THG sees Blues contending for top 3 in central
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 795
- Joined: 21 Sep 2024 19:03 pm
THG sees Blues contending for top 3 in central
The Blues didn't 'stand pat' this off-season. Some folks realize that...
Disclaimer: The video above is hosted on Youtube, and has not be reviewed by the staff of the Post-Dispatch.
Re: THG sees Blues contending for top 3 in central
Nice presentation. Very nice to see some major optimism from THG.MikoTython wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 18:32 pm The Blues didn't 'stand pat' this off-season. Some folks realize that...Disclaimer: The video above is hosted on Youtube, and has not be reviewed by the staff of the Post-Dispatch.

-
- Forum User
- Posts: 243
- Joined: 24 May 2024 08:39 am
Re: THG sees Blues contending for top 3 in central
It’s all clickbait like the Kyrou rumors. Makes me furiousMandatoryDenial wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 21:11 pmFar from it. THG is one of the best sources of hockey analysis available to us fans IMHO he is much better then many analysts not named Joe Micheletti.
Re: THG sees Blues contending for top 3 in central
Wat to chime in Glow Stick!theograce wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 21:21 pmIt’s all clickbait like the Kyrou rumors. Makes me furiousMandatoryDenial wrote: ↑25 Jul 2025 21:11 pmFar from it. THG is one of the best sources of hockey analysis available to us fans IMHO he is much better then many analysts not named Joe Micheletti.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1290
- Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm
Re: THG sees Blues contending for top 3 in central
The forum click baiter is accusing someone else of click baiting.... 

Last edited by HighStick on 26 Jul 2025 13:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: THG sees Blues contending for top 3 in central
I enjoy this guy's takes. In this case, I would disagree with one area. The depth at D doesn't seem to be up to Army's usually standards. Blues are usually 7-8 deep with NHL caliber D going into a season in case of injuires. I'd be surprised if an additional D man isn't added unless they feel Lindstein is close.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1290
- Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm
Re: THG sees Blues contending for top 3 in central
He's got more nuances to the Blues down than usual. Dvorsky emerging on the wing. Snuggerud's trajectory. Suter's possible impact. Mailloux' profile/role. He saw the same thing in Broberg close observers saw. How Fowler played and expectations going forward. It's impressive for a generalist. His thesis is he gains shrewdness through vast intake which forces objectivity and I think he's right. He has the dedication to organize and he is a born white board lover. I got white boards everywhere. This concept that he does, it's exactly the kind of one I would have picked and his route is the one I would have taken. Though I don't have anywhere near that big a thing for jerseys and memorabilia.Sudsy 11 wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 12:59 pm I enjoy this guy's takes. In this case, I would disagree with one area. The depth at D doesn't seem to be up to Army's usually standards. Blues are usually 7-8 deep with NHL caliber D going into a season in case of injuires. I'd be surprised if an additional D man isn't added unless they feel Lindstein is close.
Good point about Armstrong's normal offseason positioning of the defense I tend to agree. I don't think they are counting on Lindstein for anything significant this season, but that doesn't mean he couldn't be used in a pinch in limited minutes if injuries really hit. He is poised and has played against and with NHL talent on his top SHL team. But I agree Armstrong is more likely to add a 1yr older free agent as depth at some point.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5254
- Joined: 20 Dec 2020 10:49 am
Re: THG sees Blues contending for top 3 in central
still thinking Ryan Suter signs a PTO then a 1yr deal on day 1seattleblue wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:11 pmHe's got more nuances to the Blues down than usual. Dvorsky emerging on the wing. Snuggerud's trajectory. Suter's possible impact. Mailloux' profile/role. He saw the same thing in Broberg close observers saw. How Fowler played and expectations going forward. It's impressive for a generalist. His thesis is he gains shrewdness through vast intake which forces objectivity and I think he's right. He has the dedication to organize and he is a born white board lover. I got white boards everywhere. This concept that he does, it's exactly the kind of one I would have picked and his route is the one I would have taken. Though I don't have anywhere near that big a thing for jerseys and memorabilia.Sudsy 11 wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 12:59 pm I enjoy this guy's takes. In this case, I would disagree with one area. The depth at D doesn't seem to be up to Army's usually standards. Blues are usually 7-8 deep with NHL caliber D going into a season in case of injuires. I'd be surprised if an additional D man isn't added unless they feel Lindstein is close.
Good point about Armstrong's normal offseason positioning of the defense I tend to agree. I don't think they are counting on Lindstein for anything significant this season, but that doesn't mean he couldn't be used in a pinch in limited minutes if injuries really hit. He is poised and has played against and with NHL talent on his top SHL team. But I agree Armstrong is more likely to add a 1yr older free agent as depth at some point.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: 15 Oct 2019 08:36 am
Re: THG sees Blues contending for top 3 in central
Do you think the early injury Broberg suffered nagged him when he returned? Do you think he has been restrained when he pairs with Faulk because Faulk is the guy who joins the rush?seattleblue wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:11 pmHe's got more nuances to the Blues down than usual. Dvorsky emerging on the wing. Snuggerud's trajectory. Suter's possible impact. Mailloux' profile/role. He saw the same thing in Broberg close observers saw. How Fowler played and expectations going forward. It's impressive for a generalist. His thesis is he gains shrewdness through vast intake which forces objectivity and I think he's right. He has the dedication to organize and he is a born white board lover. I got white boards everywhere. This concept that he does, it's exactly the kind of one I would have picked and his route is the one I would have taken. Though I don't have anywhere near that big a thing for jerseys and memorabilia.Sudsy 11 wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 12:59 pm I enjoy this guy's takes. In this case, I would disagree with one area. The depth at D doesn't seem to be up to Army's usually standards. Blues are usually 7-8 deep with NHL caliber D going into a season in case of injuires. I'd be surprised if an additional D man isn't added unless they feel Lindstein is close.
Good point about Armstrong's normal offseason positioning of the defense I tend to agree. I don't think they are counting on Lindstein for anything significant this season, but that doesn't mean he couldn't be used in a pinch in limited minutes if injuries really hit. He is poised and has played against and with NHL talent on his top SHL team. But I agree Armstrong is more likely to add a 1yr older free agent as depth at some point.
The first month of last season, Broberg was All-Star material, imo.
Broberg is big enough, smart enough, and plenty fast enough to cover for mistakes. His plus minus tells that story.
I want to see him display that end-to-end magic he does more fluidly and lethally than any other Dman we have.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: 15 Oct 2019 08:36 am
Re: THG sees Blues contending for top 3 in central
That still leaves the Blues with almost all of Krug's LTIR dough.moose-and-squirrel wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:14 pmstill thinking Ryan Suter signs a PTO then a 1yr deal on day 1seattleblue wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:11 pmHe's got more nuances to the Blues down than usual. Dvorsky emerging on the wing. Snuggerud's trajectory. Suter's possible impact. Mailloux' profile/role. He saw the same thing in Broberg close observers saw. How Fowler played and expectations going forward. It's impressive for a generalist. His thesis is he gains shrewdness through vast intake which forces objectivity and I think he's right. He has the dedication to organize and he is a born white board lover. I got white boards everywhere. This concept that he does, it's exactly the kind of one I would have picked and his route is the one I would have taken. Though I don't have anywhere near that big a thing for jerseys and memorabilia.Sudsy 11 wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 12:59 pm I enjoy this guy's takes. In this case, I would disagree with one area. The depth at D doesn't seem to be up to Army's usually standards. Blues are usually 7-8 deep with NHL caliber D going into a season in case of injuires. I'd be surprised if an additional D man isn't added unless they feel Lindstein is close.
Good point about Armstrong's normal offseason positioning of the defense I tend to agree. I don't think they are counting on Lindstein for anything significant this season, but that doesn't mean he couldn't be used in a pinch in limited minutes if injuries really hit. He is poised and has played against and with NHL talent on his top SHL team. But I agree Armstrong is more likely to add a 1yr older free agent as depth at some point.
I wonder if they spend it... what might be possible.
Re: THG sees Blues contending for top 3 in central
It was tongue in cheek. I’m optimistic about this yearseattleblue wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 12:32 pmnah man, Shannon deserves respect, the guy is just a pure square shooter even when he's wrong. when everybody's talking about it, he's talking about it. the man loves jake neighbours
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2305
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: THG sees Blues contending for top 3 in central
I was going to say essentially the same thing. Just tell him to keep training and stay in shape and when the inevitable injury happens immediately sign him to a contract.moose-and-squirrel wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:14 pmstill thinking Ryan Suter signs a PTO then a 1yr deal on day 1seattleblue wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 13:11 pmHe's got more nuances to the Blues down than usual. Dvorsky emerging on the wing. Snuggerud's trajectory. Suter's possible impact. Mailloux' profile/role. He saw the same thing in Broberg close observers saw. How Fowler played and expectations going forward. It's impressive for a generalist. His thesis is he gains shrewdness through vast intake which forces objectivity and I think he's right. He has the dedication to organize and he is a born white board lover. I got white boards everywhere. This concept that he does, it's exactly the kind of one I would have picked and his route is the one I would have taken. Though I don't have anywhere near that big a thing for jerseys and memorabilia.Sudsy 11 wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025 12:59 pm I enjoy this guy's takes. In this case, I would disagree with one area. The depth at D doesn't seem to be up to Army's usually standards. Blues are usually 7-8 deep with NHL caliber D going into a season in case of injuires. I'd be surprised if an additional D man isn't added unless they feel Lindstein is close.
Good point about Armstrong's normal offseason positioning of the defense I tend to agree. I don't think they are counting on Lindstein for anything significant this season, but that doesn't mean he couldn't be used in a pinch in limited minutes if injuries really hit. He is poised and has played against and with NHL talent on his top SHL team. But I agree Armstrong is more likely to add a 1yr older free agent as depth at some point.