So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 4424
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

Ike Hammett wrote: 29 May 2025 10:32 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 29 May 2025 09:39 am
Ike Hammett wrote: 29 May 2025 08:56 am
3dender wrote: 29 May 2025 06:13 am
Ike Hammett wrote: 29 May 2025 01:06 am Not exactly sure what the point of your lame comment is, do you? Not that I care much coming from such an unknowledgeable, phony, bandwagon jumping "fan" that thinks he is part of "the bfib" that isn't really worth responding to.

Contreas went 0 for 5 tonight. He basically has the same numbers as Nado. Since being moved up he seems to not be doing as well just like Herrera. Not that I care because they are still winning. Getting wins because of the play of Arenado by the way! Just in the last few games he has had a bases clearing triple, a go ahead home run and made defensive plays that have contributed to big wins if not saved them. His absence has contributed to the team maybe losing games.

I'm not bashing on Contreas or Herrera because that's Baseball and guys sometimes don't always have big games. Why are you haters not bashing on them because of it? I always knew and even posted (before the season) this club had the potential to do something and be this good and even better. You and all your unknowledgeable hater band wagon jumping "best fans in baseball" talked smack.

Dude, you suck and basically none of you have any credibility on anything. Go talk about Burlesons calves or something because obviously you don't know baseball or Cards baseball and are weak, unknowledgble band wagon phonies.
Your whole argument at first was that they weren't winning enough. Now that they're winning just as much again you changed your argument.

And lmao at Herrera "not doing as well" bc he wasn't able to maintain his 1.400 OPS... very smart baseball argument there
BWAAAAHAHAHA!!!! So the guy has his .OPS go down .300+ points and you want to argue? The team hasn't won as much and you want to argue? That the new "clean up hitter" has basically the same numbers and you want to argue? That Nado has contributed big time to the wins and maybe would have contributed to create more wins and you want to argue?

I'm happy with where things are and a firm believer in not changing things when they are going well. I still have not read any comments that make any sense on what quantifies a better team by making that move. Certainly haven't seen any absolute results that prove it has worked. Why don't you break it down and explain instead of proving my points.

Lol, my whole argument from the beginning was the team was hot and WINNING, why mess with it. My question from the beginning was how do you haters quantify if it has worked? Both points that have not been answered or given any basic logical sense to. Just a bunch of arrogant, phony, trash, P[ositively] O[bnoxious] S[impleton] arguments about nonsense like you give.
I’d start with the wins. We still are winning. So maybe the move had zero affect, we can’t measure. But we aren’t losing either, so maybe a measure can be drawn from that fact.
I concur, but that isn't what this is about. This is about unknowledgeable hater never happy "fans" with their ridiculous over analyzing and criticism trying to passively aggressive bash in order to weakly try and prove they are right about anything.

You are kind of making my whole point, there has really been no effect and we can't really measure it very accurately. So where is all the big change these haters were calling for in every other post a little while back? And certainly the haters shouldn't be taking any victory laps on all their great analyzing and pushing. Doing so just makes them look dumb, that's what is going on and triggered my response.
You have no credibility you’re an idiot who thinks arenado was moved from the 4th spot because of fans lol that’s just dumb. You also suggested the team would pout and start losing because arenado was moved from the 4th spot you’re a clown
Ike Hammett
Forum User
Posts: 582
Joined: 24 Dec 2022 11:20 am

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by Ike Hammett »

Ozziesfan41 wrote: 29 May 2025 10:42 am
Ike Hammett wrote: 29 May 2025 10:32 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 29 May 2025 09:39 am
Ike Hammett wrote: 29 May 2025 08:56 am
3dender wrote: 29 May 2025 06:13 am
Ike Hammett wrote: 29 May 2025 01:06 am Not exactly sure what the point of your lame comment is, do you? Not that I care much coming from such an unknowledgeable, phony, bandwagon jumping "fan" that thinks he is part of "the bfib" that isn't really worth responding to.

Contreas went 0 for 5 tonight. He basically has the same numbers as Nado. Since being moved up he seems to not be doing as well just like Herrera. Not that I care because they are still winning. Getting wins because of the play of Arenado by the way! Just in the last few games he has had a bases clearing triple, a go ahead home run and made defensive plays that have contributed to big wins if not saved them. His absence has contributed to the team maybe losing games.

I'm not bashing on Contreas or Herrera because that's Baseball and guys sometimes don't always have big games. Why are you haters not bashing on them because of it? I always knew and even posted (before the season) this club had the potential to do something and be this good and even better. You and all your unknowledgeable hater band wagon jumping "best fans in baseball" talked smack.

Dude, you suck and basically none of you have any credibility on anything. Go talk about Burlesons calves or something because obviously you don't know baseball or Cards baseball and are weak, unknowledgble band wagon phonies.
Your whole argument at first was that they weren't winning enough. Now that they're winning just as much again you changed your argument.

And lmao at Herrera "not doing as well" bc he wasn't able to maintain his 1.400 OPS... very smart baseball argument there
BWAAAAHAHAHA!!!! So the guy has his .OPS go down .300+ points and you want to argue? The team hasn't won as much and you want to argue? That the new "clean up hitter" has basically the same numbers and you want to argue? That Nado has contributed big time to the wins and maybe would have contributed to create more wins and you want to argue?

I'm happy with where things are and a firm believer in not changing things when they are going well. I still have not read any comments that make any sense on what quantifies a better team by making that move. Certainly haven't seen any absolute results that prove it has worked. Why don't you break it down and explain instead of proving my points.

Lol, my whole argument from the beginning was the team was hot and WINNING, why mess with it. My question from the beginning was how do you haters quantify if it has worked? Both points that have not been answered or given any basic logical sense to. Just a bunch of arrogant, phony, trash, P[ositively] O[bnoxious] S[impleton] arguments about nonsense like you give.
I’d start with the wins. We still are winning. So maybe the move had zero affect, we can’t measure. But we aren’t losing either, so maybe a measure can be drawn from that fact.
I concur, but that isn't what this is about. This is about unknowledgeable hater never happy "fans" with their ridiculous over analyzing and criticism trying to passively aggressive bash in order to weakly try and prove they are right about anything.

You are kind of making my whole point, there has really been no effect and we can't really measure it very accurately. So where is all the big change these haters were calling for in every other post a little while back? And certainly the haters shouldn't be taking any victory laps on all their great analyzing and pushing. Doing so just makes them look dumb, that's what is going on and triggered my response.
You have no credibility you’re an idiot who thinks arenado was moved from the 4th spot because of fans lol that’s just dumb. You also suggested the team would pout and start losing because arenado was moved from the 4th spot you’re a clown
Dang girl, that's it, that's all you got? PATHETIC!

So now you want to bring your lame gaslighting nonsense, phony insults like the drama queen you are because you have no real defense to your ridiculous positions. And why are you not responding to the comments you made but instead getting involved in others comments?

Lol, are you going to spend all off-season bashing on this club and bring your "observations" then pretend like you were with them the whole time? "Fans" like you make me want to puke! Total haters until they ate good then the front row guys claiming to be fans for decades at the parade.

Lol, never stated this club would "pout" about anything, quit making things up. Yup. I will stand by my comments that haters with no real knowledge and no real support or loyalty (such as yourself) can and do effect the teams actions and moves. They as business people and good members of the community have to be nice guys and appease haters like you, I don't. You suck, nothing you have stated is credible, or proven in any way.You can't even spin and gaslight very well. A total disaster in everything!
woofy25
Forum User
Posts: 1173
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:44 pm

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by woofy25 »

scoutyjones2 wrote: 19 May 2025 18:23 pm
Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 18:07 pm
3dender wrote: 19 May 2025 17:56 pm
Ike Hammett wrote: 19 May 2025 17:49 pm Are we going to do better than 12- 2 the next few weeks? Outscore our opponents more? Build better team chemistry? What?
It's pretty easy actually... you see how many runs Scott, Noot, Winn and Donovan score over the next few weeks, and compare it to the last few weeks.
So the point of the game is who gets the most rbi out of the clean up spot? How would you know if Herrera wouldn't of got those RBI in the 6th spot and how it effects runs scored lower in the lineup? And even if your obvious truth is correct and they lose more, is that a big win for you?
GoNado isn't hitting or getting on base...

Last 7 games: 179/194/310/504
It's never fair to judge a player off seven games. You can judge on 50+. It's a real shame NA didn't agree to that Houston trade. The Cardinals will have him for '26 and '27 as well.
JDW
Forum User
Posts: 861
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:42 pm

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by JDW »

Well Ike, even though you may not be aware, you got exposed in this thread.
WLTFE
Forum User
Posts: 1597
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:49 pm

Re: So haters, how exactly do we quantify if moving Nado down worked?

Post by WLTFE »

JDW wrote: 29 May 2025 14:36 pm Well Ike, even though you may not be aware, you got exposed in this thread.
+1...he strikes as a ME-ville wannabe...and a gold member of the front office (donkey) kissers club.
Post Reply