Is there a trade opponent that makes sense
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1084
- Joined: 08 May 2023 21:08 pm
Is there a trade opponent that makes sense
I see like Seattle make
Ryker Evans, Kakko Kappo, and either Beiners or Wright
for
Kryou and Faulk
Ryker Evans, Kakko Kappo, and either Beiners or Wright
for
Kryou and Faulk
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 43
- Joined: 04 Jun 2025 15:44 pm
Re: Is there a trade opponent that makes sense
You missed your window to trade Kyrou. He would need approve a trade to Seattle now. Also, if the blues were to make a major trade it would make more sense to deal a package built around Kyrou for a true upgrade rather than Kyrou for a group of players.Zizzle1297 wrote: ↑19 Jul 2025 11:16 am I see like Seattle make
Ryker Evans, Kakko Kappo, and either Beiners or Wright
for
Kryou and Faulk
Re: Is there a trade opponent that makes sense
Kyrou and Faulk for Dunn and Schwartz
get'r done!
get'r done!
Re: Is there a trade opponent that makes sense
Why trade an elite player who is one of the top 30 scorers players in the league for a bunch of 2nd to 3rd liner types? We have a full stable of those type players.Zizzle1297 wrote: ↑19 Jul 2025 11:16 am I see like Seattle make
Ryker Evans, Kakko Kappo, and either Beiners or Wright
for
Kryou and Faulk
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1386
- Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm
Re: Is there a trade opponent that makes sense
In that proposed trade the major return would be either Matty Beniers or Shane Wright, two emerging young centers. It was my favorite idea after Dobson but I agree that the NTC kicking in ended it. Also Seattle shouldn't trade their young centers, they need at least two players to emerge from those two plus Jake O Brien who will take a couple years to put on NHL weight. A deal where Kyrou and Wright were the two best players in the deal would have probably made me happy.rezero wrote: ↑19 Jul 2025 11:39 amWhy trade an elite player who is one of the top 30 scorers players in the league for a bunch of 2nd to 3rd liner types? We have a full stable of those type players.Zizzle1297 wrote: ↑19 Jul 2025 11:16 am I see like Seattle make
Ryker Evans, Kakko Kappo, and either Beiners or Wright
for
Kryou and Faulk
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 393
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:54 pm
Re: Is there a trade opponent that makes sense
Drink up, everyone.Zizzle1297 wrote: ↑19 Jul 2025 11:16 am I see like Seattle make
Ryker Evans, Kakko Kappo, and either Beiners or Wright
for
Kryou and Faulk

-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1051
- Joined: 02 Feb 2021 23:05 pm
Re: Is there a trade opponent that makes sense
I'm not sure why people want to trade Kyrou. He's our top goal scorer and in his prime. Playing on the 2nd line. I know his defensive game could use some improvement but you can't overlook his ability to put the puck in the net. Every team has dudes who can score and dudes who can't. If Kyrou goes..... 30+ goals needs to come back because we can count on 30 from Kyrou. The D should be fine for now with the addition of Mailloux and I see no reason to trade Kyrou unless there's an even return coming back.
Re: Is there a trade opponent that makes sense
Is this something we can start a petition for?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 720
- Joined: 17 Jan 2021 16:44 pm
Re: Is there a trade opponent that makes sense
A package around Dvorsky for McTavish. No idea how either players upside compares.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 84
- Joined: 29 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Is there a trade opponent that makes sense
If we don't feel like one of our prospects are ready to step into a 3rd line wing spot- I think that will happen- we could look to pittsburgh and Ricard Rackell. 5 mil cap hit...great scoring touch.