Athletic top 100 drafted prospects
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects
Once again you have gone full ratard
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1431
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2210
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects
Florida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?a smell of green grass wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.
2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein
No Stenberg. No Jiricek.
.500 hockey, here we come.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1431
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects
Florida's prospect pool was great 10 years ago. They just completed 2 Stanley Cups. They've drained their prospect pool to keep winning.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 21:01 pmFlorida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?a smell of green grass wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.
2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein
No Stenberg. No Jiricek.
.500 hockey, here we come.
Meanwhile, the Blues and Army just completed their "Re-Whatever". Their prospect pool should be the best in the league, but It's not. The re-whatever ended, and the team is back to "staying competitive". That is what makes the cash registers ring best.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 61
- Joined: 29 Mar 2025 11:48 am
Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects
Canada sucksa smell of green grass wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 21:23 pmFlorida's prospect pool was great 10 years ago. They just completed 2 Stanley Cups. They've drained their prospect pool to keep winning.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 21:01 pmFlorida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?a smell of green grass wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.
2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein
No Stenberg. No Jiricek.
.500 hockey, here we come.
Meanwhile, the Blues and Army just completed their "Re-Whatever". Their prospect pool should be the best in the league, but It's not. The re-whatever ended, and the team is back to "staying competitive". That is what makes the cash registers ring best.
Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects
Opinion and facts (truth) are two completely different things. Your opinions are pretty much short bus material. You are a tar tara smell of green grass wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 20:41 pmI checked my flight logs. I flew due truth, but not too hard.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1431
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects
Remember how Army claimed that the re-whatever is over?
Remember how he didn't take a bow or pat himself on the back?
Now you know why.
Remember how he didn't take a bow or pat himself on the back?
Now you know why.
Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects
He probably didnt bow cause he was afraid you mybtry something to him feom behind tar tara smell of green grass wrote: ↑16 Jul 2025 07:08 am Remember how Army claimed that the re-whatever is over?
Remember how he didn't take a bow or pat himself on the back?
Now you know why.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2210
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects
Well that’s pretty easy to debunk.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 21:23 pmFlorida's prospect pool was great 10 years ago. They just completed 2 Stanley Cups. They've drained their prospect pool to keep winning.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 21:01 pmFlorida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?a smell of green grass wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.
2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein
No Stenberg. No Jiricek.
.500 hockey, here we come.
Meanwhile, the Blues and Army just completed their "Re-Whatever". Their prospect pool should be the best in the league, but It's not. The re-whatever ended, and the team is back to "staying competitive". That is what makes the cash registers ring best.
Here’s a prospect ranking from 10 years ago that has the Panthers ranked 27th: https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-team-p ... rankings/
And here’s one that has them 19th: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/250 ... nhl-draft
Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects
Yep and I noticed 5-6 of the top 10 have done little in the last 10 years. It comes down to players developing and hitting or exceeding their draft ceiling. The organization has been pretty good at with their 1st round picks and if we can get a couple 2nd/3rd rounders to surprise the team will be in good shape. No we won't have that one elite player but we'll be deep and maybe with assets to spare to trade for that elite D or F.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑16 Jul 2025 09:11 amWell that’s pretty easy to debunk.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 21:23 pmFlorida's prospect pool was great 10 years ago. They just completed 2 Stanley Cups. They've drained their prospect pool to keep winning.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 21:01 pmFlorida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?a smell of green grass wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.
2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein
No Stenberg. No Jiricek.
.500 hockey, here we come.
Meanwhile, the Blues and Army just completed their "Re-Whatever". Their prospect pool should be the best in the league, but It's not. The re-whatever ended, and the team is back to "staying competitive". That is what makes the cash registers ring best.
Here’s a prospect ranking from 10 years ago that has the Panthers ranked 27th: https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-team-p ... rankings/
And here’s one that has them 19th: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/250 ... nhl-draft
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 499
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm
Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects
ASOGG usually has an allergy to facts. My guess is they ignore this post.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑16 Jul 2025 09:11 amWell that’s pretty easy to debunk.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 21:23 pmFlorida's prospect pool was great 10 years ago. They just completed 2 Stanley Cups. They've drained their prospect pool to keep winning.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 21:01 pmFlorida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?a smell of green grass wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.
2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein
No Stenberg. No Jiricek.
.500 hockey, here we come.
Meanwhile, the Blues and Army just completed their "Re-Whatever". Their prospect pool should be the best in the league, but It's not. The re-whatever ended, and the team is back to "staying competitive". That is what makes the cash registers ring best.
Here’s a prospect ranking from 10 years ago that has the Panthers ranked 27th: https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-team-p ... rankings/
And here’s one that has them 19th: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/250 ... nhl-draft

Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects
Who needs top 100 prospects. When you have top 10 (donkey).STL fan in MN wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 21:01 pmFlorida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?a smell of green grass wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.
2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein
No Stenberg. No Jiricek.
.500 hockey, here we come.
Who wouldn't want to get to live in Miami while rich and semi famous.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1431
- Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm
Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects
Hard to believe that anyone would claim victory when their point is that the rankings mean nothing.2forDiving wrote: ↑16 Jul 2025 11:06 amASOGG usually has an allergy to facts. My guess is they ignore this post.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑16 Jul 2025 09:11 amWell that’s pretty easy to debunk.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 21:23 pmFlorida's prospect pool was great 10 years ago. They just completed 2 Stanley Cups. They've drained their prospect pool to keep winning.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 21:01 pmFlorida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?a smell of green grass wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.
2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein
No Stenberg. No Jiricek.
.500 hockey, here we come.
Meanwhile, the Blues and Army just completed their "Re-Whatever". Their prospect pool should be the best in the league, but It's not. The re-whatever ended, and the team is back to "staying competitive". That is what makes the cash registers ring best.
Here’s a prospect ranking from 10 years ago that has the Panthers ranked 27th: https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-team-p ... rankings/
And here’s one that has them 19th: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/250 ... nhl-draft![]()

ASOGG Math:
.500 prospects on top of .500 veterans = .500 team.
MN and 2ForDiving Math:
Forget what the Blues prospects look like at the current time relative to everyone else's prospects. Simply assume that all will upgrade our Line 1 offense and defense, and just extrapolate from there.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 499
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm
Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects
I was 50% correcta smell of green grass wrote: ↑16 Jul 2025 13:12 pmHard to believe that anyone would claim victory when their point is that the rankings mean nothing.2forDiving wrote: ↑16 Jul 2025 11:06 amASOGG usually has an allergy to facts. My guess is they ignore this post.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑16 Jul 2025 09:11 amWell that’s pretty easy to debunk.a smell of green grass wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 21:23 pmFlorida's prospect pool was great 10 years ago. They just completed 2 Stanley Cups. They've drained their prospect pool to keep winning.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 21:01 pmFlorida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?a smell of green grass wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.
2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein
No Stenberg. No Jiricek.
.500 hockey, here we come.
Meanwhile, the Blues and Army just completed their "Re-Whatever". Their prospect pool should be the best in the league, but It's not. The re-whatever ended, and the team is back to "staying competitive". That is what makes the cash registers ring best.
Here’s a prospect ranking from 10 years ago that has the Panthers ranked 27th: https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-team-p ... rankings/
And here’s one that has them 19th: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/250 ... nhl-draft![]()
ASOGG Math:
.500 prospects on top of .500 veterans = .500 team.
MN and 2ForDiving Math:
Forget what the Blues prospects look like at the current time relative to everyone else's prospects. Simply assume that all will upgrade our Line 1 offense and defense, and just extrapolate from there.
