After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
Cards should absolutely draft one of
Aiva Arquette, Eli Willits or Billy Carlson.
Winn I don't think is the LT solution.
Has a great arm, but other than that the
D isn't really elite and the hitting isn't either.
The big three of Walker, Gorman and Winn
are turning out to be duds.
Burleson and Donovan are the keepers here.
I expect JJ to step up and so, we need one more.
Burleson, Donovan, JJ and Billy Carlson be a nice 4some.
Not giving up on Winn, but just not superb by any means.
Aiva Arquette, Eli Willits or Billy Carlson.
Winn I don't think is the LT solution.
Has a great arm, but other than that the
D isn't really elite and the hitting isn't either.
The big three of Walker, Gorman and Winn
are turning out to be duds.
Burleson and Donovan are the keepers here.
I expect JJ to step up and so, we need one more.
Burleson, Donovan, JJ and Billy Carlson be a nice 4some.
Not giving up on Winn, but just not superb by any means.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 115
- Joined: 09 Jun 2025 08:34 am
Re: After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
agree no need to extend Winn, Walker and Gorman are stiffsBully4you wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 03:40 am Cards should absolutely draft one of
Aiva Arquette, Eli Willits or Billy Carlson.
Winn I don't think is the LT solution.
Has a great arm, but other than that the
D isn't really elite and the hitting isn't either.
The big three of Walker, Gorman and Winn
are turning out to be duds.
Burleson and Donovan are the keepers here.
I expect JJ to step up and so, we need one more.
Burleson, Donovan, JJ and Billy Carlson be a nice 4some.
Not giving up on Winn, but just not superb by any means.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1682
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:33 pm
Re: After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
Winn is still on pace to be a 4 fWAR player this season after being a 3.6 fWAR player last year. He's a young, above average defensive SS who has been a ML average (wRC+ 100) hitter. That should give him a solid floor going forward, with a chance to be even better as his hitting hopefully improves into his prime.
In regards to a long term extension, it all depends on the price. If you wanted to sign him through age 30, it would be a 7 year deal (2026-2032). But there's a big difference between whether he would sign for 7 yrs./$50 million, 7 yrs./$75 million, 7 yrs./$100 million, etc. At some price point, the team should certainly sign him long term, at some other price point they certainly should not, and there is likely a lot of grey area between those two.
In regards to a long term extension, it all depends on the price. If you wanted to sign him through age 30, it would be a 7 year deal (2026-2032). But there's a big difference between whether he would sign for 7 yrs./$50 million, 7 yrs./$75 million, 7 yrs./$100 million, etc. At some price point, the team should certainly sign him long term, at some other price point they certainly should not, and there is likely a lot of grey area between those two.
Re: After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
The traits I like about Winn are hemattmitchl44 wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 05:23 am Winn is still on pace to be a 4 fWAR player this season after being a 3.6 fWAR player last year. He's a young, above average defensive SS who has been a ML average (wRC+ 100) hitter. That should give him a solid floor going forward, with a chance to be even better as his hitting hopefully improves into his prime.
In regards to a long term extension, it all depends on the price. If you wanted to sign him through age 30, it would be a 7 year deal (2026-2032). But there's a big difference between whether he would sign for 7 yrs./$50 million, 7 yrs./$75 million, 7 yrs./$100 million, etc. At some price point, the team should certainly sign him long term, at some other price point they certainly should not, and there is likely a lot of grey area between those two.
seems to actually care and he's very
athletic.
So, he could become a special player.
However, it certainly shouldn't stop management
from drafting a SS in this year's draft.
I disagree with signing Winn this year LT.
Maybe wait a year and see what that brings.
We do have half a season left.
Maybe he will improve.
He's underperforming my expectations right now.
The D is not as good as I expected.
I expected the hitting to be subpar.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1682
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:33 pm
Re: After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
The bottom line is always the same - if you wait until you think you are "sure" you should sign him to a long term extension, that long term extension is going to be a lot more expensive. And no long term extension for any player is really a "sure thing" anyway, given the possibility of injury, etc.Bully4you wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 06:03 amThe traits I like about Winn are hemattmitchl44 wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 05:23 am Winn is still on pace to be a 4 fWAR player this season after being a 3.6 fWAR player last year. He's a young, above average defensive SS who has been a ML average (wRC+ 100) hitter. That should give him a solid floor going forward, with a chance to be even better as his hitting hopefully improves into his prime.
In regards to a long term extension, it all depends on the price. If you wanted to sign him through age 30, it would be a 7 year deal (2026-2032). But there's a big difference between whether he would sign for 7 yrs./$50 million, 7 yrs./$75 million, 7 yrs./$100 million, etc. At some price point, the team should certainly sign him long term, at some other price point they certainly should not, and there is likely a lot of grey area between those two.
seems to actually care and he's very
athletic.
So, he could become a special player.
However, it certainly shouldn't stop management
from drafting a SS in this year's draft.
I disagree with signing Winn this year LT.
Maybe wait a year and see what that brings.
We do have half a season left.
Maybe he will improve.
He's underperforming my expectations right now.
The D is not as good as I expected.
I expected the hitting to be subpar.
Being aggressive at signing young players early and as cheaply as possible entails slightly more risk but brings the possibility of a lot more reward for the team. That is just the way the economics of baseball player salaries is structured.
Re: After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
I dont necessarily disagree on extending winn, but calling him a dud is asinine.Bully4you wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 03:40 am Cards should absolutely draft one of
Aiva Arquette, Eli Willits or Billy Carlson.
Winn I don't think is the LT solution.
Has a great arm, but other than that the
D isn't really elite and the hitting isn't either.
The big three of Walker, Gorman and Winn
are turning out to be duds.
Burleson and Donovan are the keepers here.
I expect JJ to step up and so, we need one more.
Burleson, Donovan, JJ and Billy Carlson be a nice 4some.
Not giving up on Winn, but just not superb by any means.
Re: After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
Winn has been above averahe defensively.Bully4you wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 06:03 amThe traits I like about Winn are hemattmitchl44 wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 05:23 am Winn is still on pace to be a 4 fWAR player this season after being a 3.6 fWAR player last year. He's a young, above average defensive SS who has been a ML average (wRC+ 100) hitter. That should give him a solid floor going forward, with a chance to be even better as his hitting hopefully improves into his prime.
In regards to a long term extension, it all depends on the price. If you wanted to sign him through age 30, it would be a 7 year deal (2026-2032). But there's a big difference between whether he would sign for 7 yrs./$50 million, 7 yrs./$75 million, 7 yrs./$100 million, etc. At some price point, the team should certainly sign him long term, at some other price point they certainly should not, and there is likely a lot of grey area between those two.
seems to actually care and he's very
athletic.
So, he could become a special player.
However, it certainly shouldn't stop management
from drafting a SS in this year's draft.
I disagree with signing Winn this year LT.
Maybe wait a year and see what that brings.
We do have half a season left.
Maybe he will improve.
He's underperforming my expectations right now.
The D is not as good as I expected.
I expected the hitting to be subpar.
Winns hitting has been average this season and above average last season- and not just for ss but for all kf mlv.
The hitting has not been subpar.
People just neednto look at the league as a whole instead of remembering the stats players put up 10 years ago as a baseline
Winn isnt an allstar. But hes been a viable starter. Above average id even say.
Re: After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
I get it.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 06:27 amThe bottom line is always the same - if you wait until you think you are "sure" you should sign him to a long term extension, that long term extension is going to be a lot more expensive. And no long term extension for any player is really a "sure thing" anyway, given the possibility of injury, etc.Bully4you wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 06:03 amThe traits I like about Winn are hemattmitchl44 wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 05:23 am Winn is still on pace to be a 4 fWAR player this season after being a 3.6 fWAR player last year. He's a young, above average defensive SS who has been a ML average (wRC+ 100) hitter. That should give him a solid floor going forward, with a chance to be even better as his hitting hopefully improves into his prime.
In regards to a long term extension, it all depends on the price. If you wanted to sign him through age 30, it would be a 7 year deal (2026-2032). But there's a big difference between whether he would sign for 7 yrs./$50 million, 7 yrs./$75 million, 7 yrs./$100 million, etc. At some price point, the team should certainly sign him long term, at some other price point they certainly should not, and there is likely a lot of grey area between those two.
seems to actually care and he's very
athletic.
So, he could become a special player.
However, it certainly shouldn't stop management
from drafting a SS in this year's draft.
I disagree with signing Winn this year LT.
Maybe wait a year and see what that brings.
We do have half a season left.
Maybe he will improve.
He's underperforming my expectations right now.
The D is not as good as I expected.
I expected the hitting to be subpar.
Being aggressive at signing young players early and as cheaply as possible entails slightly more risk but brings the possibility of a lot more reward for the team. That is just the way the economics of baseball player salaries is structured.
It's a gamble either way.
I'm trying to remember all those that
they signed to LT extensions and whether
it worked out for the team.
I remember Carlos Martinez didn't.
I just don't recall when it worked out for
them and when it did not.
Winn may very well become a great player,
but I think he's kind of underperformed this year.
Sophomore slump?
Could be and he has a lot of athleticism too.
I guess for the right price, like you said.
Re: After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
That's fair.Wattage wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 06:33 amWinn has been above averahe defensively.Bully4you wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 06:03 amThe traits I like about Winn are hemattmitchl44 wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 05:23 am Winn is still on pace to be a 4 fWAR player this season after being a 3.6 fWAR player last year. He's a young, above average defensive SS who has been a ML average (wRC+ 100) hitter. That should give him a solid floor going forward, with a chance to be even better as his hitting hopefully improves into his prime.
In regards to a long term extension, it all depends on the price. If you wanted to sign him through age 30, it would be a 7 year deal (2026-2032). But there's a big difference between whether he would sign for 7 yrs./$50 million, 7 yrs./$75 million, 7 yrs./$100 million, etc. At some price point, the team should certainly sign him long term, at some other price point they certainly should not, and there is likely a lot of grey area between those two.
seems to actually care and he's very
athletic.
So, he could become a special player.
However, it certainly shouldn't stop management
from drafting a SS in this year's draft.
I disagree with signing Winn this year LT.
Maybe wait a year and see what that brings.
We do have half a season left.
Maybe he will improve.
He's underperforming my expectations right now.
The D is not as good as I expected.
I expected the hitting to be subpar.
Winns hitting has been average this season and above average last season- and not just for ss but for all kf mlv.
The hitting has not been subpar.
People just neednto look at the league as a whole instead of remembering the stats players put up 10 years ago as a baseline
Winn isnt an allstar. But hes been a viable starter. Above average id even say.
I think I had higher expectations for this kid.
Your argument is fair.
I probably am just venting, because I expected much more.
He's so athletic and he seems to really care.
Has great traits.
I am changing my opinion.
You and Matt changed my opinion.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1682
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:33 pm
Re: After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
An important point.
In 2000, the ML avg. OPS was .782
In 2009, the ML avg. OPS was .751
In 2019, the ML avg. OPS was .758
And, for those seasons, pitchers were still batting the NL!
In 2024, the ML avg. OPS was .711
In 2025, so far, the ML avg. OPS is .714
Re: After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
Yes, other than a select few hitting is awful.mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 06:43 amAn important point.
In 2000, the ML avg. OPS was .782
In 2009, the ML avg. OPS was .751
In 2019, the ML avg. OPS was .758
And, for those seasons, pitchers were still batting the NL!
In 2024, the ML avg. OPS was .711
In 2025, so far, the ML avg. OPS is .714
You two are correct.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1682
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:33 pm
Re: After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
It depends on what your expectations are for it to "work out" for the team.
In reality, if you are extending them at the right price point, almost no deal for a young player works out truly badly for the team.
People like to point to DeJong's deal as "bad", but even his deal was so relatively cheap (only ~$4 million AAV, IIRC) that just his 2018-2021 seasons made it not a "bad" deal for the Cardinals. The Cardinals obviously didn't get tremendous value out of it, but by doing the deal as early and as cheaply as they did, they at least avoided the possibility of giving him a much more expensive long term deal after the 2018 or 2019 seasons.
Re: After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
Can you clarify if your stiff comment applies to Winn?Honky Tonk Man wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 04:59 amagree no need to extend Winn, Walker and Gorman are stiffsBully4you wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 03:40 am Cards should absolutely draft one of
Aiva Arquette, Eli Willits or Billy Carlson.
Winn I don't think is the LT solution.
Has a great arm, but other than that the
D isn't really elite and the hitting isn't either.
The big three of Walker, Gorman and Winn
are turning out to be duds.
Burleson and Donovan are the keepers here.
I expect JJ to step up and so, we need one more.
Burleson, Donovan, JJ and Billy Carlson be a nice 4some.
Not giving up on Winn, but just not superb by any means.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 115
- Joined: 09 Jun 2025 08:34 am
Re: After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
no not Winn he is the best SS the birds have had since Renteria, just no need to extend him. Walker and Gorman are the stiffsAbsolut wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 07:23 amCan you clarify if your stiff comment applies to Winn?Honky Tonk Man wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 04:59 amagree no need to extend Winn, Walker and Gorman are stiffsBully4you wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 03:40 am Cards should absolutely draft one of
Aiva Arquette, Eli Willits or Billy Carlson.
Winn I don't think is the LT solution.
Has a great arm, but other than that the
D isn't really elite and the hitting isn't either.
The big three of Walker, Gorman and Winn
are turning out to be duds.
Burleson and Donovan are the keepers here.
I expect JJ to step up and so, we need one more.
Burleson, Donovan, JJ and Billy Carlson be a nice 4some.
Not giving up on Winn, but just not superb by any means.
Re: After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
Thanks. Was pretty sure that’s what you meant. This is a crazy thread. His job isnt secure. Good grief.Honky Tonk Man wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 07:26 amno not Winn he is the best SS the birds have had since Renteria, just no need to extend him. Walker and Gorman are the stiffsAbsolut wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 07:23 amCan you clarify if your stiff comment applies to Winn?Honky Tonk Man wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 04:59 amagree no need to extend Winn, Walker and Gorman are stiffsBully4you wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 03:40 am Cards should absolutely draft one of
Aiva Arquette, Eli Willits or Billy Carlson.
Winn I don't think is the LT solution.
Has a great arm, but other than that the
D isn't really elite and the hitting isn't either.
The big three of Walker, Gorman and Winn
are turning out to be duds.
Burleson and Donovan are the keepers here.
I expect JJ to step up and so, we need one more.
Burleson, Donovan, JJ and Billy Carlson be a nice 4some.
Not giving up on Winn, but just not superb by any means.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 115
- Joined: 09 Jun 2025 08:34 am
Re: After 1st half watching Maysn Winn--Job isn't secure. I wouldn't sign him to LT extension either
I see how my post could have been misleading glad to clarify thanksAbsolut wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 07:28 amThanks. Was pretty sure that’s what you meant. This is a crazy thread. His job isnt secure. Good grief.Honky Tonk Man wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 07:26 amno not Winn he is the best SS the birds have had since Renteria, just no need to extend him. Walker and Gorman are the stiffsAbsolut wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 07:23 amCan you clarify if your stiff comment applies to Winn?Honky Tonk Man wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 04:59 amagree no need to extend Winn, Walker and Gorman are stiffsBully4you wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025 03:40 am Cards should absolutely draft one of
Aiva Arquette, Eli Willits or Billy Carlson.
Winn I don't think is the LT solution.
Has a great arm, but other than that the
D isn't really elite and the hitting isn't either.
The big three of Walker, Gorman and Winn
are turning out to be duds.
Burleson and Donovan are the keepers here.
I expect JJ to step up and so, we need one more.
Burleson, Donovan, JJ and Billy Carlson be a nice 4some.
Not giving up on Winn, but just not superb by any means.