Orioles trade for pick #37

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Post Reply
RunSup
Forum User
Posts: 3137
Joined: 07 Dec 2022 19:08 pm

Orioles trade for pick #37

Post by RunSup »

Orioles just traded with the Rays for their competitive balance pick at #37. CB picks are the only ones that can be traded.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2025/07/ ... -rays.html


The Cardinals should be doing this. Stop pretending on being a contender this year.
brock118
Forum User
Posts: 358
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:56 pm

Re: Orioles trade for pick #37

Post by brock118 »

RunSup wrote: 10 Jul 2025 13:46 pm Orioles just traded with the Rays for their competitive balance pick at #37. CB picks are the only ones that can be traded.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2025/07/ ... -rays.html


The Cardinals should be doing this. Stop pretending on being a contender this year.
I was thinking the same thing. Then I realized they probably don't want to pay the extra money for signing bonus at those picks.
craviduce
Forum User
Posts: 23104
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm

Re: Orioles trade for pick #37

Post by craviduce »

Brian Baker has 3 years of Arb left.

Our equivalent in this trade would possibly be Kyle Leahy? Does anyone think we could get a Comp Pick for Kyle Leahy?

No?

JoJo Romero has 1 year of Arb left...Would his 1 year of Arb yield the same return? No?

--------
brock118
Forum User
Posts: 358
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:56 pm

Re: Orioles trade for pick #37

Post by brock118 »

craviduce wrote: 10 Jul 2025 13:58 pm Brian Baker has 3 years of Arb left.

Our equivalent in this trade would possibly be Kyle Leahy? Does anyone think we could get a Comp Pick for Kyle Leahy?

No?

JoJo Romero has 1 year of Arb left...Would his 1 year of Arb yield the same return? No?

--------
Then how did the Orioles get so much in return for this guy? I think this is a huge overpay by the Rays. A first round pick for a guy that's not even a closer. I mean this guy is a decent pitcher, but to give up a comp pick seems outrageous to me.
craviduce
Forum User
Posts: 23104
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm

Re: Orioles trade for pick #37

Post by craviduce »

brock118 wrote: 10 Jul 2025 16:10 pm
craviduce wrote: 10 Jul 2025 13:58 pm Brian Baker has 3 years of Arb left.

Our equivalent in this trade would possibly be Kyle Leahy? Does anyone think we could get a Comp Pick for Kyle Leahy?

No?

JoJo Romero has 1 year of Arb left...Would his 1 year of Arb yield the same return? No?

--------
Then how did the Orioles get so much in return for this guy? I think this is a huge overpay by the Rays. A first round pick for a guy that's not even a closer. I mean this guy is a decent pitcher, but to give up a comp pick seems outrageous to me.
3 years of control on a pretty good reliever. And the Rays will likely move him before the 3 years are up. Do we possess any reliever with the same type of control? I don't think so.
brock118
Forum User
Posts: 358
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:56 pm

Re: Orioles trade for pick #37

Post by brock118 »

craviduce wrote: 10 Jul 2025 16:17 pm
brock118 wrote: 10 Jul 2025 16:10 pm
craviduce wrote: 10 Jul 2025 13:58 pm Brian Baker has 3 years of Arb left.

Our equivalent in this trade would possibly be Kyle Leahy? Does anyone think we could get a Comp Pick for Kyle Leahy?

No?

JoJo Romero has 1 year of Arb left...Would his 1 year of Arb yield the same return? No?

--------
Then how did the Orioles get so much in return for this guy? I think this is a huge overpay by the Rays. A first round pick for a guy that's not even a closer. I mean this guy is a decent pitcher, but to give up a comp pick seems outrageous to me.
3 years of control on a pretty good reliever. And the Rays will likely move him before the 3 years are up. Do we possess any reliever with the same type of control? I don't think so.
I'm not disagreeing with you Cravy. I respect your opinion, but don't you think the #37 pick for a team like Tampa Bay that is always worried about payroll an overpay for Baker?
craviduce
Forum User
Posts: 23104
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm

Re: Orioles trade for pick #37

Post by craviduce »

brock118 wrote: 10 Jul 2025 16:20 pm
craviduce wrote: 10 Jul 2025 16:17 pm
brock118 wrote: 10 Jul 2025 16:10 pm
craviduce wrote: 10 Jul 2025 13:58 pm Brian Baker has 3 years of Arb left.

Our equivalent in this trade would possibly be Kyle Leahy? Does anyone think we could get a Comp Pick for Kyle Leahy?

No?

JoJo Romero has 1 year of Arb left...Would his 1 year of Arb yield the same return? No?

--------
Then how did the Orioles get so much in return for this guy? I think this is a huge overpay by the Rays. A first round pick for a guy that's not even a closer. I mean this guy is a decent pitcher, but to give up a comp pick seems outrageous to me.
3 years of control on a pretty good reliever. And the Rays will likely move him before the 3 years are up. Do we possess any reliever with the same type of control? I don't think so.
I'm not disagreeing with you Cravy. I respect your opinion, but don't you think the #37 pick for a team like Tampa Bay that is always worried about payroll an overpay for Baker?
I agree on the overpay, but the Phills are reportedly looking for relievers with years of control, too, so there's a competitive market for them. So, that's probably a driving factor in the overpay. Can that be a good thing for our two relievers with expiring control in Helsley and Maton? Maybe. Can't hurt the chances of moving Romero with 1 year of control left. Active markets are great.
peterman'srealitytour
Forum User
Posts: 306
Joined: 26 May 2024 17:41 pm

Re: Orioles trade for pick #37

Post by peterman'srealitytour »

craviduce wrote: 10 Jul 2025 16:25 pm
brock118 wrote: 10 Jul 2025 16:20 pm
craviduce wrote: 10 Jul 2025 16:17 pm
brock118 wrote: 10 Jul 2025 16:10 pm
craviduce wrote: 10 Jul 2025 13:58 pm Brian Baker has 3 years of Arb left.

Our equivalent in this trade would possibly be Kyle Leahy? Does anyone think we could get a Comp Pick for Kyle Leahy?

No?

JoJo Romero has 1 year of Arb left...Would his 1 year of Arb yield the same return? No?

--------
Then how did the Orioles get so much in return for this guy? I think this is a huge overpay by the Rays. A first round pick for a guy that's not even a closer. I mean this guy is a decent pitcher, but to give up a comp pick seems outrageous to me.
3 years of control on a pretty good reliever. And the Rays will likely move him before the 3 years are up. Do we possess any reliever with the same type of control? I don't think so.
I'm not disagreeing with you Cravy. I respect your opinion, but don't you think the #37 pick for a team like Tampa Bay that is always worried about payroll an overpay for Baker?
I agree on the overpay, but the Phills are reportedly looking for relievers with years of control, too, so there's a competitive market for them. So, that's probably a driving factor in the overpay. Can that be a good thing for our two relievers with expiring control in Helsley and Maton? Maybe. Can't hurt the chances of moving Romero with 1 year of control left. Active markets are great.
Maybe our offer would be Romero plus a bat with control (Noot?) for a comp pick. Pozo might also look appealing. Get Crooks up here for a 2 month look.

All of that said, unless Bloom is involved, none of that would happen. Mozeliak doesn’t have the desire/gumption to put something like that together.
craviduce
Forum User
Posts: 23104
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm

Re: Orioles trade for pick #37

Post by craviduce »

peterman'srealitytour wrote: 10 Jul 2025 18:09 pm
craviduce wrote: 10 Jul 2025 16:25 pm
brock118 wrote: 10 Jul 2025 16:20 pm
craviduce wrote: 10 Jul 2025 16:17 pm
brock118 wrote: 10 Jul 2025 16:10 pm
craviduce wrote: 10 Jul 2025 13:58 pm Brian Baker has 3 years of Arb left.

Our equivalent in this trade would possibly be Kyle Leahy? Does anyone think we could get a Comp Pick for Kyle Leahy?

No?

JoJo Romero has 1 year of Arb left...Would his 1 year of Arb yield the same return? No?

--------
Then how did the Orioles get so much in return for this guy? I think this is a huge overpay by the Rays. A first round pick for a guy that's not even a closer. I mean this guy is a decent pitcher, but to give up a comp pick seems outrageous to me.
3 years of control on a pretty good reliever. And the Rays will likely move him before the 3 years are up. Do we possess any reliever with the same type of control? I don't think so.
I'm not disagreeing with you Cravy. I respect your opinion, but don't you think the #37 pick for a team like Tampa Bay that is always worried about payroll an overpay for Baker?
I agree on the overpay, but the Phills are reportedly looking for relievers with years of control, too, so there's a competitive market for them. So, that's probably a driving factor in the overpay. Can that be a good thing for our two relievers with expiring control in Helsley and Maton? Maybe. Can't hurt the chances of moving Romero with 1 year of control left. Active markets are great.
Maybe our offer would be Romero plus a bat with control (Noot?) for a comp pick. Pozo might also look appealing. Get Crooks up here for a 2 month look.

All of that said, unless Bloom is involved, none of that would happen. Mozeliak doesn’t have the desire/gumption to put something like that together.
and time is running out...draft is Sunday. :(
82birds
Forum User
Posts: 15422
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:17 pm

Re: Orioles trade for pick #37

Post by 82birds »

RunSup wrote: 10 Jul 2025 13:46 pm Orioles just traded with the Rays for their competitive balance pick at #37. CB picks are the only ones that can be traded.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2025/07/ ... -rays.html


The Cardinals should be doing this. Stop pretending on being a contender this year.
"Huh, MO says, you can do that"?
Post Reply