Leafs could accuse Vegas of tampering with Marner
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 291
- Joined: 06 Oct 2018 19:46 pm
Leafs could accuse Vegas of tampering with Marner
Friedman stated on his podcast that if Vegas signs Marner, the leafs could accuse Vegas of tampering. He was clear that he has no evidence, but has heard it from a couple sources. He also mentioned that the league is “itching” to make an example out of someone.
However, he also reported that if it were a trade for rights or a sign and trade then the accusations would likely never happen.
Is this the Leags posturing to get s better deal? Rather than just letting Marner walk for nothing?
However, he also reported that if it were a trade for rights or a sign and trade then the accusations would likely never happen.
Is this the Leags posturing to get s better deal? Rather than just letting Marner walk for nothing?
Re: Leafs could accuse Vegas of tampering with Marner
Who here besides banned guy thinks this is past Vegas to tamper?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 518
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 10:23 am
Re: Leafs could accuse Vegas of tampering with Marner
Actually, the Kings might be the aggrieved party here. What I read (Hockeybuzz - so probably not happening) is that TOR was negotiating a rights swap with either LVK or LAK, and LAK eventually found out theyre just in this to drive up prices. They're upset, and accusing LVK of tampering.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 191
- Joined: 26 Apr 2018 10:36 am
Re: Leafs could accuse Vegas of tampering with Marner
I remember reading that the Blues thought Vegas tampered when they signed Petro.
Re: Leafs could accuse Vegas of tampering with Marner
Knies just signed for 6 x $7.75. That’s a heck of a deal. Do JT and Knies for likely less than Marner alone
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm
Re: Leafs could accuse Vegas of tampering with Marner
It was widely known before free agency started that the only team he was considering outside of St. Louis was Vegas. That doesn’t happen without tampering. It’s a league-wide epidemic… guys signing life altering contracts minutes after the free agency period starts (tbf Petro did not do that, he still waited). As though that’s remotely possible without breaking the rules. But the league also does it to themselves. For a few years there was an official negotiating window for several days before free agency started, and they did away with it. Go back to that and it won’t be an issue.Atlantis17A wrote: ↑29 Jun 2025 19:48 pm I remember reading that the Blues thought Vegas tampered when they signed Petro.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 316
- Joined: 25 May 2024 10:43 am
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
Re: Leafs could accuse Vegas of tampering with Marner
That’s my read of it too.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:05 amWOW... An RFA without hitting 30 goals snagged $7.75 MILLION... Thanks Leafs for messing up the market.
Holloway scored more pts in fewer games. He’s going to want a contract like that too now.
Leafs players seems to consistently get overpaid IMO.
Re: Leafs could accuse Vegas of tampering with Marner
He played 18.5 minutes this year and more than that in the playoffs on a very talented team. He also was physical and took a big step forward. You pay for those things.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:22 amThat’s my read of it too.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:05 amWOW... An RFA without hitting 30 goals snagged $7.75 MILLION... Thanks Leafs for messing up the market.
Holloway scored more pts in fewer games. He’s going to want a contract like that too now.
Leafs players seems to consistently get overpaid IMO.
Re: Leafs could accuse Vegas of tampering with Marner
There is obviously tampering going on all over the place and I would guess all kinds of cheating. For example I don't believe for a second that the leafs are only paying Tavares 4.38 million.
Re: Leafs could accuse Vegas of tampering with Marner
Yea Knies might have been the most consistently noticeable player for the Leafs. I’d take that deal all day for him.theograce wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:24 amHe played 18.5 minutes this year and more than that in the playoffs on a very talented team. He also was physical and took a big step forward. You pay for those things.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:22 amThat’s my read of it too.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:05 amWOW... An RFA without hitting 30 goals snagged $7.75 MILLION... Thanks Leafs for messing up the market.
Holloway scored more pts in fewer games. He’s going to want a contract like that too now.
Leafs players seems to consistently get overpaid IMO.
But yea MN, Holloway is getting at least that. He always was. Why would he sign long term otherwise?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 316
- Joined: 25 May 2024 10:43 am
Re: Leafs could accuse Vegas of tampering with Marner
Knies has real promise, but he's had ONE solid NHL season and still has holes in his game (foot-speed and he still gets a bit lost at times). He very well could turn into the PF the Leaf's need, but after those last four games in the playoffs this year (Florida OWNED him) he still has some growing to do.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 08:12 amYea Knies might have been the most consistently noticeable player for the Leafs. I’d take that deal all day for him.theograce wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:24 amHe played 18.5 minutes this year and more than that in the playoffs on a very talented team. He also was physical and took a big step forward. You pay for those things.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:22 amThat’s my read of it too.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:05 amWOW... An RFA without hitting 30 goals snagged $7.75 MILLION... Thanks Leafs for messing up the market.
Holloway scored more pts in fewer games. He’s going to want a contract like that too now.
Leafs players seems to consistently get overpaid IMO.
But yea MN, Holloway is getting at least that. He always was. Why would he sign long term otherwise?
That said, they did pick-up a few of his UFA years so there is that, but paying $7.5 Million for a kid who didn't hit 60pts is going to hit the league hard.
Re: Leafs could accuse Vegas of tampering with Marner
Nah that was coming no matter what the leafs did here.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 09:22 amKnies has real promise, but he's had ONE solid NHL season and still has holes in his game (foot-speed and he still gets a bit lost at times). He very well could turn into the PF the Leaf's need, but after those last four games in the playoffs this year (Florida OWNED him) he still has some growing to do.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 08:12 amYea Knies might have been the most consistently noticeable player for the Leafs. I’d take that deal all day for him.theograce wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:24 amHe played 18.5 minutes this year and more than that in the playoffs on a very talented team. He also was physical and took a big step forward. You pay for those things.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:22 amThat’s my read of it too.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:05 amWOW... An RFA without hitting 30 goals snagged $7.75 MILLION... Thanks Leafs for messing up the market.
Holloway scored more pts in fewer games. He’s going to want a contract like that too now.
Leafs players seems to consistently get overpaid IMO.
But yea MN, Holloway is getting at least that. He always was. Why would he sign long term otherwise?
That said, they did pick-up a few of his UFA years so there is that, but paying $7.5 Million for a kid who didn't hit 60pts is going to hit the league hard.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm
Re: Leafs could accuse Vegas of tampering with Marner
The cap is headed north of 110M. No stopping it.skilles wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 09:34 amNah that was coming no matter what the leafs did here.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 09:22 amKnies has real promise, but he's had ONE solid NHL season and still has holes in his game (foot-speed and he still gets a bit lost at times). He very well could turn into the PF the Leaf's need, but after those last four games in the playoffs this year (Florida OWNED him) he still has some growing to do.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 08:12 amYea Knies might have been the most consistently noticeable player for the Leafs. I’d take that deal all day for him.theograce wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:24 amHe played 18.5 minutes this year and more than that in the playoffs on a very talented team. He also was physical and took a big step forward. You pay for those things.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:22 amThat’s my read of it too.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:05 amWOW... An RFA without hitting 30 goals snagged $7.75 MILLION... Thanks Leafs for messing up the market.
Holloway scored more pts in fewer games. He’s going to want a contract like that too now.
Leafs players seems to consistently get overpaid IMO.
But yea MN, Holloway is getting at least that. He always was. Why would he sign long term otherwise?
That said, they did pick-up a few of his UFA years so there is that, but paying $7.5 Million for a kid who didn't hit 60pts is going to hit the league hard.
Re: Leafs could accuse Vegas of tampering with Marner
Honestly I think they saved themselves money. If I was a betting man, just watching Knies, I would say with very high confidence he will get better and better absent some insane injury. He is not going to be cheaper to sign in three years if they gave him a bridge.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 09:22 amKnies has real promise, but he's had ONE solid NHL season and still has holes in his game (foot-speed and he still gets a bit lost at times). He very well could turn into the PF the Leaf's need, but after those last four games in the playoffs this year (Florida OWNED him) he still has some growing to do.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 08:12 amYea Knies might have been the most consistently noticeable player for the Leafs. I’d take that deal all day for him.theograce wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:24 amHe played 18.5 minutes this year and more than that in the playoffs on a very talented team. He also was physical and took a big step forward. You pay for those things.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:22 amThat’s my read of it too.Hockey Pete wrote: ↑30 Jun 2025 01:05 amWOW... An RFA without hitting 30 goals snagged $7.75 MILLION... Thanks Leafs for messing up the market.
Holloway scored more pts in fewer games. He’s going to want a contract like that too now.
Leafs players seems to consistently get overpaid IMO.
But yea MN, Holloway is getting at least that. He always was. Why would he sign long term otherwise?
That said, they did pick-up a few of his UFA years so there is that, but paying $7.5 Million for a kid who didn't hit 60pts is going to hit the league hard.
I think this is the new NHL thinking. Lock up guys on the younger side before they break out even if you have to pay more on the front end than you could get on a shorter deal.