Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Janssen
Forum User
Posts: 315
Joined: 07 Jan 2021 14:45 pm

Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Post by Janssen »

AB. R. H. HR. RBI. SB. Avg

2025 MiLB Stats 309 60 103 12 46 15 .333 .392 .920
MiLB Career Stats 1341 218 377 24 160 63 .281 .353 .747

Not 100% how good he is defensively but have to give him a shot based on VS lack of offense?
scoutyjones2
Forum User
Posts: 7669
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Post by scoutyjones2 »

It comes next year? Cards had their pile of prospects/suspects to run thru

Also, when did Church play in MLB? 8O
Melville
Forum User
Posts: 3979
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:16 pm

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Post by Melville »

Church should be scheduled in STL immediately after the final Sunday in August and become part of the outfield choir.
Talkin' Baseball
Forum User
Posts: 1358
Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Post by Talkin' Baseball »

I don't know if he will succeed, or not, but he's ready to try. By the way, he plays all 3 OF spots and is very good defensively.
Absolut
Forum User
Posts: 12143
Joined: 12 Jan 2020 20:06 pm

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Post by Absolut »

Need to see what Noot can do first.
Futuregm2
Forum User
Posts: 7832
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:18 pm

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Post by Futuregm2 »

Talkin' Baseball wrote: 06 Aug 2025 09:41 am I don't know if he will succeed, or not, but he's ready to try. By the way, he plays all 3 OF spots and is very good defensively.
Agreed, he should be called up and play CF. At this point it can’t hurt to try.
sdaltons
Forum User
Posts: 3234
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:45 pm

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Post by sdaltons »

scoutyjones2 wrote: 06 Aug 2025 08:09 am It comes next year? Cards had their pile of prospects/suspects to run thru

Also, when did Church play in MLB? 8O
What does him not yet playing in MLB have to do with anything?
Hoosier59
Forum User
Posts: 911
Joined: 16 Dec 2022 12:03 pm

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Post by Hoosier59 »

I agree, he should be given an opportunity, but you know that it won’t be Noot, that sits, or Burleson. It will be Walker, Scott, and Gorman.
Basil Shabazz
Forum User
Posts: 1252
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Post by Basil Shabazz »

Absolut wrote: 06 Aug 2025 09:46 am Need to see what Noot can do first.
I think we know.
StlMike1969
Forum User
Posts: 232
Joined: 24 May 2024 11:01 am

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Post by StlMike1969 »

I do not believe we see Church at all this year. He will get a 2026 ST invite. They are going to ride out what they have the rest of the way and not start anyone's service time until they have to. It is obvious 2026 will be a new looking team but not any big splashes contract wise due to the impending lockout. No one knows how much time that may cost players and teams. At the end of the year when Bloom takes over they will decide what happens to guys that got their shot this year, Walker, Gorman, Nootbar, Scott etc. We can analyze all we want and propose but this is a team ran by a banker they do things by the books.
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 11655
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Post by rockondlouie »

Absolut wrote: 06 Aug 2025 09:46 am Need to see what Noot can do first.
Get hurt? :mrgreen:
ClassicO
Forum User
Posts: 1247
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:37 pm

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Post by ClassicO »

Janssen wrote: 06 Aug 2025 08:00 am AB. R. H. HR. RBI. SB. Avg

2025 MiLB Stats 309 60 103 12 46 15 .333 .392 .920
MiLB Career Stats 1341 218 377 24 160 63 .281 .353 .747

Not 100% how good he is defensively but have to give him a shot based on VS lack of offense?
Up until this year, his great defense (a good arm) was his calling card. Good speed too. Another Smurf, though at listed 5'10" (Memphis has a bunch.)
MLB - Hit: 45 | Power: 40 | Run: 70 | Arm: 60 | Field: 60 | Overall: 40

The Cards have liked him for a while, as he got a lot of Spring Training time years ago when I wondered - why - the guy can't hit. But he's figured out something.
Basil Shabazz
Forum User
Posts: 1252
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Post by Basil Shabazz »

Good discussion in this thread.

viewtopic.php?t=1514886&hilit=Church

He should definitely be getting a look over the last 1/4 of the season.
Basil Shabazz
Forum User
Posts: 1252
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Post by Basil Shabazz »

I said this tongue-in-cheek in the linked thread...

:wink: His minor league progression isn’t that dissimilar from a guy named Jim Edmonds :wink:

One can dream!!

Edmonds made it up a year ahead of Church and showed more gap power. But the HR power was similar in their early 20s. Edmond's power at 25 years old really came out of nowhere. He hit 33 HRs for the Halos in 1995, where his previous high was 14 between AA/AAA in 1992.
Cranny
Forum User
Posts: 5121
Joined: 24 May 2024 09:26 am

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Post by Cranny »

It’s criminal that Hampson is on the Cardinals and Church is not.
ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 3420
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Why no love for CF Nathan Church

Post by ecleme22 »

Cranny wrote: 06 Aug 2025 10:29 am It’s criminal that Hampson is on the Cardinals and Church is not.
Hampson has 22 pa in 21 games.

I don’t like GH, but he’s just filling a small role.
Post Reply