Trent Frederic
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 930
- Joined: 15 Feb 2019 15:04 pm
Trent Frederic
Should Armstrong sign him on July 1st? I say yes upgrade at center.
Re: Trent Frederic
He doesn’t really play center. He’s a wing which Blues have plenty of
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 346
- Joined: 31 May 2024 22:31 pm
Re: Trent Frederic
No, mostly because he is not an upgrade. If he was better at faceoffs, wanted to take under 2M, and continued hitting anything that moves, i'd take him solely because the WTF line minus Faksa and plus him would still spell the same and play the same. but a poor faceoff winrate and the fact that someone will give him a better look means no thanks.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1792
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:57 pm
Re: Trent Frederic
Mostly plays wing, when he does take faceoffs he’s at 44%, out up 15 pts this season…if he wasn’t from St. Louis most here probably wouldn’t even be familiar with him.
Decent 4th line winger but I wouldn’t go out of my way to sign him or anything.
Decent 4th line winger but I wouldn’t go out of my way to sign him or anything.
Re: Trent Frederic
Well said! All of it.STL fan in MN wrote: ↑06 May 2025 22:24 pm Mostly plays wing, when he does take faceoffs he’s at 44%, out up 15 pts this season…if he wasn’t from St. Louis most here probably wouldn’t even be familiar with him.
Decent 4th line winger but I wouldn’t go out of my way to sign him or anything.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 444
- Joined: 09 May 2018 10:22 am
Re: Trent Frederic
I fully expect the Blues to ink this guy to a deal. Fits a need and he'll be affordable.
Re: Trent Frederic
Which need exactly?Lone_Ranger wrote: ↑07 May 2025 09:36 am I fully expect the Blues to ink this guy to a deal. Fits a need and he'll be affordable.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 458
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 10:23 am
Re: Trent Frederic
This St. Louisian fetish rears its head every offseason.
Not a center.
Not a scorer.
Not particularly cheap for what he brings.
Not an obvious need (plenty of bottom six wings).
Not a reason to sign him.
Not a center.
Not a scorer.
Not particularly cheap for what he brings.
Not an obvious need (plenty of bottom six wings).
Not a reason to sign him.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 444
- Joined: 09 May 2018 10:22 am
Re: Trent Frederic
Toughness. 200 hits, 15 goals, 35 points. Willing to drop the gloves and fight. Won't cost a lot. Soldnetboy65 wrote: ↑07 May 2025 09:42 amWhich need exactly?Lone_Ranger wrote: ↑07 May 2025 09:36 am I fully expect the Blues to ink this guy to a deal. Fits a need and he'll be affordable.
Re: Trent Frederic
The first area to address is the D - specifically size. We need some beef and some reach. A guy like Scott Mayfield isn't making much and can be serviceable 5/6 guy.
Adding size and reach certainly helps the 5v6 situation. Long reach gets sticks in lanes. The 2019 D was big and ever since, they've gotten smaller. I think you'll see Tucker with a regular role.. and we'll see a bigger D next season. This one is not built for a long run.
Adding size and reach certainly helps the 5v6 situation. Long reach gets sticks in lanes. The 2019 D was big and ever since, they've gotten smaller. I think you'll see Tucker with a regular role.. and we'll see a bigger D next season. This one is not built for a long run.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 187
- Joined: 24 May 2024 17:18 pm
Re: Trent Frederic
Based off Army’s comments, I didn’t get the sense the D was going to be a big priority for the club in the offseason.bud white wrote: ↑07 May 2025 10:24 am The first area to address is the D - specifically size. We need some beef and some reach. A guy like Scott Mayfield isn't making much and can be serviceable 5/6 guy.
Adding size and reach certainly helps the 5v6 situation. Long reach gets sticks in lanes. The 2019 D was big and ever since, they've gotten smaller. I think you'll see Tucker with a regular role.. and we'll see a bigger D next season. This one is not built for a long run.
Sounds like they want to add more offense (forwards).
Re: Trent Frederic
Blues would like a center to either play on 2nd or 3rd line. They are flush with wingers. I like Frederic but he mainly plays wing. Think Blues look elsewhere.dtkblueshockey wrote: ↑07 May 2025 10:27 amBased off Army’s comments, I didn’t get the sense the D was going to be a big priority for the club in the offseason.bud white wrote: ↑07 May 2025 10:24 am The first area to address is the D - specifically size. We need some beef and some reach. A guy like Scott Mayfield isn't making much and can be serviceable 5/6 guy.
Adding size and reach certainly helps the 5v6 situation. Long reach gets sticks in lanes. The 2019 D was big and ever since, they've gotten smaller. I think you'll see Tucker with a regular role.. and we'll see a bigger D next season. This one is not built for a long run.
Sounds like they want to add more offense (forwards).
Re: Trent Frederic
If you're signing him, its to replace Walker with someone who has more size. Not sure you're going to get him for 4th line winger money.
Re: Trent Frederic
Put me down as a NO.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 224
- Joined: 24 May 2024 11:36 am
Re: Trent Frederic
This dude is vastly overrated here..
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Trent Frederic
I dont think size on D is much of an issue surprisingly losing Tucker may have hurt the Blues in front of their own net in the end, but he'll be back. Faulk at 5'11" 205 is the smallest guy the Blues dont have a small D.dtkblueshockey wrote: ↑07 May 2025 10:27 amBased off Army’s comments, I didn’t get the sense the D was going to be a big priority for the club in the offseason.bud white wrote: ↑07 May 2025 10:24 am The first area to address is the D - specifically size. We need some beef and some reach. A guy like Scott Mayfield isn't making much and can be serviceable 5/6 guy.
Adding size and reach certainly helps the 5v6 situation. Long reach gets sticks in lanes. The 2019 D was big and ever since, they've gotten smaller. I think you'll see Tucker with a regular role.. and we'll see a bigger D next season. This one is not built for a long run.
Sounds like they want to add more offense (forwards).