Athletic top 100 drafted prospects

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

Nublues69
Forum User
Posts: 483
Joined: 27 May 2024 23:05 pm

Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects

Post by Nublues69 »

Once again you have gone full ratard
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1431
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects

Post by a smell of green grass »

Nublues69 wrote: 15 Jul 2025 19:53 pm Once again you have gone full ratard
I checked my flight logs. I flew due truth, but not too hard.
STL fan in MN
Forum User
Posts: 2213
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm

Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects

Post by STL fan in MN »

a smell of green grass wrote: 15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.

2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein

No Stenberg. No Jiricek.

.500 hockey, here we come.
Florida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1431
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects

Post by a smell of green grass »

STL fan in MN wrote: 15 Jul 2025 21:01 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.

2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein

No Stenberg. No Jiricek.

.500 hockey, here we come.
Florida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?
Florida's prospect pool was great 10 years ago. They just completed 2 Stanley Cups. They've drained their prospect pool to keep winning.

Meanwhile, the Blues and Army just completed their "Re-Whatever". Their prospect pool should be the best in the league, but It's not. The re-whatever ended, and the team is back to "staying competitive". That is what makes the cash registers ring best.
Snuggyfresh
Forum User
Posts: 61
Joined: 29 Mar 2025 11:48 am

Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects

Post by Snuggyfresh »

a smell of green grass wrote: 15 Jul 2025 21:23 pm
STL fan in MN wrote: 15 Jul 2025 21:01 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.

2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein

No Stenberg. No Jiricek.

.500 hockey, here we come.
Florida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?
Florida's prospect pool was great 10 years ago. They just completed 2 Stanley Cups. They've drained their prospect pool to keep winning.

Meanwhile, the Blues and Army just completed their "Re-Whatever". Their prospect pool should be the best in the league, but It's not. The re-whatever ended, and the team is back to "staying competitive". That is what makes the cash registers ring best.
Canada sucks
Nublues69
Forum User
Posts: 483
Joined: 27 May 2024 23:05 pm

Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects

Post by Nublues69 »

a smell of green grass wrote: 15 Jul 2025 20:41 pm
Nublues69 wrote: 15 Jul 2025 19:53 pm Once again you have gone full ratard
I checked my flight logs. I flew due truth, but not too hard.
Opinion and facts (truth) are two completely different things. Your opinions are pretty much short bus material. You are a tar tar
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1431
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects

Post by a smell of green grass »

Remember how Army claimed that the re-whatever is over?
Remember how he didn't take a bow or pat himself on the back?

Now you know why.
Nublues69
Forum User
Posts: 483
Joined: 27 May 2024 23:05 pm

Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects

Post by Nublues69 »

a smell of green grass wrote: 16 Jul 2025 07:08 am Remember how Army claimed that the re-whatever is over?
Remember how he didn't take a bow or pat himself on the back?

Now you know why.
He probably didnt bow cause he was afraid you mybtry something to him feom behind tar tar
STL fan in MN
Forum User
Posts: 2213
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm

Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects

Post by STL fan in MN »

a smell of green grass wrote: 15 Jul 2025 21:23 pm
STL fan in MN wrote: 15 Jul 2025 21:01 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.

2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein

No Stenberg. No Jiricek.

.500 hockey, here we come.
Florida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?
Florida's prospect pool was great 10 years ago. They just completed 2 Stanley Cups. They've drained their prospect pool to keep winning.

Meanwhile, the Blues and Army just completed their "Re-Whatever". Their prospect pool should be the best in the league, but It's not. The re-whatever ended, and the team is back to "staying competitive". That is what makes the cash registers ring best.
Well that’s pretty easy to debunk.

Here’s a prospect ranking from 10 years ago that has the Panthers ranked 27th: https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-team-p ... rankings/

And here’s one that has them 19th: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/250 ... nhl-draft
LGB73
Forum User
Posts: 269
Joined: 29 May 2024 15:18 pm

Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects

Post by LGB73 »

STL fan in MN wrote: 16 Jul 2025 09:11 am
a smell of green grass wrote: 15 Jul 2025 21:23 pm
STL fan in MN wrote: 15 Jul 2025 21:01 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.

2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein

No Stenberg. No Jiricek.

.500 hockey, here we come.
Florida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?
Florida's prospect pool was great 10 years ago. They just completed 2 Stanley Cups. They've drained their prospect pool to keep winning.

Meanwhile, the Blues and Army just completed their "Re-Whatever". Their prospect pool should be the best in the league, but It's not. The re-whatever ended, and the team is back to "staying competitive". That is what makes the cash registers ring best.
Well that’s pretty easy to debunk.

Here’s a prospect ranking from 10 years ago that has the Panthers ranked 27th: https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-team-p ... rankings/

And here’s one that has them 19th: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/250 ... nhl-draft
Yep and I noticed 5-6 of the top 10 have done little in the last 10 years. It comes down to players developing and hitting or exceeding their draft ceiling. The organization has been pretty good at with their 1st round picks and if we can get a couple 2nd/3rd rounders to surprise the team will be in good shape. No we won't have that one elite player but we'll be deep and maybe with assets to spare to trade for that elite D or F.
2forDiving
Forum User
Posts: 499
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm

Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects

Post by 2forDiving »

STL fan in MN wrote: 16 Jul 2025 09:11 am
a smell of green grass wrote: 15 Jul 2025 21:23 pm
STL fan in MN wrote: 15 Jul 2025 21:01 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.

2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein

No Stenberg. No Jiricek.

.500 hockey, here we come.
Florida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?
Florida's prospect pool was great 10 years ago. They just completed 2 Stanley Cups. They've drained their prospect pool to keep winning.

Meanwhile, the Blues and Army just completed their "Re-Whatever". Their prospect pool should be the best in the league, but It's not. The re-whatever ended, and the team is back to "staying competitive". That is what makes the cash registers ring best.
Well that’s pretty easy to debunk.

Here’s a prospect ranking from 10 years ago that has the Panthers ranked 27th: https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-team-p ... rankings/

And here’s one that has them 19th: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/250 ... nhl-draft
ASOGG usually has an allergy to facts. My guess is they ignore this post. :D
Cahokanut
Forum User
Posts: 187
Joined: 15 Jun 2024 06:19 am

Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects

Post by Cahokanut »

STL fan in MN wrote: 15 Jul 2025 21:01 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.

2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein

No Stenberg. No Jiricek.

.500 hockey, here we come.
Florida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?
Who needs top 100 prospects. When you have top 10 (donkey).
Who wouldn't want to get to live in Miami while rich and semi famous.
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1431
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects

Post by a smell of green grass »

2forDiving wrote: 16 Jul 2025 11:06 am
STL fan in MN wrote: 16 Jul 2025 09:11 am
a smell of green grass wrote: 15 Jul 2025 21:23 pm
STL fan in MN wrote: 15 Jul 2025 21:01 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.

2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein

No Stenberg. No Jiricek.

.500 hockey, here we come.
Florida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?
Florida's prospect pool was great 10 years ago. They just completed 2 Stanley Cups. They've drained their prospect pool to keep winning.

Meanwhile, the Blues and Army just completed their "Re-Whatever". Their prospect pool should be the best in the league, but It's not. The re-whatever ended, and the team is back to "staying competitive". That is what makes the cash registers ring best.
Well that’s pretty easy to debunk.

Here’s a prospect ranking from 10 years ago that has the Panthers ranked 27th: https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-team-p ... rankings/

And here’s one that has them 19th: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/250 ... nhl-draft
ASOGG usually has an allergy to facts. My guess is they ignore this post. :D
Hard to believe that anyone would claim victory when their point is that the rankings mean nothing. :)

ASOGG Math:
.500 prospects on top of .500 veterans = .500 team.

MN and 2ForDiving Math:
Forget what the Blues prospects look like at the current time relative to everyone else's prospects. Simply assume that all will upgrade our Line 1 offense and defense, and just extrapolate from there.
2forDiving
Forum User
Posts: 499
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm

Re: Athletic top 100 drafted prospects

Post by 2forDiving »

a smell of green grass wrote: 16 Jul 2025 13:12 pm
2forDiving wrote: 16 Jul 2025 11:06 am
STL fan in MN wrote: 16 Jul 2025 09:11 am
a smell of green grass wrote: 15 Jul 2025 21:23 pm
STL fan in MN wrote: 15 Jul 2025 21:01 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 15 Jul 2025 19:46 pm Blues rankings are very disappointing. It's why the Blues are ranked in the middle of the pack consistently. Will these prospects make it to the NHL? Sure, Army will dress the Barbie, but you don't get a date with Stanley Cup when your Barbie is Tier 3 and below.

2 Players in Tier 3 - Snuggerud, Carbonneau
2 Players in Tier 4 - Dvorsky, Mailloux
1 Player in Tier 5 - Lindstein

No Stenberg. No Jiricek.

.500 hockey, here we come.
Florida has zero in the top 100. How are they doing?
Florida's prospect pool was great 10 years ago. They just completed 2 Stanley Cups. They've drained their prospect pool to keep winning.

Meanwhile, the Blues and Army just completed their "Re-Whatever". Their prospect pool should be the best in the league, but It's not. The re-whatever ended, and the team is back to "staying competitive". That is what makes the cash registers ring best.
Well that’s pretty easy to debunk.

Here’s a prospect ranking from 10 years ago that has the Panthers ranked 27th: https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-team-p ... rankings/

And here’s one that has them 19th: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/250 ... nhl-draft
ASOGG usually has an allergy to facts. My guess is they ignore this post. :D
Hard to believe that anyone would claim victory when their point is that the rankings mean nothing. :)

ASOGG Math:
.500 prospects on top of .500 veterans = .500 team.

MN and 2ForDiving Math:
Forget what the Blues prospects look like at the current time relative to everyone else's prospects. Simply assume that all will upgrade our Line 1 offense and defense, and just extrapolate from there.
I was 50% correct :D
Post Reply