said, when MM was fired, he didn't trust Oli.
Cranny didn't defend Fowler. In fact, he didn't like him and made that well known.
Cranny will do logic gymnastics to defend Matheny. To a lesser extent, Mo.
Cranny isn't a shill for the FO. He's just a Matheny lover.
Me: "Okay, he won GG. I liked him as a Cardinal"
You: I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him.
Me: Who cares? He was a nice. Cool, dude.
You: And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in.
Me: I agree. Matheny was at his best when he got rosters who just won the WS. Any other roster would show Matheny's lack of skills as a manager.
Re: For the Matheny haters
Ecleme -ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 23:36 pmYou "I respected his toughness as a player."Cranny wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 21:09 pmI respected his toughness as a player. I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him. And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in. And then was made a scapegoat. That’s all.ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 20:49 pmCranny isn't some insider. Maybe he knows one or two joe blows from his church.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:59 pmOl’ Friend, I believe you. And I’ve posted several times that to be so vehement in his defense of Mozo, Cranny must be connected with the FO, or be related to someone in the FO, or be friends with someone in the FO. I’ve derisively called him Mrs. Mozeliak in a couple of posts.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:44 pmIt’s not an off chance. Seriously.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:37 pmSuuuuure he does.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:05 pmFWIW, Cranny likely does have acquaintances in or adjacent to the front office / ownership.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 18:48 pmFeel free to prove me wrong.Cranny wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 18:38 pmWhatever you say, Rat.
He’s not gonna “prove” it in any way that satiates your demand, but I’m familiar enough with Cranny to know he’s closer to that room than probably any other regular on the forum.
And, on the off chance he does, I guess it would explain the sycophancy.
You don’t have to believe me, but I also have no reason to make it up.
No normal Cardinal “just a fan” would be on here as much, blindly defending this incompetent organization.
Cranny doesn't defend Oli. He even said, when MM was fired, he didn't trust Oli.
Cranny didn't defend Fowler. In fact, he didn't like him and made that well known.
Cranny will do logic gymnastics to defend Matheny. To a lesser extent, Mo.
Cranny isn't a shill for the FO. He's just a Matheny lover.
Me: "Okay, he won GG. I liked him as a Cardinal"
You: I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him.
Me: Who cares? He was a nice. Cool, dude.
You: And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in.
Me: I agree. Matheny was at his best when he got rosters who just won the WS. Any other roster would show Matheny's lack of skills as a manager.
One time I attended a charity event and Matheny was the guest speaker. The fee for a speaker was $15,000. He donated that entire speaking fee to the charity. He easily could have used that money for his family. He was more than just “nice”.
I guess what triggered me on this thread is the thread’s subject. Hate is a strong word.
Re: For the Matheny haters
And there it is (as if we didn’t know)Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:13 amEcleme -ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 23:36 pmYou "I respected his toughness as a player."Cranny wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 21:09 pmI respected his toughness as a player. I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him. And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in. And then was made a scapegoat. That’s all.ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 20:49 pmCranny isn't some insider. Maybe he knows one or two joe blows from his church.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:59 pmOl’ Friend, I believe you. And I’ve posted several times that to be so vehement in his defense of Mozo, Cranny must be connected with the FO, or be related to someone in the FO, or be friends with someone in the FO. I’ve derisively called him Mrs. Mozeliak in a couple of posts.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:44 pmIt’s not an off chance. Seriously.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:37 pmSuuuuure he does.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:05 pmFWIW, Cranny likely does have acquaintances in or adjacent to the front office / ownership.
He’s not gonna “prove” it in any way that satiates your demand, but I’m familiar enough with Cranny to know he’s closer to that room than probably any other regular on the forum.
And, on the off chance he does, I guess it would explain the sycophancy.
You don’t have to believe me, but I also have no reason to make it up.
No normal Cardinal “just a fan” would be on here as much, blindly defending this incompetent organization.
Cranny doesn't defend Oli. He even said, when MM was fired, he didn't trust Oli.
Cranny didn't defend Fowler. In fact, he didn't like him and made that well known.
Cranny will do logic gymnastics to defend Matheny. To a lesser extent, Mo.
Cranny isn't a shill for the FO. He's just a Matheny lover.
Me: "Okay, he won GG. I liked him as a Cardinal"
You: I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him.
Me: Who cares? He was a nice. Cool, dude.
You: And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in.
Me: I agree. Matheny was at his best when he got rosters who just won the WS. Any other roster would show Matheny's lack of skills as a manager.
One time I attended a charity event and Matheny was the guest speaker. The fee for a speaker was $15,000. He donated that entire speaking fee to the charity. He easily could have used that money for his family. He was more than just “nice”.
I guess what triggered me on this thread is the thread’s subject. Hate is a strong word.
Cranny is sticking up for a guy he likes, not a manager he thinks was good.
Re: For the Matheny haters
Well he never was good with moneyCranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:13 amEcleme -ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 23:36 pmYou "I respected his toughness as a player."Cranny wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 21:09 pmI respected his toughness as a player. I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him. And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in. And then was made a scapegoat. That’s all.ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 20:49 pmCranny isn't some insider. Maybe he knows one or two joe blows from his church.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:59 pmOl’ Friend, I believe you. And I’ve posted several times that to be so vehement in his defense of Mozo, Cranny must be connected with the FO, or be related to someone in the FO, or be friends with someone in the FO. I’ve derisively called him Mrs. Mozeliak in a couple of posts.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:44 pmIt’s not an off chance. Seriously.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:37 pmSuuuuure he does.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:05 pmFWIW, Cranny likely does have acquaintances in or adjacent to the front office / ownership.
He’s not gonna “prove” it in any way that satiates your demand, but I’m familiar enough with Cranny to know he’s closer to that room than probably any other regular on the forum.
And, on the off chance he does, I guess it would explain the sycophancy.
You don’t have to believe me, but I also have no reason to make it up.
No normal Cardinal “just a fan” would be on here as much, blindly defending this incompetent organization.
Cranny doesn't defend Oli. He even said, when MM was fired, he didn't trust Oli.
Cranny didn't defend Fowler. In fact, he didn't like him and made that well known.
Cranny will do logic gymnastics to defend Matheny. To a lesser extent, Mo.
Cranny isn't a shill for the FO. He's just a Matheny lover.
Me: "Okay, he won GG. I liked him as a Cardinal"
You: I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him.
Me: Who cares? He was a nice. Cool, dude.
You: And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in.
Me: I agree. Matheny was at his best when he got rosters who just won the WS. Any other roster would show Matheny's lack of skills as a manager.
One time I attended a charity event and Matheny was the guest speaker. The fee for a speaker was $15,000. He donated that entire speaking fee to the charity. He easily could have used that money for his family. He was more than just “nice”.
I guess what triggered me on this thread is the thread’s subject. Hate is a strong word.

Re: For the Matheny haters
You have no idea about that, sdaltons. He and other investors invested in a building and had a tenant lined up for the building. The tenant company moved in. When the recession hit, the tenant couldn’t pay the rent and the investors didn’t have rental income to pay the debt service on the building. The investors had personally guaranteed the Ioan. It happened all over the country.sdaltons wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:23 amWell he never was good with moneyCranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:13 amEcleme -ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 23:36 pmYou "I respected his toughness as a player."Cranny wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 21:09 pmI respected his toughness as a player. I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him. And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in. And then was made a scapegoat. That’s all.ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 20:49 pmCranny isn't some insider. Maybe he knows one or two joe blows from his church.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:59 pmOl’ Friend, I believe you. And I’ve posted several times that to be so vehement in his defense of Mozo, Cranny must be connected with the FO, or be related to someone in the FO, or be friends with someone in the FO. I’ve derisively called him Mrs. Mozeliak in a couple of posts.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:44 pmIt’s not an off chance. Seriously.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:37 pmSuuuuure he does.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:05 pmFWIW, Cranny likely does have acquaintances in or adjacent to the front office / ownership.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 18:48 pmFeel free to prove me wrong.
He’s not gonna “prove” it in any way that satiates your demand, but I’m familiar enough with Cranny to know he’s closer to that room than probably any other regular on the forum.
And, on the off chance he does, I guess it would explain the sycophancy.
You don’t have to believe me, but I also have no reason to make it up.
No normal Cardinal “just a fan” would be on here as much, blindly defending this incompetent organization.
Cranny doesn't defend Oli. He even said, when MM was fired, he didn't trust Oli.
Cranny didn't defend Fowler. In fact, he didn't like him and made that well known.
Cranny will do logic gymnastics to defend Matheny. To a lesser extent, Mo.
Cranny isn't a shill for the FO. He's just a Matheny lover.
Me: "Okay, he won GG. I liked him as a Cardinal"
You: I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him.
Me: Who cares? He was a nice. Cool, dude.
You: And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in.
Me: I agree. Matheny was at his best when he got rosters who just won the WS. Any other roster would show Matheny's lack of skills as a manager.
One time I attended a charity event and Matheny was the guest speaker. The fee for a speaker was $15,000. He donated that entire speaking fee to the charity. He easily could have used that money for his family. He was more than just “nice”.
I guess what triggered me on this thread is the thread’s subject. Hate is a strong word.![]()
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1441
- Joined: 28 May 2024 18:12 pm
Re: For the Matheny haters
Doesn’t make it smart.Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:50 amYou have no idea about that, sdaltons. He and other investors invested in a building and had a tenant lined up for the building. The tenant company moved in. When the recession hit, the tenant couldn’t pay the rent and the investors didn’t have rental income to pay the debt service on the building. The investors had personally guaranteed the Ioan. It happened all over the country.sdaltons wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:23 amWell he never was good with moneyCranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:13 amEcleme -ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 23:36 pmYou "I respected his toughness as a player."Cranny wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 21:09 pmI respected his toughness as a player. I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him. And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in. And then was made a scapegoat. That’s all.ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 20:49 pmCranny isn't some insider. Maybe he knows one or two joe blows from his church.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:59 pmOl’ Friend, I believe you. And I’ve posted several times that to be so vehement in his defense of Mozo, Cranny must be connected with the FO, or be related to someone in the FO, or be friends with someone in the FO. I’ve derisively called him Mrs. Mozeliak in a couple of posts.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:44 pmIt’s not an off chance. Seriously.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:37 pmSuuuuure he does.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:05 pmFWIW, Cranny likely does have acquaintances in or adjacent to the front office / ownership.
He’s not gonna “prove” it in any way that satiates your demand, but I’m familiar enough with Cranny to know he’s closer to that room than probably any other regular on the forum.
And, on the off chance he does, I guess it would explain the sycophancy.
You don’t have to believe me, but I also have no reason to make it up.
No normal Cardinal “just a fan” would be on here as much, blindly defending this incompetent organization.
Cranny doesn't defend Oli. He even said, when MM was fired, he didn't trust Oli.
Cranny didn't defend Fowler. In fact, he didn't like him and made that well known.
Cranny will do logic gymnastics to defend Matheny. To a lesser extent, Mo.
Cranny isn't a shill for the FO. He's just a Matheny lover.
Me: "Okay, he won GG. I liked him as a Cardinal"
You: I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him.
Me: Who cares? He was a nice. Cool, dude.
You: And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in.
Me: I agree. Matheny was at his best when he got rosters who just won the WS. Any other roster would show Matheny's lack of skills as a manager.
One time I attended a charity event and Matheny was the guest speaker. The fee for a speaker was $15,000. He donated that entire speaking fee to the charity. He easily could have used that money for his family. He was more than just “nice”.
I guess what triggered me on this thread is the thread’s subject. Hate is a strong word.![]()
Re: For the Matheny haters
The commercial real estate industry was turned upside downdesertrat23 wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 09:02 amDoesn’t make it smart.Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:50 amYou have no idea about that, sdaltons. He and other investors invested in a building and had a tenant lined up for the building. The tenant company moved in. When the recession hit, the tenant couldn’t pay the rent and the investors didn’t have rental income to pay the debt service on the building. The investors had personally guaranteed the Ioan. It happened all over the country.sdaltons wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:23 amWell he never was good with moneyCranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:13 amEcleme -ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 23:36 pmYou "I respected his toughness as a player."Cranny wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 21:09 pmI respected his toughness as a player. I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him. And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in. And then was made a scapegoat. That’s all.ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 20:49 pmCranny isn't some insider. Maybe he knows one or two joe blows from his church.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:59 pmOl’ Friend, I believe you. And I’ve posted several times that to be so vehement in his defense of Mozo, Cranny must be connected with the FO, or be related to someone in the FO, or be friends with someone in the FO. I’ve derisively called him Mrs. Mozeliak in a couple of posts.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:44 pmIt’s not an off chance. Seriously.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:37 pmSuuuuure he does.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:05 pmFWIW, Cranny likely does have acquaintances in or adjacent to the front office / ownership.
He’s not gonna “prove” it in any way that satiates your demand, but I’m familiar enough with Cranny to know he’s closer to that room than probably any other regular on the forum.
And, on the off chance he does, I guess it would explain the sycophancy.
You don’t have to believe me, but I also have no reason to make it up.
No normal Cardinal “just a fan” would be on here as much, blindly defending this incompetent organization.
Cranny doesn't defend Oli. He even said, when MM was fired, he didn't trust Oli.
Cranny didn't defend Fowler. In fact, he didn't like him and made that well known.
Cranny will do logic gymnastics to defend Matheny. To a lesser extent, Mo.
Cranny isn't a shill for the FO. He's just a Matheny lover.
Me: "Okay, he won GG. I liked him as a Cardinal"
You: I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him.
Me: Who cares? He was a nice. Cool, dude.
You: And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in.
Me: I agree. Matheny was at his best when he got rosters who just won the WS. Any other roster would show Matheny's lack of skills as a manager.
One time I attended a charity event and Matheny was the guest speaker. The fee for a speaker was $15,000. He donated that entire speaking fee to the charity. He easily could have used that money for his family. He was more than just “nice”.
I guess what triggered me on this thread is the thread’s subject. Hate is a strong word.![]()
as many tenants throughout the country couldn’t pay rent.
Many very smart, experienced investors got caught in it.
Re: For the Matheny haters
I think he had no experience as a manager, and it showed in a number of ways. He was a tough, down and dirty, all out ball player who left it all on the field every game. He expected the same from each player and got down on them if they didn’t live up to that standard. That approach didn’t work with several players and it caused friction.ecleme22 wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:23 amAnd there it is (as if we didn’t know)Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:13 amEcleme -ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 23:36 pmYou "I respected his toughness as a player."Cranny wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 21:09 pmI respected his toughness as a player. I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him. And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in. And then was made a scapegoat. That’s all.ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 20:49 pmCranny isn't some insider. Maybe he knows one or two joe blows from his church.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:59 pmOl’ Friend, I believe you. And I’ve posted several times that to be so vehement in his defense of Mozo, Cranny must be connected with the FO, or be related to someone in the FO, or be friends with someone in the FO. I’ve derisively called him Mrs. Mozeliak in a couple of posts.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:44 pmIt’s not an off chance. Seriously.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:37 pmSuuuuure he does.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:05 pmFWIW, Cranny likely does have acquaintances in or adjacent to the front office / ownership.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 18:48 pmFeel free to prove me wrong.
He’s not gonna “prove” it in any way that satiates your demand, but I’m familiar enough with Cranny to know he’s closer to that room than probably any other regular on the forum.
And, on the off chance he does, I guess it would explain the sycophancy.
You don’t have to believe me, but I also have no reason to make it up.
No normal Cardinal “just a fan” would be on here as much, blindly defending this incompetent organization.
Cranny doesn't defend Oli. He even said, when MM was fired, he didn't trust Oli.
Cranny didn't defend Fowler. In fact, he didn't like him and made that well known.
Cranny will do logic gymnastics to defend Matheny. To a lesser extent, Mo.
Cranny isn't a shill for the FO. He's just a Matheny lover.
Me: "Okay, he won GG. I liked him as a Cardinal"
You: I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him.
Me: Who cares? He was a nice. Cool, dude.
You: And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in.
Me: I agree. Matheny was at his best when he got rosters who just won the WS. Any other roster would show Matheny's lack of skills as a manager.
One time I attended a charity event and Matheny was the guest speaker. The fee for a speaker was $15,000. He donated that entire speaking fee to the charity. He easily could have used that money for his family. He was more than just “nice”.
I guess what triggered me on this thread is the thread’s subject. Hate is a strong word.
Cranny is sticking up for a guy he likes, not a manager he thinks was good.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: 02 Jan 2020 19:58 pm
Re: For the Matheny haters
He earned over 22 million in his baseball career. While after taxes and living expenses that doesn't really fall under generational wealth, but for anyone with any sense about money, that's enough to get through the rest of your life without ever ending up homeless/living with the in-laws.Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:50 amYou have no idea about that, sdaltons. He and other investors invested in a building and had a tenant lined up for the building. The tenant company moved in. When the recession hit, the tenant couldn’t pay the rent and the investors didn’t have rental income to pay the debt service on the building. The investors had personally guaranteed the Ioan. It happened all over the country.sdaltons wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:23 amWell he never was good with moneyCranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:13 amEcleme -ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 23:36 pmYou "I respected his toughness as a player."Cranny wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 21:09 pmI respected his toughness as a player. I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him. And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in. And then was made a scapegoat. That’s all.ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 20:49 pmCranny isn't some insider. Maybe he knows one or two joe blows from his church.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:59 pmOl’ Friend, I believe you. And I’ve posted several times that to be so vehement in his defense of Mozo, Cranny must be connected with the FO, or be related to someone in the FO, or be friends with someone in the FO. I’ve derisively called him Mrs. Mozeliak in a couple of posts.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:44 pmIt’s not an off chance. Seriously.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:37 pmSuuuuure he does.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:05 pmFWIW, Cranny likely does have acquaintances in or adjacent to the front office / ownership.
He’s not gonna “prove” it in any way that satiates your demand, but I’m familiar enough with Cranny to know he’s closer to that room than probably any other regular on the forum.
And, on the off chance he does, I guess it would explain the sycophancy.
You don’t have to believe me, but I also have no reason to make it up.
No normal Cardinal “just a fan” would be on here as much, blindly defending this incompetent organization.
Cranny doesn't defend Oli. He even said, when MM was fired, he didn't trust Oli.
Cranny didn't defend Fowler. In fact, he didn't like him and made that well known.
Cranny will do logic gymnastics to defend Matheny. To a lesser extent, Mo.
Cranny isn't a shill for the FO. He's just a Matheny lover.
Me: "Okay, he won GG. I liked him as a Cardinal"
You: I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him.
Me: Who cares? He was a nice. Cool, dude.
You: And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in.
Me: I agree. Matheny was at his best when he got rosters who just won the WS. Any other roster would show Matheny's lack of skills as a manager.
One time I attended a charity event and Matheny was the guest speaker. The fee for a speaker was $15,000. He donated that entire speaking fee to the charity. He easily could have used that money for his family. He was more than just “nice”.
I guess what triggered me on this thread is the thread’s subject. Hate is a strong word.![]()
Re: For the Matheny haters
Lol.Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 09:16 amI think he had no experience as a manager, and it showed in a number of ways. He was a tough, down and dirty, all out ball player who left it all on the field every game. He expected the same from each player and got down on them if they didn’t live up to that standard. That approach didn’t work with several players and it caused friction.ecleme22 wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:23 amAnd there it is (as if we didn’t know)Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:13 amEcleme -ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 23:36 pmYou "I respected his toughness as a player."Cranny wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 21:09 pmI respected his toughness as a player. I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him. And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in. And then was made a scapegoat. That’s all.ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 20:49 pmCranny isn't some insider. Maybe he knows one or two joe blows from his church.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:59 pmOl’ Friend, I believe you. And I’ve posted several times that to be so vehement in his defense of Mozo, Cranny must be connected with the FO, or be related to someone in the FO, or be friends with someone in the FO. I’ve derisively called him Mrs. Mozeliak in a couple of posts.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:44 pmIt’s not an off chance. Seriously.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:37 pmSuuuuure he does.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:05 pmFWIW, Cranny likely does have acquaintances in or adjacent to the front office / ownership.
He’s not gonna “prove” it in any way that satiates your demand, but I’m familiar enough with Cranny to know he’s closer to that room than probably any other regular on the forum.
And, on the off chance he does, I guess it would explain the sycophancy.
You don’t have to believe me, but I also have no reason to make it up.
No normal Cardinal “just a fan” would be on here as much, blindly defending this incompetent organization.
Cranny doesn't defend Oli. He even said, when MM was fired, he didn't trust Oli.
Cranny didn't defend Fowler. In fact, he didn't like him and made that well known.
Cranny will do logic gymnastics to defend Matheny. To a lesser extent, Mo.
Cranny isn't a shill for the FO. He's just a Matheny lover.
Me: "Okay, he won GG. I liked him as a Cardinal"
You: I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him.
Me: Who cares? He was a nice. Cool, dude.
You: And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in.
Me: I agree. Matheny was at his best when he got rosters who just won the WS. Any other roster would show Matheny's lack of skills as a manager.
One time I attended a charity event and Matheny was the guest speaker. The fee for a speaker was $15,000. He donated that entire speaking fee to the charity. He easily could have used that money for his family. He was more than just “nice”.
I guess what triggered me on this thread is the thread’s subject. Hate is a strong word.
Cranny is sticking up for a guy he likes, not a manager he thinks was good.
“Mathenys biggest issue was he cared too much!”
S[top] T[hose] F[raudulent] U[tterances]
Re: For the Matheny haters
Getting gross, Ecleme? Read my post again. He didn’t like payers who didn’t put out 110%. Was tough on players like that. They didn’t like it.ecleme22 wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 09:29 amLol.Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 09:16 amI think he had no experience as a manager, and it showed in a number of ways. He was a tough, down and dirty, all out ball player who left it all on the field every game. He expected the same from each player and got down on them if they didn’t live up to that standard. That approach didn’t work with several players and it caused friction.ecleme22 wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:23 amAnd there it is (as if we didn’t know)Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:13 amEcleme -ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 23:36 pmYou "I respected his toughness as a player."Cranny wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 21:09 pmI respected his toughness as a player. I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him. And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in. And then was made a scapegoat. That’s all.ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 20:49 pmCranny isn't some insider. Maybe he knows one or two joe blows from his church.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:59 pmOl’ Friend, I believe you. And I’ve posted several times that to be so vehement in his defense of Mozo, Cranny must be connected with the FO, or be related to someone in the FO, or be friends with someone in the FO. I’ve derisively called him Mrs. Mozeliak in a couple of posts.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:44 pmIt’s not an off chance. Seriously.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:37 pmSuuuuure he does.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:05 pmFWIW, Cranny likely does have acquaintances in or adjacent to the front office / ownership.
He’s not gonna “prove” it in any way that satiates your demand, but I’m familiar enough with Cranny to know he’s closer to that room than probably any other regular on the forum.
And, on the off chance he does, I guess it would explain the sycophancy.
You don’t have to believe me, but I also have no reason to make it up.
No normal Cardinal “just a fan” would be on here as much, blindly defending this incompetent organization.
Cranny doesn't defend Oli. He even said, when MM was fired, he didn't trust Oli.
Cranny didn't defend Fowler. In fact, he didn't like him and made that well known.
Cranny will do logic gymnastics to defend Matheny. To a lesser extent, Mo.
Cranny isn't a shill for the FO. He's just a Matheny lover.
Me: "Okay, he won GG. I liked him as a Cardinal"
You: I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him.
Me: Who cares? He was a nice. Cool, dude.
You: And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in.
Me: I agree. Matheny was at his best when he got rosters who just won the WS. Any other roster would show Matheny's lack of skills as a manager.
One time I attended a charity event and Matheny was the guest speaker. The fee for a speaker was $15,000. He donated that entire speaking fee to the charity. He easily could have used that money for his family. He was more than just “nice”.
I guess what triggered me on this thread is the thread’s subject. Hate is a strong word.
Cranny is sticking up for a guy he likes, not a manager he thinks was good.
“Mathenys biggest issue was he cared too much!”
S[top] T[hose] F[raudulent] U[tterances]
Re: For the Matheny haters
Cranny after all these years we get it. You loved Matheny. Please get over it, it's over and time to move on.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 13067
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: For the Matheny haters
You stated he didn’t like certain players. That’s personnel. You also stated he was tough on those he didn’t like. That’s bias.Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 09:38 amGetting gross, Ecleme? Read my post again. He didn’t like payers who didn’t put out 110%. Was tough on players like that. They didn’t like it.ecleme22 wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 09:29 amLol.Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 09:16 amI think he had no experience as a manager, and it showed in a number of ways. He was a tough, down and dirty, all out ball player who left it all on the field every game. He expected the same from each player and got down on them if they didn’t live up to that standard. That approach didn’t work with several players and it caused friction.ecleme22 wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:23 amAnd there it is (as if we didn’t know)Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:13 amEcleme -ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 23:36 pmYou "I respected his toughness as a player."Cranny wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 21:09 pmI respected his toughness as a player. I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him. And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in. And then was made a scapegoat. That’s all.ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 20:49 pmCranny isn't some insider. Maybe he knows one or two joe blows from his church.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:59 pmOl’ Friend, I believe you. And I’ve posted several times that to be so vehement in his defense of Mozo, Cranny must be connected with the FO, or be related to someone in the FO, or be friends with someone in the FO. I’ve derisively called him Mrs. Mozeliak in a couple of posts.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:44 pmIt’s not an off chance. Seriously.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:37 pmSuuuuure he does.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:05 pm
FWIW, Cranny likely does have acquaintances in or adjacent to the front office / ownership.
He’s not gonna “prove” it in any way that satiates your demand, but I’m familiar enough with Cranny to know he’s closer to that room than probably any other regular on the forum.
And, on the off chance he does, I guess it would explain the sycophancy.
You don’t have to believe me, but I also have no reason to make it up.
No normal Cardinal “just a fan” would be on here as much, blindly defending this incompetent organization.
Cranny doesn't defend Oli. He even said, when MM was fired, he didn't trust Oli.
Cranny didn't defend Fowler. In fact, he didn't like him and made that well known.
Cranny will do logic gymnastics to defend Matheny. To a lesser extent, Mo.
Cranny isn't a shill for the FO. He's just a Matheny lover.
Me: "Okay, he won GG. I liked him as a Cardinal"
You: I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him.
Me: Who cares? He was a nice. Cool, dude.
You: And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in.
Me: I agree. Matheny was at his best when he got rosters who just won the WS. Any other roster would show Matheny's lack of skills as a manager.
One time I attended a charity event and Matheny was the guest speaker. The fee for a speaker was $15,000. He donated that entire speaking fee to the charity. He easily could have used that money for his family. He was more than just “nice”.
I guess what triggered me on this thread is the thread’s subject. Hate is a strong word.
Cranny is sticking up for a guy he likes, not a manager he thinks was good.
“Mathenys biggest issue was he cared too much!”
S[top] T[hose] F[raudulent] U[tterances]
Re: For the Matheny haters
There were certain payers he didn’t like for the reasons I denoted. There were other factors too. Like one player whosikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 09:42 amYou stated he didn’t like certain players. That’s personnel. You also stated he was tough on those he didn’t like. That’s bias.Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 09:38 amGetting gross, Ecleme? Read my post again. He didn’t like payers who didn’t put out 110%. Was tough on players like that. They didn’t like it.ecleme22 wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 09:29 amLol.Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 09:16 amI think he had no experience as a manager, and it showed in a number of ways. He was a tough, down and dirty, all out ball player who left it all on the field every game. He expected the same from each player and got down on them if they didn’t live up to that standard. That approach didn’t work with several players and it caused friction.ecleme22 wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:23 amAnd there it is (as if we didn’t know)Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:13 amEcleme -ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 23:36 pmYou "I respected his toughness as a player."Cranny wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 21:09 pmI respected his toughness as a player. I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him. And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in. And then was made a scapegoat. That’s all.ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 20:49 pmCranny isn't some insider. Maybe he knows one or two joe blows from his church.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:59 pmOl’ Friend, I believe you. And I’ve posted several times that to be so vehement in his defense of Mozo, Cranny must be connected with the FO, or be related to someone in the FO, or be friends with someone in the FO. I’ve derisively called him Mrs. Mozeliak in a couple of posts.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:44 pmIt’s not an off chance. Seriously.desertrat23 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:37 pm
Suuuuure he does.
And, on the off chance he does, I guess it would explain the sycophancy.
You don’t have to believe me, but I also have no reason to make it up.
No normal Cardinal “just a fan” would be on here as much, blindly defending this incompetent organization.
Cranny doesn't defend Oli. He even said, when MM was fired, he didn't trust Oli.
Cranny didn't defend Fowler. In fact, he didn't like him and made that well known.
Cranny will do logic gymnastics to defend Matheny. To a lesser extent, Mo.
Cranny isn't a shill for the FO. He's just a Matheny lover.
Me: "Okay, he won GG. I liked him as a Cardinal"
You: I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him.
Me: Who cares? He was a nice. Cool, dude.
You: And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in.
Me: I agree. Matheny was at his best when he got rosters who just won the WS. Any other roster would show Matheny's lack of skills as a manager.
One time I attended a charity event and Matheny was the guest speaker. The fee for a speaker was $15,000. He donated that entire speaking fee to the charity. He easily could have used that money for his family. He was more than just “nice”.
I guess what triggered me on this thread is the thread’s subject. Hate is a strong word.
Cranny is sticking up for a guy he likes, not a manager he thinks was good.
“Mathenys biggest issue was he cared too much!”
S[top] T[hose] F[raudulent] U[tterances]
refused to stay in the same hotel as the rest of the team.
He didn’t care for that.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 13067
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: For the Matheny haters
Being upset with a player for lodging preferences and then holding it against their profession seems strong.Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 09:56 amThere were certain payers he didn’t like for the reasons I denoted. There were other factors too. Like one player whosikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 09:42 amYou stated he didn’t like certain players. That’s personnel. You also stated he was tough on those he didn’t like. That’s bias.Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 09:38 amGetting gross, Ecleme? Read my post again. He didn’t like payers who didn’t put out 110%. Was tough on players like that. They didn’t like it.ecleme22 wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 09:29 amLol.Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 09:16 amI think he had no experience as a manager, and it showed in a number of ways. He was a tough, down and dirty, all out ball player who left it all on the field every game. He expected the same from each player and got down on them if they didn’t live up to that standard. That approach didn’t work with several players and it caused friction.ecleme22 wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:23 amAnd there it is (as if we didn’t know)Cranny wrote: ↑21 Aug 2025 08:13 amEcleme -ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 23:36 pmYou "I respected his toughness as a player."Cranny wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 21:09 pmI respected his toughness as a player. I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him. And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in. And then was made a scapegoat. That’s all.ecleme22 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 20:49 pmCranny isn't some insider. Maybe he knows one or two joe blows from his church.Hazelwood72 wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:59 pmOl’ Friend, I believe you. And I’ve posted several times that to be so vehement in his defense of Mozo, Cranny must be connected with the FO, or be related to someone in the FO, or be friends with someone in the FO. I’ve derisively called him Mrs. Mozeliak in a couple of posts.An Old Friend wrote: ↑20 Aug 2025 19:44 pm
It’s not an off chance. Seriously.
You don’t have to believe me, but I also have no reason to make it up.
No normal Cardinal “just a fan” would be on here as much, blindly defending this incompetent organization.
Cranny doesn't defend Oli. He even said, when MM was fired, he didn't trust Oli.
Cranny didn't defend Fowler. In fact, he didn't like him and made that well known.
Cranny will do logic gymnastics to defend Matheny. To a lesser extent, Mo.
Cranny isn't a shill for the FO. He's just a Matheny lover.
Me: "Okay, he won GG. I liked him as a Cardinal"
You: I respect what kind of person he is because I’ve met him.
Me: Who cares? He was a nice. Cool, dude.
You: And I truly think he got the short end of the stick as far as the quality of players Mo brought in.
Me: I agree. Matheny was at his best when he got rosters who just won the WS. Any other roster would show Matheny's lack of skills as a manager.
One time I attended a charity event and Matheny was the guest speaker. The fee for a speaker was $15,000. He donated that entire speaking fee to the charity. He easily could have used that money for his family. He was more than just “nice”.
I guess what triggered me on this thread is the thread’s subject. Hate is a strong word.
Cranny is sticking up for a guy he likes, not a manager he thinks was good.
“Mathenys biggest issue was he cared too much!”
S[top] T[hose] F[raudulent] U[tterances]
refused to stay in the same hotel as the rest of the team.
He didn’t care for that.