Initial Habs deal was huge according to this
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1795
- Joined: 30 Mar 2023 15:23 pm
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 168
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm
Re: Initial Habs deal was huge according to this
(bleep), that would have been something!
Re: Initial Habs deal was huge according to this
Wow if true.
Remove Mattheson or the 1st round pick (preferably Matteson) and the deal would be nice.
Remove Mattheson or the 1st round pick (preferably Matteson) and the deal would be nice.
Re: Initial Habs deal was huge according to this
I'm not certain I would have liked that, I don't know a ton about Hage but getting two non-current NHLers and a pick that wouldn't have impact for 1-5 years seems risky.
Kyrou is pretty much a known quantity at this point, Matheson I assume would be included to let the dollars work (UFA at end of season). We still wouldn't have a logical place to play him without blocking Tucker, Kessel, or Leddy.
IMO I think that means the Blues believed that Bolduc had Kyrou level upside if this account has a connection. No issues with the swap yesterday, loved what Bolduc could potentially bring but understand we were overstocked on BPA wingers from the last 5 years of drafts.
Kyrou is pretty much a known quantity at this point, Matheson I assume would be included to let the dollars work (UFA at end of season). We still wouldn't have a logical place to play him without blocking Tucker, Kessel, or Leddy.
IMO I think that means the Blues believed that Bolduc had Kyrou level upside if this account has a connection. No issues with the swap yesterday, loved what Bolduc could potentially bring but understand we were overstocked on BPA wingers from the last 5 years of drafts.
Last edited by Kilokaai on 02 Jul 2025 11:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Initial Habs deal was huge according to this
The Habs fans in the comments are hating on it too. Is Hage really that good? I agree that with the first, it is very steep.Kilokaai wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:05 am I'm not certain I would have liked that, I don't know a ton about Hage but getting two non-current NHLers and a pick that wouldn't have impact for 1-5 years seems risky.
Kyrou is pretty much a known quantity at this point, Matheson I assume would be included to let the dollars work (UFA at end of season). We still wouldn't have a logical place to play him without blocking Tucker, Kessel, or Leddy.
IMO I think that means the Blues believed that Bolduc had Kyrou level upside if this account has a connection.
Re: Initial Habs deal was huge according to this
Speaking of...the Canadiens are still over the cap ($1.5M according to capwages). It would've been nice to pick up a player like Jake Evans in the deal with Bolduc (with maybe mid-pick from the Blues).Kilokaai wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:05 am I'm not certain I would have liked that, I don't know a ton about Hage but getting two non-current NHLers and a pick that wouldn't have impact for 1-5 years seems risky.
Kyrou is pretty much a known quantity at this point, Matheson I assume would be included to let the dollars work (UFA at end of season). We still wouldn't have a logical place to play him without blocking Tucker, Kessel, or Leddy.
IMO I think that means the Blues believed that Bolduc had Kyrou level upside if this account has a connection. No issues with the swap yesterday, loved what Bolduc could potentially bring but understand we were overstocked on BPA wingers from the last 5 years of drafts.
Re: Initial Habs deal was huge according to this
My guess would be that it was basically Kyrou for Hage/Mailloux and then to take Matheson we asked for more (1st) or something similar. Still can't say that would be been a good trade in my eyes. Just not seeing the payoff for letting Kyrou go for non-nhl talent, that contract will look really nice in a few years.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:07 amThe Habs fans in the comments are hating on it too. Is Hage really that good? I agree that with the first, it is very steep.Kilokaai wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:05 am I'm not certain I would have liked that, I don't know a ton about Hage but getting two non-current NHLers and a pick that wouldn't have impact for 1-5 years seems risky.
Kyrou is pretty much a known quantity at this point, Matheson I assume would be included to let the dollars work (UFA at end of season). We still wouldn't have a logical place to play him without blocking Tucker, Kessel, or Leddy.
IMO I think that means the Blues believed that Bolduc had Kyrou level upside if this account has a connection.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 168
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm
Re: Initial Habs deal was huge according to this
"Hage is a dynamic rush attacker, combining inside drives, flashy dekes, and give-and-go playmaking. A crossover burst gets defenders’ feet moving, then he looks for vulnerabilities. He fakes wide, cuts in, and accelerates to the net. -EliteProspects 2024 NHL Draft Guide"MiamiLaw wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:07 amThe Habs fans in the comments are hating on it too. Is Hage really that good? I agree that with the first, it is very steep.Kilokaai wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:05 am I'm not certain I would have liked that, I don't know a ton about Hage but getting two non-current NHLers and a pick that wouldn't have impact for 1-5 years seems risky.
Kyrou is pretty much a known quantity at this point, Matheson I assume would be included to let the dollars work (UFA at end of season). We still wouldn't have a logical place to play him without blocking Tucker, Kessel, or Leddy.
IMO I think that means the Blues believed that Bolduc had Kyrou level upside if this account has a connection.
2024 1st rounder #21 selected overall
https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/5 ... chael-hage
Re: Initial Habs deal was huge according to this
FWIW, Craig Button had him below both Dvorksy and Lindstein 4 months ago. Seems like a good add but at the expense of Kyrou seems steep to me.succinct712 wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:14 am"Hage is a dynamic rush attacker, combining inside drives, flashy dekes, and give-and-go playmaking. A crossover burst gets defenders’ feet moving, then he looks for vulnerabilities. He fakes wide, cuts in, and accelerates to the net. -EliteProspects 2024 NHL Draft Guide"MiamiLaw wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:07 amThe Habs fans in the comments are hating on it too. Is Hage really that good? I agree that with the first, it is very steep.Kilokaai wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:05 am I'm not certain I would have liked that, I don't know a ton about Hage but getting two non-current NHLers and a pick that wouldn't have impact for 1-5 years seems risky.
Kyrou is pretty much a known quantity at this point, Matheson I assume would be included to let the dollars work (UFA at end of season). We still wouldn't have a logical place to play him without blocking Tucker, Kessel, or Leddy.
IMO I think that means the Blues believed that Bolduc had Kyrou level upside if this account has a connection.
2024 1st rounder #21 selected overall
https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/5 ... chael-hage
https://www.tsn.ca/nhl/montreal-canadie ... -1.2248370
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 626
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:02 pm
Re: Initial Habs deal was huge according to this
This actually sounds more like an Army deal. But does anyone know anything about this site/source? Decent number of followers, but I have no clue about the track record.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 168
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm
Re: Initial Habs deal was huge according to this
Yeah, I'm not saying it would have been a good or bad deal for the Blues just highlighting the facts.Kilokaai wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:18 amFWIW, Craig Button had him below both Dvorksy and Lindstein 4 months ago. Seems like a good add but at the expense of Kyrou seems steep to me.succinct712 wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:14 am"Hage is a dynamic rush attacker, combining inside drives, flashy dekes, and give-and-go playmaking. A crossover burst gets defenders’ feet moving, then he looks for vulnerabilities. He fakes wide, cuts in, and accelerates to the net. -EliteProspects 2024 NHL Draft Guide"MiamiLaw wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:07 amThe Habs fans in the comments are hating on it too. Is Hage really that good? I agree that with the first, it is very steep.Kilokaai wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:05 am I'm not certain I would have liked that, I don't know a ton about Hage but getting two non-current NHLers and a pick that wouldn't have impact for 1-5 years seems risky.
Kyrou is pretty much a known quantity at this point, Matheson I assume would be included to let the dollars work (UFA at end of season). We still wouldn't have a logical place to play him without blocking Tucker, Kessel, or Leddy.
IMO I think that means the Blues believed that Bolduc had Kyrou level upside if this account has a connection.
2024 1st rounder #21 selected overall
https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/5 ... chael-hage
https://www.tsn.ca/nhl/montreal-canadie ... -1.2248370
Re: Initial Habs deal was huge according to this
I've seen a lot of "leaks" from this account, I don't recall any of them coming to fruition but they are all pretty plausible. I think they did hit on one pretty early in the accounts life IIRC but it's been pretty much all rumors or after the fact notes since.Frank Underwood wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:20 am This actually sounds more like an Army deal. But does anyone know anything about this site/source? Decent number of followers, but I have no clue about the track record.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 113
- Joined: 23 May 2024 17:46 pm
Re: Initial Habs deal was huge according to this
That account is garbage.
That said, the Blues were absolutely trying to move Kyrou AND when Mailloux hits his prime in 2-3 years, Bolduc will be the better player than Kyrou.
It was a desperation move by Armstrong and I firmly believe it was a below average trade compared to what could/should have been done.
That said, the Blues were absolutely trying to move Kyrou AND when Mailloux hits his prime in 2-3 years, Bolduc will be the better player than Kyrou.
It was a desperation move by Armstrong and I firmly believe it was a below average trade compared to what could/should have been done.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2228
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm
Re: Initial Habs deal was huge according to this
ok what are you basing that on?WilliamWestcliffe wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 12:30 pm That account is garbage.
That said, the Blues were absolutely trying to move Kyrou AND when Mailloux hits his prime in 2-3 years, Bolduc will be the better player than Kyrou.
It was a desperation move by Armstrong and I firmly believe it was a below average trade compared to what could/should have been done.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 113
- Joined: 23 May 2024 17:46 pm
Re: Initial Habs deal was huge according to this
Other than observation?TheJackBurton wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 16:12 pmok what are you basing that on?WilliamWestcliffe wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 12:30 pm That account is garbage.
That said, the Blues were absolutely trying to move Kyrou AND when Mailloux hits his prime in 2-3 years, Bolduc will be the better player than Kyrou.
It was a desperation move by Armstrong and I firmly believe it was a below average trade compared to what could/should have been done.
We can compare their draft slot:
J.Kyrou 35th overall (2nd round)
Z.Bolduc 17th overall (drafted higher than T.Thompson, J.Kyrou, R.Thomas, J.Neighbors, J.Snuggerud, O.Stenberg, T.Lindstein and J.Carbonneau
We can compare their age:
J.Kyrou - 27 years old
Z.Bolduc - 22 years old
We can compare their age 22 seasons (I'll even give you Kyrou's extrapolated to 72 games):
J.Kyrou - age 22 | 28 gp | 4 g | 9 pts | +1
J.Kyrou - age 22 | 72 gp | 10 g | 23 pts | +1
Z.Bolduc- age 22 | 72 gp | 19 g | 36 pts | +20
You may argue "what about their first full rookie seasons?". Sure:
J.Kyrou - age 24 | 74 gp | 27 g | 75 pts | +10 *playing w/ R.Thomas and P.Buchnevich
Z.Bolduc - age 22 | 72 gp | 19 g | 36 pts | +20 *playing w/ O.Sundqvist and M.Joseph
So, yes, in my opinion, comparing rookie seasons, with Kyrou being 2 years older, playing with Thomas and Buchnevich vs. Sundqvist and Joseph, and playing on average 4 more minutes per night...I think Bolduc has both the draft capital and the type of rookie season that tells me in 2-3 more years, he will be the better player than a 30 year old Jordan Kyrou.
Re: Initial Habs deal was huge according to this
Kyrou must want out so bad