Orioles trade for pick #37
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Orioles trade for pick #37
Orioles just traded with the Rays for their competitive balance pick at #37. CB picks are the only ones that can be traded.
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2025/07/ ... -rays.html
The Cardinals should be doing this. Stop pretending on being a contender this year.
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2025/07/ ... -rays.html
The Cardinals should be doing this. Stop pretending on being a contender this year.
Re: Orioles trade for pick #37
I was thinking the same thing. Then I realized they probably don't want to pay the extra money for signing bonus at those picks.RunSup wrote: ↑10 Jul 2025 13:46 pm Orioles just traded with the Rays for their competitive balance pick at #37. CB picks are the only ones that can be traded.
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2025/07/ ... -rays.html
The Cardinals should be doing this. Stop pretending on being a contender this year.
Re: Orioles trade for pick #37
Brian Baker has 3 years of Arb left.
Our equivalent in this trade would possibly be Kyle Leahy? Does anyone think we could get a Comp Pick for Kyle Leahy?
No?
JoJo Romero has 1 year of Arb left...Would his 1 year of Arb yield the same return? No?
--------
Our equivalent in this trade would possibly be Kyle Leahy? Does anyone think we could get a Comp Pick for Kyle Leahy?
No?
JoJo Romero has 1 year of Arb left...Would his 1 year of Arb yield the same return? No?
--------
Re: Orioles trade for pick #37
Then how did the Orioles get so much in return for this guy? I think this is a huge overpay by the Rays. A first round pick for a guy that's not even a closer. I mean this guy is a decent pitcher, but to give up a comp pick seems outrageous to me.
Re: Orioles trade for pick #37
3 years of control on a pretty good reliever. And the Rays will likely move him before the 3 years are up. Do we possess any reliever with the same type of control? I don't think so.
Re: Orioles trade for pick #37
I'm not disagreeing with you Cravy. I respect your opinion, but don't you think the #37 pick for a team like Tampa Bay that is always worried about payroll an overpay for Baker?craviduce wrote: ↑10 Jul 2025 16:17 pm3 years of control on a pretty good reliever. And the Rays will likely move him before the 3 years are up. Do we possess any reliever with the same type of control? I don't think so.
Re: Orioles trade for pick #37
I agree on the overpay, but the Phills are reportedly looking for relievers with years of control, too, so there's a competitive market for them. So, that's probably a driving factor in the overpay. Can that be a good thing for our two relievers with expiring control in Helsley and Maton? Maybe. Can't hurt the chances of moving Romero with 1 year of control left. Active markets are great.brock118 wrote: ↑10 Jul 2025 16:20 pmI'm not disagreeing with you Cravy. I respect your opinion, but don't you think the #37 pick for a team like Tampa Bay that is always worried about payroll an overpay for Baker?craviduce wrote: ↑10 Jul 2025 16:17 pm3 years of control on a pretty good reliever. And the Rays will likely move him before the 3 years are up. Do we possess any reliever with the same type of control? I don't think so.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 306
- Joined: 26 May 2024 17:41 pm
Re: Orioles trade for pick #37
Maybe our offer would be Romero plus a bat with control (Noot?) for a comp pick. Pozo might also look appealing. Get Crooks up here for a 2 month look.craviduce wrote: ↑10 Jul 2025 16:25 pmI agree on the overpay, but the Phills are reportedly looking for relievers with years of control, too, so there's a competitive market for them. So, that's probably a driving factor in the overpay. Can that be a good thing for our two relievers with expiring control in Helsley and Maton? Maybe. Can't hurt the chances of moving Romero with 1 year of control left. Active markets are great.brock118 wrote: ↑10 Jul 2025 16:20 pmI'm not disagreeing with you Cravy. I respect your opinion, but don't you think the #37 pick for a team like Tampa Bay that is always worried about payroll an overpay for Baker?craviduce wrote: ↑10 Jul 2025 16:17 pm3 years of control on a pretty good reliever. And the Rays will likely move him before the 3 years are up. Do we possess any reliever with the same type of control? I don't think so.
All of that said, unless Bloom is involved, none of that would happen. Mozeliak doesn’t have the desire/gumption to put something like that together.
Re: Orioles trade for pick #37
and time is running out...draft is Sunday.peterman'srealitytour wrote: ↑10 Jul 2025 18:09 pmMaybe our offer would be Romero plus a bat with control (Noot?) for a comp pick. Pozo might also look appealing. Get Crooks up here for a 2 month look.craviduce wrote: ↑10 Jul 2025 16:25 pmI agree on the overpay, but the Phills are reportedly looking for relievers with years of control, too, so there's a competitive market for them. So, that's probably a driving factor in the overpay. Can that be a good thing for our two relievers with expiring control in Helsley and Maton? Maybe. Can't hurt the chances of moving Romero with 1 year of control left. Active markets are great.brock118 wrote: ↑10 Jul 2025 16:20 pmI'm not disagreeing with you Cravy. I respect your opinion, but don't you think the #37 pick for a team like Tampa Bay that is always worried about payroll an overpay for Baker?craviduce wrote: ↑10 Jul 2025 16:17 pm3 years of control on a pretty good reliever. And the Rays will likely move him before the 3 years are up. Do we possess any reliever with the same type of control? I don't think so.
All of that said, unless Bloom is involved, none of that would happen. Mozeliak doesn’t have the desire/gumption to put something like that together.

Re: Orioles trade for pick #37
"Huh, MO says, you can do that"?RunSup wrote: ↑10 Jul 2025 13:46 pm Orioles just traded with the Rays for their competitive balance pick at #37. CB picks are the only ones that can be traded.
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2025/07/ ... -rays.html
The Cardinals should be doing this. Stop pretending on being a contender this year.