Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Join the discussion about the Blues.

[Complete Blues coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators

ZouMiz2424
Forum User
Posts: 489
Joined: 11 Apr 2019 15:22 pm

Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Post by ZouMiz2424 »

They want no part of Binner in the playoffs
tubastarr
Forum User
Posts: 49
Joined: 20 Jan 2025 17:41 pm

Re: Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Post by tubastarr »

Was kind of wondering the same thing
2forDiving
Forum User
Posts: 446
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm

Re: Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Post by 2forDiving »

Bednar just threw a game.
IsDurbanodoingtime
Forum User
Posts: 502
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:17 pm

Re: Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Post by IsDurbanodoingtime »

Exactly. Just posted same on other thread. Colton, coyle and the cokehead?
clemonsonroots
Forum User
Posts: 28
Joined: 29 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Post by clemonsonroots »

That is odd, but really dumb if that is the case. They are a virtual lock, but still not a statistical lock. Throwing away points in their position over who you want higher in the standings below you is a terrible move.
zamadoo
Forum User
Posts: 1334
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:11 pm

Re: Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Post by zamadoo »

More fuel for our fire.

Blues players gotta see what's going on and smell the blood.
dhsux
Forum User
Posts: 2628
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm

Re: Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Post by dhsux »

Hard to argue otherwise, isn't it?
blues2112
Forum User
Posts: 3307
Joined: 27 Apr 2018 18:17 pm

Re: Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Post by blues2112 »

Facts:

Makar's last successful shootout goal was in 2021-22. He is 1-4 in his career
MacKinnon is 0-3 this year, 14-45 for career, 31.1 percent

Based on a poster's comment, I'm presuming the three who shot were Coyle, Nichushkin and Colton
Coyle is 1-2 this year, 19-52 career, 36.5 percent
Nichushkin 1-3 this year, 3-6 career, 50.0 percent
Colton 0-1 this year, 5-10 career, 50.0 percent

Avs have three shootout goals this year: Nichushkin, Coyle and Brock Nelson

Tell me who the logical choices were.
Kilokaai
Forum User
Posts: 38
Joined: 09 Jun 2024 22:01 pm

Re: Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Post by Kilokaai »

blues2112 wrote: 01 Apr 2025 07:58 am Facts:

Makar's last successful shootout goal was in 2021-22. He is 1-4 in his career
MacKinnon is 0-3 this year, 14-45 for career, 31.1 percent

Based on a poster's comment, I'm presuming the three who shot were Coyle, Nichushkin and Colton
Coyle is 1-2 this year, 19-52 career, 36.5 percent
Nichushkin 1-3 this year, 3-6 career, 50.0 percent
Colton 0-1 this year, 5-10 career, 50.0 percent

Avs have three shootout goals this year: Nichushkin, Coyle and Brock Nelson

Tell me who the logical choices were.
I never expected MacKinnon to be 31% for his career. That stat blew my mind as I consider him easily a top 5 player in the NHL. Similar to McDavid, he has the skill and speed that seems like a shoe-in for someone who would be great at shootouts.
a smell of green grass
Forum User
Posts: 904
Joined: 20 Aug 2024 15:51 pm

Re: Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Post by a smell of green grass »

If the last game is steering Colorado, Colorado fears the post more than Binnington.

I don't see that Colorado is afraid of the Blues.
tubastarr
Forum User
Posts: 49
Joined: 20 Jan 2025 17:41 pm

Re: Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Post by tubastarr »

a smell of green grass wrote: 01 Apr 2025 09:33 am If the last game is steering Colorado, Colorado fears the post more than Binnington.

I don't see that Colorado is afraid of the Blues.
They should be. They don’t have Kadri to take out Binnington this year.
bluetunehead
Forum User
Posts: 844
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:28 pm

Re: Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Post by bluetunehead »

Being the best at the shootout doesn’t necessarily come from being the best player overall. It’s not like Oshie was ever a Top 10 player in the league, but he’s one of the best ever to do it in the shootout.
callitwhatyouwant
Forum User
Posts: 3400
Joined: 12 Jan 2019 20:05 pm

Re: Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Post by callitwhatyouwant »

blues2112 wrote: 01 Apr 2025 07:58 am Facts:

Makar's last successful shootout goal was in 2021-22. He is 1-4 in his career
MacKinnon is 0-3 this year, 14-45 for career, 31.1 percent

Based on a poster's comment, I'm presuming the three who shot were Coyle, Nichushkin and Colton
Coyle is 1-2 this year, 19-52 career, 36.5 percent
Nichushkin 1-3 this year, 3-6 career, 50.0 percent
Colton 0-1 this year, 5-10 career, 50.0 percent

Avs have three shootout goals this year: Nichushkin, Coyle and Brock Nelson

Tell me who the logical choices were.
add to this, it appears like the Avs fans claim that all of their guys are terrible at shootouts, atleast during the reddit GDT yesterday. They didn't seem too upset with the choices. Alas, another bummer for the Blues. You would hope 95 gets you in, but the way this race is going the West is going to have to break records to get in, while the East is breaking records in futility to get in.
seattleblue
Forum User
Posts: 974
Joined: 08 Feb 2025 12:01 pm

Re: Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Post by seattleblue »

Calgary has the 9th best record and are pacing for 92 points. In no way shape or form is this a year where records need to be broken to get in. In fact it's a relatively easy year to get in, for both conferences.

(FWIW this record would be Buffalo and Montreal each had 96 points about 7-8 years ago and didn't get in)
blues2112
Forum User
Posts: 3307
Joined: 27 Apr 2018 18:17 pm

Re: Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Post by blues2112 »

Kilokaai wrote: 01 Apr 2025 09:26 am
blues2112 wrote: 01 Apr 2025 07:58 am Facts:

Makar's last successful shootout goal was in 2021-22. He is 1-4 in his career
MacKinnon is 0-3 this year, 14-45 for career, 31.1 percent

Based on a poster's comment, I'm presuming the three who shot were Coyle, Nichushkin and Colton
Coyle is 1-2 this year, 19-52 career, 36.5 percent
Nichushkin 1-3 this year, 3-6 career, 50.0 percent
Colton 0-1 this year, 5-10 career, 50.0 percent

Avs have three shootout goals this year: Nichushkin, Coyle and Brock Nelson

Tell me who the logical choices were.
I never expected MacKinnon to be 31% for his career. That stat blew my mind as I consider him easily a top 5 player in the NHL. Similar to McDavid, he has the skill and speed that seems like a shoe-in for someone who would be great at shootouts.
Looked up McDavid, 46.9 percent; Kyrou 22.2.
2forDiving
Forum User
Posts: 446
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm

Re: Seemed intentional by Colorado. Didn’t use Mckinnnon or Makar in the shootout

Post by 2forDiving »

seattleblue wrote: 01 Apr 2025 12:04 pm Calgary has the 9th best record and are pacing for 92 points. In no way shape or form is this a year where records need to be broken to get in. In fact it's a relatively easy year to get in, for both conferences.

(FWIW this record would be Buffalo and Montreal each had 96 points about 7-8 years ago and didn't get in)
It is going to take quite a run for the 2nd WC in the East to get to 90 pts. 6-2-1 for the Habs or 6-1-1 for the Rangers and better for any of the other contenders. Never would have guessed that back in January when it seemed like it was going to take 96 or 97 to make it.
Post Reply