scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 12:03 pm
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 11:56 am
rockondlouie wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 11:52 am
Wattage wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 11:49 am
rockondlouie wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 11:41 am
Wattage wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 11:37 am
rockondlouie wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 11:19 am
sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 11:12 am
rockondlouie wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 11:03 am
icon wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 10:54 am
This team's biggest issue last year was offense. Pages offers little in the way of that. Why should he be guaranteed more than 1 start per week with the fallout of benching Herrera's bat? Pages should get 30 starts max unless he shows he can hit more.
^^^THIS^^^
Pages role should be like Siani's, late inning defensive replacement and 35-40 spot starts (Sinai way, way less starts).
NO WAY he starts every 3 games.
Oli playing the "cooler" again instead of riding the hot bat of Hererra.
When it comes to winning strategy, Oli ain’t it. When it comes to being Mr Nice Guy, he xcels. That reeks of like me not respect me.
Agreed
Also why he kept Winn at lead-off all spring even while the poor kid just kept burying himself deeper and deeper.
Many in here claim "if Oli like's you (re: Burleson, Pages, Sinai, ...), then he plays you".
Can't wait for him to be fired at seasons end, he's not qualified to be a ML Manager.
I have also never seen another manager pull cruising starters at such low putch counts as consistently as oli. He will try to squeeze 5 innings out of a struggling putcher with a high pitch count but will do stuff like pull fedde yesterday after 6 with pitch count of 73 like he hates letting starters pitch into the 7th unless he has no choice from taxed bullpen. He did it to gray a lot last year too.
It also seemed ti titally contradict what mo said about targeting lynn and gibsin because they were inning eaters to save pen but he wouldn't let starters eat inning when they had low pitch counts.
Makes even less sense to pull fedde early when we are going to a 6 man rotation that gives extra rest anyways
His downfall all started w/that stupid removal of "Q" in Game 1 vs the Phils when "Q" was cruising and had plenty left in the tank.
This.
Im fine with using analytics but there needs to be context and logic tio.
3rd time through order splits lumps days where a pitcher was struggling all day and laboring on fumes and having control problems by time he faced order 3rd time with days he was dominating and had total control and plenty in the tank coming to 3rd time in order where i doubt the result vs 3rd time in order is the same in those 2 scenarios so you cant just blindly trust the split and ignore how the pitcher is actually pitching that day.
The best Managers incorporate both advanced metrics and years of accumulated baseball knowledge, using their eye's (like Oli should've done when "Q" was mowing down Philly after Philly) instead of relying on a metric that only tells you WHAT HAS HAPPENED in the PAST and are NOT a predictor of WHAT WILL HAPPEN in the FUTURE.
Couple lost morsels. Had he not pulled Q and we win, we play SD not LA, and Q would pitch game one of NLCS.
Huge amounts of strategic ability was thrown out.
This is just another Dekingser fallacy. Cards weren't winning when Q was pulled and there was still like half a game to play
The loss in that series was on the immortal Whitey not getting his boys focused as much as Dek.
The bad call lets Whitey off the hook for what may have been his worst moment as a manager.
Imagine Oli doing the exact same. We'd read how he isn't a leader. Which he does need more
improvement.
The loss vs Philly can be spread on most of the roster as much as Oli. IMO, Hels should have indeed been pulled
but he didn't, an error It just doesn't sharpen the ax as well for the guys who can always do things better.
Cards got 4 hits in gm 1, chance PH by Gorman and Yepez for the 3 runs, shut out in game 2.
Had a Pallante as RH's backup, equally sketchy in 2022. Oli chose to die with RH. Whether that death was in the
8th vs the 9th inning seems irrelevant. Long ago Hindsight Stuff.
Oli is improving and fast approaching average. It may be interesting to see how he manages in 2026 without MO.
