The NHL Draft report cards are in...

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1438
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

The NHL Draft report cards are in...

Post by a smell of green grass »

The Blues get a "B-"

https://www.espn.com/nhl/story/_/id/456 ... icks-value

B- doesn't sound that bad, but the distirbing aspect of this is that there were many teams that did better. In the NHL, if you are not moving forward, you are moving backward.

St Louis's primary issue was that we didn't have many picks to begin with.
the miracle
Forum User
Posts: 239
Joined: 24 May 2024 12:14 pm

Re: The NHL Draft report cards are in...

Post by the miracle »

Fine with the grade based on the limited criteria they used, but a complete picture would have taken into consideration picking up a top 4 defenseman with the Blues 2nd rounder and a top 6 winger with the third rounder.
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1438
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: The NHL Draft report cards are in...

Post by a smell of green grass »

In fairness, the grade also did not reflect some ugly truth.

The Blue highest need remains the 2C and RHD. That this need exists after drafting a 2C and an RHD in the first round in 2023, and 2024 is troubling.
b-a-a-a-rclay
Forum User
Posts: 599
Joined: 30 Jun 2024 08:51 am

Re: The NHL Draft report cards are in...

Post by b-a-a-a-rclay »

We didn't have many picks because we are stuck with Holloway and Broberg, right? :D
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1438
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: The NHL Draft report cards are in...

Post by a smell of green grass »

Another B- from another source. And like the other, many teams fared better.

https://www.dailyfaceoff.com/news/2025- ... -teams-did
b-a-a-a-rclay
Forum User
Posts: 599
Joined: 30 Jun 2024 08:51 am

Re: The NHL Draft report cards are in...

Post by b-a-a-a-rclay »

Ugly Truth? League-wide how many 2024 draft picks are filling a 2C or top 4 RHD role currently?
You said that you feared DA would trade valuable prospects for aging vets. He didn't do that. In fact he keeps saying that trade targets will be in the 20-25 age range. I just wish one time you could admit that your fears aren't always very accurate. But hey, you do you.
DawgDad
Forum User
Posts: 6991
Joined: 16 May 2019 10:58 am

Re: The NHL Draft report cards are in...

Post by DawgDad »

Harshness warning, for all you Karen's.

This is beyond stupid, FAR beyond stupid. Another thread today CORRECTLY states the Blues draft in reality is Carbonneau, Broberg, and Holloway, plus the 5th and 6th guys. Check back in 4-5 years and see which teams fared better.
seattleblue
Forum User
Posts: 1387
Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm

Re: The NHL Draft report cards are in...

Post by seattleblue »

They got a real 1st round talent in Carbonneau and they had previously converted their 2d and 3d rounders into roster impact. That's a really good draft result.

fwiw "Grades" mean nothing the day after the draft. what matters is whether they got an NHL top six scoring RW in Carbonneau or not. If they did they did very well for the 19th pick and I obviously love the pick.
82birds
Forum User
Posts: 14889
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:17 pm

Re: The NHL Draft report cards are in...

Post by 82birds »

b-a-a-a-rclay wrote: 29 Jun 2025 12:15 pm We didn't have many picks because we are stuck with Holloway and Broberg, right? :D
:D
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1438
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: The NHL Draft report cards are in...

Post by a smell of green grass »

And an "A"

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/252 ... raft-class

I agree with this grade. Finding high-impact players is the goal, not dressing a Barbie doll. Carbonneau has a good chance at being that, and that the Blues got him at 19 is very good.
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1438
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: The NHL Draft report cards are in...

Post by a smell of green grass »

82birds wrote: 29 Jun 2025 12:26 pm
b-a-a-a-rclay wrote: 29 Jun 2025 12:15 pm We didn't have many picks because we are stuck with Holloway and Broberg, right? :D
:D
I love Broberg and Holloway, and I'm glad we have them.

Stealing great players from other team's benches is great---UNTIL YOU ASK YOURSELF THE QUESTION... How is that other team's bench players are better than anyone on my active roster?
rezero
Forum User
Posts: 1934
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:24 pm

Re: The NHL Draft report cards are in...

Post by rezero »

a smell of green grass wrote: 29 Jun 2025 12:14 pm In fairness, the grade also did not reflect some ugly truth.

The Blue highest need remains the 2C and RHD. That this need exists after drafting a 2C and an RHD in the first round in 2023, and 2024 is troubling.
Those are Blues needs now, but they are drafting for what their needs will be in 4-5 years from now.
wiscrev
Forum User
Posts: 925
Joined: 23 Nov 2018 23:26 pm

Re: The NHL Draft report cards are in...

Post by wiscrev »

a smell of green grass wrote: 29 Jun 2025 12:14 pm In fairness, the grade also did not reflect some ugly truth.

The Blue highest need remains the 2C and RHD. That this need exists after drafting a 2C and an RHD in the first round in 2023, and 2024 is troubling.
Thank you Debbie Downer. I guess that was something that has never been thought of before.
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 1438
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: The NHL Draft report cards are in...

Post by a smell of green grass »

rezero wrote: 29 Jun 2025 12:40 pm
a smell of green grass wrote: 29 Jun 2025 12:14 pm In fairness, the grade also did not reflect some ugly truth.

The Blue highest need remains the 2C and RHD. That this need exists after drafting a 2C and an RHD in the first round in 2023, and 2024 is troubling.
Those are Blues needs now, but they are drafting for what their needs will be in 4-5 years from now.
Why is it that there are quite a few centers drafted since 2023 that are already starting in the NHL?
Post Reply