cards were winners at the deadline

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Post Reply
jbrach
Forum User
Posts: 598
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:33 pm

cards were winners at the deadline

Post by jbrach »

they had 3 pitchers who were not coming back who all had at least some value...we can argue about the return but we wont really know for a couple of yrs good or bad...that said the cards are not in contention and none of the 3 would be getting the 22 mil qualifying offer offer so there was going to be no draft pick attached to any of them so the 6 prospects we received is a win
Braund241
Forum User
Posts: 703
Joined: 24 May 2024 17:52 pm

Re: cards were winners at the deadline

Post by Braund241 »

jbrach wrote: 01 Aug 2025 08:27 am they had 3 pitchers who were not coming back who all had at least some value...we can argue about the return but we wont really know for a couple of yrs good or bad...that said the cards are not in contention and none of the 3 would be getting the 22 mil qualifying offer offer so there was going to be no draft pick attached to any of them so the 6 prospects we received is a win
If you like the Pirates and Marlins model - Sure.
jbrach
Forum User
Posts: 598
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:33 pm

Re: cards were winners at the deadline

Post by jbrach »

Braund241 wrote: 01 Aug 2025 08:32 am
jbrach wrote: 01 Aug 2025 08:27 am they had 3 pitchers who were not coming back who all had at least some value...we can argue about the return but we wont really know for a couple of yrs good or bad...that said the cards are not in contention and none of the 3 would be getting the 22 mil qualifying offer offer so there was going to be no draft pick attached to any of them so the 6 prospects we received is a win
If you like the Pirates and Marlins model - Sure.
assuming the cards are going to be building a solid team going forward the 6 prospects will help a heck of a lot more than holding onto the 3 pitchers
HorseTrader
Forum User
Posts: 2258
Joined: 18 Apr 2020 13:40 pm

Re: cards were winners at the deadline

Post by HorseTrader »

jbrach wrote: 01 Aug 2025 08:27 am they had 3 pitchers who were not coming back who all had at least some value...we can argue about the return but we wont really know for a couple of yrs good or bad...that said the cards are not in contention and none of the 3 would be getting the 22 mil qualifying offer offer so there was going to be no draft pick attached to any of them so the 6 prospects we received is a win
The return may have been a little light but I agree. Something is better then nothing. The only one that might have gotten a qualifying offer would have been Helsley, what got for him was probably better then the extra draft pick
Jatalk
Forum User
Posts: 1479
Joined: 05 Apr 2024 08:33 am

Re: cards were winners at the deadline

Post by Jatalk »

jbrach wrote: 01 Aug 2025 08:27 am they had 3 pitchers who were not coming back who all had at least some value...we can argue about the return but we wont really know for a couple of yrs good or bad...that said the cards are not in contention and none of the 3 would be getting the 22 mil qualifying offer offer so there was going to be no draft pick attached to any of them so the 6 prospects we received is a win
The disappointment is we won’t know for a couple of years as you mentioned. Therefore this so called reset is really extended 3 to 5 years before we are contending. It’s depressing. We will see what happens in the off season with trades and if they will spend some money. But right now not excited.
cardsrmyteam
Forum User
Posts: 2335
Joined: 07 Sep 2022 17:38 pm

Re: cards were winners at the deadline

Post by cardsrmyteam »

Braund241 wrote: 01 Aug 2025 08:32 am
jbrach wrote: 01 Aug 2025 08:27 am they had 3 pitchers who were not coming back who all had at least some value...we can argue about the return but we wont really know for a couple of yrs good or bad...that said the cards are not in contention and none of the 3 would be getting the 22 mil qualifying offer offer so there was going to be no draft pick attached to any of them so the 6 prospects we received is a win
If you like the Pirates and Marlins model - Sure.
It is rare that a team gets all of its prospects to hit and turn into a winner. This was the approach with the Cardinals in the late 80's early 90's and was changed when DeWitt bought the team. Now we are in the same if do loop that doesn't work. It is very RARE that a team built with internal options (whether drafted or acquired) wins. If that was the case, the Rays, Pirates, Reds, etc would have multiple World Series wins across the group. The model does NOT work, the blind faith that Chaim will make it happen with a youth movement is another story line being fulfilled by an ownership group that is changing generations. This is Auggie 2 to Auggie 3 all over again.
Hoosier59
Forum User
Posts: 911
Joined: 16 Dec 2022 12:03 pm

Re: cards were winners at the deadline

Post by Hoosier59 »

That’s what it’s looking like to me too.
musicman
Forum User
Posts: 85
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:04 pm

Re: cards were winners at the deadline

Post by musicman »

They still have a log jam on the 40 man roster,what are they going to do about that?
3rd base fan
Forum User
Posts: 40
Joined: 29 May 2024 12:37 pm

Re: cards were winners at the deadline

Post by 3rd base fan »

Marlins make the playoffs next year. I would trade cards team for the Marlins. They have excellent young pitchers and a good offense.
jbrach
Forum User
Posts: 598
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:33 pm

Re: cards were winners at the deadline

Post by jbrach »

HorseTrader wrote: 01 Aug 2025 08:48 am
jbrach wrote: 01 Aug 2025 08:27 am they had 3 pitchers who were not coming back who all had at least some value...we can argue about the return but we wont really know for a couple of yrs good or bad...that said the cards are not in contention and none of the 3 would be getting the 22 mil qualifying offer offer so there was going to be no draft pick attached to any of them so the 6 prospects we received is a win
The return may have been a little light but I agree. Something is better then nothing. The only one that might have gotten a qualifying offer would have been Helsley, what got for him was probably better then the extra draft pick
no way helesley was getting a qualifying offer coming off this season
ilcubuffs
Forum User
Posts: 743
Joined: 30 May 2024 16:48 pm

Re: cards were winners at the deadline

Post by ilcubuffs »

Evidently all the talking heads, evaluators, et al are wrong. NO ONE who I have read said the Cards won anything. IF not for the Twins the Cards FO would have been racked over the coals for getting a return of zip.
moose-and-squirrel
Forum User
Posts: 5600
Joined: 20 Dec 2020 10:49 am

Re: cards were winners at the deadline

Post by moose-and-squirrel »

musicman wrote: 01 Aug 2025 10:04 am They still have a log jam on the 40 man roster,what are they going to do about that?
lots of fat thats falling off/can be trimmed from that
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 649
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: cards were winners at the deadline

Post by ScotchMIrish »

jbrach wrote: 01 Aug 2025 08:27 am they had 3 pitchers who were not coming back who all had at least some value...we can argue about the return but we wont really know for a couple of yrs good or bad...that said the cards are not in contention and none of the 3 would be getting the 22 mil qualifying offer offer so there was going to be no draft pick attached to any of them so the 6 prospects we received is a win
At this point you have to trust the scouts and front office. It's interesting that Bloom isn't speaking but I suspect he was involved.
Post Reply