cards were winners at the deadline
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
cards were winners at the deadline
they had 3 pitchers who were not coming back who all had at least some value...we can argue about the return but we wont really know for a couple of yrs good or bad...that said the cards are not in contention and none of the 3 would be getting the 22 mil qualifying offer offer so there was going to be no draft pick attached to any of them so the 6 prospects we received is a win
Re: cards were winners at the deadline
If you like the Pirates and Marlins model - Sure.jbrach wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025 08:27 am they had 3 pitchers who were not coming back who all had at least some value...we can argue about the return but we wont really know for a couple of yrs good or bad...that said the cards are not in contention and none of the 3 would be getting the 22 mil qualifying offer offer so there was going to be no draft pick attached to any of them so the 6 prospects we received is a win
Re: cards were winners at the deadline
assuming the cards are going to be building a solid team going forward the 6 prospects will help a heck of a lot more than holding onto the 3 pitchersBraund241 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025 08:32 amIf you like the Pirates and Marlins model - Sure.jbrach wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025 08:27 am they had 3 pitchers who were not coming back who all had at least some value...we can argue about the return but we wont really know for a couple of yrs good or bad...that said the cards are not in contention and none of the 3 would be getting the 22 mil qualifying offer offer so there was going to be no draft pick attached to any of them so the 6 prospects we received is a win
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2258
- Joined: 18 Apr 2020 13:40 pm
Re: cards were winners at the deadline
The return may have been a little light but I agree. Something is better then nothing. The only one that might have gotten a qualifying offer would have been Helsley, what got for him was probably better then the extra draft pickjbrach wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025 08:27 am they had 3 pitchers who were not coming back who all had at least some value...we can argue about the return but we wont really know for a couple of yrs good or bad...that said the cards are not in contention and none of the 3 would be getting the 22 mil qualifying offer offer so there was going to be no draft pick attached to any of them so the 6 prospects we received is a win
Re: cards were winners at the deadline
The disappointment is we won’t know for a couple of years as you mentioned. Therefore this so called reset is really extended 3 to 5 years before we are contending. It’s depressing. We will see what happens in the off season with trades and if they will spend some money. But right now not excited.jbrach wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025 08:27 am they had 3 pitchers who were not coming back who all had at least some value...we can argue about the return but we wont really know for a couple of yrs good or bad...that said the cards are not in contention and none of the 3 would be getting the 22 mil qualifying offer offer so there was going to be no draft pick attached to any of them so the 6 prospects we received is a win
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2335
- Joined: 07 Sep 2022 17:38 pm
Re: cards were winners at the deadline
It is rare that a team gets all of its prospects to hit and turn into a winner. This was the approach with the Cardinals in the late 80's early 90's and was changed when DeWitt bought the team. Now we are in the same if do loop that doesn't work. It is very RARE that a team built with internal options (whether drafted or acquired) wins. If that was the case, the Rays, Pirates, Reds, etc would have multiple World Series wins across the group. The model does NOT work, the blind faith that Chaim will make it happen with a youth movement is another story line being fulfilled by an ownership group that is changing generations. This is Auggie 2 to Auggie 3 all over again.Braund241 wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025 08:32 amIf you like the Pirates and Marlins model - Sure.jbrach wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025 08:27 am they had 3 pitchers who were not coming back who all had at least some value...we can argue about the return but we wont really know for a couple of yrs good or bad...that said the cards are not in contention and none of the 3 would be getting the 22 mil qualifying offer offer so there was going to be no draft pick attached to any of them so the 6 prospects we received is a win
Re: cards were winners at the deadline
That’s what it’s looking like to me too.
Re: cards were winners at the deadline
They still have a log jam on the 40 man roster,what are they going to do about that?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 29 May 2024 12:37 pm
Re: cards were winners at the deadline
Marlins make the playoffs next year. I would trade cards team for the Marlins. They have excellent young pitchers and a good offense.
Re: cards were winners at the deadline
no way helesley was getting a qualifying offer coming off this seasonHorseTrader wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025 08:48 amThe return may have been a little light but I agree. Something is better then nothing. The only one that might have gotten a qualifying offer would have been Helsley, what got for him was probably better then the extra draft pickjbrach wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025 08:27 am they had 3 pitchers who were not coming back who all had at least some value...we can argue about the return but we wont really know for a couple of yrs good or bad...that said the cards are not in contention and none of the 3 would be getting the 22 mil qualifying offer offer so there was going to be no draft pick attached to any of them so the 6 prospects we received is a win
Re: cards were winners at the deadline
Evidently all the talking heads, evaluators, et al are wrong. NO ONE who I have read said the Cards won anything. IF not for the Twins the Cards FO would have been racked over the coals for getting a return of zip.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5600
- Joined: 20 Dec 2020 10:49 am
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 649
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: cards were winners at the deadline
At this point you have to trust the scouts and front office. It's interesting that Bloom isn't speaking but I suspect he was involved.jbrach wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025 08:27 am they had 3 pitchers who were not coming back who all had at least some value...we can argue about the return but we wont really know for a couple of yrs good or bad...that said the cards are not in contention and none of the 3 would be getting the 22 mil qualifying offer offer so there was going to be no draft pick attached to any of them so the 6 prospects we received is a win