Why no love for CF Nathan Church
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 169
- Joined: 23 May 2024 22:43 pm
Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church
Very small samples size, but I his rapid accession in 2025 came on a bit unexpected. He will get a shot soon, if he keeps it up!
He was a mediocre (0.704 OPS) in AA last year.
He went 1 for 16 in ST and was assigned back to AA and got injured. He had a short stint in 1A for rehab, then back to AA.
He had a phenomenal 29 games in AA with a 0.943 OPS and 6 steals.
Got promoted to AAA in early June and has a 0.937 OPS in 44 games.
He's had a great run these past few months, but it's not like he was knocking on the door in March.
I'm hopeful he pans out!
He was a mediocre (0.704 OPS) in AA last year.
He went 1 for 16 in ST and was assigned back to AA and got injured. He had a short stint in 1A for rehab, then back to AA.
He had a phenomenal 29 games in AA with a 0.943 OPS and 6 steals.
Got promoted to AAA in early June and has a 0.937 OPS in 44 games.
He's had a great run these past few months, but it's not like he was knocking on the door in March.
I'm hopeful he pans out!
Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church
That’s the joke. I almost replaced noot with Joe medwick…
When they held on to noot at the deadline a small part of me died.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 11661
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church
^^^THIS^^^
Have to think Bloom is going to give a lot of kids their shot knowing he needs to turnover a lot of this roster.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 13102
- Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm
Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church
His wasn’t a name that Mozeliak wrote down on a piece of paper before the season started as guys who needed a look.
A reminder - his org is one that moved to opportunities being given and not earned.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1666
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:42 pm
Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church
Plenty of love for Nathan. I have him projected for CF next year.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1358
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church
Church and Joshua Baez are another two minor league players who have finally shown some improvement with our new player development people. I think the payroll levels will increase over time, but even if they didn't, we are going to get much better mileage out of the players in our system than we are used to. Like, players will actually improve. A novel concept.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 7669
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church
Posted MLB numberssdaltons wrote: ↑06 Aug 2025 09:54 amWhat does him not yet playing in MLB have to do with anything?scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑06 Aug 2025 08:09 am It comes next year? Cards had their pile of prospects/suspects to run thru
Also, when did Church play in MLB?![]()

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church
Maybe get your eyes checked. Then read it again.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑06 Aug 2025 12:40 pmPosted MLB numberssdaltons wrote: ↑06 Aug 2025 09:54 amWhat does him not yet playing in MLB have to do with anything?scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑06 Aug 2025 08:09 am It comes next year? Cards had their pile of prospects/suspects to run thru
Also, when did Church play in MLB?![]()
![]()

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church
If he is called up after August 15, it does not impact his service time. The Cards still retain a full 6 years of control. So by the books, they can bring him up...StlMike1969 wrote: ↑06 Aug 2025 10:07 am I do not believe we see Church at all this year. He will get a 2026 ST invite. They are going to ride out what they have the rest of the way and not start anyone's service time until they have to. It is obvious 2026 will be a new looking team but not any big splashes contract wise due to the impending lockout. No one knows how much time that may cost players and teams. At the end of the year when Bloom takes over they will decide what happens to guys that got their shot this year, Walker, Gorman, Nootbar, Scott etc. We can analyze all we want and propose but this is a team ran by a banker they do things by the books.
Nootbar always gets hurt and only has two more years of control. He still has value and should be a guy they try and trade / package in a deal to get a young starting pitcher.
Scott showed improvement this year and I am willing to stick with him. Walker I am on the fence at this point whether he gets more runway or not. Gorman has not looked good at 3B. I think he should be traded as well. He also has some value. Plus with Arenado still on the team and Wetherholdt arriving, there is no position for Gorman, even if they do unload Arenado.
Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church
Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church
Excited to get a look at noot batting cleanup today. This should answer some questions.