Nick Bjugstad signed

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

zamadoo
Forum User
Posts: 1470
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:11 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad signed

Post by zamadoo »

At least we're getting bigger?
stlblue06
Forum User
Posts: 381
Joined: 24 May 2024 13:44 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad signed

Post by stlblue06 »

Ouch the day keeps getting worse. This means we are losing Faksa :(
sdaltons
Forum User
Posts: 2847
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:45 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad signed

Post by sdaltons »

TheJackBurton wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:46 pm
sdaltons wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:45 pm If this is for Faksa, I'd have preferred keeping Radek. Mostly because I liked the WTF line.
He is likely looking for 2-3 million on a multi-year deal.

That's out of our range.
If we can go $1.75 for Bjug, we can go $2 for Faksa. $3 is too much, though, I agree.
Harry S Deals
Forum User
Posts: 1499
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad signed

Post by Harry S Deals »

Good center signing I thought he may have been an option 30-40 pt potentially I'd be fine with Bjugstad and Sunny on the bottom 6 while Dvorsky is on the horizon. Big tough centers down the middle he could have really helped vs the Jets
Harry S Deals
Forum User
Posts: 1499
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad signed

Post by Harry S Deals »

stlblue06 wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:49 pm Ouch the day keeps getting worse. This means we are losing Faksa :(
Faksa is better than Bjugstad?
TheJackBurton
Forum User
Posts: 2228
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:43 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad signed

Post by TheJackBurton »

sdaltons wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:49 pm
TheJackBurton wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:46 pm
sdaltons wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:45 pm If this is for Faksa, I'd have preferred keeping Radek. Mostly because I liked the WTF line.
He is likely looking for 2-3 million on a multi-year deal.

That's out of our range.
If we can go $1.75 for Bjug, we can go $2 for Faksa. $3 is too much, though, I agree.
I'm guessing 2, odds are it was minimum 2.5-3
TruBlueFan_1970
Forum User
Posts: 1275
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad signed

Post by TruBlueFan_1970 »

Frank Barone wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:44 pm He is a short term placeholder for Dvorsky. Gotta think big picture here.
He wreaks of the Kevin Hayes experiment. Big, slow, non-physical, lumbering 30-point center. Not a fan. Would honestly rather have Alexandrov get another shot over this guy and that’s saying a lot.
STL fan in MN
Forum User
Posts: 1958
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad signed

Post by STL fan in MN »

Ok?

I’m going to assume a Faksa replacement here. I suppose his 19 pts is marginally better than Faksa’s 15 pts but he’s not a good defensively or in the faceoff circle. Would’ve preferred to keep Faksa tbh.

Or just let Sunny be the 4C.

Maybe it’ll make more sense in a day or two when the dust settles, idk.
2forDiving
Forum User
Posts: 471
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad signed

Post by 2forDiving »

BluesDom wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:43 pm
2forDiving wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:35 pm Not sure I get this move other than he his 6’5” and RH. Not good on FOs, and not even sure he is an upgrade to Sunny. I assume this means Faksa is gone. There needs to be more than this coming at forward for the current roster.
Hopefully there is not more coming. Id like for us to be done. We can really screw this up.
We have the prospects. Lets see what they can do. Stay away from free agency, etc.
We need roster space--Roster flexibility.

Alexandrov was qualified. If he signs---he can play in the NHL right now. He deserves a shot.
Bjustad is a good signing.
I do agree about Alexandrov. I know everyone says he hasn’t done anything in the NHL, but he’s also been put in 4th line roles mainly. We saw what Schenn’s production was without Holloway last year and it was far from ideal. Let the guy play with better talent at least and see what happens? Can it be worse than Sunny?
stlblue06
Forum User
Posts: 381
Joined: 24 May 2024 13:44 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad signed

Post by stlblue06 »

Harry S Deals wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:50 pm
stlblue06 wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:49 pm Ouch the day keeps getting worse. This means we are losing Faksa :(
Faksa is better than Bjugstad?
He was the glue that made our 4th line one of the best in the league. Faksa is the definition of a player you look beyond the goals/assists for his value.
thegibby.
Forum User
Posts: 1288
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:03 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad signed

Post by thegibby. »

WilliamWestcliffe wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:39 pm Apparently Berglund was busy.

God I hope these aren’t Steens picks and a sign of what’s to come.
Steen thought Bjugstad was a Swed.



IMO Ugly start to free agent frenzy.
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 6776
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: Nick Bjugstad signed

Post by DawgDad »

2forDiving wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:52 pm
BluesDom wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:43 pm
2forDiving wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:35 pm Not sure I get this move other than he his 6’5” and RH. Not good on FOs, and not even sure he is an upgrade to Sunny. I assume this means Faksa is gone. There needs to be more than this coming at forward for the current roster.
Hopefully there is not more coming. Id like for us to be done. We can really screw this up.
We have the prospects. Lets see what they can do. Stay away from free agency, etc.
We need roster space--Roster flexibility.

Alexandrov was qualified. If he signs---he can play in the NHL right now. He deserves a shot.
Bjustad is a good signing.
I do agree about Alexandrov. I know everyone says he hasn’t done anything in the NHL, but he’s also been put in 4th line roles mainly. We saw what Schenn’s production was without Holloway last year and it was far from ideal. Let the guy play with better talent at least and see what happens? Can it be worse than Sunny?
To answer your hypothetical question, yes it could be.

Blues appear to be keeping their eye on the ball, they have prospects they need to work in without over-committing to them. So, right now they have Sunny, Bjugstad, Alexandrov, Dvorsky, Peterson to cover two center spots and backfill top-6. Two or three can slide to 4th line wing. Those vets are guys you can park in the press box when needed.
somni
Forum User
Posts: 2505
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:53 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad signed

Post by somni »

I don't mind it. It's cheap and short. Maybe he'll be a 3rd liner for a year, but if Faksa doesn't sign, I sure hope there is a 3rd line center somewhere.

I think Dvorsky is going to replace Bolduc on wing...or have a good shot to. It'll get him up to speed for the NHL.
zamadoo
Forum User
Posts: 1470
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:11 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad signed

Post by zamadoo »

TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:51 pm
Frank Barone wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:44 pm He is a short term placeholder for Dvorsky. Gotta think big picture here.
He wreaks of the Kevin Hayes experiment. Big, slow, non-physical, lumbering 30-point center. Not a fan. Would honestly rather have Alexandrov get another shot over this guy and that’s saying a lot.
I thought the same thing.

He has the potential to score more, as he has done so in the past, but a 2 year deal at that price tells you what he thinks of himself and who he is.
Frank Barone
Forum User
Posts: 224
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:55 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad signed

Post by Frank Barone »

TruBlueFan_1970 wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:51 pm
Frank Barone wrote: 01 Jul 2025 12:44 pm He is a short term placeholder for Dvorsky. Gotta think big picture here.
He wreaks of the Kevin Hayes experiment. Big, slow, non-physical, lumbering 30-point center. Not a fan. Would honestly rather have Alexandrov get another shot over this guy and that’s saying a lot.
Don't disagree, but Kevin Hayes was on a much bigger contract. Dvorsky could be at 2C or 3C by midseason. At that point, Bjugstad might be the 13th/14th forward. I think Alexandrov will have a depth role on the NHL team, not in the minors.
Zizzle1297
Forum User
Posts: 1073
Joined: 08 May 2023 21:08 pm

Re: Nick Bjugstad signed

Post by Zizzle1297 »

yuck hate this signing.

Hate the Bolduc trade.
i dont mind mailloux but bolduc was to steep.
Does this signal a leddy trade?

Cam/ CP55
Broberg/ Faulk
Tucker/ Mailloux?
Kessel
Post Reply